Federal Forces Back To Portland?

Rightguide

Prof Triggernometry
Joined
Feb 7, 2017
Posts
67,394
Will Trump be forced to send federal officers back to Portland to keep the courthouse from being burned down?

Oregon State Police Pull Out Of Protecting Portland Courthouse After City Refuses To ‘Prosecute This Criminal Behavior,’ Department Says
By Ryan Saavedra

Aug 13, 2020 DailyWire.com

The Oregon State Police announced on Thursday that it was pulling out its roughly 100 state troopers from protecting the Mark O. Hatfield United States Courthouse in downtown Portland after the city’s district attorney announced that he is not pursuing charges against the rioters who have been arrested.

The Oregon State Police had committed to helping local law enforcement officials deal with the violent riots for a period of two weeks, which has now expired.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/oreg...secute-this-criminal-behavior-department-says
 
Will Trump be forced to send federal officers back to Portland to keep the courthouse from being burned down?

Oregon State Police Pull Out Of Protecting Portland Courthouse After City Refuses To ‘Prosecute This Criminal Behavior,’ Department Says
By Ryan Saavedra

Aug 13, 2020 DailyWire.com

The Oregon State Police announced on Thursday that it was pulling out its roughly 100 state troopers from protecting the Mark O. Hatfield United States Courthouse in downtown Portland after the city’s district attorney announced that he is not pursuing charges against the rioters who have been arrested.

The Oregon State Police had committed to helping local law enforcement officials deal with the violent riots for a period of two weeks, which has now expired.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/oreg...secute-this-criminal-behavior-department-says

Yep, the DA found there was not enough evidence to prosecute spurious "failure to respect mah authoriteh!" arrests by violent cops. The DA will still prosecute violent crimes and property damage, but 80% of the charges that the violent cops made were "failure to follow a police order".

Those poor butthurt violent cops had their fee fees hurt.

To the dismay of RightGuide, the First Amendment still trumps (pun semi-intended) an uneducated poorly trained militarized violent cop's interpretation of the law.
 
Yep, the DA found there was not enough evidence to prosecute spurious "failure to respect mah authoriteh!" arrests by violent cops. The DA will still prosecute violent crimes and property damage, but 80% of the charges that the violent cops made were "failure to follow a police order".

Those poor butthurt violent cops had their fee fees hurt.

To the dismay of RightGuide, the First Amendment still trumps (pun semi-intended) an uneducated poorly trained militarized violent cop's interpretation of the law.

Even you don't believe that bullshit.
 
Yep, the DA found there was not enough evidence to prosecute spurious "failure to respect mah authoriteh!" arrests by violent cops. The DA will still prosecute violent crimes and property damage, but 80% of the charges that the violent cops made were "failure to follow a police order".

Those poor butthurt violent cops had their fee fees hurt.

To the dismay of RightGuide, the First Amendment still trumps (pun semi-intended) an uneducated poorly trained militarized violent cop's interpretation of the law.

The First Amendment doesn't include riot, assault on a police officer, arson, or destruction of federal property.
 
The First Amendment doesn't include riot, assault on a police officer, arson, or destruction of federal property.

How many of the people the DA isn't prosecuting were charged with those offences?
 
Yep, the DA found there was not enough evidence to prosecute spurious "failure to respect mah authoriteh!" arrests by violent cops. The DA will still prosecute violent crimes and property damage, but 80% of the charges that the violent cops made were "failure to follow a police order".

Those poor butthurt violent cops had their fee fees hurt.

To the dismay of RightGuide, the First Amendment still trumps (pun semi-intended) an uneducated poorly trained militarized violent cop's interpretation of the law.

Says the guy who chastizes people for their "freedom to infect" when he supports shitting on their 1A rights.

There is no limit to your hypocrisy or dishonesty is there?

1A rights for me, regulations for thee!! = the Rob Motto.
 
How many of the people the DA isn't prosecuting were charged with those offences?

He could have charged dozens, based on the probable cause behind the arrests. This DA isn't about enforcing the law in this event. He's about advancing the communist agenda behind it. He is an activist official in the Ted Wheeler mold. There's a reason why Kim Foxx in Chicago dismissed over 25,000 felony charges in the last few years. She too, like the Portland DA, is an activist with an agenda.
 
He could have charged dozens, based on the probable cause behind the arrests. This DA isn't about enforcing the law in this event. He's about advancing the communist agenda behind it. He is an activist official in the Ted Wheeler mold. There's a reason why Kim Foxx in Chicago dismissed over 25,000 felony charges in the last few years. She too, like the Portland DA, is an activist with an agenda.

You didn't answer the question, Vettebigot. Your paranoid cold war fantasies are not what I asked for.
 
You didn't answer the question,

Here ya go asswipe:

"Portland police have referred 550 cases to the DA’s office since the protests began on May 29, four days after George Floyd’s police-custody killing in Minneapolis. Of those, about 140 were felony crimes, including assault, arson, riot and theft.

Prosecutors are moving ahead in only around 45 of those cases, while the remainder were dropped or are deemed under review, Weisberg said."

https://nypost.com/2020/08/12/most-charges-against-portland-protesters-wont-be-prosecuted-da/
 
Here ya go asswipe:

"Portland police have referred 550 cases to the DA’s office since the protests began on May 29, four days after George Floyd’s police-custody killing in Minneapolis. Of those, about 140 were felony crimes, including assault, arson, riot and theft.

Prosecutors are moving ahead in only around 45 of those cases, while the remainder were dropped or are deemed under review, Weisberg said."

https://nypost.com/2020/08/12/most-charges-against-portland-protesters-wont-be-prosecuted-da/

That pesky "due process" provision of the US Constitution keeps thwarting attempts by Republicans to convert America from a Democratic Republic to a Police State.

Educated prosecutors are tossing uneducated police officers' complaints about citizens "failure to follow orders". Poor butt hurt officer fee fees!
 
Back
Top