Yup....nothing but stupid memes is what you have to offer.
Thanks for proving my point bugfucker.
Thanks for proving my point bugfucker.
███████████ Impeachment Proceedings On Donald Trump ███████████
- Thread starter RoryN
- Start date
jaF0
Moderator
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2009
- Posts
- 39,168
... working on their post count.
Talk about someone.......
....who is a ignorant misguided leftist wacko asshole.......
IT'S JEFFRO!!!!!!
Curmudgeonly
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2014
- Posts
- 861
That does seem to be the problem.
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2015
- Posts
- 19,247
He’s a trick to be certain.
You are phlegm....to be certain.....
LincolnDuncan
Thread hijacker
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2015
- Posts
- 6,648
adrina
Heretic
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2017
- Posts
- 25,430
Ha. He is definitely predictable at this point. Who wants to take a bet he'll employ some grade school playground style insults in reply to this post? Apparently I'm Twat and you're Phlegm. Or maybe he'll reach into his "fertile" imagination and come up with some equally sophisticated monikers.
He's turned himself into a caricature.
Sad to see you cunti.....period.
Still doing nothing but being an insulting twat.
That is your style......
Maybe you should shut the fuck up?
Naw....you are too smart for that....
juttjaw
Don't fence me in
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2011
- Posts
- 4,797
adrina
Heretic
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2017
- Posts
- 25,430
A stupid caricature! Stupid.
And lacking in style.
You are just lacking in brains.....or in your case....brain cells.
You only have a couple.
One is on days off.
The other, is on drugs.
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2015
- Posts
- 19,247
I’m good with calling Nancy the instigator.
I’m also good with an impeachment playlist.
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2015
- Posts
- 19,247
Must include Talking Heads.
juttjaw
Don't fence me in
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2011
- Posts
- 4,797
RoryN
You're screwed.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2003
- Posts
- 61,291
White House Ukraine expert to testify he reported concerns about Trump-Zelensky call
Washington (CNN) — The National Security Council's top Ukraine expert plans to tell House impeachment investigators on Tuesday that he was so troubled by President Donald Trump's July phone call with Ukraine's President that he reported his concerns to a superior, according to a copy of his opening statement obtained by CNN.
"I was concerned by the call. I did not think it was proper to demand that a foreign government investigate a U.S. citizen, and I was worried about the implications for the U.S. government's support of Ukraine," Army Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman plans to tell lawmakers, according to his opening statement. "I realized that if Ukraine pursued an investigation into the Bidens and Burisma, it would likely be interpreted as a partisan play which would undoubtedly result in Ukraine losing the bipartisan support it has thus far maintained."
"This would all undermine U.S. national security. Following the call, I again reported my concerns to NSC's lead counsel."
https://www-m.cnn.com/2019/10/28/po...ony/index.html?r=https**A**F**Fwww.cnn.com**F
SgtSpiderMan
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2003
- Posts
- 28,210
White House Ukraine expert to testify he reported concerns about Trump-Zelensky call
Washington (CNN) — The National Security Council's top Ukraine expert plans to tell House impeachment investigators on Tuesday that he was so troubled by President Donald Trump's July phone call with Ukraine's President that he reported his concerns to a superior, according to a copy of his opening statement obtained by CNN.
"I was concerned by the call. I did not think it was proper to demand that a foreign government investigate a U.S. citizen, and I was worried about the implications for the U.S. government's support of Ukraine," Army Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman plans to tell lawmakers, according to his opening statement. "I realized that if Ukraine pursued an investigation into the Bidens and Burisma, it would likely be interpreted as a partisan play which would undoubtedly result in Ukraine losing the bipartisan support it has thus far maintained."
"This would all undermine U.S. national security. Following the call, I again reported my concerns to NSC's lead counsel."
https://www-m.cnn.com/2019/10/28/po...ony/index.html?r=https**A**F**Fwww.cnn.com**F
Glad there are some patriots out there.
RoryN
You're screwed.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2003
- Posts
- 61,291
Rightguide
Prof Triggernometry
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2017
- Posts
- 68,663
White House Ukraine expert to testify he reported concerns about Trump-Zelensky call
Washington (CNN) — The National Security Council's top Ukraine expert plans to tell House impeachment investigators on Tuesday that he was so troubled by President Donald Trump's July phone call with Ukraine's President that he reported his concerns to a superior, according to a copy of his opening statement obtained by CNN.
"I was concerned by the call. I did not think it was proper to demand that a foreign government investigate a U.S. citizen, and I was worried about the implications for the U.S. government's support of Ukraine," Army Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman plans to tell lawmakers, according to his opening statement. "I realized that if Ukraine pursued an investigation into the Bidens and Burisma, it would likely be interpreted as a partisan play which would undoubtedly result in Ukraine losing the bipartisan support it has thus far maintained."
"This would all undermine U.S. national security. Following the call, I again reported my concerns to NSC's lead counsel."
https://www-m.cnn.com/2019/10/28/po...ony/index.html?r=https**A**F**Fwww.cnn.com**F
The issue is dead, it has collapsed.
^^^Wishful thinking.
It ain't dead yet. Il Dookie will be impeached, so there is more teeth gnashing to come for the Deplorables. Trump will have to deal with being the first impeached President to run for re-election. Boo hoo.
If extorting favors from Ukraine is the main charge, the Senate will likely decide that it is fine for a President to pressure foreign governments to help with his election campaigns, as long as that President has an R beside his name. A few Republican Senators will break rank with the Deplorables, but not enough to swing a two-thirds majority to convict.
I don't know how the election will turn out. Too many variables there. Depends on who runs and what gets uncovered.
Meanwhile, much whining and fit-throwing by the Deplorables. They are terminal victims-- it's just their nature. Super serious egos and no sense of integrity or personal responsibility, so there will be plenty of opportunities to toy with them on the GB
Boxlicker101
Licker of Boxes
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2003
- Posts
- 33,665
You are mistaken. In 2000, Clinton was not eligible to run for reelection. In 1868, Andrew Johnson, the only other impeached president, did run for reelection, but did not win the nomination.
https://www.270towin.com/1868_Election/
Similar threads
