Lootequiette: Pmann's Totally Original/Unaffiliated Thread

[hotwords229_A]

No. No. No.

What a boring topic.

Now he’s going to be self conscious about your perception of his questioning abilities.
Let’s see what he does to win back your approval.

 

[Corbal]

Now he’s going to be self conscious about your perception of his questioning abilities.
Let’s see what he does to win back your approval.

He’ll make a reference to me being a dirty bitch, a whore, or loose...to which I’ll make fun of his tiny cock and balls. It’s how all amazing friendships should be.

 

[Lord Pmann]

What shall the topic be then?! I'm sorry you don't approve. I've sent you a gift card for an ass, crack and back waxing.

You know I'm a people pleaser and this hurts my sensibilities.

I thought you did ask these questions already.

Maybe I did! I ask a question every day! I can't remember.

You all are some unruly peasants!!

 

[Corbal]

What shall the topic be then?! I'm sorry you don't approve. I've sent you a gift card for an ass, crack and back waxing.

You know I'm a people pleaser and this hurts my sensibilities.

Ask a question about a time you defied public opinion or didn’t give a fuck what anyone else thought. Show us you have a set of brass balls. Those are so much more empowering.

 

[Lord Pmann]

New Question

Alright, Corbal.

Tell us an example of a time when you said, "I don't give a fairy's fuck about _______!" What caused you to stand up? Is it typical? Or out of character? Was there any fallout?

 

[Corbal]

Alright, Corbal.

Tell us an example of a time when you said, "I don't give a fairy's fuck about _______!" What caused you to stand up? Is it typical? Or out of character? Was there any fallout?

I’ve never done this. Public opinion weighs too heavily on my conscience.

 

[Lord Pmann]

I would give my own answer, but I just caved to public pressure, so I’m a pussy.

 

[Corbal]

I would give my own answer, but I just caved to public pressure, so I’m a pussy.

I expected a more shitty response.

I'm disappointed.

You are a pussy.

 

[Lord Pmann]

Alright, so, we know I tend to be very shy about expressing my opinions, but I’ll search through my memory and try to find a story.

...

...

I’ve found one. I’ll tell this story exactly as I remember, perhaps with the only slight enhancements. The story isn’t necessarily against public opinion, but against the opinion of a person in power.

I remember back in 7th grade, I had a confrontation with a teacher. This hagbeast was from the fiery pits of hell and was released only to bring evil on this earth in the form of teaching literature. She took the form of a bean stalk and her heart was made from brimstone, shit, vipers and splinters. She had no good inside of her.

One day, she decided to start talking about a political subject woefully inappropriate for 7th graders. Perhaps in hell they had no decorum, but this was a classroom of children. After a minute, I suggested we move on and stop this conversation. She, with her forked tongue and fiery eyes, said it was her classroom and she will talk as she pleases. If I didn’t like it and I persisted talking to her in that manner, I could take a walk on down to the principal’s office.

Now, 7th grade pmann was only different in size and cuteness. I was still a mouthy little fucker. But, I always kept my mouthy nature with forum, err- CLASSROOM, rules. I told her that was fine and she should stop talking about this subject. She threw her pitchfork aside and suggested I take a trip down to the principal’s office. I agreed that was an option. But, being one step ahead of this Chaucer quoting gargoyle, I called her bluff. I began to pack my things and started to rehearse my lines with the principal, out loud. I asked her at what point I should inform the principal the subject matter she chose to discuss. The penny dropped and her eyes stopped glowing and turned back to their normal, solid black colouring. It was like the ending of The Devil’s Advocate where Satan realizes he was defeated.

She quickly stopped me from packing up and said I didn’t need to go down there. That was good, because I didn’t want to go down there. I didn’t want to be in trouble, even though I knew she was wrong. Nevertheless, I was the hero of the class for a day. Evil lost and good prevailed. I am sure she has returned to the underworld to perform her wifely duties as Lucifer’s bride. But I like to think that, as that Bardy bitch is punished with a face full of devil jizz, she thinks of the time she was defeated by a 7th grader.

 

[Justadesperatewifeandmom]

Someone above mentioned something that spawns today's topic...

*EDIT- SCRATCH THIS TOPIC AS IT IS UNAPPROVED BY THE (M)ASSES- scroll down*

Do you worry about how people perceive you? Does it bother you when people don't like you? Do you sometimes do things you wish you didn't in order to get public approval?

Alright, Corbal.

Tell us an example of a time when you said, "I don't give a fairy's fuck about _______!" What caused you to stand up? Is it typical? Or out of character? Was there any fallout?

