Tulsi's Secret Surge

[SEVERUSMAX]

The DNC-approved polls mysteriously won't reflect this, but nearly every other poll shows Hawaii Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard, the first ever female combat veteran to run for President, surging, and at least one poll has her at 6%, putting her in fourth place in New Hampshire. If this trend continues, debate or no debate, Tulsi could emerge as the biggest upset candidate of them all. Say she does shockingly well in Iowa, New Hampshire, maybe even Nevada or California, what then?

Meanwhile, Kamala's numbers are tanking rapidly, in free fall to be frank. Her numbers are collapsing so rapidly she'll soon be competing with Klobuchar, de Blasio, and several others for dead last. What does it say that she's running behind Andrew Yang in her home state of California? Nothing good, that much is clear. Maybe using people for slave labor past their prison terms is bad politics after all? Maybe fighting to keep innocent people locked up is bad politics? Maybe jail isn't the best solution for truancy? Looks that way to me.

 

[JackLuis]

Tulsi says, "Trump is not our Pimp!"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Jo...EKujWbboZU1B1Cwdyr9jdBl7W4MsBQ9qCFCqVnVZ5-Z4I

Suck it Donnie!

 

[BotanyBoy]

She loves the USA and isn't a radical intersectional leftist....making her basically a Nazi.

The (D)'s will never run her.

 

[SEVERUSMAX]

I see her as a progressive, but the kind of progressive that I would be, willing to stand up for progressive values when necessary, but also work with other groups when there is common ground on a particular issue, on the merits.

 

[SEVERUSMAX]

Tulsi is the best candidate the Democrats have right now, and predictably, they're doing everything they can to ignore her.

She's also kinda hot....

Finally, some things where we agree.

 

[SEVERUSMAX]

The DNC-approved polls mysteriously won't reflect this, but nearly every other poll shows Hawaii Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard, the first ever female combat veteran to run for President, surging, and at least one poll has her at 6%, putting her in fourth place in New Hampshire. If this trend continues, debate or no debate, Tulsi could emerge as the biggest upset candidate of them all. Say she does shockingly well in Iowa, New Hampshire, maybe even Nevada or California, what then?

Meanwhile, Kamala's numbers are tanking rapidly, in free fall to be frank. Her numbers are collapsing so rapidly she'll soon be competing with Klobuchar, de Blasio, and several others for dead last. What does it say that she's running behind Andrew Yang in her home state of California? Nothing good, that much is clear. Maybe using people for slave labor past their prison terms is bad politics after all? Maybe fighting to keep innocent people locked up is bad politics? Maybe jail isn't the best solution for truancy? Looks that way to me.

Well, this has aged well, hasn't it? Tulsi's now at 5% in New Hampshire, Kamala's at 3%, and Tulsi's at 4% nationally in recent polls. Kamala, do you feel her breathing down your neck as you grasp at straws to stay relevant?

 

[BotanyBoy]

I see her as a progressive, but the kind of progressive that I would be, willing to stand up for progressive values when necessary, but also work with other groups when there is common ground on a particular issue, on the merits.

Define "progressive"

 

[Boxlicker101]

Tulsi has a good chance of winning in Iowa. Personally, I would vote for her in preference to most, maybe all the other Dem candidates.

 

[JackLuis]

I see Tulsi in being the "Moderate we can accept" by a lot of people who wouldn't vote for Trump, butt...are not comfortable with Wild Eyed Tax Raisers!

She's got a lot of things going that will appeal to Dems and Repub lite's.

I think she would enforce the law in a legit manor, and won't start another war, without good reason and then with massive force!

She doesn't come off as a larger than life, Princess, which makes some think they can dominate her, to their dismay.

She could get more votes if she was given a larger audience. The LSM has no interest in having an orderly market place of ideas, they've got eyeballs to grab!

She needs to speak out more about the disarray that Trump scatters thru our Government with his sleezeball Cabinet. Then she can call of a return of a lot less disruption of the agencies that provide the controls for the economy and infrastructure. Plus she can continue to talk about the 'subsidies' we give to Pharma by not allowing the government to negotiate prices for drugs. Except for the VA.

She could talk about Ike's last address and tamp down the Chicken hawks, saving billions and probably retiring a few Generals, they're damned expensive!

 

[jaF0]

From what little I've read, she's more of an R than a D. Not someone I would support.

 

[BotanyBoy]

From what little I've read, she's more of an R than a D. Not someone I would support.

Can't have a liberal!!!

Gotta be a full on communist.



Why do progressives hate the USA so much??

Further more why don't they get the fuck out??

There are dozens of socialist shit hole for them to choose from where they would get the EXACT policies they desire.

 

[YDB95]

Can't have a liberal!!!

Gotta be a full on communist.



Why do progressives hate the USA so much??

Further more why don't they get the fuck out??

There are dozens of socialist shit hole for them to choose from where they would get the EXACT policies they desire.

Can't you at least vary your insults a bit?

 

[BotanyBoy]

Can't you at least vary your insults a bit?

Why? That one is right on target.

 

[domroger]

Can't you at least vary your insults a bit?

I have on iggy .
But to respond to the quote ,since Republicans are in the minority perhaps they should leave .

