LITEROTICA PODCAST
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

███████████ Impeachment Proceedings On Donald Trump ███████████

https://www.politico.com/news/2019/10/28/donald-trump-muller-grand-jury-material-059893

The Trump administration is appealing a judge’s ruling requiring the Justice Department to give the House Judiciary Committee grand jury materials related to former special counsel Robert Mueller’s report.

The decision Friday from Chief Judge Beryl Howell of U.S. District Court in Washington effectively put the onus on the Justice Department to persuade the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals or, perhaps, the Supreme Court, to reverse her ruling.
Click to expand...
But Trump and Barr said that Mueller exonerated Trump, and everyone is demanding transparency. Why would they block the grand jury materials, unless they show that he's guilty as hell?
 
Why are Trump and cronies mounting such an obstructionist campaign at all if they aren't guilt as sin of multiple crimes/corruptions? The Trumpettes here certainly don't want to deal with that. They'd rather wallow with Trump in the slime.
 
coati said:
Gosh and golly gee whiz, is it possible that the Deplorables really don't want transparency? :confused:
Click to expand...



For the protection of witnesses. Nadler can get them anytime he wants. I believe if Barr appeals to a higher court he will win. Congress can't keep a secret. I believe the Judge is wrong.
 
Klinkster said:
Why don't you read, and study a little bit, about grand juries, so you don't ask stupid questions.
Click to expand...



You can post the correct responses a thousand times, they don't get it. Grand jury testimony is protected testimony. They got a court order and so far won and the judge was wrong to give it a green light. If it's leaked, you can expect witnesses to plead the 5th in the future.

Howell is a Barack appointee, just saying, how deep is the deep state?
 
Last edited:
icanhelp1 said:
You can post the correct responses a thousand times, they don't get it. Grand jury testimony is protected testimony. They got a court order and so far won and the judge was wrong to give it a green light. If it's leaked, you can expect witnesses to plead the 5th in the future.
Click to expand...

That's why I told 'em to look it up themselves.
They won't. They don't care.

They have TDS. Terminal TDS. Listen for their little craniums as they explode. It could happen at any time.
 
Rightguide said:
Because the law says to.
Click to expand...

Oh, so the law matters.

I think there is a disagreement about how the law applies to granting restricted Congressional access to the entire Mueller report, hence the lawsuit. And also, same reason for a lawsuit regarding access to Trump's IRS returns-- wanting a court ruling on the law.

And, if you don't think the law is being followed in the first part of this impeachment inquiry, why are the Republicans not suing Schiff for setting rules about which Congressional reps can attend the initial interviews with witnesses? Is that complaining about transparency a "law thing" or just whining?

Just asking...
 
coati said:
Oh, so the law matters.

I think there is a disagreement about how the law applies to granting restricted Congressional access to the entire Mueller report, hence the lawsuit. And also, same reason for a lawsuit regarding access to Trump's IRS returns-- wanting a court ruling on the law.

And, if you don't think the law is being followed in the first part of this impeachment inquiry, why are the Republicans not suing Schiff for setting rules about which Congressional reps can attend the initial interviews with witnesses? Is that complaining about transparency a "law thing" or just whining?

Just asking...
Click to expand...

A rep can't sue another rep. The heads of each committee were granted access, Nadler wants it available for all the house members. It needs to be in a classified setting for the protection of witnesses. Transparency is not the issue, the law is at issue!
 
Doesn't matter what you 'think' cunti.
Doesn't matter if you agree, or disagree.
It does matter what the law says.
Look it up.
Read it.
Make an opinion based on what the law says.....not what the fuck you want it to say, or some 'expert' tells you it says.


coati said:
Oh, so the law matters.

I think there is a disagreement about how the law applies to granting restricted Congressional access to the entire Mueller report, hence the lawsuit. And also, same reason for a lawsuit regarding access to Trump's IRS returns-- wanting a court ruling on the law.

And, if you don't think the law is being followed in the first part of this impeachment inquiry, why are the Republicans not suing Schiff for setting rules about which Congressional reps can attend the initial interviews with witnesses? Is that complaining about transparency a "law thing" or just whining?

Just asking...
Click to expand...
 
http://forum.literotica.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=2083787&stc=1&d=1572291755
 
Last edited:
Klinkster said:
Doesn't matter what you 'think' cunti.
Doesn't matter if you agree, or disagree.
It does matter what the law says.
Look it up.
Read it.
Make an opinion based on what the law says.....not what the fuck you want it to say, or some 'expert' tells you it says.
Click to expand...

You seem a bit upset, today. :rose:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Rotadom
Trump Strokes Out at 9/11 Memorial
Replies
20
Views
292
Rotadom
Rotadom
RoryN
Trump has started talking about dying & going to heaven
2
Replies
42
Views
639
MajorRewrite
M
RoryN
Deplorable mascot, #1 Trump fanboy "QAnon Shaman": Then vs Now
Replies
7
Views
169
stxjimmy
S
RobDownSouth
Trump Executive Order Adds $100,000 "processing fee" to new H1-B Visas
2 3
Replies
53
Views
458
DanOkeffie
DanOkeffie
RoryN
Judge rules Trump illegally deployed National Guard to L.A.
2
Replies
33
Views
260
BabyBoomer50s
BabyBoomer50s
Back
Top