A TIMELESS reminder of how ruinous male thirst can get

LJ_Reloaded

バクスター の
Joined
Apr 3, 2010
Posts
21,217
Laurel needs to sticky this shit so every man who comes into this forum sees it and learns.

http://gawker.com/woman-creates-worst-online-dating-profile-ever-gets-1495674285
It's a question that's been asked since time immemorial: Could a woman create an online dating profile "so loathsome that no man would message it"?

Cracked's crack investigative reporter Alli Reed decided to solve the "omnipervet paradox" once and for all by going on OKCupid and posting what she firmly believed was the "worst online dating profile ever."

Her thesis: There did indeed exist a woman "so awful, so toxic, so irredeemably unlikeable that no one would message her, or if they did, at least they would realize they never, ever wanted to meet her."

As it turns out, there wasn't.

In creating her profile for "AaronCarterFan," Reed used the real photo of her model friend Rae to entice gentlemen callers. But that was exactly where AaronCarterFan's attractiveness ended and her repugnant personality began.

Her self-summary was the infamous "if u cant handle me at my worst u dont deserve me at my best"; the thing she was really good at was "convincing people im pregnat lol"; and under "favorite books, movies, shows, music, and food," AaronCarterFan wrote "soooooo glad their making another Grown Ups."
https://i.imgur.com/gR1VZeY.jpg

Red Pill says "all women are like that" but more important than the neverending debate over AWALT is the question of why any woman is ever "like that".

This woman mentioned above got crowds of men chasing her and showering her with validation. What in the world can men expect after such an interaction? It sends a message to all women that the bar for acceptable behavior is not just low, it's underground.

Fail to vet a potential love interest on the basis of their moral character and you automatically reward deplorable behavior. And when deplorable behavior is accepted and rewarded, reprobates will flourish.

Everyone on this forum knows I hate hypergamic women like the flames of hell itself. But such hatred can only ever lead to one logical conclusion: to know why so many women are "like that", a man has to look in the mirror and ask himself what he did to help encourage them to be like that.

Half the problem is men's fault. Stop being so desperate that you lower your bar for moral character through the floor of the universe and you'll stop being fucked over. Expect better, get better.

Male thirst is just as much the enemy as hypergamic women.
 
Her thesis: There did indeed exist a woman "so awful, so toxic, so irredeemably unlikeable that no one would message her, or if they did, at least they would realize they never, ever wanted to meet her."

As it turns out, there wasn't.

https://i.imgur.com/gR1VZeY.jpg

If that's her one attempt at that, she failed to even start to prove it. What she created is obviously attractive as a potential casual fuck, at least a dumb plaything, even if probably not a relationship material. Let's not forget a lot of guys will not look past that profile pick at all, in naive belief it's real. And even if we do, she's come over as desperate for attention -- and then she wonders she got tons of it? Wtf. Yes, she's obviously a liar, but 99% people tell lies 99% of time (and the rest are just too dumb to do that), so what. Nothing granted, but she's reading as active and playful. That's attractive. She got a vibe of naivety that let's us believe she lies about how much high life she actually lives, and a lot of guys will believe she could be malleable enough and weak enough to be pushed in their mold. So, no, this is not a way you create an undesirable.
 
Last edited:
Maybe Laurel will apply her forum rules
to this male who sees himself not just as Alpha Prime,
but not bound to a silly woman's set of rules and boundaries...



*woof* *woof*
 
If that's her one attempt at that, she failed to even start to prove it. What she created is obviously attractive as a potential casual fuck, at least a dumb plaything, even if probably not a relationship material. Let's not forget a lot of guys will not look past that profile pick at all, in naive belief it's real. And even if we do, she's come over as desperate for attention -- and then she wonders she got tons of it? Wtf. Yes, she's obviously a liar, but 99% people tell lies 99% of time (and the rest are just too dumb to do that), so what. Nothing granted, but she's reading as active and playful. That's attractive. She got a vibe of naivety that let's us believe she lies about how much high life she actually lives, and a lot of guys will believe she could be malleable enough and weak enough to be pushed in their mold. So, no, this is not a way you create an undesirable.
Proving my point that many men out there are willing to queue up to stick their dick in crazy.
 
Back
Top