Well, I will answer both questions, as I think they go hand in hand. Surprising as it may seem, I do not go to job interviews in pajamas, with purple hair, and my glowing personality. Same with school meetings, the occasional sales call etc. Of course, sometimes I worry about how I am perceived and as such attempt to alter the perception. Generally, it is a means to an end. I wouldn't say it bothers me if they don't like me, but it bothers me if hinders the progress to what goal I am attempting to achieve. There are times where it may annoy me to bite my tongue because not doing so is not likely to bring about the best possible outcome. I think most of thus make these modifications. If we all looked how we wanted and said everything we wanted to say, the work place would be a very interesting indeed. I'd love to see it, but not holding my breath.

As for question 2, um I am in my 40s, often with rainbow hippie hair, who spent time as a nomadic hippie, now working as a systems engineer, prior to that weapons marketing, and prior commissioned sales. I have generally been the only female around in these male dominated industries, and I kick ass. My hobbies include pornography, weapons, and generally spending my time doing what proper women or good girls don't do. A large portion of my life is about not giving a happy rats ass. I will say I am not near as outwardly aggressive anymore. I more prefer usurping authority now rather than outwardly challenging it. It better matches my skill set and has proven a higher success rate. Starting a fist fight with the big, strong guy, who is also in a position of power usually just ends with me getting knocked on my ass.

However, you want specific stories. Well, like your young self, my young self at around the same age also had a smart mouth, and kind of blackmailed a teacher in a very similar way, with also being sent to the principals, and sure I will tell him about this, I will also tell him about that. My dirt was substantial and it made for a peaceful year. There is one story that makes me look back and laugh. The corporation I was working at was shady as fuck. At first, I thought it was traditional corporate level shady but I soon came to realize it was much deeper than that. My last stand was basically "you know what, you can all kiss my ass", and walking out, while doing that flipping my skirt up to reveal my thong clad ass to accentuate my point, and slamming the door behind me. I found a new job, the CEO went out disgraced on the heels of a scandal and cover up not that long after (surprising no one who worked for the corporation), and eventually they went bankrupt and closed the doors.

 

[Lord Pmann]

Alright... busy morning so I haven’t been around.

The subject today is gender differences. Man, there are a lot of them. I used to watch this show called Dating In the Dark. That’s right, sometimes pmann watches really shitty TV. There was another show similar on Netflix recently that I mentioned before called Love Is Blind. The premise of both shows is that you get to know someone without seeing them first, not dissimilar to some interactions here.

The interesting thing to note was the disparity between men and women. The guys were much more accepting of the women they liked upon seeing them. The girls were often very disappointed.

Why is this? Do you think that is representative of society as a whole? If you fell for someone without seeing them, how much do looks matter when you see them? Do you think men are more apt to be accepting? How does this link to your experiences at Lit?

 

[Justis]

For me looks are not really that important, I am drawn by a persons character. Someone can be what is typically coined as good looking and have an awful character that just makes them unattractive to me. Someone who is not typically coined as good looking can have an amazing character and that makes them attractive to me. For the most part I have been lucky on Lit in that I have met some wonderful people with great characters and had some great experiences. Those that have not been as great I think I’m still lucky to have had as you learn something from them and I find that generally you learn something about yourself as a person as well. I’m not sure that either sex is more critical of this than the other I think it comes down to the individual rather than the gender.

 

[Orchidea73]

The interesting thing to note was the disparity between men and women. The guys were much more accepting of the women they liked upon seeing them. The girls were often very disappointed.

Why is this? Do you think that is representative of society as a whole? If you fell for someone without seeing them, how much do looks matter when you see them? Do you think men are more apt to be accepting? How does this link to your experiences at Lit?

I don't know about reality shows, I can only speak for myself. I do have to like the guy when I see him, just like he has to like me as well. Otherwise it doesn't work. As simple as that. No, he doesn't need to be gorgeous looking, but we need to click. I call it "lust at first sight" myself.

 

[Lord Pmann]

For me, I find personality can truly enhance a person’s looks. If I like the person first, seeing them would probably just be a bonus. Unless they’re hideous or have a tail or something. But an average person can be very attractive if they have a great personality. That’s what people say anyway. I only talk to hot bitches.

I am not sure if I’ve ever noticed a big disparity between men and women. I think guys here are just happy to have some girl talk to them. I’ve heard some really awful stories about a few girls just completely ditching guys because of their looks, once they see them. But I feel it’s probably the same on the other side of the coin.

