How’s That Impeachment Going?

[Comshaw]

"Documemts?"

Hahahaha

Hey would you like to buy some documentary evidence of who shot JFK? I have it right here on a Post-It note.

Jeremiah 5:21
‘Hear now this, O foolish people, and without understanding; which have eyes, and see not; which have ears, and hear not’


Comshaw

 

[jaF0]

Hey, RocketLauncher

Rockey needs to ask DawnOhDuh what happens to they who post repetitive nonsense.

 

[Rightguide]

Ken Starr

Allan Dershowitz

Vs

Adam Shit and Jerry Blubber Nadler and a NIGGER, MUSLIM, and Sundry crazies

No contest.

 

[Adre]

No contest.

That’s what Mitch has already promised and predicted.

 

[Rightguide]

That’s what Mitch has already promised and predicted.

Can't proceed without any impeachable "facts" to go on.

 

[HisArpy]

Can't proceed without any impeachable "facts" to go on.

I wonder what they progressives would say if the Senate approves a vote to dismiss based on BIPARTISAN votes?

Unless all the TDS sufferers here believe that the D's won't vote to dismiss as a block. And the independents will all vote "present" like Gabbard. It's going to be REALLY interesting if/when we get to that point because if the Demmies in the Senate vote based on political party, then there is no reason for the R's to do anything other than the same.

And voting against a lynch mob isn't exactly a "coverup" is it?

 

[Kantarii]

Finally Someone Says It! Marsha Blackburn: Senators Running for President Must Recuse From Impeachment Trial

https://apple.news/AtzFeHw_ETtKrxR4DykSACQ

Smartest thing said thus far.

 

[jaF0]

^^ Your work release program let you off for the evening, did they?

 

[cowslinger64]

^^ Your work release program let you off for the evening, did they?

What kind of work could kuntari possibly do?


https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRQRhwJxFETgyLzaZyVCM2Kjv-AXgwW_FaU29-o-flkH8MR6nndGg&s

 

[icanhelp1]

I wonder what they progressives would say if the Senate approves a vote to dismiss based on BIPARTISAN votes?

Unless all the TDS sufferers here believe that the D's won't vote to dismiss as a block. And the independents will all vote "present" like Gabbard. It's going to be REALLY interesting if/when we get to that point because if the Demmies in the Senate vote based on political party, then there is no reason for the R's to do anything other than the same.

And voting against a lynch mob isn't exactly a "coverup" is it?

I was thinking the same thing! If the Dems vote on issues in lockstep it will just prove impeachment was a predetermined event and deserves an equal and opposing response. Would look kind of stupid for Dems to blame repubs for being partisan with shit all over their own face.

 

[Conager]

Won't bother them a bit thanks to the fatally flawed HRC campaign they already have their canned response ready to go.

"Whataboutism!"

They are completely immune from charges of hypocrisy because history, if it does not favor them, always started this morning.

Don't compare and contrast their behavior and statements in the kafkaesque impeachment farce. That was then, this is now. Any position they held 20 minutes ago cannot be held against them if it undermines their position now.

 

[jaF0]

What kind of work could kuntari possibly do?

Picking up litter along highways for one.

 

[Conager]

Finally Someone Says It! Marsha Blackburn: Senators Running for President Must Recuse From Impeachment Trial

https://apple.news/AtzFeHw_ETtKrxR4DykSACQ

Smartest thing said thus far.

Given that the alleged offence was Trump supposedly gaining unfair advantage in the upcoming election by having his opponent investigated it sounds like that's pretty much sauce for the gander.

Not to mention the fact even those who aren't voting in the Senate should probably be investigated and jailed for some sort of obstruction of something. These days it seems that obstruction means getting in the way of my narrative.

I mean if Trump can't ask Ukraine for Witnesses and evidence about possible wrongdoing by Bidens, then how can Biden call for Witnesses and evidence in a trial that he's already said he won't be willing to testify in?

The circular reasoning involved here is hilarious.

 

[cowslinger64]

Given that the alleged offence was Trump supposedly gaining unfair advantage in the upcoming election by having his opponent investigated it sounds like that's pretty much sauce for the gander.

Not to mention the fact even those who aren't voting in the Senate should probably be investigated and jailed for some sort of obstruction of something. These days it seems that obstruction means getting in the way of my narrative.

