Hydroxychoroquine/Azithromycin/Zinc Sulfate

[oggbashan]

The UK's equivalent is that 5G mobile phone masts spread Covid-19 because some of the technology comes from China.

So people are vandalising mobile phone masts and equipment and attacking engineers sent to repair them.

It doesn't help that they can't tell a 5G mast from a 4G or earlier versions and none yet attacked have been 5G.

It's on the internet so it must be true - go out and burn a mast...

The irony is that they probably got the fake news through a mobile mast...

 

[Conager]

As you suggested I used a few other search sites. Each and everyone showed nothing for your posted quote. N-O-T-H-I-N-G.

I also took your suggestion and went to DIA.mil and searched, using these parameters:

Search query used:

Col. R. Shane Day, Spokesman, National Center for Medical Intelligence statement on Corona virus

And

Corona Virus statement

And

Corvid-19 Statement

And lastly

Col. R. Shane Day

For each and everyone I got this reply:

Sorry, no results found for (search query). Try entering fewer or broader query terms.


Nothing that you quoted or claimed, zip, zilch, nada.

It could be I'm inept at doing internet searches. It could be you mis-quoted. Or it could be it never existed. since I gave you the benefit of the doubt and tried all your suggestions I'll ask again, where did you acquire the quote? Since you quoted, you claimed it as accurate and factual, it's your responsibility to prove it. You quoted the good Col. (I assume) verbatim so you must have copied and pasted it from some where. If you did point me to it. If you did it from memory it is suspect and can be discounted as fiction, until such time as you provide a link to the actual quote.

The problem isn't Google as you claim, it isn't my insistence that you prove up, it's your refusal to verify what you claim is true. Even a 4th grader knows that doesn't fly.

So prove up, shut up or try to worm your way out of it. Your choice.

Comshaw

Or it could be that Google knows you only read "reputable" news sites.

You go ahead and keep repeating the quotes from unnamed sources.. people that don't have the balls to put their name out there...and I'll go with the colonel.

Let's say you and that idiot Aglo are correct and it was some vast, right wing conspiracy to make up a spokesman That would be in even bigger story you idiot. Every major new story would be reporting about how the Trump Administration tried to quash that previously valid story by making up a phony Colonel.

How stupid are you people?

You are now officially on the long list of people that aren't allowed to ask me for citations. Ever.

You were already unofficially on that list but you just reached official status. Sean has been on that list for years but I went ahead and embarrassed him today and he, like you doubled down then tripled down.

Just stop it you're embarrassing yourself you complete moron.

 

[ryan8558]

probably a youtube thing.


example how youtube gave rise to the flat earth

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-8T7nMy0O0

 

[Aglaopheme]

Call up ABC News ask them if they still stand by there story.

Call the DIA, you dumb-fuck.

You believe the unnamed sources are not disinformation but the named source with an actual title next to his name is nothing but a conspiracy theory.

I simply posted the first four google links, you nitwit. Comshaw is so insulated that he got NONE. I got HUNDREDS of returns.

You are incredibly stupid. you know that, right? Like Sgt Sgt Spidey / Phrodeau level stupid?

You mad, bro?

 

[Fuzzy1975]

Or it could be that Google knows you only read "reputable" news sites.

You go ahead and keep repeating the quotes from unnamed sources.. people that don't have the balls to put their name out there...and I'll go with the colonel.

Let's say you and that idiot Aglo are correct and it was some vast, right wing conspiracy to make up a spokesman That would be in even bigger story you idiot. Every major new story would be reporting about how the Trump Administration tried to quash that previously valid story by making up a phony Colonel.

How stupid are you people?

You are now officially on the long list of people that aren't allowed to ask me for citations. Ever.

You were already unofficially on that list but you just reached official status. Sean has been on that list for years but I went ahead and embarrassed him today and he, like you doubled down then tripled down.

Just stop it you're embarrassing yourself you complete moron.

Doesn't show up on duckduck or Yahoo either....chuckles.......

 

[icanhelp1]

Okey dokey, what did PW have to say about the study exactly?

Not disputing the fact that the French publication was faulty and that the peer review was a borderline lie and the study was incomplete by our standards, you and Fuzzy are correct. The study needs more clinical studies. My point was that the French study brought into focus, as I mentioned previously, the possibility as a preventative measure, was thought to be a promising regimen if used with zinc sulphate as a third part of the regimen. I never! ever! said it was a cure or magic bullet.

