Bodington
Virgin
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2009
- Posts
- 257
So in 2018, we have Female “A” appear out of the blue during the confirmation hearing for the appointment of a Supreme Court Justice. She alleges that in 1983 or thereabouts, not quite sure of the year, she attended a party somewhere in the State of Maryland, precise location not remembered. She can’t remember how she got to the party or how she got home. What she does apparently remember, was that she was lured to a separate bedroom by the Supreme Court nominee and his friend where the nominee attempted to sexually assault her, but was restrained by the nominee’s friend. Female “A” then ran from the room, but she didn’t tell anyone of the incident. In particular she didn’t tell her closest life long friend who presumably was at the alleged party. The latter could not even recall of such party and doubted that either her or Female “A” of ever having been in the company of the Supreme Court nominee. Two women momentarily appeared to suggest having witnessed unseemly sexual behavior by the Supreme Court nominee at separate events but recanted. No other women came out of the woodworks to allege unseemly sexual behavior by the Supreme Court Justice.
So in 2020, we have Female “B” appear out of the blue in the midst of a subdued (subdued because of covid-19) Presidential election campaign to allege that the presumptive Democratic nominee had sexually assaulted her (touching under her clothing her private parts) in the spring of 1993, when she was staff worker (such status acknowledged) during the time the Presidential nominee was a US Senator. She could recall the exact date and location where the alleged assault occurred. She reported the incident contemporaneously to a close friend and to her brother and mother. The friend and brother confirmed, such communication. The mother has since passed away, but a 1993 tape of the Larry King show reveals that the mother did call the show and suggested her daughter had been molested by a US Senator. Female “B” claimed that she filed a formal written complaint about harassment to a Senate personnel office but did not receive any follow-up. She even filed a police report albeit belatedly, but Female “A” did not do even that. Prior to the accusation by Female “B” , lots of women had come out of the woodwork to complain about creepy behavior by the Presidential nominee, such as unwanted touchings and sniffing of their hair.
So whose accusation is more credible? Why Female “A” of course without a doubt! You see the Dems and their faithful lackeys the MSM, the self proclaimed champions of women’s rights, solely because they favor abortion, are fond of saying all women must be believed when they allege sexual misconduct by men. What about Female “B” you might ask? Well there’s a caveat, women can not be believed if they allege sexual misconduct by male politicians of the Democratic party.
So in 2020, we have Female “B” appear out of the blue in the midst of a subdued (subdued because of covid-19) Presidential election campaign to allege that the presumptive Democratic nominee had sexually assaulted her (touching under her clothing her private parts) in the spring of 1993, when she was staff worker (such status acknowledged) during the time the Presidential nominee was a US Senator. She could recall the exact date and location where the alleged assault occurred. She reported the incident contemporaneously to a close friend and to her brother and mother. The friend and brother confirmed, such communication. The mother has since passed away, but a 1993 tape of the Larry King show reveals that the mother did call the show and suggested her daughter had been molested by a US Senator. Female “B” claimed that she filed a formal written complaint about harassment to a Senate personnel office but did not receive any follow-up. She even filed a police report albeit belatedly, but Female “A” did not do even that. Prior to the accusation by Female “B” , lots of women had come out of the woodwork to complain about creepy behavior by the Presidential nominee, such as unwanted touchings and sniffing of their hair.
So whose accusation is more credible? Why Female “A” of course without a doubt! You see the Dems and their faithful lackeys the MSM, the self proclaimed champions of women’s rights, solely because they favor abortion, are fond of saying all women must be believed when they allege sexual misconduct by men. What about Female “B” you might ask? Well there’s a caveat, women can not be believed if they allege sexual misconduct by male politicians of the Democratic party.