I am pretty picky, which is weird, because I’m basically a troll. But my classy personality makes up for my appearance and my tail.

 

[StacyLeigh]

Why is this? Do you think that is representative of society as a whole? If you fell for someone without seeing them, how much do looks matter when you see them? Do you think men are more apt to be accepting? How does this link to your experiences at Lit?

I think physical attraction is important but, as we grow up, that seems to be less about being hot and more about features that appeal to us (kind eyes, warm smile, strong arms, etc). I’m not a troll but I also don’t see myself as hot. I’m not Giselle and I’m not expecting Tom Brady . I’ve been very lucky to have encountered mostly very (attractive to me) guys on Lit and (I think) most have been pleased with my looks as well. I’d like to think it is a match of winning personalities - but likely it’s my boobs and their warm smiles haha

 

[hotwords229_A]

It’s interesting to hear that the guys were the ones who were more accepting about how a woman looked once they got to know her.

I can see how that would be the case and I wonder if it’s because we, guys, are so visual that it gets in the way of our judgement. We see a hot girl and want her even though she is probably terrible for us. But the Plain Jane (who always wears overalls and glasses) is really the right match for us personality wise.

You have to wonder if we, as a society, will be more capable of finding the right match for ourselves if we can get to the “I love her personality and I wonder what she looks like” before “I wonder what she looks like naked, oh yeah—and if she has a personality, or whatever”.

 

[hotwords229_A]

I’m not a troll but I also don’t see myself as hot. I’m not Giselle and I’m not expecting Tom Brady

I read that Tom Brady has deflated balls. I think it was in the news.

 

[StacyLeigh]

I read that Tom Brady has deflated balls. I think it was in the news.

Ha! I think he’s a great example that looks don’t equal trustworthy, brilliant, or even a tad interesting.

 

[Lord Pmann]

@Stacy- I’m not Tom Brady, but I expect Gisele. Nothing less.

It’s interesting to hear that the guys were the ones who were more accepting about how a woman looked once they got to know her.

I can see how that would be the case and I wonder if it’s because we, guys, are so visual that it gets in the way of our judgement. We see a hot girl and want her even though she is probably terrible for us. But the Plain Jane (who always wears overalls and glasses) is really the right match for us personality wise.

You have to wonder if we, as a society, will be more capable of finding the right match for ourselves if we can get to the “I love her personality and I wonder what she looks like” before “I wonder what she looks like naked, oh yeah—and if she has a personality, or whatever”.

I’m totally guilty of this. It’s why one has to give the girl the wank test. That is, in the few moments after you’ve cum, how do you feel about her? Those are the only moments of clarity we have to us as guys.

 

[StacyLeigh]

@Stacy- I’m not Tom Brady, but I expect Gisele. Nothing less.

https://media.giphy.com/media/Fjr6v88OPk7U4/giphy.gif

 

[hotwords229_A]

I’m totally guilty of this. It’s why one has to give the girl the wank test. That is, in the few moments after you’ve cum, how do you feel about her? Those are the only moments of clarity we have to us as guys.

Sad, but true.
The power of the cock is strong. It takes great will to overcome it. So far, no one has.

 

[Justadesperatewifeandmom]

Alright... busy morning so I haven’t been around.

The subject today is gender differences. Man, there are a lot of them. I used to watch this show called Dating In the Dark. That’s right, sometimes pmann watches really shitty TV. There was another show similar on Netflix recently that I mentioned before called Love Is Blind. The premise of both shows is that you get to know someone without seeing them first, not dissimilar to some interactions here.

The interesting thing to note was the disparity between men and women. The guys were much more accepting of the women they liked upon seeing them. The girls were often very disappointed.

Why is this? Do you think that is representative of society as a whole? If you fell for someone without seeing them, how much do looks matter when you see them? Do you think men are more apt to be accepting? How does this link to your experiences at Lit?

