Climate continues to change.

[gunthernehmen]

Where?

How would I know where to look for the fake science you and von missthemark are always jabbering about? They're your sources. You tell me.

 

[bhurry]

How would I know where to look for the fake science you and von missthemark are always jabbering about? They're your sources. You tell me.

Oct 4 40 this Am IN Iola wi

 

[gunthernehmen]

Oct 4 40 this Am IN Iola wi

That is what's called a data point. Collect enough data points and you can create a theory on why it is 40 today and predict that a week from now the temp will be 38 or 42. Might or might not come true and the theory might or might not be correct.

The climate scarologists aren't applying any kind of science. They just believe and come up with scripture (instead of data) that supports their beliefs.

The fact is, Iola has been be hotter and colder than it is right now. Climate changes. Claiming this is due solely/primarily to mankind is simple idiocy. It was changing before we evolved and will change even after we go extinct in the next ice (or heat) age.

 

[phrodeau]

How would I know where to look for the fake science you and von missthemark are always jabbering about? They're your sources. You tell me.

But you seemed so sure of it yesterday.

 

[gunthernehmen]

But you seemed so sure of it yesterday.

So cite something that actually supports your scripture. How can I believe what you refuse to prove? Oh yeah. I have to have faith.

 

[thør]

“Next thing,” he said, “we’ll have watermelon.”

 

[phrodeau]

So cite something that actually supports your scripture. How can I believe what you refuse to prove? Oh yeah. I have to have faith.

You will never believe in the science of ACGW. You will never even read any of the science of ACGW. You have made that abundantly clear.

 

[gunthernehmen]

You will never believe in the science of ACGW. You will never even read any of the science of ACGW. You have made that abundantly clear.

I believe in climate change. In fact, none of us would exist without it.

I also believe that you self important, self appointed saviors of humanity are completely full of shit and what little science you might actually know involves the volcano Bobby Brady made in the back yard.

If any of them even acknowledged the possibility that PART of the problem is due to natural causes I could take them a little more seriously.

I'd also love to hear a plan that doesn't involve mass suicide (AOC Green New Deal reference if you were wondering).

 

[phrodeau]

I believe in climate change. In fact, none of us would exist without it.

I also believe that you self important, self appointed saviors of humanity are completely full of shit and what little science you might actually know involves the volcano Bobby Brady made in the back yard.

If any of them even acknowledged the possibility that PART of the problem is due to natural causes I could take them a little more seriously.

I'd also love to hear a plan that doesn't involve mass suicide (AOC Green New Deal reference if you were wondering).

Here’s a guide to the effect of natural causes on climate change.

https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/education/info_activities/pdfs/TBI_natural_climate_change.pdf

Which ones do you think are significant?

 

[gunthernehmen]

Here’s a guide to the effect of natural causes on climate change.

https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/education/info_activities/pdfs/TBI_natural_climate_change.pdf

Which ones do you think are significant?

How the hell do I know? I ain't no scientist. Given that ALL non nuclear energy comes from the sun (wind/solar/tidal/fossil/everything - either directly or indirectly) or from geothermal, I should imagine it's one, the other or both.

Interestingly, that was more of an op-ed piece, or executive summary than anything else. It certainly wasn't "data". It was just someone else stating the same thoughts that you have expressed here. For all I know that's where you copied it from.

 

[trysail]

This is a perfect example of just how completely bent the media has become:

https://www.cjr.org/covering_climate_now/covering-climate-now-170-outlets.php
(Columbia Journalism Review)

It's the most amazing and astonishing thing I've ever seen. It is an outright, brazen, formal effort by "journalists" to bend the news.

And you thought "journalism" was supposed to be non-partisan, honest and objective.


The Society of Professional Journalists’ Code of Ethics clearly states,

...first and foremost:

“Ethical journalism should be accurate and fair. Journalists should be honest and courageous in gathering, reporting and interpreting information.”​

And specifically directs journalists to:

Label advocacy and commentary
​

​

 

[bhurry]

That is what's called a data point. Collect enough data points and you can create a theory on why it is 40 today and predict that a week from now the temp will be 38 or 42. Might or might not come true and the theory might or might not be correct.

