The new faces of the neo-fascist & racist Democratic Party!

[dan_c00000]

This is how I spent my holiday. Posting racist, anti-Semitic shit in the middle of the afternoon.

Come on bot, you should have gone outside. It was a decent enough day.

 

[Dumpington]

dan_c00000 writes: "Come on brother, you should have gone outside. It was a decent enough day."

Yeah, it's a beautiful day - thanks for your advice, Dan.

By the way, are you aware that you can ALSO use your laptop computer ouside?

http://www.thetruthdenied.com/news/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/global-warming-myth.jpg - (Relax - Global Warming is a Myth!)

https://www.returnofkings.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/global-warming-myth-667x441.jpg - (It's fun to keep making alarming predictions that never come true!)

https://thefederalistpapers.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Global-Warming-Myth.jpg - (Global warming hysteria has made Al Gore a VERY wealthy man!)

https://downtrend.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/algore.png - (I'm going to say that the second choice is far more likely!)

http://media.breitbart.com/media/2017/06/stop-global-warming-before-its-too-late-flickr-640x480.jpg - (Liberal Democratic Party climate alarmists on parade!)

 

[jp55665566]

Why are Democrats so consistently racist? Skin color is all they seem to care about; and gender/sexual preference. Why? Is it a way to divide people as part of a "divide and conquer" strategy?

 

[badbabysitter]

Why are Democrats so consistently racist? Skin color is all they seem to care about; and gender/sexual preference. Why? Is it a way to divide people as part of a "divide and conquer" strategy?

If that's the case...why did you bring it up?

 

[dan_c00000]

https://www.returnofkings.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/global-warming-myth-667x441.jpg

Return of the Kings? Oh man. That's literally the site for a rape apologist. Fuck dump/bot/dawn I always knew you hated women but I didn't think you'd actually post something from a site condoning rape.

 

[Dumpington]

dan_c00000 writes: "Return of the Kings? Oh man. That's literally the site for a rape apologist."

Seriously, Dan? YOU know all about the official web-site for RAPE APOLOGISTS? I'm afraid to ask how this knowledge came to you!

"Fuck dump/bot/dawn I always knew you hated women but I didn't think you'd actually post something from a site condoning rape."

Seriously? YOU know all about web-sites devoted to condoning RAPE?

What you find interesting is YOUR business, Dan - but if I was you I'd keep that tid-bit of knowledge to myself!

It's just seriously CREEPY!

 

[JKendallDane]

If somebody disagrees with your political beliefs, J-Kendall, you call them a racist and/or a bigot. HOW is that in any ways "intellectually honest?"

Since I have never once called you or anyone else here a "racist and/or bigot" (search my posts - search every single one of them) that claim of yours is a perfect example of your intellectual dishonesty.

Now granted, you and several others here most certainly have posted various things that could be considered racist and/or bigoted, but those posts usually jump up and down all on their own and don't need to have a wagging finger pointing them out.

"But I'll give you the chance to prove me wrong. Please list five "far-left-leaning political beliefs" that you just somehow magically are certain I have."

Okay, Jay - let's DO this! I'll ask you seven simple questions to see if you're REALLY a loyal Democrat, or not:

1) Socialism or capitalism?
2) Pro-abortion (e.g. pro-choice) or anti-abortion (pro-life)?
3) Pro-Atheist (anti-Christian) or do you believe in America's Judeo-Christian values & traditions?
4) Pro-open-borders or secure borders?
5) Men-claiming-to-be-women competing in women's athletics or NO WAY could I ever support that bullsh*t?
6) Islamic Sharia Law or the U.S. Constitution?
7) Celebrating the gay/rainbow flag or honoring the U.S. flag?

Using the above criteria I can pretty safely determine how you stand politically and which party you are more likely to support in November of 2020.

Fasten your seat belt, Dump. This is going to be a bumpy ride!

1) Taking into account that I have multiple degrees in business administration and considering the number of businesses I have either owned or managed over the last 50 years, I would say I have a pretty good grasp on and support of capitalism. Because of the back room shenanigans I have not only witnessed but even have been a part of myself, I also understand and support the idea of regulations and oversight on just how free capitalism is permitted to be. As far as my "socialism" bent, <shrug> is pretty much what I come up with because your side has turned it into little more than a boogeyman buzzword while ignoring that the most popular and most successful government programs and infrastructure projects of the last 100 years are "socialism" in the purest sense of the word.

