So, "women and children first" isn't a thing?

[LJ_Reloaded]

http://www.sullysullenberger.com/mi...soaked-and-freezing-but-they-were-also-alive/

“It was bad, man,” Kolodjay said. But he and others spoke of a sense of calm and purpose that quickly descended on the passengers and crew as the plane started filling with water and rescue boats swarmed to the scene. They decided women and children would be evacuated first.

Fake news, maybe?

 

[Curmudgeonly]

You could always wear a dress, putz

 

[badbabysitter]

Exceptions do not prove the rule

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...an-for-himself-on-a-sinking-ship-7987975.html

 

[Ann_Tagonist]

The origins of 'women and children first' and the Birkenhead Drill

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

Exceptions do not prove the rule

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...an-for-himself-on-a-sinking-ship-7987975.html

Feminists are more likely to sacrifice men in an emergency

You can sit the fuck back down now.

 

[badbabysitter]

Feminists are more likely to sacrifice men in an emergency

You can sit the fuck back down now.

I never got up mansplainer, your link does nothing to support your indignity over your lack of knowledge concerning this thread


also, your link also says girls are more likely to be forced into child marriage, is that a win for you too?

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

I never got up mansplainer, your link does nothing to support your indignity over your lack of knowledge concerning this thread

What lack of knowledge? Oh yes, you lack the reading skills to comprehend what was written in that article:

In a second test, the women were given a hypothetical situation where they had to sacrifice one person to save a group. They were once again shown gender stereotypes subliminally. Results showed that feminists were much more likely to sacrifice the person if it was a man, compared with the nonfeminists.

It means that feminists are willing to sacrifice men's lives when it comes time to save a group during a dire emergency. Feminists - you know, others like you.

Do you get it yet or do I need to draw this out for your tiny dinosaur brain in fucking crayon?

also, your link also says girls are more likely to be forced into child marriage, is that a win for you too?

Speaking as a man who wishes he could send Captain Marvel to take Offred's place, to answer your retarded question with "fuck no, you crazy douchebag" would not even remotely suffice.

 

[oggbashan]

In the Herald of Free Enterprise disaster, many men helped women and children to escape from the sinking ship.

Male crew members more likely to survive? Of course they are. They are more likely to be on deck or close to it than passengers and are trained in survival. They are also likely to man the lifeboats.

Often the difference between survival and not is physical strength and height. In an overturned ship being able to reach a ceiling, or to be taller than the depth of water, or able to hang on against incoming water, can be important factors. Women and children are at a disadvantage.

 

[Go_Fuck_Yourself]

https://media1.tenor.com/images/0b6fca48c873d659d7240822024c39f3/tenor.gif?itemid=14719353 https://media.tenor.com/images/a4036e99181a02a70f230a483f7c5a52/tenor.gif

 

[domroger]

The origins of 'women and children first' and the Birkenhead Drill

Thanks for the post .
I remembered the incident but could not recall the name of the ship .

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

In the Herald of Free Enterprise disaster, many men helped women and children to escape from the sinking ship.

Male crew members more likely to survive? Of course they are. They are more likely to be on deck or close to it than passengers and are trained in survival. They are also likely to man the lifeboats.

Often the difference between survival and not is physical strength and height. In an overturned ship being able to reach a ceiling, or to be taller than the depth of water, or able to hang on against incoming water, can be important factors. Women and children are at a disadvantage.

So you think men should sacrifice their lives for women? I promise you if that's me on that ship, a hide-a-gun will come out if someone makes me wait to get out of danger's way. Hell will break loose.

Actually, this is why I will never set foot on a ship again. Or, probably, an airplane. Or venture anywhere else that "women and children first" becomes a policy. I can and will vote with my wallet and my feet. I encourage other men to do that, too. Our absence will shut a lot of industries down completely and force a total attitude readjustment. A boycott has real devastating force if applied by large enough numbers.

 

[oggbashan]

...