I mean if Trump can't ask Ukraine for Witnesses and evidence about possible wrongdoing by Bidens, then how can Biden call for Witnesses and evidence in a trial that he's already said he won't be willing to testify in?

The circular reasoning involved here is hilarious.

Thanks for your monumental stupidity, professor gav.

 

[Kantarii]

Picking up litter along highways for one.

You know, I posted something relevant to the thread and you posted some BS like a GB retard thinking you’re being cute. So tell us, are you still getting top dollar selling your ass for crack in unpleasantville these days?

 

[jomar]

Finally Someone Says It! Marsha Blackburn: Senators Running for President Must Recuse From Impeachment Trial

https://apple.news/AtzFeHw_ETtKrxR4DykSACQ

Smartest thing said thus far.

Why should they if McConnell and Miss Graham have stated they will break their oath of impartiality.

Thanks for your monumental stupidity, professor gav.

Sometimes I just don’t know how respond to the idiocy. It’s actually fascinating at times and I wonder if it’s really an attempt at performance art.

 

[jaF0]

Sometimes I just don’t know how respond to the idiocy. It’s actually fascinating at times and I wonder if it’s really an attempt at performance art.

That's why I kind of gave up for the most part. You say you like green and they launch into some silly assed diatribe about the color wheel and the various RGB formulations ranting that you weren't specific enough as to which shade of green.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Thanks for your monumental stupidity, professor gav.

Ohhhh more name calling, because cowslinger can't refute, he's not smart enough to put together that many sentences.

That's why I kind of gave up for the most part.

You gave up because you feel, you don't think.

Sometimes I just don’t know how respond to the idiocy.

Neither do Cowslinger or jaF0 or any other lefties...not a single one of you can ANYTHING but name call like a 5 year old.

https://media1.tenor.com/images/63a60d5456a4b38d08b8d30dcf3b1a67/tenor.gif?itemid=4456612

 

[jomar]

...

Neither do Cowslinger or jaF0 or any other lefties...not a single one of you can ANYTHING but name call like a 5 year old.

LOL, better include yourself in that name calling club then.

 

[cowslinger64]

Why should they if McConnell and Miss Graham have stated they will break their oath of impartiality.



Sometimes I just don’t know how respond to the idiocy. It’s actually fascinating at times and I wonder if it’s really an attempt at performance art.

This, exactly.


My morbid fascination with the way they try to think makes me scratch my head.

I get that not everything the media reports trump doing wrong is true. But to deny EVERYTHING?? It's so outlandish as to be hilarious. Then they double down, triple down and beat the dead horse on and on and on as though somehow that makes it true.

I still say, EVERYONE testifies under oath. Repub and Dem. Prosecute them all.

 

[zipman]

Why should they if McConnell and Miss Graham have stated they will break their oath of impartiality.



Sometimes I just don’t know how respond to the idiocy. It’s actually fascinating at times and I wonder if it’s really an attempt at performance art.

It's a staggering level of stupidity and partisan bias.

4 democrats should recuse themselves because of the potential for conflict of interest but multiple republican senators including Graham and McConnell have come right out and said they won't be impartial and that's just fine with these RWCJ mouth breathers.

 

[BotanyBoy]

LOL, better include yourself in that name calling club then.

Difference being I actually have points/positions and argue them.

Sometimes I highlight it with name calling but rather rarely and usually in jest at the bubbling sack of fee fees that just got done calling me names because they can't put forth ANY argument of their own.

This, exactly.


My morbid fascination with the way they try to think makes me scratch my head.

CommieSuckup64, that's because you feel, you don't think.

 

[BotanyBoy]

It's a staggering level of stupidity and partisan bias.

4 democrats should recuse themselves because of the potential for conflict of interest but multiple republican senators including Graham and McConnell have come right out and said they won't be impartial and that's just fine with these RWCJ mouth breathers.

With the staggering level of stupidity and partisan bias coming from the house what were you expecting???

Again....feeling....not thinking.

 

[Kantarii]

In the end, I see Trump being acquitted and the Democrats doubling down on stupid by trying to impeach him a second time.

Anyone wanna bet on that?

If at first you don’t succeed, try again rules apply in their case

 

[icanhelp1]

Why should they if McConnell and Miss Graham have stated they will break their oath of impartiality.



Sometimes I just don’t know how respond to the idiocy. It’s actually fascinating at times and I wonder if it’s really an attempt at performance art.

Refresh my memory, when exactly did McConnell and Graham state that they will break their oath of impartiality?