Whistleblower

In an Aug. 26 letter, the Intelligence Community's inspector general, Michael Atkinson, wrote that the anonymous whistleblower who set off the Trump-Ukraine impeachment fight showed "some indicia of an arguable political bias ... in favor of a rival political candidate."

A few weeks later, news reports said the whistleblower's possible bias was that he is a registered Democrat. That was all....

Now, however, there is word of more evidence of possible bias on the whistleblower's part. Under questioning from Republicans during last Friday's impeachment inquiry interview with Atkinson, the inspector general revealed that the whistleblower's possible bias was not that he was simply a registered Democrat. It was that he had a significant tie to one of the Democratic presidential candidates currently vying to challenge President Trump in next year's election.

"The IG said [the whistleblower] worked or had some type of professional relationship with one of the Democratic candidates," said one person with knowledge of what was said.

"The IG said the whistleblower had a professional relationship with one of the 2020 candidates," said another person with knowledge of what was said.

"What [Atkinson] said was that the whistleblower self-disclosed that he was a registered Democrat and that he had a prior working relationship with a current 2020 Democratic presidential candidate," said a third person with knowledge of what was said.​

B. York, Whistleblower had 'professional' tie to 2020 Democratic candidate, Washington Examiner (Oct. 8, 2019).
 
His lawyers are trying to deny all the allegations.

We need to know who this person is.

We need to ask about the

motivation...
 
His lawyers are trying to deny all the allegations.

We need to know who this person is.

We need to ask about the

motivation...

If they actually impeach, he of she will have to be revealed. An accused has a right to face his accuser. The whistleblower is probably praying they don't actually impeach.
 
His lawyers are trying to deny all the allegations.

We need to know who this person is.

We need to ask about the

motivation...

If they actually impeach, he of she will have to be revealed. An accused has a right to face his accuser. The whistleblower is probably praying they don't actually impeach.

Precisely why the democrats are keeping the WB under a shroud. Also undoubtedly the reason there is NO official impeachment inquiry nor is there likely to be given the facts of this allegation.
 
Yes.

I think they just want to keep dangling the threat.

The parable of the boy who cried wolf means nothing to them...
 
The whistleblower isn't "accusing" Trump of anything. In fact that is not what a "whistleblower" is, by definition:

"A whistleblower is a person who exposes secretive information or activity that is deemed illegal, unethical, or not correct within a private or public organization."

That's what distinguishes any garden variety nutjob making unsubstantiated accusations from a legit WB: they have the goods.

There's nothing more to say. The WB EXPOSED "secretive information" we didn't know before, and it has been substantiated by the Prez himself.

WHat's Trump going to say--How dare you accuse me of making this call that I just gave you the transcript of?




If they actually impeach, he of she will have to be revealed. An accused has a right to face his accuser. The whistleblower is probably praying they don't actually impeach.
 
Oh, good fawkin' lord...



:rolleyes:


Redneck translation: This isn't us out to get Trump! We're just going to get "the sensitive..."
 
So the latest reports have that Biden was paid $900,000 for lobbying for Ukraine did he ever file the requisite lobbying foreign lobbying papers will he end up with manafort in solitary confinement
 
So the latest reports have that Biden was paid $900,000 for lobbying for Ukraine did he ever file the requisite lobbying foreign lobbying papers will he end up with manafort in solitary confinement

Inquiring minds want to know.
 
If they actually impeach, he of she will have to be revealed. An accused has a right to face his accuser. The whistleblower is probably praying they don't actually impeach.



If the house takes a vote the repubs will have equal powers, that means subpoena powers and the right to cross examine.
 
Oh, good fawkin' lord...



:rolleyes:


Redneck translation: This isn't us out to get Trump! We're just going to get "the sensitive..."

DELUSIONAL.

1. Registered Democrat
2. Second Hand Knowledge
3. Employed by a 2020 Democratic Candidate.

Isn't that digging up dirt on an opponent and interfering in a political campaign.
I'm sure he/she had a reasonable belief that something illegal has occurred.

LMFAO!!
 
How pissed is Trump that half of America wants him impeached and convicted, while no one ever seriously suggested Obama be impeached?:D
 
So the latest reports have that Biden was paid $900,000 for lobbying for Ukraine did he ever file the requisite lobbying foreign lobbying papers will he end up with manafort in solitary confinement

here is the link

there is NOTHING wrong with being a lobbyist

BUT DID HE REGISTER?

Manfort didnt, look where he is
 
How pissed is Trump that half of America wants him impeached and convicted, while no one ever seriously suggested Obama be impeached?:D

the "poll" was done by a "PROGRESSIVE" group

not credible


and why did you ask where the vote for Benghazi was? you KNOW no vote is needed for herings

what was the point? :rolleyes:
 
the "poll" was done by a "PROGRESSIVE" group

not credible


and why did you ask where the vote for Benghazi was? you KNOW no vote is needed for herings

what was the point? :rolleyes:

Fox News, Yidiot.
 
the "poll" was done by a "PROGRESSIVE" group

not credible


and why did you ask where the vote for Benghazi was? you KNOW no vote is needed for herings

what was the point? :rolleyes:

Just as no vote is required for inquiry into impeachment.
 
The Ad Hominem attacks on the whistleblower are meaningless.

Trump used taxpayer money as leverage to get Ukraine's president to do opposition research for his reelection campaign. And specifically directed him to work with "Rudy".

All else is sophistry and bullshit.
 
Back
Top