Hillary Clinton Cleared Of Mishandling Classified Information

[schism666]

HILLARY CLINTON CLEARED OF MISHANDLING CLASSIFIED INFORMATION AFTER 3-YEAR PRIVATE EMAIL PROBE, TRUMP SO FAR SILENT



not a word from trump or his sycophants here

 

[BotanyBoy]

We already got that from the FBI years ago.

Thing is "deliberate" only clears rich (D)'s like Clinton.

"deliberate" doesn't matter when poor people mishandle classified info....they go to prison.

Not that elitism at that level bothers any lefties....as long as it's (D)'s doing it.

Thus Trump, hopefully he does worse and he and his whole crew get over on it, rubbing Clinton elitism fans noses in it the whole way.

 

[schism666]

We already got that from the FBI years ago.

Thing is "deliberate" only clears rich (D)'s like Clinton.

"deliberate" doesn't matter when poor people mishandle classified info....they go to prison.

you're literally watching our current president get away with mishandling classified info and you still say only rich (d)'s get cleared. you're more partisan than moscow mitch.

 

[someoneyouknow]

We already got that from the FBI years ago.

Thing is "deliberate" only clears rich (D)'s like Clinton.

"deliberate" doesn't matter when poor people mishandle classified info....they go to prison.

Not that elitism at that level bothers any lefties....as long as it's (D)'s doing it.

Thus Trump, hopefully he does worse and he and his whole crew get over on it, rubbing Clinton elitism fans noses in it the whole way.

Excuses. That's all we hear from you. As Ben Franklin remarked:

He that is good for making excuses is seldom good for anything else.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Excuses. That's all we hear from you. As Ben Franklin remarked:

He that is good for making excuses is seldom good for anything else.

The ONLY excuses being made here are for HRC by elitist like you...."It wasn't DELIBERATE!!" as if that means fuck all.

Just own up to your elitism, HRC is above the law that puts poor people in prison regularly and you're good with it because (D).

 

[silver gurl]

They are all shit. End of discussion.

 

[heathergives]

https://s24193.pcdn.co/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/funny-hillary-clinton-scandal-memes-entity.jpg

 

[jaF0]

Yer a few hours late wit' yer thread there schizzy. At least two, maybe three other threads beat ya'.

 

[BotanyBoy]

you're literally watching our current president get away with mishandling classified info

When did that happen?

POTUS is no longer CIC?? Since when??

and you still say only rich (d)'s get cleared.

So far that has been the case. Facts are br00tal like that.

you're more partisan than moscow mitch.

Ideologue, not partisan.....being an ideologue with principals is what allows me to so effectively trash party loyalist like yourself when they flip flop around any time they have to church up/defend one of their scum bags.

 

[heathergives]

https://i.imgflip.com/17xrye.jpg

 

[someoneyouknow]

The ONLY excuses being made here are for HRC by elitist like you...."It wasn't DELIBERATE!!" as if that means fuck all.

Just own up to your elitism, HRC is above the law that puts poor people in prison regularly and you're good with it because (D).

Being deliberate is the very thing you uneducated deplorables kept whining about. Now you're whining the report didn't give you what you wanted.

It's like Benghazi all over. Seven Republican-led investigations, where, unlike the con artist's obstruction of justice, Hillary and everyone else who was asked to testify, did so completely and honestly without having to be served a subpoena, without whining it was a witch hunt, and who weren't told not to testify.

Fuck off. You've lost, again. An independent report verified, for at least the second time, there was no criminal intent. A lack of common sense, yes, but not criminal either in nature or by the letter of the law. Remember the law? The thing you buffoons talk about yet come up with excuse after excuse after excuse for why the con artist can violate the law. Talk about elitism.

 

[someoneyouknow]

https://i.imgflip.com/17xrye.jpg

Which is true. The emails which were given to WikiLeaks came from Russian hackers who gained access to other people's emails. It's why the con artist asked Russia to commit more espionage against a U.S. citizen.

 

[FGB]

"SNORT!"

 

[BotanyBoy]

Being deliberate is the very thing you uneducated deplorables kept whining about.

No, that's the irrelevant deflection the left keeps trotting out to mask their elitism.

Intent doesn't matter when you're poor, you fuck up you go to prison.

It should be the same for HRC.

Fuck off. You've lost, again. An independent report verified, for at least the second time, there was no criminal intent.

Again, criminal intent is irrelevant when you're poor.

A lack of common sense, yes, but not criminal either in nature or by the letter of the law. Remember the law?

YES...the law says NOTHING about intent.

That why when poor people fuck up in the slightest? There is no investigation into intent, they just go to prison.

Not that such things matter to elitist (D)'s.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Which is true. The emails which were given to WikiLeaks came from Russian hackers who gained access to other people's emails. It's why the con artist asked Russia to commit more espionage against a U.S. citizen.

GOOD, hopefully he does all sorts of illegal shit and has the FBI/AG make up a bunch of bullshit reasons as to why he's above the law.

Like "criminal intent"......there was no criminal intent when Trump did that, so it's not a crime!!

Good enough for HRC, good enough for Trump.

 

[someoneyouknow]

No, that's the irrelevant deflection the left keeps trotting out to mask their elitism.