Consider this example where the two "-isms" cross paths: The GOP just loves to bash the SNAP program because they see it as socialism at its most evil core. Yet, every single study ever done shows that for every government dollar of SNAP benefits that's distributed, a minimum of $1.70 comes back in economic activity. 170% return on investment...a 70% profit...and usually within a 45 to 60 day period, day-in, day-out, year-round. Those kind of numbers are a capitalist's wet dream, but they can't unwrap their heads from word "socialism" to deal with the reality that sometimes, "socialistic things" often DO work to their benefit too.

2) I don't like abortion. I wish there were never any reasons for anyone to need or seek out one. I wish rape, incest, and child molestation never fertilized a single egg. I wish life-endangering medical conditions never occurred during a pregnancy. I wish every ultrasound showed a perfectly formed and properly growing fetus. I wish every male and female in the country had full access to and properly used birth control. I wish we lived in a time where abortion was extremely rare and almost unnecessary. I wish the GOP was as pro-child as they are pro-birth. I also wish my 80# Labrador pooped gold bullion.

If you insist on me pigeonholing myself, then slip me into the pro-choice slot because I do not believe the idea of 100% anti-abortion is either legal nor medically sound.

3) Well, I am a Christian that believes the Constitution guarantees both the right of freedom of and from religion. That doesn't mean I am "pro-atheist" any more than your silly attempt at trying to paint everyone to the left of Franklin Graham and Jerry Falwell Jr as "anti-christian" means anything.

As far as "believing in America's Judeo-Christian values & traditions" ... well, you're going to have to be a bit more specific since the Christian faith community of today can't even come to a consensus on something as simple as the way to practice the sacraments of communion and baptism. After 2,000 years we still can't even get the two laws that Christ said all other laws hang on correct, but you think there is some secret master list of qualifications and "proper Christian conduct" hidden in the Constitution?

4) Yes, I want secure borders. But more importantly, I want them secured using rational methods that simultaneously protect us AND protect what the USA had stood for and promoted for its first 240 years. Wasting billions on a wall that is little more than a monument to 45's ego isn't going to do that.

5) You can't even figure out what a transgender guy is, so I'm not going to give you the satisfaction of dragging me into explaining how this fantasy of "guys competing against women" you keep sputtering about is Ivory soap level 99.44% in your head.

6) "Islamic Sharia Law or the U.S. Constitution?" ~ The fact you bothered typing that says you have reduced yourself to the deflection/shit throwing stage. Sorry, but that one didn't even make it TO the wall you were trying to get it to stick to.

(Just as a side note, since one of my ancestors not only was a member of the Constitutional Convention but also became its youngest signatory, I'm pretty sure I have a deeper reverence for that document than you could ever possibly muster.)

7) "Celebrating the gay/rainbow flag or honoring the U.S. flag?" It wouldn't be a Dump post if you didn't go down that path of poo-flinging.

Yes, Dump, I do "celebrate" the rainbow flag because that is the community I am a part of. I also honor the American flag (the fifty star version) by respecting it and doing everything I can to believe it still stands for what it always had prior to 2017 when 45 decided that public displays of dry-humping it was the ultimate display of "patriotism."

"No deflecting. No ranting. No rambling. Just a simple list of five things without buzzword commentary attached. Think you're up to it? I don't."

I have asked you five simple questions without any buzzword commentaries attached. Can you answer them? I'm thinking that you probably won't.

Kinda looks like your thinking was as flawed as usual, doesn't it?
.

 

[dan_c00000]

Fuck I got owned hard! I'd better back peddle! Let's see I've already played the "real racist" card, maybe I ought to try it again! Except, fuck, I'm already on here as being a hate-filled misogynist who thinks women don't deserve agency over their own bodies.

Keep moving those goal posts rape apologist. You just keep sinking lower.

 

[Dumpington]

JKendallDane writes: "Now granted, you and several others here most certainly have posted various things that could be considered racist and/or bigoted...""

First you point out how you've NEVER called me a racist or a bigot, J-Kendall - and then you add that I've posted bigoted things. WHAT have I ever once posted that's even remotely racist or bigoted?

"Fasten your seat belt, Dump. This is going to be a bumpy ride!"

Not so much bumpy as your answers are inconclusive.

1) Socialism or capitalism? You NEVER even answered the question!
2) It sounds to me like while you AGREE with me that abortion is horrific, you are still pro-choice!
3) It sounds to me like you are a Christian who supports the increasingly pro-atheistic stance of the modern Democratic Party.
4) It sounds to me like you speak in favor of secure borders but don't really want to allow any money to be spent actually securing them.
5) You didn't really answer this question at all. You sound like a secret Cece Telfer fan who doesn't want to openly admit it!
6) I probably should have asked which flag do you support MORE? The U.S. flag or the gay/rainbow flag?" But you wouldn't have answered it.

dan_c00000 writes: "Keep moving those goal posts rape apologist. You just keep sinking lower."

