Why you can't have nice things.

[Sean]

I see that Trump's 'The beatings will continue until morale improves' approach to civil unrest will continue for another day as he cheers on Tom Cotton for threatening citizens with the "101st Airborne Division"

Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump ·1h
100% Correct. Thank you Tom!

Quote Tweet
Tom Cotton
@TomCottonAR
US Senate candidate, AR· 6h
Anarchy, rioting, and looting needs to end tonight.

If local law enforcement is overwhelmed and needs backup, let's see how tough these Antifa terrorists are when they're facing off with the 101st Airborne Division.

We need to have zero tolerance for this destruction.

Pretty sure the posse comitatus act thinks Mr Cotton is a fuckwit.

 

[FlowersForFun]

Pretty sure the posse comitatus act thinks Mr Cotton is a fuckwit.

Really?

And hows that??

 

[girlsmiley]

Do you think putting a knee deep into his neck during his dying breaths for 9 fucking minutes might have contributed to... I dunno, him dying?

I see the Australian public education system is becoming a failure as well.

Nine minutes is an exaggeration, an appeal to emotion and rhetorical fallacy.

Here is an objective description of that which transpired from
a very smart guy who writes on a conservative site
(which has the virtue of detesting Trump
with every living breath they take...)
which does not describe actions of
an innocent and peaceful man:

https://www.nationalreview.com/2020/05/what-we-do-and-dont-know-now-about-george-floyds-death/



This descriptive account is taken from official documents released.

I'm sure they'll be along any minute now to admit they were wrong.

 

[hogjack]

We need to have zero tolerance for this destruction.

Zero tolerance for looting and rioting.
Zero tolerance for bad cops.
Zero tolerance for intolerance.

 

[Counselor706]

The President, the military and Minneapolis: What you need to know

Pretty sure the posse comitatus act thinks Mr Cotton is a fuckwit.

The Insurrection Act is, by far, the Posse Comitatus Act’s most important exception. This is the legal key that unlocks the door to use federal military forces—whether through federalizing the National Guard or calling in “title 10 forces” to quell civil unrest. Dating from 1807, there are three key Insurrection Act provisions worth addressing.

First, a state legislature or governor could request assistance from the president under 10 U.S.C. § 251 “to suppress [an] Insurrection.” It states, in full:

If there is an insurrection in a State, the President, at the request of the State’s legislature, or Governor if the legislature cannot be convened, may call National Guards of other States into Federal service as well as use the Federal military to suppress the insurrection.

This authority was invoked in May 1992, when California Governor Pete Wilson turned to the Insurrection Act in requesting federal military assistance from President George H.W. Bush. This was in response to the Los Angeles riots, after a jury acquitted the officers involved in the arrest and beating of Rodney King. In requesting federal troops to patrol Los Angeles, Wilson specified that the California National Guard lacked the ability to quell the domestic disturbance. Shortly thereafter, Bush issued an executive order, which authorized the defense secretary to federalize the California National Guard and deploy active-duty Army and Marine personnel from bases in California to the scenes of the riots.

Source

 

[HisArpy]

Pretty sure the posse comitatus act thinks Mr Cotton is a fuckwit.

It's not the USA's fault you can't keep up with the rest of the class.

 

[Lancedalot]

Pretty sure the posse comitatus act thinks Mr Cotton is a fuckwit.

Please educate your ignorant self Sean.

https://www.cga.ct.gov/2005/rpt/2005-r-0755.htm

Or at least beg ltr to buy you fourth grade reading level comic books from whose back pages you may solicit a higher quality of law learning than you demonstrate?

 

[Rightguide]

Pretty sure the posse comitatus act thinks Mr Cotton is a fuckwit.

Check it again, dunmmy.

"The Posse Comitatus Act outlaws the willful use of any part of the Army or Air Force to execute the law unless expressly authorized by the Constitution or an act of Congress. History supplies the grist for an argument that the Constitution prohibits military involvement in civilian affairs subject to only limited alterations by Congress or the President, but the courts do not appear to have ever accepted the argument unless violation of more explicit constitutional command could also be shown. The express statutory exceptions include the legislation that allows the President to use military force to suppress insurrection or to enforce federal authority, 10 U.S.C. Sections 251-255, and laws that permit the Department of Defense to provide federal, state and local police with information, equipment, and personnel, 10 U.S.C. §§ 271-284."

 

[SpeareChucker]

Most of the world is rooting for the peaceful protesters,
while condemning both the lynchings of the Black jogger and Flyn ,
and the Black looters and vandals.

You speak for them?

I don't have a Rolodex of outrage...

 

[bellisarius]

Interesting little tid bit to chew on. If Trump invokes the "Insurrection Act" the insurance companies are not going to have to pay off on any damage done by the looters. I haven''t checked but that may also include life insurance.

 

[hogjack]

Federal government resources should not be used. Let local government determine how - or if - they should burn or not. Local officials, elected by the citizens, know their communities better than anyone else.

That's not a federal government decision to make unless asked to help.

 

[Rightguide]

What happened to Sean?

