LITEROTICA PODCAST
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

███████████ Impeachment Proceedings On Donald Trump ███████████

Whistleblower started Trump-Ukraine matter, framed issue in way House Dems have adopted for impeachment. Now Chairman Schiff orders GOP: Do not talk about whistleblower in impeachment hearings. If you do, you'll hear from Ethics Committee. http://******/MrCy50x8W76
 
Looks like Rory is going to start hiding from this thread the way he does his Stock Market Thread and his Mueller Investigation Results Thread.

Still doesn't top RDS' shame at his "Obama's Energy Policies Result in a Three Year Low in Gas Prices" thread.
 
Conager said:
Looks like Rory is going to start hiding from this thread the way he does his Stock Market Thread and his Mueller Investigation Results Thread.

Still doesn't top RDS' shame at his "Obama's Energy Policies Result in a Three Year Low in Gas Prices" thread.
Click to expand...

Next week marks four years....FOUR YEARS (November 2015)....since you swore a blood oath to "run me off this board" and protect the likes of Ishmael, CapnAmatrica, Miles and Vetteman from my meanness.

How is that workin' out for ya, little fella? They (and you) have all been banhammered...I'm still standing tall.
 
the end result?

Trump gets re-elected, Liberals cry some more and the Supreme Court goes 6-3. As Nov 3, 2020 nears millions of Liberals will promise to move to Canada, why not Mexico? seems racist to me, hahaha. Liberals triggered in 1...2....3 hahaha.
 
If it worked what would it mean for the future?

If any political party can alter the results of an election by making up shit and tossing it at the POTUS and driving him out of office what would that mean for all future POTUS? If would mean that impeachment would be the new weapon of choice and all political parties would simply over-ride the popular vote. Really a bloodless coup.

It would be the end of any pretext of being a democracy in the USA. The level of hate and division in the country would be the fodder of a civil war. This is not a theory it is just a comment about what has happened to other "democracies" when deep state monsters are really running the show behind the scenes.
 
Gosh, you would think the founding fathers would have thought of that when they gave Congress impeachment powers. In the fucking Constitution.
 
seeshelly said:
If any political party can alter the results of an election by making up shit and tossing it at the POTUS and driving him out of office what would that mean for all future POTUS? If would mean that impeachment would be the new weapon of choice and all political parties would simply over-ride the popular vote. Really a bloodless coup.

It would be the end of any pretext of being a democracy in the USA. The level of hate and division in the country would be the fodder of a civil war. This is not a theory it is just a comment about what has happened to other "democracies" when deep state monsters are really running the show behind the scenes.
Click to expand...

You mean like if he wasn’t held accountable for his obvious and clear extortion and obstruction then every president henceforth could do whatever they wanted? That end of democracy?
 
jomar said:
You mean like if he wasn’t held accountable for his obvious and clear extortion and obstruction then every president henceforth could do whatever they wanted? That end of democracy?
Click to expand...
or maybe it's all the 'made up' stuff that's being related to the american (and world) public via the auspices of all those well-respected, served-their-country, non-political career diplomats and government workers who know how to do their jobs, what constitutes irregularities that need reporting, and -- yanno-- facts? sure, the trump-enablers would rather believe ALL of those, including republican-voting witnesses, are 'making stuff up' because that's what they've been told to think. they cannot think for themselves.
 
butters said:
or maybe it's all the 'made up' stuff that's being related to the american (and world) public via the auspices of all those well-respected, served-their-country, non-political career diplomats and government workers who know how to do their jobs, what constitutes irregularities that need reporting, and -- yanno-- facts? sure, the trump-enablers would rather believe ALL of those, including republican-voting witnesses, are 'making stuff up' because that's what they've been told to think. they cannot think for themselves.
Click to expand...

The counter arguments so far are silly!

You never talked to the president? Proof of something!

Trump sent missiles, Obama sent blankets!

Do you agree with xyz so I can box you into a sound bite? Dude, I’m here as a fact witness.

Corruption! Focus on Biden then, not Trump now!
 
jomar said:
The counter arguments so far are silly!

You never talked to the president? Proof of something!

Trump sent missiles, Obama sent blankets!

Do you agree with xyz so I can box you into a sound bite? Dude, I’m here as a fact witness.

Corruption! Focus on Biden then, not Trump now!
Click to expand...

The fact that the star witness into the President's intention never spoke to the President is a "silly" counter argument?

The fact that they are allegedly so poutraged that missiles were delayed because that supposedly benefits Russia and were not the least but concerned that Obama refused all military aid is a "silly" argument?

Trump looking into corruption, including Biden, is corruption?

Your team's television star lawyer led the witness on every single question. You don't get to whine about asking a witness to be specific in his testimony.
 