Seriously, Dan? You actually know all about the official web-site for RAPE APOLOGISTS? That is beyond creepy!

 

[YDB95]

Seriously, Dan? You actually know all about the official web-site for RAPE APOLOGISTS? That is beyond creepy!

Not half as creepy as your visiting that site and even reposting stuff from it without knowing anything about its ugly backstory. Could it be rape-apologists simply don't bother you very much?

And oh, by the way...
https://www.factcheck.org/2019/05/manipulated-time-cover-on-climate-recirculates/

 

[magicalmoments]

I see that some of the contributors to this thread are classifying each other politically on simple for and against arguments. As in if you don't support me your against me. It seems that either they are very young, (under 21 years of age), or have managed to pass through life without learning very much at all.

Life and politics (same thing really) is about compromise.

Personally I'm a believer in capitalism however life has taught me that capitalism tempered with selected and controlled elements of socialism provides a better life for the many. The number of highly successful social democracies in the world tends to prove the point.

I believe in freedom of choice within a democratic construct. The right of everyone to pursue their version of happiness up to the point where they start impinging on my rights, or me impinging theirs. The will of the majority deciding where that point of impingement occurs. On the specific of abortion, whether or not you have an abortion is no business of mine. I'm a great believer in mind your own businessism.

Personally I'm an atheist. However I am not anti religion because of that. All religions espouse moral standards and values and some of these are good, some are bad. I cherry pick the ones I prefer to live by. Again this is backed up by my belief in mind your own businessism. You have no right to impose your values on me, even if your God gives you permission. I have no desire to impose mine on you.

I'm an internationalist I welcome and enjoy other cultures. I enjoy living in a multicultural society. I believe we have a duty to help those less fortunate and fully support our countrys controlled refugee intake, I support the right of people to claim asylum. However having said that I also support controlled borders, which is easy for us being one of the most isolated island nations on earth. Our basic immigration policy is occupation based. With a few restrictions, If you have a trade or skill we need you're welcome here.

Transgendeism is a matter of personal choice. Again, doesn't affect me, don't care. Trams people competing in sport, that's a matter for the particular codes to sort out, not a matter for the law. Again, mind your own businessism.

I am a firm believer of the separation of church and state. There is no place for bishops, ayatollahs, rabbis, or priests of any description in the institutions of state. Religions should not have any tax free status. Religious teaching should be completely banned from state funded schools and those private schools that have religious instruction should not have state funding. Secular constitutional rule should prevail, and that should include the practice of prayers in the institutions of state.

Even though I am an internationalist I recognise there is a place for national pride and the symbols of that pride are important. The nation's history, traditions, it's flag and anthem should be respected for what they are and that includes protecting and representing the rights and opinions of others who may see things differently to you, even if they are a minority. After all that flag represents all of the struggles your nation faced to attain the freedom. It should never become a caricature or an idol in and of itself. The fact that some may feel stronger allegiance to, say a State flag, a religious banner, a gay pride flag and that you may be offended is tough luck. Your beliefs should not be imposed on others in a free society, just as mine may not be imposed on you.

Diversity and compromise makes you strong.

Rant over, carry on.

 

[JKendallDane]

Rant over, carry on.

And a most excellent rant it was, MM. Thank you!

.

 

[JKendallDane]

JKendallDane writes: "Now granted, you and several others here most certainly have posted various things that could be considered racist and/or bigoted...""

First you point out how you've NEVER called me a racist or a bigot, J-Kendall - and then you add that I've posted bigoted things. WHAT have I ever once posted that's even remotely racist or bigoted?

Nope. Not playing that game, Dump. If you really can't already see how much your own words convict you on a regular basis, then any example I would provide would simply become deflection and denial fodder for you.

"Fasten your seat belt, Dump. This is going to be a bumpy ride!"

Not so much bumpy as your answers are inconclusive.

1) Socialism or capitalism? You NEVER even answered the question!
2) It sounds to me like while you AGREE with me that abortion is horrific, you are still pro-choice!
3) It sounds to me like you are a Christian who supports the increasingly pro-atheistic stance of the modern Democratic Party.
4) It sounds to me like you speak in favor of secure borders but don't really want to allow any money to be spent actually securing them.
5) You didn't really answer this question at all. You sound like a secret Cece Telfer fan who doesn't want to openly admit it!
6) I probably should have asked which flag do you support MORE? The U.S. flag or the gay/rainbow flag?" But you wouldn't have answered it.

