nascar refusing certain gun ads, infuriating the gun industry

[jaF0]

End ALL killing machine ads.

 

[jp55665566]

I've never seen a "gun ad", except in a Sportman's/hunting advertising circular.

 

[butters]

End ALL killing machine ads.

i'd back that

 

[Klinkster]

End ALL killing machine ads.

OK...got it....
Since more people are killed by blunt force trauma.....baseball bats and 2 x 4's are out. Louisvillle Slugger....Weyerhaeuser....outa here.
Same goes for MMA, and boxing. Are you aware of the deaths from people just beating others to death? Way more than crazies with guns, in case you don't know.
More are killed by auto accidents that crazies with a gun....so.....no more advertising by the auto industry. I refer you to Nice France.
Knives....bad news....look at London. Sorry Ginsu....you are fuckin' out of here.

 

[jaF0]

I know nuthing, nuthing!!!

Wrong guy. That was Schultz, not Klink.

 

[Klinkster]

Wrong guy. That was Schultz, not Klink.

I know you are nothing more than a troll.

 

[Klinkster]

Wrong guy. That was Schultz, not Klink.

With nothing to offer....but BS.

 

[BotanyBoy]

This, is so stupid, on so many levels.

What exactly, is an "assault/sniper style weapon"?
What makes a weapon qualify to fit this 'class'....what is the criteria?

I keep asking the question, but none of you gun grabbers seem to know....since none of you have answered the question.

She doesn't have the slightest fucking clue what she's talking about, she's just posting feel good bits as a virtue signal.

 

[Klinkster]

She doesn't have the slightest fucking clue what she's talking about, she's just posting feel good bits as a virtue signal.

Yeah....a fucking IGNORANT troll.

 

[jaF0]

"Klink, what am I going to do with you?"


https://schicklgruberfest.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/la511.jpg

 

[bellisarius]

There are NO assault weapons in civilian hands save those held by class III license holders. No shootings have been traced back to those license holders.

By definition every firearm out there is a "military style" weapon. All of them, shotgun, rifle, and pistol have been and are still currently in use by the military. This is especially true WRT the SOCOM troops who use a variety of firearms that are not standard issue. That being the case by broadening the definition of "military style" firearms ALL firearms may be subject to confiscation. And the democrats are past masters of definition broadening.

 

[Ann_Tagonist]

Budweiser kills more people every year than guns do.

https://www.picclickimg.com/d/l400/pict/273621984700_/SPORTS-POSTER-Dale-Earnhardt-Jr-Nascar-Budweiser-Collage-Racing.jpg

 

[jaF0]

I have no dear friend.

"I can believe that."

https://vignette4.wikia.nocookie.net/hhwikia/images/9/93/Tve2516-19670210-156.gif/revision/latest?cb=20130816185922

 

[someoneyouknow]

I keep asking the question, but none of you gun grabbers seem to know....since none of you have answered the question.

Bullshit. The question has been repeatedly answered, even by law enforcement, but when it is, you deny the answer. In fact, excuses are made. But, you asked, so let's try one more time.

An assault rifle is one which can fire in either full or semiautomatic mode. This would be like the M4. An assault-style weapon would be one which would be similar to said weapon in both operation and appearance.

Don't like that? Here's the Army's definition:

The US Army does define the term assault rifle as a short, compact, selective-fire weapon that fires a cartridge intermediate in power between submachine gun and rifle cartridges​

So there you have it. A rifle which looks like a true assault rifle (the M4) and operates in a similar fashion (semi-automatic) which fires a cartridge in power somewhere between a submachine gun and a rifle cartridge.

Now go on, let's hear the excuses while you move the goalposts.

https://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Assault-style+weapons

 

[Klinkster]

Good sentence!

And, to add a note....how many wack-a-doodles who committed crimes using guns, have turned out to be NRA members?
(I can answer that question)

It's not that the leftists can't define 'assault weapon', or a 'military style' weapon. They don't, and won't....for specific purpose.

There are NO assault weapons in civilian hands save those held by class III license holders. No shootings have been traced back to those license holders.

By definition every firearm out there is a "military style" weapon. All of them, shotgun, rifle, and pistol have been and are still currently in use by the military. This is especially true WRT the SOCOM troops who use a variety of firearms that are not standard issue. That being the case by broadening the definition of "military style" firearms ALL firearms may be subject to confiscation. And the democrats are past masters of definition broadening.

 

[L3gacy]

I wouldn’t really worry about any of this. There’s no way that guns will go away. It’s a lot of lip service. There are many many more Americans that own guns and support gun ownership than the trolls here that don’t.
There’s no way to actually enforce a law banning guns, “assault type” or otherwise. Who would enforce it? The police? The military? Most of those are gun owners and enthusiasts themselves. The only way to actually enforce those type of laws would be to have a foreign military force, some sort of “United peace keeping” force permitted in this country. Whomever would allow that sounds like a traitor to me.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Bullshit. The question has been repeatedly answered, even by law enforcement, but when it is, you deny the answer. In fact, excuses are made. But, you asked, so let's try one more time.

