Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So officially you can now all go fuck yourselves.
Matt Hancock says so.
Next? The Treaty of Utrecht.
Wankers.
Soon if Trump is re-elected we will be the world's newest banana republic.
I think Hobbit is Welsh, so he’s referring to Wales.Soon if Trump is re-elected we will be the world's newest banana republic.
you really do need to let that one go. Do we really need St Kitts?
Maybe they will dump the Geneva convention though, they have already repealed the royal marriages act of 1772, be a bloody papist on the throne soon.
We are rogue state with nuclear weapons though......
you really do need to let that one go. Do we really need St Kitts?
Maybe they will dump the Geneva convention though, they have already repealed the royal marriages act of 1772, be a bloody papist on the throne soon.
We are rogue state with nuclear weapons though......
I think Hobbit is Welsh, so he’s referring to Wales.
good point, but we dont need that either.It also covers Gibraltar.
we could just do it anyway we dont need permissionNo we are not, we are a rogue state with the means of delivering US nuclear weapons if they give their permission. Think of it as being one step down from Israel.
bunch of cunts lead by a lying bastard with no social conscience armed with nuclear weapons.Define "rogue state".......
Define "rogue state".......
Define "rogue state".......
.
How serious the UK government is? We don't know.
By the terms of the OP, a state which flouts international treaty agreements.
The current bill may just be the UK government saying in effect - you want us to comply with rules when you don't impose them on yourselves? Fuck off!
By the terms of the OP, a state which flouts international treaty agreements.
By the terms of the OP, a state which flouts international treaty agreements.
The UK hasn't done that yet but a bill is before the UK parliament, which if passed, (and that is dubious given the annoyance in the Conservative party and House of Lords, so probably won't,) would slightly amend the agreement made with the EU about trade arrangements in the island of Ireland after 31st December.
How serious the UK government is? We don't know. It could just be a negotiating tactic but is annoying the EU negotiators considerably. The UK government is very irritated by the EU's immovable red lines especially about fishing and how the UK could fund companies with state money after 31st December. The UK has strictly complied with EU rules up to now when the French and Germans (and many other EU countries,) have not. The EU has been trying to make the current situation enforceable under international law when it doesn't enforce the rules on current members.
The current bill may just be the UK government saying in effect - you want us to comply with rules when you don't impose them on yourselves? Fuck off!
Reasonable definition for sure.
Oh noes....the globalist lefty elite are NOT going to be happy about that.
That's not strictly true Ogg. France and Germany have written into law the original EU directives. These directives have always been deliberately ambiguous so that states can apply their own interpretation. Only Britain has completely rewritten the directives removing all ambuity and making it far easier for the lawyers. A prime example of this is the Health and safety legislation. The directive was 22 pages long. When Britain rewrote it it became 250 pages long. The result is that we were the only country with the new industry of Health and safety consultants. Even then the legislation on it's own wouldn't have been a problem had our government not made No Win, No Fee legal. Most of the stupidity blamed on the legislation is actually brought about by the fear of being sued.
.. A level playing field? The EU has NEVER been that.
Much like Britain, but when the toffs are getting arse fucked against their will by johnny foreigner, suddenly its all wrong?