Apparently the Demmies don't want witnesses

HisArpy

Loose canon extraordinair
Joined
Jul 30, 2016
Posts
43,154
Rand Paul submitted a question which Roberts refused to read because it contained the name of the whistleblower. Paul then left the Senate to tweet the question and read it aloud to the press.

Now there's this:

https://nationalfile.com/democrats-...or-asks-about-obama-holdover-eric-ciaramella/

Apparently the Demmies are afraid that if the people know who the whistleblower is, and his connections to Impeachment Manager Schiffty Schiff, they might change their minds about the propriety of the Impeachment Articles.

It's a shame that the Demmies don't want witnesses and evidence to be presented. They are so afraid that they're willing to call for the Arrest of a US Senator for asking a question while on the floor of the US Senate.

An act for which said US Senator has absolute Constitutional Immunity.
 
Last edited:
Rand Paul submitted a question which Roberts refused to read because it contained the name of the whistleblower. Paul then left the Senate to tweet the question and read it aloud to the press.

Now there's this:

https://nationalfile.com/democrats-...or-asks-about-obama-holdover-eric-ciaramella/

Apparently the Demmies are afraid that if the people know who the whistleblower is, and his connections to Impeachment Manager Schiffty Schiff, they might change their minds about the propriety of the Impeachment Articles.

It's a shame that the Demmies don't want witnesses and evidence to be presented. They are so afraid that they're willing to call for the Arrest of a US Senator for asking a question while on the floor of the US Senate.

For which Rand Paul has Constitutional Immunity.

I suspect the Chief Justice overstepped his authority under the Senate rules. The rules should be changed to say in the event the Chief Justice refuses to read a question the Majority Leader will direct Clerk to read the question.
 
I suspect the Chief Justice overstepped his authority under the Senate rules. The rules should be changed to say in the event the Chief Justice refuses to read a question the Majority Leader will direct Clerk to read the question.

Roberts has always been squishy.

McConnell stood up after Roberts refused to read the question but then sat back down without speaking.

I wonder what he was going to say on that spur of the moment.
 
Rand Paul submitted a question which Roberts refused to read because it contained the name of the whistleblower. Paul then left the Senate to tweet the question and read it aloud to the press.

Now there's this:

https://nationalfile.com/democrats-...or-asks-about-obama-holdover-eric-ciaramella/

Apparently the Demmies are afraid that if the people know who the whistleblower is, and his connections to Impeachment Manager Schiffty Schiff, they might change their minds about the propriety of the Impeachment Articles.

It's a shame that the Demmies don't want witnesses and evidence to be presented. They are so afraid that they're willing to call for the Arrest of a US Senator for asking a question while on the floor of the US Senate.

An act for which said US Senator has absolute Constitutional Immunity.

There's no way he can be arrested. The Dems expose their total lack of constitutional knowledge. The other point is Ciaramella is not a whistleblower under the law, the Chief Justice just gave unwarranted creedence to the notion that he is. This is the second time Roberts has disgraced himself.
 
Roberts has always been squishy.

McConnell stood up after Roberts refused to read the question but then sat back down without speaking.

I wonder what he was going to say on that spur of the moment.

He should have protested the refusal under the rules and ordered the question asked or allow Paul to state his question from his desk. Just my opinion.
 
$248.100,000,000.00 October 2020 Budget Deficit.

Rand Paul submitted a question which Roberts refused to read because it contained the name of the whistleblower. Paul then left the Senate to tweet the question and read it aloud to the press.

Now there's this:

https://nationalfile.com/democrats-...or-asks-about-obama-holdover-eric-ciaramella/

Apparently the Demmies are afraid that if the people know who the whistleblower is, and his connections to Impeachment Manager Schiffty Schiff, they might change their minds about the propriety of the Impeachment Articles.

It's a shame that the Demmies don't want witnesses and evidence to be presented. They are so afraid that they're willing to call for the Arrest of a US Senator for asking a question while on the floor of the US Senate.

An act for which said US Senator has absolute Constitutional Immunity.

Thanks for nothing, assholes!
 
Apparently HisArpy doesn't want to keep politics on in the "Politics" section of the Forum.

Also, his quoted source is garbage.


Media bias fact check National File

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/national-file/

"Overall, we rate National File an extreme right Tin-Foil Hat Conspiracy website based on the promotion of unproven/debunked claims and a Strong Pseudoscience purveyor based on using junk science to support claims. "


Not worth an intelligent response.
 
Last edited:
Jesus. You people need to check post dates. This thread was created long before the mods started moving threads to the Politics Board.
 
Apparently HisArpy doesn't want to keep politics on in the "Politics" section of the Forum.

Also, his quoted source is garbage.


Media bias fact check National File

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/national-file/

"Overall, we rate National File an extreme right Tin-Foil Hat Conspiracy website based on the promotion of unproven/debunked claims and a Strong Pseudoscience purveyor based on using junk science to support claims. "


Not worth an intelligent response.

Rules? I don't need no stinkin' rules!

Comshaw
 
Back
Top