An assault rifle is one which can fire in either full or semiautomatic mode. This would be like the M4. An assault-style weapon would be one which would be similar to said weapon in both operation and appearance.

Don't like that? Here's the Army's definition:

The US Army does define the term assault rifle as a short, compact, selective-fire weapon that fires a cartridge intermediate in power between submachine gun and rifle cartridges​

So there you have it. A rifle which looks like a true assault rifle (the M4) and operates in a similar fashion (semi-automatic) which fires a cartridge in power somewhere between a submachine gun and a rifle cartridge.

Now go on, let's hear the excuses while you move the goalposts.

https://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Assault-style+weapons

So then explain why the (D)'s and the left keep trying to put AR-15's into that category even though they are not "Assault Weapons" by either of those definitions???

Because they are dishonest and are attempting to lead the ignorant to fear in order to subvert the civil rights of the American people.....you must be PROUD.

 

[BotanyBoy]

I wouldn’t really worry about any of this. There’s no way that guns will go away. It’s a lot of lip service. There are many many more Americans that own guns and support gun ownership than the trolls here that don’t.
There’s no way to actually enforce a law banning guns, “assault type” or otherwise. Who would enforce it? The police? The military? Most of those are gun owners and enthusiasts themselves. The only way to actually enforce those type of laws would be to have a foreign military force, some sort of “United peace keeping” force permitted in this country. Whomever would allow that sounds like a traitor to me.

You're giving "progressive" democrats policy ideas.....

 

[L3gacy]

Bullshit. The question has been repeatedly answered, even by law enforcement, but when it is, you deny the answer. In fact, excuses are made. But, you asked, so let's try one more time.

An assault rifle is one which can fire in either full or semiautomatic mode. This would be like the M4. An assault-style weapon would be one which would be similar to said weapon in both operation and appearance.

Don't like that? Here's the Army's definition:

The US Army does define the term assault rifle as a short, compact, selective-fire weapon that fires a cartridge intermediate in power between submachine gun and rifle cartridges​

So there you have it. A rifle which looks like a true assault rifle (the M4) and operates in a similar fashion (semi-automatic) which fires a cartridge in power somewhere between a submachine gun and a rifle cartridge.

Now go on, let's hear the excuses while you move the goalposts.

https://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Assault-style+weapons

EXCEPT...assault style doesn’t fire full automatic. It is semi. Just like a nine mm hand gun.
Assault STYLE is not the same thing as an assault rifle. I do support assault rifle bans to civilians
I don’t support assault STYLE bans.

 

[Rightguide]

The NRA is marching towards irrelevance.

They still have more than 5 million members.

 

[Klinkster]

I know exactly what the DOD defines as an 'assault weapon'. Read....I said it.

So then what exactly are the gun grabbers trying to ban, and confiscate then?
A small, trivial point you failed to mention.

Te gun-grabbers, here, and all over, will not, and have not, defined what they want to ban, and confiscate....other than "assault weapons". Just only saying "assault rifles". (for now)
And....they have not explained why, they are more dangerous, than any oyther semi-auto.

I moved no goalposts. I make no excuses. Please gather your shit, and put it in a heap.

And YOU defined, a weapon, I already CANNOT buy!

Bullshit. The question has been repeatedly answered, even by law enforcement, but when it is, you deny the answer. In fact, excuses are made. But, you asked, so let's try one more time.

An assault rifle is one which can fire in either full or semiautomatic mode. This would be like the M4. An assault-style weapon would be one which would be similar to said weapon in both operation and appearance.

Don't like that? Here's the Army's definition:

The US Army does define the term assault rifle as a short, compact, selective-fire weapon that fires a cartridge intermediate in power between submachine gun and rifle cartridges​

So there you have it. A rifle which looks like a true assault rifle (the M4) and operates in a similar fashion (semi-automatic) which fires a cartridge in power somewhere between a submachine gun and a rifle cartridge.

Now go on, let's hear the excuses while you move the goalposts.

https://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Assault-style+weapons

 

[Klinkster]

Sorry....not according to the DOD. Assault rifle has selective fire.
Irt has full auto.
Can't buy full auto's. Against the law.
Assault weapons are against the law.

EXCEPT...assault style doesn’t fire full automatic. It is semi. Just like a nine mm hand gun.
Assault STYLE is not the same thing as an assault rifle. I do support assault rifle bans to civilians
I don’t support assault STYLE bans.

 

[L3gacy]

You're giving "progressive" democrats policy ideas.....

I’m more than willing to change their minds. Go ahead and TRY to land a foreign military on our shores, see what happens.

 

[BotanyBoy]

know exactly what the DOD defines as an 'assault weapon'. Read....I said it.
And....they have not explained why, they are more dangerous, than any oyther semi-auto.

They can't, they don't even understand the question.

They just know scary looking = more deadly!!!!

And YOU defined, a weapon, I already CANNOT buy!

That sucks....what state?

 

[BotanyBoy]

I’m more than willing to change their minds. Go ahead and TRY to land a foreign military on our shores, see what happens.

The idea of them doing so gets my dick hard.