Rand Paul Puts The Screws To Wobbly Republicans

Whiney Little Ranny belongs in a dunk tank at a carnival sideshow.

In Canada.

I get a kick out of this entire narrative.

Rand Paul is a well known PACIFIST. If he's "threatening" anyone, something has really knocked him out of his usual orbit.

And yet, you go on a rampage scolding him for it while totally missing the point that SOMETHING got under the skin of a pacifist. Perhaps you should look at the Articles of Impeachment to figure out what that could be.
 
He was dishonestly impeached because "Orange Man Bad!!" that's why.



Says the guy who can't cite the laws that Trump violated.

The first article is a joke....asking the Ukraine to investigate corruption in Ukraine isn't soliciting the Ukraine to interfere in the US election just because it's exposing the (D) front runner for being the quintessential dirty dirty old rich white guy (D)'s are allegedly against and consider the enemy.

The second article isn't a crime, and isn't an impeachable offense just because it pisses the house (D)eez off that Trump doesn't just do whatever they say.

Your hero was legally impeached, you retarded fuck. Just shut up about that.
 
Your hero was legally impeached, you retarded fuck. Just shut up about that.


The US House of Representatives ILLEGALLY impeached the President on grounds that aren't Constitutional.

You've been told this over and over again. So, you retarded fuck, STFU with your TDS display.
 
The US House of Representatives ILLEGALLY impeached the President on grounds that aren't Constitutional.

You've been told this over and over again. So, you retarded fuck, STFU with your TDS display.

What grounds? Who told me? Quit lying, asshole.
 
No, it wasn't.

Obstruction of Congress is NOT obstruction of justice.

Congress, when stymied by someone who won't comply with their demands, or someone who exerts a privilege, has ONLY ONE recourse - to seek a court order. It is ONLY AFTER THAT ORDER IS ISSUED AND THE PERSONS SO ORDERED FAILS TO COMPLY that it becomes "obstruction of justice" and/or "contempt of Court".

At this juncture, the House has failed to do what it is Constitutionally mandated to do. Rather than obey their limitations and Constitutional duties, they "invented" a new catchword phrase and have impeached the President on that basis (in part).

The trouble is, the "invented" rationale isn't Constitutional since it is neither "treason, bribery, a high crime or misdemeanor".

I tried to tell him, but I'm not Rachel "Roswell" Maddow.:D
 
Show me where the document defines “high crimes and misdemeanors.”

It doesn't, that however doesn't mean triggering the (D)eez into a temper tantrum qualifies.

Misdemeanors are defined by the law.

High crimes are generally considered to be felonies, also defined by our laws.

But hey...."Because himz makes the (D)eez so angwy!!" fits the "high crimes and misdemeanors" for you and all your #resistance comrades, then you will reap what they sow.
 
Twist yourself into a pretzel if you like, he is impeached and will forever be described as the impeached 45th President of the United States. Your refusal to accept the fact will be ignored by history I can assure you. Btw, I have stated several times here that I want him removed by the voters, not by Congress. And if the Democrats nominate Biden I believe that will come to pass.

Along with being the most formidable and successful President in history.

Biden is all done.
 
What grounds? Who told me? Quit lying, asshole.

Lol, you can't even remember what was posted earlier today, let alone yesterday. Or the day before. Or the day before that. Or the...

The Constitution ONLY allows for impeachment for the enumerated reasons of "Treason, Bribery, High Crimes, or Misdemeanors."

Please note that "Obstruction of Congress" isn't one of the things listed. Nor is it a crime unless you can identify a US code that says so. (Hint: you won't.)

Therefore, the basis for the impeachment isn't within the EXPRESS REASONS laid out in the Founding document. Unless the impeachment fits within those reasons, it is outside the parameters and, therefore, UNCONSTITUTIONAL.

Now, stop being a stupid deflecting fuckwad and STFU for once before your ass cheeks blister from the spanking you're getting.
 
Your hero was legally impeached, you retarded fuck. Just shut up about that.

No, he wasn't.

What grounds? Who told me? Quit lying, asshole.

Exactly...there are no grounds for impeachment.

Upsetting (D)'z and triggering the shit out of socialist scum like yourself isn't good enough for impeachment.

True. She's much smarter and more informed than you.

LOL supports the Alex Jones of the left.....not at all shocking. :D
 
Lol, you can't even remember what was posted earlier today, let alone yesterday. Or the day before. Or the day before that. Or the...

The Constitution ONLY allows for impeachment for the enumerated reasons of "Treason, Bribery, High Crimes, or Misdemeanors."

Please note that "Obstruction of Congress" isn't one of the things listed. Nor is it a crime unless you can identify a US code that says so. (Hint: you won't.)

Therefore, the basis for the impeachment isn't within the EXPRESS REASONS laid out in the Founding document. Unless the impeachment fits within those reasons, it is outside the parameters and, therefore, UNCONSTITUTIONAL.

Now, stop being a stupid deflecting fuckwad and STFU for once before your ass cheeks blister from the spanking you're getting.

Was Trump impeached or not? Now shut the fuck up.
 
Was Trump impeached or not? Now shut the fuck up.

dudly, that's NOT what you've been saying. Or what we've been talking about.

Deflecting to the daily talking point won't change that.

Trump was ILLEGALLY impeached. That you won't recognize that is where the fault lies and you should take your own advice.
 
No, he wasn't.



Exactly...there are no grounds for impeachment.

Upsetting (D)'z and triggering the shit out of socialist scum like yourself isn't good enough for impeachment.



LOL supports the Alex Jones of the left.....not at all shocking. :D

Yes he was. How high are you? And pointing out that Maddow is smarter than that retard doesn't mean I support her. Learn to read.
 
dudly, that's NOT what you've been saying. Or what we've been talking about.

Deflecting to the daily talking point won't change that.

Trump was ILLEGALLY impeached. That you won't recognize that is where the fault lies and you should take your own advice.

This is what not being able to argue your position on it's merit looks like....:D

Yes, he was impeached, on trumped up charges. :cool:

You two window lickers need to get on the same page.
 
True. She's much smarter and more informed than you.

Especially when it comes to things that don't exist or aren't true. Probably what attracts Huggy wearing, marshmallow roasting, tin foil hat wearing, crap consumers, like you. :rolleyes:
 
Yes he was. How high are you?

No, he wasn't, not high enough.

And pointing out that Maddow is smarter than that retard doesn't mean I support her. Learn to read.

Yea, kinda does....especially when you're churching her up.

I'm not the one with the reading problem son. ;)

You two window lickers need to get on the same page.

No....diversity of thought is a good thing.

I know that boggle socialist hive minds like yours but it's true.
 
Back
Top