1) I answered the question. I can't be responsible for your reading comprehension issues.

2) I think my words were pretty clear: "If you insist on me pigeonholing myself, then slip me into the pro-choice slot because I do not believe the idea of 100% anti-abortion is either legal nor medically sound."

3) Your words, Dump: "...the increasingly pro-atheistic stance of the modern Democratic Party." If you really believe that in any way resembles what I said or what the Democratic party stands for, then any further discussion is worthless. That ridiculousness is Pat Robertson and Jim Bakker territory and I don't go down that road unless it's for a good laugh.

4) Again, Dump...reading comprehension. It's a real thing and you should try it. I said I'm all in favor of border security. Donnie can spend fifteen or twenty billion on increased manpower, equipment, and modern technology and I'd probably say, "Great!" But no more dollars...not even a single dime...for an archaic, ineffective, environmental & wildlife disaster, and just flat-out fuckin' ugly scar across the land that 45's wet dream ego wall would be.

5) And I told you why I wasn't answering it. It's a total bullshit question that doesn't deserve an answer. Clear enough now?

6) Question #6 wasn't about flags. It was: "Islamic Sharia Law or the U.S. Constitution?" In your confusion and haste, possibly you missed my answer? If so, here it is again:

"The fact you bothered typing that says you have reduced yourself to the deflection/shit throwing stage. Sorry, but that one didn't even make it TO the wall you were trying to get it to stick to.

(Just as a side note, since one of my ancestors not only was a member of the Constitutional Convention but also became its youngest signatory, I'm pretty sure I have a deeper reverence for that document than you could ever possibly muster.)"

7) (which you incorrectly labelled as 6) ) Ah, yes. The predictable "move the goal posts because I didn't get handed something I could easily attack" gambit. The American flag will always come first for me so long as we still have a country that respects the founding documents and what all they encompass.

That doesn't mean I wouldn't also pick up my rainbow flag and help protect myself and my community from you flag humpers that think bashing gays and transgenders every chance you get makes you some kind of "Tru Blu 'Muricun Pay-tree-ot!"

Now that I've basically answered your little quiz twice, when are you going to do your "Carnac the Magnificent" impression and give us your all-knowing answer as to which side of the political fence I unquestionably belong on?

.

 

[Dumpington]

YDB95 writes: "Could it be rape-apologists simply don't bother you very much?"

I just find it creepy than Dan (e.g. dan_c00000) knows so much about RAPE-APOLOGIST web-sites.

magicalmoments writes: "Personally I'm a believer in capitalism... on the specific of abortion, whether or not you have an abortion is no business of mine... personally I'm an atheist... trans people competing in sport, that's a matter for the particular codes to sort out, not a matter for the law... the nation's history, traditions, it's flag and anthem should be respected for what they are"

Sorry to have broken your post down to the above specifics, magicalmoments - but with the exception of your pro-capitalist & respect-the-U.S.-flag views (which are NOT in line with the modern progressive agenda), you have mostly mainstream political opinions. Of course, if you were ever to run for public office as a Democrat, you'd have to become more pro-abortion & have to hold more pro-trans views.

JKendallDane writes: "Nope. Not playing that game, Dump."

No, JKendall - of course you're not. Best to keep your open biases & intolerances hidden away.

"I said I'm all in favor of border security."

That's NOT something that modern liberal progressives would agree with, but I'm glad you came out and said it.

"...since one of my ancestors not only was a member of the Constitutional Convention but also became its youngest signatory, I'm pretty sure I have a deeper reverence for that document than you could ever possibly muster"

Today's liberals would call your ancestor a racist! (Did he own slaves?) In any event, I'm glad you're still proud of him. The First & Second Amendments, along with the Electoral College were especially awesome ideas to include in our U.S. Constitution!

"The American flag will always come first for me..."

Colin Kaepernick & Megan Rapinoe may both hate you for writing that, Jay-Kendall - but I agree with you 100%!

 

[YDB95]

YDB95 writes: "Could it be rape-apologists simply don't bother you very much?"

I just find it creepy than Dan (e.g. dan_c00000) knows so much about RAPE-APOLOGIST web-sites.