I wasn't even arguing with you!

this was my original comment


The science is there in that it doesn't act as a traditional antiviral, the positive is, it, in some cases, seems to be capable of decreasing the viral load, protecting against cell intrusion and slowing ones own immune system, another words, it slows the body's immune system ( antibodies ) from killing one's self and attacking one's organs.

It's complicated at best. It is true that more studies are needed but when used as a preventative regimen it is showing some promise. I never said it was a magic bullet but there are promising studies as well as negative results. It's being used off-label till more clinical studies can be verified.

 

[Hugh_Essay]

You mad, bro?

Any friday is a Good Friday for meth!

 

[Aglaopheme]

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/int...isis-early-november-sources/story?id=70031273


Not sure why my comments didn’t show up when I posted this before.

It’s all over the news, but that doesn’t make your sources any less hilarious.

The Pentagon did not comment Tuesday, but on Wednesday evening following the publication of this report, the Defense Department provided a statement from Col. R. Shane Day, Director of the NCMI.

"As a matter of practice the National Center for Medical Intelligence does not comment publicly on specific intelligence matters. However, in the interest of transparency during this current public health crisis, we can confirm that media reporting about the existence/release of a National Center for Medical Intelligence Coronavirus-related product/assessment in November of 2019 is not correct. No such NCMI product exists," the statement said.

 

[Comshaw]

Or it could be that Google knows you only read "reputable" news sites.

You go ahead and keep repeating the quotes from unnamed sources.. people that don't have the balls to put their name out there...and I'll go with the colonel.

Let's say you and that idiot Aglo are correct and it was some vast, right wing conspiracy to make up a spokesman That would be in even bigger story you idiot. Every major new story would be reporting about how the Trump Administration tried to quash that previously valid story by making up a phony Colonel.

How stupid are you people?

Did you even read what I wrote? I've used 8 different search engines, only one of which was Google.

And what the fuck are you talking about? "unnamed sources"? This isn't about what I said or claimed, but about what YOU did.

Why is it you are trying to deflect attention from your inability to verify what you claim to me?

Oh I get it, your pulling an Ish, taking the last of the three options I posted: worming your way out of it.

In that case let''s back up and do a simple, easy to understand challenge: Prove up or shut up.........if you can. I can guarantee you can't and won't.

Comshaw

 

[Aglaopheme]

Not disputing the fact that the French publication was faulty and that the peer review was a borderline lie and the study was incomplete by our standards, you and Fuzzy are correct. The study needs more clinical studies. My point was that the French study brought into focus, as I mentioned previously, the possibility as a preventative measure, was thought to be a promising regimen if used with zinc sulphate as a third part of the regimen. I never! ever! said it was a cure or magic bullet.

I wasn't even arguing with you!

I know. I was just pointing out that wasn’t a PW article and in fact, they have cautioned against using it.

 

[icanhelp1]

I know. I was just pointing out that wasn’t a PW article and in fact, they have cautioned against using it.

Not disputing the fact that the French publication was faulty and that the peer review was a borderline lie and the study was incomplete by our standards, you and Fuzzy are correct. The study needs more clinical studies. My point was that the French study brought into focus, as I mentioned previously, the possibility as a preventative measure, was thought to be a promising regimen if used with zinc sulphate as a third part of the regimen. I never! ever! said it was a cure or magic bullet.

I wasn't even arguing with you!

this was my original comment


The science is there in that it doesn't act as a traditional antiviral, the positive is, it, in some cases, seems to be capable of decreasing the viral load, protecting against cell intrusion and slowing ones own immune system, another words, it slows the body's immune system ( antibodies ) from killing one's self and attacking one's organs.

It's complicated at best. It is true that more studies are needed but when used as a preventative regimen it is showing some promise. I never said it was a magic bullet but there are promising studies as well as negative results. It's being used off-label till more clinical studies can be verified.

 

[Conager]

Did you even read what I wrote? I've used 8 different search engines, only one of which was Google.

And what the fuck are you talking about? "unnamed sources"? This isn't about what I said or claimed, but about what YOU did.

Why is it you are trying to deflect attention from your inability to verify what you claim to me?

Oh I get it, your pulling an Ish, taking the last of the three options I posted: worming your way out of it.

In that case let''s back up and do a simple, easy to understand challenge: Prove up or shut up.........if you can. I can guarantee you can't and won't.

Comshaw

Just. Shut. Up.

 

[Richard_C]

Google found something..................


