IF Trump refused to step down?

[Carnal_Flower]

Nothing supports that.

They will clearly keep the House and are threatening the Senate and WH. Nothing supports any other conclusion--unless you're an idiot breathing in his own gas fumes.

With their behavior as of late they'll be lucky to keep the house.


.

 

[HisArpy]

They've never been wrong? What were the odds against Trump in 2016?

https://www.oddsshark.com/entertainment/us-presidential-odds-2016-futures

https://www.fox6now.com/news/what-a...linton-winning-the-2016-presidential-election

So much for theory about "it's serious for them."

Dipshits like Adre never understand that, no matter the odds, the house always wins.

So, even if they have to pay out, they'll make money.

 

[Rightguide]

Dipshits like Adre never understand that, no matter the odds, the house always wins.

So, even if they have to pay out, they'll make money.

One could write a book about what ADRE doesn't understand.

 

[Adre]

Dipshits like Adre never understand that, no matter the odds, the house always wins.

So, even if they have to pay out, they'll make money.

Dumbfuck knowitall is wrong yet again. You should stay in your lane moron.


“Although a bookmaker’s aim is to “balance the books”when taking bets on an event to guarantee a profit regardless of the outcome, there are plenty of occasions when that doesn’t happen. This could be because the bookmaker takes a “position” (favours one outcome more than another and is willing to risk more money on it) or bettors take advantage of early odds or new information before it reaches the market.

Even the world’s sharpest bookmaker can make a loss on certain events.”

 

[Adre]

One could write a book about what ADRE doesn't understand.

The other dumbfuck knowitall is also wrong.

 

[FescueFan]

They would 100% have control of the Senate. The numbers are what they are with anyone whose term was up in January being out and having had no election held.

Ok, so how exactly does the Senate default to (D) control if there is no election??

Nothing supports that.

Other than the lefts failing at everything and promoting anarchy and rioting over being responsible and productive.

They will clearly keep the House

They would be LUCKY to keep that.

and are threatening the Senate and WH.

LOL exactly....threatening, and threatening with violence and anarchy if they don't get their way.

Hissy fit supreme, please riot MOAR.

Nothing supports any other conclusion--unless you're an idiot breathing in his own gas fumes.

Or just not so delusional as to think BLM/AntiFa terrorism would be widely supported and accepted.

Most of the country is disgusted with you.

Please riot some more, maybe lynch some white demons for being born white!!! They're all born Nazis after all.

 

[Aglaopheme]

Ok, so how exactly does the Senate default to (D) control if there is no election??

Anyone whose term is up would be out of office. No one would be elected to those seats. That would leave a majority of Democrats whose term is not up seated. Republicans have 53 seats now with 23 up, and Democrats hold 45 seats with only 12 up election. No election would result in the Dems holding 33 seats and Rebs holding 30. You can add the 2 Independents to the Dems count as well.

 

[doowdniw]

Dipshits like Adre never understand that, no matter the odds, the house always wins.

So, even if they have to pay out, they'll make money.

Well sure, unless the house is a Trump casino.

 

[Carnal_Flower]

What supports these views?

They would be LUCKY to keep that.

Most of the country is disgusted with you.
l.

 

[Rightguide]

The other dumbfuck knowitall is also wrong.

Prove me wrong in post #14.

 

[FescueFan]

What supports these views?

The drop in support for your rioting and terrorism.

 

[FescueFan]

Anyone whose term is up would be out of office. No one would be elected to those seats. That would leave a majority of Democrats whose term is not up seated. Republicans have 53 seats now with 23 up, and Democrats hold 45 seats with only 12 up election. No election would result in the Dems holding 33 seats and Rebs holding 30. You can add the 2 Independents to the Dems count as well.

I see.

Yea, then we would all just be super fucked, the CCP would be in charge and it would be time to GTFO of the geographical region formerly known as the USA.

Hopefully I could make it out before being selected for "re-education" .

 

[KeithD]

Nothing supports that.

They will clearly keep the House and are threatening the Senate and WH. Nothing supports any other conclusion--unless you're an idiot breathing in his own gas fumes.