The worst part about this impeachment probe is that it's looking more and more as if John Bolton.....John motherfucking war-hawk Bolton!.....is the nominal "hero" in this sad affair, by going behind Trump's back and releasing the Ukranian aid money.
 
Gavager said:
Looks like Rory is going to start hiding from this thread the way he does his Stock Market Thread and his Mueller Investigation Results Thread.

Still doesn't top RDS' shame at his "Obama's Energy Policies Result in a Three Year Low in Gas Prices" thread.
Click to expand...

Look at you go! Rory, Rob and Obama all in one shot.

Nobody gets triggered quite like you do, Prof Gav. lol
 
Conager said:
The fact that the star witness into the President's intention never spoke to the President is a "silly" counter argument?

The fact that they are allegedly so poutraged that missiles were delayed because that supposedly benefits Russia and were not the least but concerned that Obama refused all military aid is a "silly" argument?

Trump looking into corruption, including Biden, is corruption?

Your team's television star lawyer led the witness on every single question. You don't get to whine about asking a witness to be specific in his testimony.
Click to expand...

Trump looking into corruption is just like OJ looking for Nicoles killer.


You're a vile pig.
 
Conager said:
The fact that the star witness into the President's intention never spoke to the President is a "silly" counter argument?

The fact that they are allegedly so poutraged that missiles were delayed because that supposedly benefits Russia and were not the least but concerned that Obama refused all military aid is a "silly" argument?

Trump looking into corruption, including Biden, is corruption?

Your team's television star lawyer led the witness on every single question. You don't get to whine about asking a witness to be specific in his testimony.
Click to expand...

Two joke witnesses. How can you be a witness when you haven't actually witnessed anything?
 
Rightguide said:
Two joke witnesses. How can you be a witness when you haven't actually witnessed anything?
Click to expand...

They keep selectively comparing this to a grand jury to an investigation or any other number of not very analogous processes, then they ignore everything that you would do if you were doing any such thing.

If This Were any kind of Investigation the only value that these witnesses have is two point investigator to whoever told them something first hand. It doesn't matter what they heard from people it matters with those people said and what they knew that permitted them just say it.

In a courtroom it would be stricken as hearsay. You don't put someone on the stand to testify that they heard that someone heard something.

What they're really offended by was that they were not on the phone call and they were not consulted after or before the phone call. The fact that they were cut out of the loop is what they're complaining about.

The Whistleblower was offended that he couldn't leak private conversations between world leaders anymore because he got caught and kicked out of the White House.

They were mortified that they couldn't get to these conversations in order to selectively leak portions of them because they were put on a more secure, non-State Department server to keep these assholes from doing just that.

They set this thing in motion assuming that the memorandum of the call wouldn't be released. Then they were going to claim that he was hiding something. When he didn't hide it now there just left spluttering
 
Conager said:
They keep selectively comparing this to a grand jury to an investigation or any other number of not very analogous processes, then they ignore everything that you would do if you were doing any such thing.

If This Were any kind of Investigation the only value that these witnesses have is two point investigator to whoever told them something first hand. It doesn't matter what they heard from people it matters with those people said and what they knew that permitted them just say it.

In a courtroom it would be stricken as hearsay. You don't put someone on the stand to testify that they heard that someone heard something.

What they're really offended by was that they were not on the phone call and they were not consulted after or before the phone call. The fact that they were cut out of the loop is what they're complaining about.

The Whistleblower was offended that he couldn't leak private conversations between world leaders anymore because he got caught and kicked out of the White House.

They were mortified that they couldn't get to these conversations in order to selectively leak portions of them because they were put on a more secure, non-State Department server to keep these assholes from doing just that.

They set this thing in motion assuming that the memorandum of the call wouldn't be released. Then they were going to claim that he was hiding something. When he didn't hide it now there just left spluttering
Click to expand...

They were mortified as well that Trump had a different approach to foreign policy or that he might assert his Constitutional right to fire any Ambassador at will. What planet do these self absorbed Twinkies think they live on?
 
How can anyone vote for someone to be president when it's glaringly obvious that they are lacking any sense oh dignity, ethics or humanity?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

RoryN
Trump has started talking about dying & going to heaven
2
Replies
42
Views
546
MajorRewrite
M
RoryN
Deplorable mascot, #1 Trump fanboy "QAnon Shaman": Then vs Now
Replies
7
Views
144
stxjimmy
S
RoryN
Judge rules Trump illegally deployed National Guard to L.A.
2
Replies
33
Views
198
BabyBoomer50s
BabyBoomer50s
P
Trump demands pollsters be investigated for "election fraud"
Replies
16
Views
383
SluttyTheresa
S
P
Congressman introduces articles of impeachment against Trump
2
Replies
45
Views
862
BrightShinyGirl
BrightShinyGirl
Back
Top