HisArpy
Loose canon extraordinair
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2016
- Posts
- 43,154
Yeah, no. I caught it.![]()
Yeah, it just slightly didn't come out the way you intended.
Not that it wasn't funny at the time.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah, no. I caught it.![]()
Yeah, it just slightly didn't come out the way you intended.
Not that it wasn't funny at the time.
Three law professors testified before the House committee this morning.
In essence, they said that Trump's behavior more than satisfies the criteria for "high crimes" in the Constitution, as Trump has repeatedly put his own personal profits ahead of the national interest.
I'm surprised the RWCJ Sealion Brigade hasn't shown up yet, they've had quite a bit of practice defendin' the indefensible of late, with their "Party Before Country" mansplainin'.
Jonathan Turley said:“If this Committee elects to seek impeachment on the failure to yield to congressional demands in an oversight or impeachment investigation, it will have to distinguish a long line of cases where prior presidents sought the very same review while withholding witnesses and documents,” Turley said, according to his prepared remarks. “Basing impeachment on this obstruction theory would itself be an abuse of power … by Congress. It would be an extremely dangerous precedent to set for future presidents and Congresses in making an appeal to the Judiciary into ‘high crime and misdemeanor.'”
“In the current case, the record is facially insufficient. The problem is not simply that the record does not contain direct evidence of the President stating a quid pro quo, as Chairman Schiff has suggested,” Turley continued. “The problem is that the House has not bothered to subpoena the key witnesses who would have such direct knowledge. This alone sets a dangerous precedent. A House in the future could avoid countervailing evidence by simply relying on tailored records with testimony from people who offer damning presumptions or speculation.”
“It is not enough to simply shrug and say this is ‘close enough for jazz’ in an impeachment,” Turley added. “The expectation, as shown by dozens of failed English impeachments, was that the lower house must offer a complete and compelling record. That is not to say that the final record must have a confession or incriminating statement from the accused. Rather, it was meant to be a complete record of the key witnesses that establishes the full range of material evidence. Only then could the body reach a conclusion on the true weight of the evidence—a conclusion that carries sufficient legitimacy with the public to justify the remedy of removal.”
Exactly as I said about Coati's claim of "obstruction."
That's really dumb.
Matt Gaetz destroyed all three of the Obama and Clinton donors that testified today. Turley painted a pretty good illustration of the misguided left wing legal orthodoxy of their faculty lounge as well.
What a brilliant pile of analysis, BettyPoop!
Again.....IT DOESN'T MATTER!!!! THE FIX IS ALREADY IN!!!
The House will vote on impeachment.
Polluted Pelosi, will line up her minions, threaten them with loss of DNC campaign funds, and cushy committee jobs, and the House will vote along party lines.
Facts be dammed.
Need a crime? Nope.
The vote will happen.
The articles of impeachment, complete with contrived & supposed crimes, are already drafted. It's just a matter of getting through the dog & pony show.....and then.....away we go!
Orange man bad you know......
Now.......do you have a clue as to what happens after the House vote? I mean....other than all you leftists cumming in your Carr Harts?
Leftists don't wear Car Harts, Red Neck Deplorables do
Leftists don't wear Car Harts, Red Neck Deplorables do
Again.....IT DOESN'T MATTER!!!! THE FIX IS ALREADY IN!!!
The House will vote on impeachment.
Polluted Pelosi, will line up her minions, threaten them with loss of DNC campaign funds, and cushy committee jobs, and the House will vote along party lines.
Facts be dammed.
Need a crime? Nope.
The vote will happen.
The articles of impeachment, complete with contrived & supposed crimes, are already drafted. It's just a matter of getting through the dog & pony show.....and then.....away we go!
Orange man bad you know......
Now.......do you have a clue as to what happens after the House vote? I mean....other than all you leftists cumming in your Carr Harts?
How is it a fix? Did Trump not ask a foreign nation for a personal favor in exchange for a thing? Has he not obstructed justice by disobeying subpoenas in the impeachment process and also doing more in trying to stop the mueller investigation?
No.
No.
And....No.
Read what I wrote. It doesn't matter. Facts don't matter. TDS blinding leftist vision ....who cares?
What part of that don't you understand?
Vote and impeach away......
It's a done deal.
And.....ya'll better know what happens after that.
It will shrivel your little pecker, after all the euphoria of the House vote.
No.
No.
And....No.
Read what I wrote. It doesn't matter. Facts don't matter. TDS blinding leftist vision ....who cares?
What part of that don't you understand?
Vote and impeach away......
It's a done deal.
And.....ya'll better know what happens after that.
It will shrivel your little pecker, after all the euphoria of the House vote.
He then goes on to whine that you can't conduct an impeachment inquiry without all the witnesses ---> he therefore lends support to an Article of Impeachment on Obstruction. Trump is obstructing the inquiry.
He did, did, did.
Facts don’t matter. Seriously? No irony there?
Probably, both in the house and senate.
I don’t know about shriveled peckers. Please tell me about what your experience is so I can help others.
Again....IT DOESN'T FUCKING MATTER!!!
The decision was made to impeach.....long ago, before any hearings started. Got it? A little s-l-o-w to what I'm sayin'?
What part of that don't you understand?
Wanna see a shriveled pecker, just look in the mirror.
Wanna see a shriveled pecker,
Anyone read the Impeachment Report? Did anyone notice the call logs included showing Schiff spied on Nunes, Giuliani, and Lev Parnas? Parnas is under indictment in SDNY for a campaign violation scheme. Those call logs are from ATT and are the product of a National Security Letter (NSL). How did Schiff get his hands on them.
That's bullshit.
Of course, facts don't matter, but the FACT is Nancy Pelosi took shit from Dems for 2 years for resusing to impeach, and Adam Schiff too for that matter. If "all they wanted to do was impeach" they would have done it a loooooong time ago.
Another FACT: The Impeachment didn't start until and because of the WB complaint. That's why Trump is where he is right now. Not because of Dems, not because of TDS, not because of the Fake News, but because Orange Lard-o Fat Ass got caught breaking the law, end of story.