The climate scarologists aren't applying any kind of science. They just believe and come up with scripture (instead of data) that supports their beliefs.

The fact is, Iola has been be hotter and colder than it is right now. Climate changes. Claiming this is due solely/primarily to mankind is simple idiocy. It was changing before we evolved and will change even after we go extinct in the next ice (or heat) age.

What? I think perhaps to much maple syrup. Follow the birds. They left. The squirrels have hid all the nuts. Thank god. weather the same as real weather history tells us. Good night and God bless.

 

[gunthernehmen]

What? I think perhaps to much maple syrup. Follow the birds. They left. The squirrels have hid all the nuts. Thank god. weather the same as real weather history tells us. Good night and God bless.

Are you aware that your hometown was once beneath half a mile or so of ice?

Granted that was a few thousand years before the town was incorporated.

 

[phrodeau]

Are you aware that your hometown was once beneath half a mile or so of ice?

Granted that was a few thousand years before the town was incorporated.

You seem so sure of that, and yet...

How the hell do I know? I ain't no scientist.

 

[gunthernehmen]

You seem so sure of that, and yet...

You clearly have access to the raw data, even though you've never posted anything other than op-eds. Look for yourself.

 

[OldJourno]

Hey, anyone else notice it's getting cooler outside?

 

[phrodeau]

Hey, anyone else notice it's getting cooler outside?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...C-temperatures-amid-severe-fire-warnings.html

Australia is bracing for severe bushfires as a heatwave brings dry air and temperatures of 40C.

Sydney will be 34C on Friday, prompting thousands to flock to the beaches to start the weekend.

But the heat has prompted a severe fire warning in the Hunter Valley, with high fire danger warnings in place in surrounding regions.

Up the coast in Queensland, Brisbane will be a toasty 28C on Friday and the mercury will rise to 34C early next week, 11C above average for this time of year.

Meanwhile in Ipswich, temperatures are set to reach 40C on Tuesday as a high pressure system brings hot desert weather from central Australia to the south.

'During the weekend, that hot air mass will push all the way towards the east coast, leading to near record high October temperatures,' said Sky News Weather chief meteorologist Tom Saunders.

 

[gunthernehmen]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...C-temperatures-amid-severe-fire-warnings.html

Yes, they were warmer than us North Americans in that last ice age too.

https://www.australiangeographic.com.au/news/2013/09/ice-age-struck-indigenous-australians-hard/

It did get COLD, but they (some anyway) adapted. Then the seas started rising and they lost a third of their land area.

 

[phrodeau]

Yes, they were warmer than us North Americans in that last ice age too.

https://www.australiangeographic.com.au/news/2013/09/ice-age-struck-indigenous-australians-hard/

It did get COLD, but they (some anyway) adapted. Then the seas started rising and they lost a third of their land area.

That’s just an op-ed piece. Where’s the data?

 

[gunthernehmen]

That’s just an op-ed piece. Where’s the data?

Oh don't worry. You already have it. It's the same data your op eds are based on. That's the beauty of data: It means anything you want it to, so long as you have faith.

 

[bhurry]

Are you aware that your hometown was once beneath half a mile or so of ice?

Granted that was a few thousand years before the town was incorporated.

Point I'm trying to make. Maybe nothing new here. Things go in cycles? Lets hear the shit on that.

 

[trysail]

[Spamming, bumping multiple threads in order to flood the forum, posting same content to multiple locations, or screen-stretching to disrupt the forum is prohibited per our forum guidelines.]

 

[RobDownSouth]

Oh don't worry. You already have it. It's the same data your op eds are based on. That's the beauty of data: It means anything you want it to, so long as you have faith.

This is HisArpy-class ignorance.^^^^^^

 

[trysail]

[Spamming, bumping multiple threads in order to flood the forum, posting same content to multiple locations, or screen-stretching to disrupt the forum is prohibited per our forum guidelines.]

 

[gunthernehmen]

This is HisArpy-class ignorance.^^^^^^

If you genuinely believe that people do not routinely shape information to make it appear to support their point of view you are a complete and utter moron.