More for Hydroxychoroquine/Azithromycin/Zinc Sulfate
Web results

Hydroxychloroquine Update For April 6 | In the Pipelineblogs.sciencemag.org › pipeline › archives › 2020/04/06
4 days ago - One is that hydroxychloroquine itself actually lowers the activity of the innate ... about the hydroxychloroquine/azithromycin work: I called it “potentially very ... talking about the role and value of Zinc Sulfate in the HCQ regime.

Special Report: Doctors embrace drug touted by Trump for ...www.reuters.com › article › us-health-coronavirus-usa-...
4 days ago - Use of hydroxychloroquine has soared as the United States has quickly ... cocktail of hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin and zinc sulfate has ...

hydroxychloroquine at Right Now Minnesotawww.rightnowmn.org › tags › hydroxychloroquine
New updates from Dr. Vladimir Zelenko: Cocktail of Hydroxychloroquine, Zinc Sulfate and Azithromycin are showing phenomenon results with 900 coronavirus ...

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko has now treated 699 coronavirus patients ...www.rightnowmn.org › dr_vladimir_zelenko_has_now...
Mar 30, 2020 - ... 100% success using Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate, Zinc and Z-Pak ... of drugs: hydroxychloroquine, in combination with azithromycin (Z-Pak), ...

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko's claims of virus cure make him a star ...www.chicagotribune.com › coronavirus › ct-nw-nyt-co...
Apr 2, 2020 - ... who claims to have cured hundreds of coronavirus patients with the antimalarial drug hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin and zinc sulfate, ...

Malaria Drug and Antibiotic Combo May Work Against COVID ...www.biospace.com › article › hydroxychloroquine-and...
Mar 23, 2020 - ... a combination of hydroxychloroquine and the antibiotic azithromycin. ... A lot of attention has shifted to the malaria drug hydroxychloroquine ...

Ventricular Arrhythmia Risk Due to Hydroxychloroquine ...www.acc.org › articles › 2020/03/27 › ventricular-arrh...
Mar 29, 2020 - Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine therapy should occur in the context of a ... However, chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin all ... Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome, Sodium Chloride Symporter Inhibitors, ...

Trump's Aggressive Advocacy of Malaria Drug for Treating ...www.nytimes.com › coronavirus-trump-malaria-drug
4 days ago - If hydroxychloroquine becomes an accepted treatment, several ... a cocktail of hydroxychloroquine, the antibiotic azithromycin and zinc sulfate.

Azithromycin and Zinc Drug Interactions - Drugs.comwww.drugs.com › drug-interactions › azithromycin-wit...
Drug Interactions between azithromycin and Zinc. This report displays the potential drug interactions for the following 2 drugs: azithromycin; Zinc (zinc sulfate).


FML

 

[Conager]

You mad, bro?

Yes. At myself for bothering to provide anything to those who are unwilling or incapable of engaging in meaningful discourse.

You stupid, sis?

 

[Fuzzy1975]

Did you even read what I wrote? I've used 8 different search engines, only one of which was Google.

And what the fuck are you talking about? "unnamed sources"? This isn't about what I said or claimed, but about what YOU did.

Why is it you are trying to deflect attention from your inability to verify what you claim to me?

Oh I get it, your pulling an Ish, taking the last of the three options I posted: worming your way out of it.

In that case let''s back up and do a simple, easy to understand challenge: Prove up or shut up.........if you can. I can guarantee you can't and won't.

Comshaw

Just. Shut. Up.

Good sound defense of your post....love it....Chuckles

 

[zipman]

The dumb-fucks are actually proud of the fact that no one that they get their news from conveyed that little tidbit of news to them. Not even to present it, then insist they have valid sources. Just silence.

"Pay no attention to the nan behind the curtain!"

Think about that. They're proud tgat the people that they depend on for "news" would obscure that important statement about a huge new story that you now understand why it' petered out on their favorite news outlets.

They throw that charges against the wall; when it slides down into a greasy pile on the floor they slink away from the story and their loyal readers don't care set either new the newspaper or they newspapers sources lied to them.

This is the same intelligence community that they didn't trust after Iraq, but they have trusted throughout the Trump presidency despite evidence of the intelligence committee has been not just committing malpractice but actually engaging in disinformation against citizens of their own country. They forget that the intelligence community actually trains to disseminate that, and "journalists" and their leftist American consumers do not care that they are being played like a banana republic coup.

So we should just trust the members of the intelligence community that agree with Trump? Is that your position?

I personally don't believe that despite all of his efforts, our intelligence services haven't been so severely degraded under Trump. What's more likely, that our intelligence services did observe what was going on in Wuhan and reported it up the chain and now they are saying they didn't because they are afraid to lose their jobs which is exactly what Trump has done during his purge of the our government... OR... that we had no idea what was going on there?