Bullshit. All we heard was how Hillary deliberately ignored protocol and deliberately used an "insecure" email server. In fact, the Fox tabloid ran a story about the hugely biased "Judicial Watch" lawsuit to obtain those emails:

Conservative group Judicial Watch had filed a Freedom of information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the State and Justice departments, alleging that Clinton’s email practices represented a deliberate effort to violate the FOIA, Politico reported.​

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/hillary-clintons-use-of-private-email-server-among-gravest-offenses-to-transparency-judge-says

Intent doesn't matter when you're poor, you fuck up you go to prison.

It should be the same for HRC.

Is that like the con artist didn't "intend" to obstruct justice, it just happened, right?

 

[Gypsytag]

you're literally watching our current president get away with mishandling classified info and you still say only rich (d)'s get cleared. you're more partisan than moscow mitch.

Hes an idiot.

 

[schism666]

Hes an idiot.

and too much of a pussy to admit it.

 

[Dribble]

Yer a few hours late wit' yer thread there schizzy. At least two, maybe three other threads beat ya'.

Then my ignore list must be right on. Why should I be forced to read threads created by morons?

 

[BotanyBoy]

Bullshit. All we heard was how Hillary deliberately ignored protocol and deliberately used an "insecure" email server.

Idiots being distracted by the lefts irrelevant obfuscation of "intent".

Is that like the con artist didn't "intend" to obstruct justice, it just happened, right?

Hopefully...and hopefully they actually prove it and never charge him because reasons.

Just like with Hillary.

You and yours deserve to have your noses rubbed in it.

Hes an idiot.

Yet you never manage to refute shit....just ad hominem.

Another Luk/cowslinger/Dribble, mentally stunted at 8 years old, barely literate and name calling is the most advanced form of discussion they are capable of.

 

[Klinkster]

Then my ignore list must be right on. Why should I be forced to read threads created by morons?

Sounds good!

Make sure you add 'Dribble' to your iggy list, as Dribble, is indeed....a moron.

 

[Carnal_Flower]

This report was released by the State Department (R-led) and rabid Trumper Chuck Grassley's office. Also, we should add, in 2019 with Bill Barr's Justice Dept. and a CLinton Deranged POTUS. Has nothing to do with the FBI.

ALL THESE Rs ARE THE ONES CLEARING THE "ELITE" DEM. If that's what you want to bitch about, take it up with the R Party since this is their ruling.

We already got that from the FBI years ago.

Thing is "deliberate" only clears rich (D)'s like Clinton.

"deliberate" doesn't matter when poor people mishandle classified info....they go to prison.

Not that elitism at that level bothers any lefties....as long as it's (D)'s doing it.

Thus Trump, hopefully he does worse and he and his whole crew get over on it, rubbing Clinton elitism fans noses in it the whole way.

 

[BotanyBoy]

ALL THESE Rs ARE THE ONES CLEARING THE "ELITE" DEM.

Not being a partisan tool like you, I don't care about the party.

As long as poor, unpowerful, "little" people don't get an 'intent' defense neither should Clinton.

As long as poor people are ruled by a zero tolerance law, so should rich and elite politicians.

Time to pick one, either national security laws are no longer enforced with poor people because 'intent' makes negligence and incompetence with our national security is ok.... or lock her up.

Can't have it both ways, gotta pick one....or own being a partisan elitist.

 

[someoneyouknow]

Idiots being distracted by the lefts irrelevant obfuscation of "intent".

Riiiiight. Keep coming up with excuses. The law states, unequivocally, there must willful and/or knowing dissemination of classified information to unauthorized persons or entities. Hillary did neither. That is the law. Here is what Comey said the first time this was put through the wash:

“In looking back at our investigations into mishandling or removal of classified information, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts,” Comey said.​

On these facts, meaning the facts of what Hillary did. She did not willfully, knowingly, or deliberately cause classified information to be released. End of case.

Hopefully...and hopefully they actually prove it and never charge him because reasons.

Au contraire mon frere. According to you, one does not have to prove anything. Simply saying a law has been broken is enough. Based on your whining, there is more than enough evidence to have the con artist in jail.

Just like with Hillary.

Considering this the second, third, or even fourth investigation into this matter, and each and every one of them has found the same thing, no willful, knowing, or deliberate release of classified information, there is no issue with Hillary.

You and yours deserve to have your noses rubbed in it.

Yes, you do, considering the near weekly violations of the law the con artist knowingly, willfully, and deliberately commits.

Also, for the umpteenth time, you keep referring to me as if I'm a Democrat/liberal/socialist/whatever. That you can't recognize a real conservative shows how stupendously moronic you and your kind have become. The mark of a conservative is to follow the facts and the law, regardless of political affiliation.

Instead, you miscreants go out of your way to justify willful, knowing, and deliberate violations of the law as if it's a game to see who much you can get away with, then cry the victim when people call you out. You abhor personal responsibility and make excuses for why the con artist should not be held accountable for his criminal acts.

It's why so many conservatives have left the Republican party which has turned into some weird amalgamation of fascists and white supremacists. We're tired of the bullshit, the lies, the excuses, the abdication of fiscal and personal responsibility, and those who defend all such practices.

 

[BotanyBoy]

The law states, unequivocally, there must willful and/or knowing dissemination of classified information to unauthorized persons or entities.

Cite??

Au contraire mon frere. According to you, one does not have to prove anything.

Cite???