 

[Rightguide]

Tough shit:

Man Dies Trying to Blow Up ATM on Philadelphia Sidewalk
One man was killed and explosions punctuated the overnight hours as thieves blew up and stole ATMs across the city, authorities say
By Dan Stamm and Wire reports • Published 3 hours ago

https://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/news/local/atm-explosion-philadelphia/2416372/

 

[RobDownSouth]

You speak for them?

I don't have a Rolodex of outrage...

Agreed. Your outrage is very specific and very situational: Democrats, liberals, Bill Clinton, Haitians, and most of all Butters.

 

[FlowersForFun]

Agreed. Your outrage is very specific and very situational: Democrats, liberals, Bill Clinton, Haitians, and most of all Butters.

Why would he have a problem with liberals?

By everything he's posted, he is a liberal.

Oh...that's right you don't know what liberalism is.

 

[RobDownSouth]

Why would he have a problem with liberals?

By everything he's posted, he is a liberal.

Oh...that's right you don't know what liberalism is.

Nah, he is a glibertarian shit stain just like you

• Mongrel mixed-race mutt, rejected by both races
• Claims multiple college degrees, but fails to grasp basic concepts
• Failed to complete the terms of his military enlistment contract
• Preaches bootstrappyness, but unwilling to work (spouse is primary breadwinner in family
• Takes it personally when someone disagrees with him, believes freedom of speech implies freedom from criticism
• Incel
• Demands maximum freedom from consequence for himself while promoting government control over those he disagrees with politically ("rules for thee but not for me!")
• Believes any law he personally disagrees with is "unconstitutional"
• Tries tirelessly to be accepted by fringe white right wing organizations

 

[FlowersForFun]

Nah, he is a glibertarian shit stain just like you

Libertarians are liberals Rob. Radically so....which is why you and the other anti-American leftist hate them so much.

I'm not a libertarian, I'm a social liberal, not that you'd ever understand the difference having never made it past middle school and all.

• Mongrel mixed-race mutt, rejected by both races
• Failed to complete the terms of his military enlistment contract
• Preaches bootstrappyness, but unwilling to work (spouse is primary breadwinner in family
• Takes it personally when someone disagrees with him, believes freedom of speech implies freedom from criticism
• Incel
• Demands maximum freedom from consequence for himself while promoting government control over those he disagrees with politically ("rules for thee but not for me!")
• Believes any law he personally disagrees with is "unconstitutional"
• Tries tirelessly to be accepted by fringe white right wing organizations

^^100% lies and dishonesty can't support.....shit most of that is a projection if I ever saw it.

Except the racist bit, notice how much he hates mixed folks?? Racist ALWAYS do, we represent everything racist like Rob hate.

The only point you made here that might be true is this one.....

[*]Claims multiple college degrees, but fails to grasp basic concepts

But just as with the lies I'm betting you NEVER back it up and specifically name what basic concepts I've failed to grasp.

Or explain what one has to do with the other.

I know PhD's that are brilliant physicist and chemist....they can't find their way out of a wet paper back and barely manage to park their car legally half the time.

 

[Emerson40]

Soldier boy seems particularly triggered today.

 

[FlowersForFun]

Soldier boy seems particularly triggered today.

Fantasies.....I'm having fun fucking with the domestic terrorist advocates like Rob and the rest of the Neo-Maoist scum here.

Still hopeful I get to collect some teeth from anti-American socialist this week.

 

[cinnefille]

I'm with the GB Right generally, I have far more satisfying and constructive interactions with them generally.

But guys, I've been watching heaps of clips
and I feel that you're terribly out of touch with what's really going on.

Yes, there are heaps of looters and vandals and the coup d'etat by Antifa
but there's also a genuine popular uprising, by millions of aggrieved laypeople of all races.

 

[hogjack]

..a genuine popular uprising, by millions of aggrieved laypeople of all races.

That's not good. Not good at all.

What are their specific proposals to solve their grievances? A list would help get things started in the best direction.

 

[FlowersForFun]

I'm with the GB Right generally, I have far more satisfying and constructive interactions with them generally.

But guys, I've been watching heaps of clips
and I feel that you're terribly out of touch with what's really going on.

Yes, there are heaps of looters and vandals and the coup d'etat by Antifa
but there's also a genuine popular uprising, by millions of aggrieved laypeople of all races.

No problem with them.

Not even most the looters and vandals....shit if they want to destroy their community??? That's fine by me.

They can destroy their community and their shit all they want, no problem.

We're happy to BBQ and watch the children throw a self destruction temper tantrum.

You want to come at my community with beatings and firebombs?

That's going to be a fuckin problem real quick.

 

[HisArpy]

What happened to Sean?

His Emerson Alt is easier to burn.

 

[Emerson40]

The plague-rat jack-leg lawyer maintains his daily derp quota, showcasing his progressing comprehension and perception handicaps.


What other lies do you have for us today, Timmeh?

 

[RobDownSouth]

That's not good. Not good at all.

What are their specific proposals to solve their grievances? A list would help get things started in the best direction.

How about this one, for starters:

Do away with the law of "qualified immunity" nationwide.

Cop fucks up, he loses at trial, victim gets paid from cop's pension first.

Garon-damn-tee you there would be an immediate drop in "overpolicing".

Officer Stumblebum would think twice about "street justice" when his pension is on the line.