Our absence will shut a lot of industries down completely and force a total attitude readjustment. A boycott has real devastating force if applied by large enough numbers.

WW1 and WW2 and 'Rosie the Riveter' show that you are mistaken.

As far as I am concerned, women and children first is sensible because I am already dying.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

WW1 and WW2 and 'Rosie the Riveter' show that you are mistaken.

As far as I am concerned, women and children first is sensible because I am already dying.

LOL Rosie the Riveter quit her job in the middle of the war. Even if she didn't, she could not solve the economic and funding problem that would come from cutting the boat and general public transportation ridership BY HALF.

And speak for yourself, but the rest of us men want to survive such a disaster and these feminist shit turds making us stand back and die to save the women are risking themselves a revolt. That doesn't end well even for the monkeys on these planes or ships with guns. This ain't the 1910s anymore.

 

[badbabysitter]

LOL Rosie the Riveter quit her job in the middle of the war. .

Wait? A fictional character quit their job in the middle of the war?

Scandalous

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

Wait? A fictional character quit their job in the middle of the war?

Scandalous

Holy shit woman don't you ever get tired of making a fool of yourself?

 

[Biggs_Darklighter]

Holy shit woman don't you ever get tired of making a fool of yourself?

That article doesn't say what you seem to think it says.

 

[oggbashan]

...

And speak for yourself, but the rest of us men want to survive such a disaster and these feminist shit turds making us stand back and die to save the women are risking themselves a revolt. That doesn't end well even for the monkeys on these planes or ships with guns. This ain't the 1910s anymore.

Which only shows you as an entitled and selfish asshole.

But we knew that.

 

[badbabysitter]

Holy shit woman don't you ever get tired of making a fool of yourself?

The article doesn't quite say what you think it does, close, but not quite

But lets discuss the other aspects of the article, you're okay with her image being used without her permission and no recompense? How women were discouraged and forced from wartime jobs


Also Rosie is fictional, the model whose likeness was used with out consent is a real person

Its like saying Chewbacca is dead because Peter Mayhew is

And let me know how that boycott of a phrase (used to describe something legally non binding which generally doesn't happen in the first place according to actual studies) turns out for you

 

[OldJourno]

So you think men should sacrifice their lives for women? I promise you if that's me on that ship, a hide-a-gun will come out if someone makes me wait to get out of danger's way.

Any excuse to shoot another dog, eh?

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

That article doesn't say what you seem to think it says.

Geraldine Doyle didn’t realize she was Rosie the Riveter until the early 1980s, when she saw the image in a magazine. Only she had never flexed her bicep for the original picture.
A reporter snapped her photo as the 17-year-old worked in a Michigan metal-stamping factory in 1942. Later, illustrator J. Howard Miller used Doyle’s image as a model for the now-iconic “We Can Do It!” poster, now a worldwide feminist coat of arms.
Ironically, the young woman quit the factory after two weeks, afraid an injury might prevent her from playing cello.

1) Rosie the Riveter was based on real woman; who

2) Promptly quit after two weeks.

It says exactly everything I was saying.

Which only shows you as an entitled and selfish asshole.

But we knew that.

If not wanting to die is being a selfish asshole then fuck you and the horse you rode in on, I'm gonna live at all costs.

At all fucking costs.

Darwin favors survivors. Survival uber alles.

The article doesn't quite say what you think it does, close, but not quite

But lets discuss the other aspects of the article, you're okay with her image being used without her permission and no recompense? How women were discouraged and forced from wartime jobs


Also Rosie is fictional, the model whose likeness was used with out consent is a real person

Its like saying Chewbacca is dead because Peter Mayhew is

And let me know how that boycott of a phrase (used to describe something legally non binding which generally doesn't happen in the first place according to actual studies) turns out for you

1) Rosie the Riveter was based on real woman; who

2) Promptly quit after two weeks.

You can sit the fuck down now.

As for the boycott, hey, I am always winning. I'll never have to be forced to wait behind a woman to be rescued in a disaster. Winning, baby.