I am not familiar with the show, but the premise is basic enough. As to why those women seem more disappointed in the men, I think has to do with conscious and unconscious bias, and is representative of society, but not due to attractiveness being more important to women or men. Ok, gender wise, I think the importance of physical attractiveness is about the same for both. I am not talking the hot damn model attractive. Of course, we all like to look at the 10s, but for most, a 10 for a mate is not what we look for. However, somewhat attractive or attractive enough is of importance. Among gender differences in mate selection, men are often better able to consciously admit a bias towards attractiveness, and quantify its importance. Women are more likely to bury this fact and it then becomes an unconscious bias. If one has a conscious bias, they are better able to look at it and truly level its importance. An unconscious bias is ignored with a notion that it doesn't exist and therefor is harder to adjust. The men on that show have probably thought about the traits of the partner, balanced that with the level of attractiveness that would be needed to be enough, rationalized the expectations to meet the necessity, as such have managed the expectations to a level of realism. Women are more likely to say and feel looks aren't important, even though they actually place the same level of value to it as men, denying the psychological reality that it is a factor. Then they are fantasizing a 9 or 10 without noticing they are doing it, because it isn't important, and reality smacked them in the face. I suspect women are likely less able to admit a bias towards attractiveness because it isn't nice. Society really tries to train chicks to be nice. I'd guess once those women are given time to adjust those expectations with the reality they were presented, factor in the positive traits, and determine an accurate mate value, as long as the man was near attractive enough, their mate value should fall into an acceptable alignment and the disappointment should vanish. In the end, the personality traits determine the strength and longevity of the attraction as long as the physical minimum is met.

Personally, I have dated much of the spectrum, but will admit there are men whose looks I could not get past at all. I loved their personality but the thought of sexual contact made me nauseated. Also a borderline man or two who got friend zoned but occasional one night stand when I was intoxicated and horny, because they were more attractive to me at that moment. I had never really been one for blind dates or picking up men on the internet. I met them in person, the old fashioned way. I only have one blind experience. It did not go well. Circa mid 90s, teens, friend gave a guy my number, we talked for hours, got along great. We described ourselves and made plans to meet. He greatly overestimated his attractiveness. I could not keep up the relationship after meeting him. His positive traits were not enough to be able to see any sexual possibility in a positive or even neutral light. Now though, I wouldn't even consider a highly physically attractive partner. I'd assume the financial burden needed to acquire and keep him would be too high and he would say cruel things like gym or "thons". My attractive enough threshold is much lower than it was in my dating days as my attractiveness is lower, thus it lowered accordingly.

As far as Lit, oh my god the men are extremely accepting. I was so surprised by this when I was new. I had just a profile, maybe isolated clothed pictures. I'd join video chats and they were down right ecstatic. Several of them were so far out of my league in the real world too. It was rather confusing. After seeing more of the culture of Lit, I think they are at the point that someone wanting sexual interaction with them and not having a beard and dick gives huge bonus points. Or they have a fetish for big tits and give out bonus points on that. Probably a mix of both. Big tits and no dick is a winning combination for a portion of Lit.

 

[Endless_Night]

< The interesting thing to note was the disparity between men and women. The guys were much more accepting of the women they liked upon seeing them. The girls were often very disappointed.

Why is this? Do you think that is representative of society as a whole? If you fell for someone without seeing them, how much do looks matter when you see them? Do you think men are more apt to be accepting? How does this link to your experiences at Lit?

I have a type. A specific physical type.

Is that all I need? Nope. Absolutely nope. But real time, it’s what gets me to the table.

Is it hard and fast? No. I am occasionally attracted to something different, but it’s rare. Most of my friends say looks don’t matter, and, I absolutely agree. In theory. But if there isn’t that initial physical frisson I’ll never be attracted. Not in a sexual way, no matter how fabulous I come to view someone as a person. *shrug*

It matters less on Lit, at least not if I’ve already made the commitment to be interested. Here it’s been about the kink, and I’d be perfectly happy to never see pics.

I will say I’m always a little horrified at how quickly people rush to send pics on the board! One often accompanies an out of the blue *hello* PM. Don’t do that.

Yeah. I realize all that^ is probably not the norm.

 

[Mr_bogey]

I have a type. A specific physical type.

Is that all I need? Nope. Absolutely nope. But real time, it’s what gets me to the table.

Is it hard and fast? No. I am occasionally attracted to something different, but it’s rare. Most of my friends say looks don’t matter, and, I absolutely agree. In theory. But if there isn’t that initial physical frisson I’ll never be attracted. Not in a sexual way, no matter how fabulous I come to view someone as a person. *shrug*

It matters less on Lit, at least not if I’ve already made the commitment to be interested. Here it’s been about the kink, and I’d be perfectly happy to never see pics.

I will say I’m always a little horrified at how quickly people rush to send pics on the board! One often accompanies an out of the blue *hello* PM. Don’t do that.

Yeah. I realize all that^ is probably not the norm.

So you've never had one too many and found "not your type" sleeping next to you?

 

[Lord Pmann]

I’ve been a neglectful Nancy today. Oops!