I've noticed you tend to get awfully worked up about anyone else knowing about anything indisputably evil. Exactly how are we ever supposed to do anything about disgusting garbage like that website if we don't know it exists? For one thing, people like you are a lot more likely to embarrass yourselves by linking to it!

 

[dan_c00000]

I've noticed you tend to get awfully worked up about anyone else knowing about anything indisputably evil. Exactly how are we ever supposed to do anything about disgusting garbage like that website if we don't know it exists? For one thing, people like you are a lot more likely to embarrass yourselves by linking to it!

I'm sure bot/dump/dawn saw that article and got really excited thinking "Yes! Not only does this site condone rape it also...wait fuck it just the rape stuff is good!"

I always suspected that bot/dump/dawn was some sort of MRA loser who hated women and now I know for sure that he is.

 

[Dumpington]

YDB95 writes: "I've noticed you tend to get awfully worked up about anyone else knowing about anything indisputably evil."

It's people ENDORSING things that are indisputably evil that gets me worked up, like Dan so regularly chooses to do!

"Exactly how are we ever supposed to do anything about disgusting garbage like that website if we don't know it exists?"

HERE is the photo I posted off of the "Return of the Kings" web-site that Dan claimed to be associated with rape-apologists:

https://www.returnofkings.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/global-warming-myth-667x441.jpg - (TIME magazine covers focusing on the threat of global warming!)

As you can see, the cover on the left is from 1977, and focuses on the coming ICE AGE that never actually happened - and the cover on the right threatens us with the exact OPPOSITE problem, that our planet is melting. And Dan sees all of this as related to RAPE?

"For one thing, people like you are a lot more likely to embarrass yourselves by linking to it!"

If anybody should be embarrassed by the content of those two magazine covers, it's Al Gore!

dan_c00000 writes: "I always suspected that bot/dump/dawn is more intelligent than myself, and finds my posts to be childish and vindictive."

Seriously, Dan? You know all about RAPE-APOLOGISTS web-sites? Where-ever did you go to discover those? (It's just CREEPY, Dan!)

 

[JKendallDane]

JKendallDane writes: "Nope. Not playing that game, Dump."

No, JKendall - of course you're not. Best to keep your open biases & intolerances hidden away.

My "biases & intolerances" are hardly "hidden away" Dump. If they really were, you wouldn't expend so much effort and energy bitching about me allegedly calling you a racist and/or bigot. That I choose to not get down in the mud with you that far, is my way of saying I'd rather have reasoned, rational, adult discussions and let our posted words speak for themselves, instead of acting like ten-year-olds starting a food fight in the cafeteria while yelling "Your Mom wears army boots!" and "Well your Dad is a homo!" back and forth. The fact you self-own yourself so often is your problem, not mine.

"I said I'm all in favor of border security."

That's NOT something that modern liberal progressives would agree with, but I'm glad you came out and said it.

Many, many Democrats have said the very same things I did about border security. It's the same thing the majority of the citizens have said also. The problem is every time they propose those kind of things legislatively and funding-wise, 45 does his clench-fisted, feet stomping, eyes-bulging "Where's the money for MY WALL? I want MY WALL, dammit! NO WALL, NO NOTHING!" tantrums and any REAL progress towards better border security goes down the crapper yet again.

As MagicalMoments so aptly put it above: "Life and politics (and governing) is all about compromise." When you have an Oval Office that believes "compromise" is everyone just agreeing with him on everything, and his sycophants in both Houses of Congress do nothing more than nod their heads you only end up with...well, the word "clusterfuck" seems to fit pretty good. LBJ and Tip O'Neill are undoubtedly two of the most successful leaders ever of the Senate and House and they ruled with an iron fist. But both of them also understood that compromise was a part of achieving success and practiced that part of the political game every bit as expertly as well. We need to return to that kind of governing where making progress and moving forward is more important than winning every fight.

"...since one of my ancestors not only was a member of the Constitutional Convention but also became its youngest signatory, I'm pretty sure I have a deeper reverence for that document than you could ever possibly muster"

Today's liberals would call your ancestor a racist! (Did he own slaves?) In any event, I'm glad you're still proud of him.

What a ridiculously foolish statement.

Since Jonathan Dayton, after serving as the third Speaker of the House, went on to serve as a Senator from New Jersey during which time NJ abolished slavery, I'd say he probably didn't own any slaves. Nothing in his biography even suggests that. And that is further supported by the fact that in the 1790's he purchased more than a quarter million acres of land in the Northwest Territory all situated in what is now SW Ohio. The Northwest Territory Ordinance was the guiding document of the first major expansion of the United States encompassing pretty much everything west and north of the Ohio River that would eventually become six new states. Since it specifically included a ban on slavery within the territory, I don't quite see him investing so much of his fortune there if he was a slave owner.

