The latest and greatest "model"!!!

A lot of people did.

Too bad the search function is not a terribly good tool when it comes to pre-2019.

Most of us remember the use of the picture of happy Obama in the golf cart...
Even those who defended his golfing only to find themselves amnesiac now.


:shrug:
 
A lot of people did.

Too bad the search function is not a terribly good tool when it comes to pre-2019.

Most of us remember the use of the picture of happy Obama in the golf cart...
Even those who defended his golfing only to find themselves amnesiac now.


:shrug:

Tell me the search terms you're looking for, I will find it for you :)
 
If you want to "prove" I am lying, then search for the people
who were chastising Obama for playing golf and
the proof will be in the paucity of defense.



No?



It's easy to proclaim, but harder to prove...
 
"All models are wrong; some models are useful."

- George E. P. Box
 
If you want to "prove" I am lying, then search for the people
who were chastising Obama for playing golf and
the proof will be in the paucity of defense.



No?



It's easy to proclaim, but harder to prove...

It must be nap time because you're not even trying anymore.
 
One of the reason that I remember the Obama golf apologies was
because at the time, I was pointing out the hypocrisy of those who
were impugning Bush over golfing leading up to 9-11, but of course,
they had to stop doing that because he stopped golfing...

President Obama never let anything get in the way of golf or hoops.
 
One of the reason that I remember the Obama golf apologies was
because at the time, I was pointing out the hypocrisy of those who
were impugning Bush over golfing leading up to 9-11, but of course,
they had to stop doing that because he stopped golfing...

President Obama never let anything get in the way of golf or hoops.

Then it should make your search to these alleged posts even easier. :)
Wait, you weren't here during the Obama years. :confused:
 
Last edited:
Lying sack of shit.



So every scientist has said this virus is an unknown and yet the anointed one has left a playbook for exactly this type of pandemic. :eek: I inserted pandemic because zipperhead doesn't seem to understand the dif between an epidemic and pandemic. Since Obama never dealt with a pandemic it's hard to qualify his playbook as on the level of a pandemic and a solution to our current situation.

Zipper once again distorting the facts.
 
So every scientist has said this virus is an unknown and yet the anointed one has left a playbook for exactly this type of pandemic. :eek: I inserted pandemic because zipperhead doesn't seem to understand the dif between an epidemic and pandemic. Since Obama never dealt with a pandemic it's hard to qualify his playbook as on the level of a pandemic and a solution to our current situation.

Zipper once again distorting the facts.

See the links. Try reading and educating yourself for a change.

You wouldn't look quite so stupid.
 
See the links. Try reading and educating yourself for a change.

You wouldn't look quite so stupid.



MSNBC, AXIOS, CNN and Vanityfair, really. Objectivity is not their forte and neither is honest reporting.

If those are your sources, well, I'm afraid, you're the stupid one. :cool::D
 
See the links. Try reading and educating yourself for a change.

You wouldn't look quite so stupid.



If you took a moment and did some backward statistical analysis, the rate of spread does not support the numbers China is providing when describing the mortality rate due to the covid-19 outbreak.

The mortality rate figures in China just based on the european models should perhaps be closer to 100,000 to 200,000 with a transmission of 10 to 20 times their lying and dishonest reported levels. Having more realistic data sets and not the anecdotal crap they gave the WHO would have put most countries in a higher sense of urgency and definitely would have changed how we did things in the states. I don't think people realize how destructive not having an accurate person to person transmission rate data sets early on really is, it's everything!!! You go blame whomever you want but the fudging of statistical transmission and mortality rates by China is on par with crimes against humanity and should be prosecuted as such.
 
If you took a moment and did some backward statistical analysis, the rate of spread does not support the numbers China is providing when describing the mortality rate due to the covid-19 outbreak.

The mortality rate figures in China just based on the european models should perhaps be closer to 100,000 to 200,000 with a transmission of 10 to 20 times their lying and dishonest reported levels. Having more realistic data sets and not the anecdotal crap they gave the WHO would have put most countries in a higher sense of urgency and definitely would have changed how we did things in the states. I don't think people realize how destructive not having an accurate person to person transmission rate data sets early on really is, it's everything!!! You go blame whomever you want but the fudging of statistical transmission and mortality rates by China is on par with crimes against humanity and should be prosecuted as such.

Most of the people pointing fingers in all of this are denying the fact that when you don't have actual reliable data, any decisions you make on the data you have will be flawed. This is especially true when the data sources intentionally lie to you prior to and during your decision making process.

It doesn't matter where you get the data, if it's falsified, your decisions will not be based on what's really happening. 20/20 hindsight cannot change this no matter how gleeful the detractors are over it.
 
Back
Top