FBI Used News Hooks To Hook Lit's Left And Others

Rightguide

Prof Triggernometry
Joined
Feb 7, 2017
Posts
66,985
How The FBI Used ‘News Hooks’ To Advance The Trump-Russia Probe

Chuck Ross
Investigative Reporter

The FBI relied heavily on media reporting, often based on leaks, to justify taking additional steps in Crossfire Hurricane, according to a Daily Caller News Foundation analysis of public records.

FBI officials relied on the so-called news hooks to conduct interviews with Michael Flynn.

A series of news hooks also led to the publication of the now-debunked Steele dossier. The FBI relied on the publication of the dossier itself to provide cover to conduct interviews for Crossfire Hurricane.

And James Comey himself crafted his own news hook to spur the appointment of a special counsel to take over Crossfire Hurricane after he was fired.

All the rest here:

https://dailycaller.com/2020/05/18/fbi-crossfire-hurricane-leaks-donald-trump-russia/
 
The history of tge term "fake news" is interesting.

It was started by legacy media to try and discredit internet-based, upstart reporters who were exposing the holes in various narratives being pushed by the legacy outlets on behalf of progressives causes and candidates.

It was turned back on them because of how often they are either used by sources or complicit in promoting false narratives like the above. I happen to think it is more the latter than the former since they never seem to burn their "sources" when a story does not bear out or is shown to be a fabrication.
 
That tricky left hook gets 'em every time. :)

Just wanted to say, thank you for making this post. Not only for the above quoted verity, but for its timely bell-ringing.

As you can well predict, it will get the usual idjits severely triggered. And you only had to make the one post, so far! Templar showcase of minimalist excellence at work, milord!

https://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lxpj6grFIe1qcaomb.gif
 
The history of tge term "fake news" is interesting.

It was started by legacy media to try and discredit internet-based, upstart reporters who were exposing the holes in various narratives being pushed by the legacy outlets on behalf of progressives causes and candidates.

"upstart reporters". Yeah no. Actual, intentionally fictional gubbins with the veneer of news designed to game Facebook.

https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-42724320
 
Amazing how that cycle works, and it works well.

The "authorities" leak something to the press, who duly report it as "investigative journalism." Now that it's appeared in the press the "authorities" have to look into the matter because it's soooo serious.

And the problem is is that there aren't any investigative journalists out there any more. Management has decided to get rid of them because they often come in with stories that don't fit the message management is trying to push. So what we end up with is reporting via surreptitious phone calls and Tweets.
 
Inside sources indicate fooling the Left is not exactly a challenge.

Five-year-olds catch onto the coin-in-the-ear trick faster than the Left catches on to false information.
 
As long as Sinclair, FoxNews, Breitbart, Blaze, Daily Caller, Newsmax, and the Federalist exist, the right has no grounds to whine about the "Liberal Media."
 
Inside sources indicate fooling the Left is not exactly a challenge.

Five-year-olds catch onto the coin-in-the-ear trick faster than the Left catches on to false information.

All of 'em bought the "Truth Over Facts" website.

Carville became a Democrat consultant because the Democrats are easier to persuade.
 
All of 'em bought the "Truth Over Facts" website.

Carville became a Democrat consultant because the Democrats are easier to persuade.

Funny, Trump became a Republican because he knows he can mold you people like Play-Doh.
 
The FBI and the DOJ are corrupt orginizations

La Cosa Nostra

I'd like to think that was only true with the upper echelon but one has to wonder why there were no whistle blowers that came forward to report these violations of laws over the last four years and before.
 
I'd like to think that was only true with the upper echelon but one has to wonder why there were no whistle blowers that came forward to report these violations of laws over the last four years and before.

This has been my thought. Everyone in the media and on the news say that the rot was only on the top levels. But, where are the "honest cops" who knew what was going on and yet did nothing?

Rot always starts at the bottom where it's wet and swampy and works it way up.
 
Funny, Trump became a Republican because he knows he can mold you people like Play-Doh.

Trump went with the Republican Party because he couldn't embrace the communist values of the Democrat Party. Unlike the Democrat party, Trump believes in the Constitution, loves the country as founded, and the productive people who've made it what it is today.
 
This has been my thought. Everyone in the media and on the news say that the rot was only on the top levels. But, where are the "honest cops" who knew what was going on and yet did nothing?

Rot always starts at the bottom where it's wet and swampy and works it way up.

The IG chooses at random 29 FISC applications and can't find one with proper Woods file or one at all. Why shouldn't we suspect the FISC wasn't just a rubber stamp for the corrupted FBI as well? I think we need an IG review of every FISC warrant application since day one to get a feel for how or if they protected our constitutional rights from the beginning and then start trying and executing people who didn't think it was important enough to do so.
 
Trump went with the Republican Party because he couldn't embrace the communist values of the Democrat Party. Unlike the Democrat party, Trump believes in the Constitution, loves the country as founded, and the productive people who've made it what it is today.

Holy shit, you're manufacturing what Trump thinks when none of that is true.

Was he believing in the Constitution and the Country as founded when he threatened to take your penis extenders without due process? He went Republican because it's the closest thing to a fascist dictatorship he could find.
 
As long as Sinclair, FoxNews, Breitbart, Blaze, Daily Caller, Newsmax, and the Federalist exist, the right has no grounds to whine about the "Liberal Media."

They came into existence because the left had the entire MSM locked up as propaganda arms of the DNC, the CCP, and the globalist Marxist movement.:rolleyes:
 
They came into existence because the left had the entire MSM locked up as propaganda arms of the DNC, the CCP, and the globalist Marxist movement.:rolleyes:

Just stop, you're only fooling yourself. Sinclair and Fox News have been around forever and a day. Blatantly lying doesn't make it true.
 
How can someone who doesn't exist listen to anyone, Derpy?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existence_of_God

There is 1 thing all those arguments have in common. Thus begging the question that if you're trying to argue that something doesn't exist, WHY are you arguing about it? The mere fact that we can formulate an argument for both sides of the subject issue is itself evidence of existence. The only remaining issue is the quantitative degree of such existence - ie whether God is in fact "the all powerful creator" or merely a theological topic.

Please try and keep up with the rest of the class.
 
Back
Top