Interesting that a dumbbell like Trump obviously understands the trouble he's in better than the board Trumpettes do.

 

[Adre]

I see.

Yea, then we would all just be super fucked, the CCP would be in charge and it would be time to GTFO of the geographical region formerly known as the USA.

Hopefully I could make it out before being selected for "re-education" .

As they say, don’t let the door...

 

[FescueFan]

Interesting that a dumbbell like Trump obviously understands the trouble he's in better than the board Trumpettes do.

Oh yea, everyone is just in LOVE with the idea of the totalitarian BLM terrorist state as you are.

Are they "peacefully protesting" at your house yet?

Biden is going to landslide this with all 50 states bro, Trump has ZERO chance of ever winning anything ever.

 

[FescueFan]

As they say, don’t let the door...

Oh don't worry, if the (D)'s took total control of the government like that?

LOL that's not a problem....I'm not ready to die for the totalitarian "progressive" shit hole that hates itself and wants to crush me like a bug for having a white mother.

 

[HisArpy]

Dumbfuck knowitall is wrong yet again. You should stay in your lane moron.


“Although a bookmaker’s aim is to “balance the books”when taking bets on an event to guarantee a profit regardless of the outcome, there are plenty of occasions when that doesn’t happen. This could be because the bookmaker takes a “position” (favours one outcome more than another and is willing to risk more money on it) or bettors take advantage of early odds or new information before it reaches the market.

Even the world’s sharpest bookmaker can make a loss on certain events.”

Failure to understand that THE EXCEPTION IS NOT THE RULE is where you continually fail.

But go ahead and promote that crapfest all you want. After all, it's not my fault you insist on being an idjit in public.

 

[Adre]

Failure to understand that THE EXCEPTION IS NOT THE RULE is where you continually fail.

But go ahead and promote that crapfest all you want. After all, it's not my fault you insist on being an idjit in public.

You missed the words “plenty of occasions.” That does not equal THE EXCEPTION. You’d think with all your experiences with it you’d learn to accept being wrong.

 

[HisArpy]

You missed the words “plenty of occasions.” That does not equal THE EXCEPTION. You’d think with all your experiences with it you’d learn to accept being wrong.

"Plenty of occasions" is not "balance the books". Nor is it "most of the time" or even "half of the time".

It's an EXCEPTION to the normal business practice that odds makers have. The house ALWAYS wins.

That you can't seem to understand that just tells everyone that you have trouble with just about everything on a basic comprehension level.

 

[KeithD]

Dumbfuck knowitall is wrong yet again. You should stay in your lane moron.


“Although a bookmaker’s aim is to “balance the books”when taking bets on an event to guarantee a profit regardless of the outcome, there are plenty of occasions when that doesn’t happen. This could be because the bookmaker takes a “position” (favours one outcome more than another and is willing to risk more money on it) or bettors take advantage of early odds or new information before it reaches the market.

Even the world’s sharpest bookmaker can make a loss on certain events.”

I guess no one informed Harpy about Trump losing his shirt from owning a money-losing casino.

 

[HisArpy]

I guess no one informed Harpy about Trump losing his shirt from owning a money-losing casino.

Except he didn't.

The CASINO filed for bankruptcy protection... not Trump.

Please get your facts straight before you open your mouth again.

 

[FescueFan]

Except he didn't.

The CASINO filed for bankruptcy protection... not Trump.

Please get your facts straight before you open your mouth again.

KeithD doesn't seem to understand the difference between a corporation and a sole proprietorship.

 

[HisArpy]

KeithD doesn't seem to understand the difference between a corporation and a sole proprietorship.

He also doesn't understand the "Golden Rule" when it comes to money, how money works, or anything else financial beyond his bar tab at his local ale house.

No matter how you slice it, the Casino made money off of filing Chapter 11. The books might not show it after lawful business deductions, but they did. Bet on it.

 

[KeithD]

Trump showing more deeply his vileness and his desperation and the board Trumpettes just keep on keeping on with him.

 

[HisArpy]

Trump showing more deeply his vileness and his desperation and the board Trumpettes just keep on keeping on with him.

Dude, that plot has already been written. Try thinking of something else before you get busted for plagiarism.