 

[Aglaopheme]

Yes. At myself for bothering to provide anything to those who are unwilling or incapable of engaging in meaningful discourse.

You stupid, sis?

https://media.giphy.com/media/Vsl4fGedmYFRC/giphy.gif

 

[Comshaw]

Just. Shut. Up.

WaHaHa! FFS. Your come back is just shut up? Really? Damn but you do have those grade school comebacks down pat.

Okay, I'll go with that. All it did was prove you pull most of what you say claim to be true from thin air.

You tell me that my cites are from anonymous reporters, that the numbers I quote and cite don't mean anything and that I know nothing, while at the same time refusing to verify anything you claim as true.

You are a piece of work.

I guess I will shut up. It's frustrating talking to someone who acts and thinks like a child.

TA

Comshaw

 

[zipman]

The science is there in that it doesn't act as a traditional antiviral, the positive is, it, in some cases, seems to be capable of decreasing the viral load, protecting against cell intrusion and slowing ones own immune system, another words, it slows the body's immune system ( antibodies ) from killing one's self and attacking one's organs.

It's complicated at best. It is true that more studies are needed but when used as a preventative regimen it is showing some promise. I never said it was a magic bullet but there are promising studies as well as negative results. It's being used off-label till more clinical studies can be verified.

The problem is that there is little to no guidance on how to take it. I've seen people saying that it should be used as a preventative measure which is insane in my book.

Again, I hope it does work and help patients as I'm at ground zero of this in NYC. But nothing I've seen or read goes beyond some anecdotal data with regards to COVID.

 

[zipman]

WaHaHa! FFS. Your come back is just shut up? Really? Damn but you do have those grade school comebacks down pat.

Okay, I'll go with that. All it did was prove you pull most of what you say claim to be true from thin air.

You tell me that my cites are from anonymous reporters, that the numbers I quote and cite don't mean anything and that I know nothing, while at the same time refusing to verify anything you claim as true.

You are a piece of work.

I guess I will shut up. It's frustrating talking to someone who acts and thinks like a child.

TA

Comshaw

Right wingers are all just cult members at this point.

I would say it was sad if it wasn't so scary.

They repeat lies until they think they are true.

 

[Klinkster]

Right wingers are all just cult members at this point.

I would say it was sad if it wasn't so scary.

They repeat lies until they think they are true.

Left wingers are just Marxists at this point.

I would say it's sad, if it wasn't so scary.

They repeat lies until they think they are true.

 

[icanhelp1]

The problem is that there is little to no guidance on how to take it. I've seen people saying that it should be used as a preventative measure which is insane in my book.

Again, I hope it does work and help patients as I'm at ground zero of this in NYC. But nothing I've seen or read goes beyond some anecdotal data with regards to COVID.

No doubt you guys are going through a rough time of it and we're rooting for you.
The guidance is MED school for now. Sometimes the placebo effect can work miracles and if you're dying to refuse someone a chance I think is unfair.

 

[Conager]

Right wingers are all just cult members at this point.

I would say it was sad if it wasn't so scary.

They repeat lies until they think they are true.

https://www.airforcemedicine.af.mil/News/Biographies/Display/Article/1024443/colonel-dr-r-shane-day/

Here's Col. Day.

Ask him if he said what I said he said or if it is some vast, right wing conspiracy just because every single leftist "news" site ignored his statement.

Or, just contact your favorite left leaning site and point out to them that the vast right wing conspiracy is putting out a phony statement by this actual person. Should be easy enough for them to check and it will be a huge scoop for them to show how the vast right wing conspiracy works.

 

[Comshaw]

Yes. At myself for bothering to provide anything to those who are unwilling or incapable of engaging in meaningful discourse.

You stupid, sis?

Well, I guess I'm not ready to shutup.

So tell me, how can you "engage in meaningful discourse" when you don't trust my opinion and I don't trust yours? When neither one of us will trust what the other claims without some kind of verification? And when one party to the discussion refuses to do that, demands their opinion or what they quote be taken without verification, while discounting and vilifying each and every post from the opposition even if it contains a link to what they consider verification, how is that a balanced and meaningful discussion?

Let me ask it another way, if I am to take everything you post that has no link to a creditable cite or verification as true, are you prepared to do the same for me? And if not why not?

Simple questions. They should be easy for you to answer.

Comshaw

 

[hogjack]

Right wingers are all just cult members at this point.

But the cult's group sex sucks. What's the good of joining a cult without the side benefits?