 

[BotanyBoy]

I have on iggy .
But to respond to the quote ,since Republicans are in the minority perhaps they should leave .

Because the Republicans aren't the ones that hate the USA and want it destroyed.

 

[jaF0]

From what little I've read, she's more of an R than a D. Not someone I would support.

This seems to have been changed since last I read it and appears to be more favorable:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulsi_Gabbard

 

[JackLuis]

The View erupts after Joy Behar goes hard after Tulsi Gabbard on Russia and Fox News appearances

“The View” co-host Joy Behar accused Rep. Tulsi Gabbard to her face of being a Russian asset and Republican dupe.

The Hawaii Democrat has faced those allegations from Hillary Clinton and others, but she vehemently denies the claims, which she finds insulting and offensive.

“I know Hillary Clinton thinks you’re a witting asset,” Behar said. “You might be unwitting. Not that that means you’re stupid, but people can be used.”

Gabbard insisted the suggestion was an attack on her intelligence, but Behar moved on with another line of attack.

“One more question,” Behar said. “You’re on state TV all the time. Why do you go on the Fox channel? It’s a propaganda network — 16 times with Tucker Carlson. I never see you with Chris Wallace or that other guy. What’s his name? Bret Baier. They are middle of the road. Why do you go on with Tucker, who is a liar and a propagandist?”

“You raised a second issue about why I go on Fox News,” Gabbard said. “I go on Tucker Carlson, go on Bret Baier, go on Sean Hannity, go on MSNBC, go on CNN. I am here to speak to every single American in this country about the unifying leadership that I want to bring as president, not just speak to those who agree with me, but to speak to those who may disagree.”

Joy appears to be carrying water for HRC and the DNC, who are afraid of Tulsi's broad appeal to Rino's. Even Hillary said she "mispoke", when she meant that it was Repubs not Russians who were promoting Tulsi.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Joy appears to be carrying water for HRC and the DNC, who are afraid of Tulsi's broad appeal to Rino's. Even Hillary said she "mispoke", when she meant that it was Repubs not Russians who were promoting Tulsi.

It would be nice to have a liberal (D) option vs. Trump instead of some anti-American socialist scum bag like Warren or Sandaz.

 

[SEVERUSMAX]

I prefer to think of Tulsi as an old-school, JFK-style liberal Democrat. Progressive, but in a sane way, not full of tribalist, woke, butthurt politics. Not refusing to sit down with the opposition. Willing to maintain civil discourse and work together on areas of common ground, instead of an unnatural partisan mindless bloc, where everyone must march in lockstep together. Just my take. She's also a lot better at articulating her patriotism than many of my fellow progressives are at times.

 

[KeithD]

[ Even Hillary said she "mispoke", when she meant that it was Repubs not Russians who were promoting Tulsi.

Citation? What I heard was the NYT saying they misnoted that it was the Russians rather than the Republicans?

 

[Ziggins]

She won't get nominated this time, but she is set for 2024...or her party could make her Speaker to lead them out of the swamp.

 

[SlipInCider]

Once Tulsi turned her back on the DNC, she basically sealed her fate. They will never accept her. Shame because she and Andrew Yang are showing as candidates who can actually beat Trump.

Oh well...the MSM want another 4 years of Trump. Get ready.

 

[YDB95]

She won't get nominated this time, but she is set for 2024...or her party could make her Speaker to lead them out of the swamp.

She isn't running for re-election to the House, and I can't imagine how she could get elected to anything within the Democratic caucus with some of the positions she has staked out.

 

[BotanyBoy]

She won't get nominated this time, but she is set for 2024...or her party could make her Speaker to lead them out of the swamp.

Nope....her party is being taken over by "progressive" socialist like Warren, Sandaz, AOC , Waters and the rest of the loony toonz left. AKA the swamp.

Tulsi is a liberal....that means she's supportive of alls sorts of fascistic ideas like free speech, not warmongering about for shits n' giggles and individuals owning private property.

This makes her an alt-right adjacent pseudo-Nazi in the eyes of her party, which is why they are shitting all over her as much as they can.

If she is to make it she will almost certainly do so as an (R).....the more liberal party.

I prefer to think of Tulsi as an old-school, JFK-style liberal Democrat.

She is....100% totally agree with you.

That's why she's smeared by "progressives" as alt-(R)ight adjacent PUTIN PUPPET FASCIST!!! LOL Russia Russia Russia!!

Progressive, but in a sane way, not full of tribalist, woke, butthurt politics.

So not at all "progressive" .

She's also a lot better at articulating her patriotism than many of my fellow progressives are at times.

That's because she actually has some.

When "progress" means shit canning everything the USA is about because it's so horrible for the exact opposite it's hard to claim any patriotism.

She isn't running for re-election to the House, and I can't imagine how she could get elected to anything within the Democratic caucus with some of the positions she has staked out.

She won't be.....she's a liberal, the majority of (D)'s have become authoritarian and do NOT like her for that.

 

[Ziggins]

Nope....her party is being taken over

Until next year's overwhelming defeat makes them finally reassess. If they can relearn the basics of meeting, hearing, and working with and for a wider range of citizens, including the deplorables, that puts them a step ahead of anyone who refuses to work with librul commies.