Fungibility

[adrina]

https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/28/politics/trump-billboards-ppp-loan-invs/index.html

*nods*

 

[SpeareChucker]

Is this the exception?




Or do you really, truly believe it is the rule...

 

[adrina]

That's the question. Toward those that make the argument.

I'm sure you've got an answer.

 

[SpeareChucker]

Non-responsive avoidance of the question.

 

[toeskr]

So poor and disappointed that she doesn't have enough money for a tub upgrade or a pedicure.

And NO, I never waste my time checking her slanted links. Just .02 worth.

 

[adrina]

Non-responsive avoidance of the question.

Yes indeed. Why are you avoiding the question? Instead of facing up to the issue, you're trying to turn it on me as if that dismisses it. This isn't math or the pH system.

 

[SpeareChucker]

https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/28/politics/trump-billboards-ppp-loan-invs/index.html

*nods*

NOT a question. No answer required.

Is this the exception?




Or do you really, truly believe it is the rule...

IS a question, but we won't require you to answer
since you clearly don't want to...

 

[toeskr]

When one group or culture wants what another has. Too lazy to work for it, looks for government or regulations to reparate them and make them equal without additional effort.

 

[HisArpy]

NOT a question. No answer required.






IS a question, but we won't require you to answer
since you clearly don't want to...

Actually, the article IMPLIED there was a question. Notably: "Did Jones1 commit a crime?"

The answer to that is "possibly" because the individual behind "Jones1" may not have reported spending more than $1k on political advertising for a candidate within 24 hours".


The article implied a lot of other things too. Mostly without any facts at all and then spun the hell out of it to make that lack almost disappear. "Should someone use PPP money to finance political advertising?" was the question they used to avoid the issue of whether Jones1 ACTUALLY DID THAT. And the answer was "Expert blah blah blah..." which totally fails since there's no evidence that Jones1 did anything that was claimed.


I also liked how CNN thought it has the right to ask Jones1's bank for the details on his SBA loan. "Hey, we're big media, let us dig through the private financial records of your bank customers..."


The article was smear because Jones1 did something to promote Trump that's working.

 

[FGB]

Ha!

I can hear the stink wagon of investigation cranking already!

 

[HisArpy]

Ha!

I can hear the stink wagon of investigation cranking already!

The FEC will probably look into it once they get a couple more members appointed so that they'll have a quorum and can actually do business...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Election_Commission

 

[toeskr]

Where'd addie go?