SugarDaddy1
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2012
- Posts
- 1,904
SourceIt will not be difficult to prove to a jury that former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin killed George Floyd. It could, however, be difficult to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he intended to kill Floyd.
The problem is that the charges brought by the state do not determine guilt, or how seriously the state treats a crime. Legal charges act as definitive standards, which means they set the parameters for criminal acts and the evidence prosecutors must provide to earn a conviction. And the price of getting it wrong, of prosecutors over-charging and failing to produce the evidence, is that the perp walks.
Again, it’s easy to understand why a second-degree murder charge is more appealing. If Chauvin is convicted on second-degree murder charges, he will likely serve a longer prison sentence, as he should. But Ellison is taking on a heavy legal burden, because prosecutors must now find evidence that Chauvin actively intended to kill Floyd.
It’s also important to note that in Chauvin’s case, the third-degree murder charge might be just as problematic as a second-degree murder charge. The Minnesota Supreme Court has ruled in the past that “depraved mind murder,” which is what a third-degree murder charge entails, “cannot occur where the defendant’s actions were focused on a specific person.” In Chauvin’s case, his actions were directed at a specific person: Floyd.