The NW Territory Ordinance is an amazing piece of the USA's history. Since it was written and passed in 1787, it's considered to be a part of our nation's founding documents even though most people are clueless to its existence or what all it included. There is a new bestselling book by Pulitzer Prize-winning historian David McCullough called "The Pioneers" you should read. It goes into great detail about how the first settlers and governments in the new territory not only depended on that document to guide their missions, but also how much of a role it's contents and unique Bill of Rights played in the next 175 years of the nation. I will forewarn you though, McCullough shows how the document includes such "radically socialistic, progressive lefty crap" like public education, but I still think you could learn from it anyway.

"The American flag will always come first for me..."

Colin Kaepernick & Megan Rapinoe may both hate you for writing that, Jay-Kendall - but I agree with you 100%!

Thank YOU, Dump, for yet once again proving you don't have the first clue about what the whole Kaepernick and Rapinoe thing was about. Sadly I don't expect you to ever learn because that is one of your most favorite broken drums to beat and you have no desire to let facts get in your way of making noise.

.

 

[JKendallDane]

"Exactly how are we ever supposed to do anything about disgusting garbage like that website if we don't know it exists?"

HERE is the photo I posted off of the "Return of the Kings" web-site that Dan claimed to be associated with rape-apologists:

https://www.returnofkings.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/global-warming-myth-667x441.jpg - (TIME magazine covers focusing on the threat of global warming!)

As you can see, the cover on the left is from 1977, and focuses on the coming ICE AGE that never actually happened - and the cover on the right threatens us with the exact OPPOSITE problem, that our planet is melting.

"YDB: For one thing, people like you are a lot more likely to embarrass yourselves by linking to it!"

If anybody should be embarrassed by the content of those two magazine covers, it's Al Gore!

BUWAHAHAHAHA!

Um, Dump. There is this really interesting new thing called FACT CHECKING that can help keep you from making a complete ass of yourself. I mean all of us enjoy getting a good laugh from you, but that one is just downright completely embarrassing because you doubled-down on it in a single post. SNORT!

Had you bothered to do that with your "This proves everything I'm saying" link to those Time covers, here is what you would have discovered:

The "cover" on the left is a doctored creation and never existed!

www.factcheck.org/manipulated-time-cover-on-climate-recirculates/

But don't feel too bad for getting suckered. Even Ted Nugent was sharing that meme on Facebook and 45 had a copy of it on his Oval Office desk. That probably falls under the "Bigliest brains think alike" exemption.

SNORT! SNORT! SNORT!

Dammit, Dump. You owe me a bottle of Windex and roll of paper towels so I can clean up the mouthful of coffee I splattered on my laptop for that self-own!

SNORT! SNORT! SNORT!

.

 

[YDB95]

BUWAHAHAHAHA!

Um, Dump. There is this really interesting new thing called FACT CHECKING that can help keep you from making a complete ass of yourself. I mean all of us enjoy getting a good laugh from you, but that one is just downright completely embarrassing because you doubled-down on it in a single post. SNORT!

Had you bothered to do that with your "This proves everything I'm saying" link to those Time covers, here is what you would have discovered:

The "cover" on the left is a doctored creation and never existed!

www.factcheck.org/manipulated-time-cover-on-climate-recirculates/

But don't feel too bad for getting suckered. Even Ted Nugent was sharing that meme on Facebook and 45 had a copy of it on his Oval Office desk. That probably falls under the "Bigliest brains think alike" exemption.

SNORT! SNORT! SNORT!

Dammit, Dump. You owe me a bottle of Windex and roll of paper towels so I can clean up the mouthful of coffee I splattered on my laptop for that self-own!

SNORT! SNORT! SNORT!

.

Not to steal your thunder or anything, but I posted a link that said the same in response to Dump several posts ago. Naturally he didn't acknowledge it in any way.

YDB95 writes: "I've noticed you tend to get awfully worked up about anyone else knowing about anything indisputably evil."

It's people ENDORSING things that are indisputably evil that gets me worked up, like Dan so regularly chooses to do!

The only one who endorsed that site was you, by posting that link (which, as JKD and I have both pointed out to you now, is a fake).

Seriously, Dan? You know all about RAPE-APOLOGISTS web-sites? Where-ever did you go to discover those? (It's just CREEPY, Dan!)

Wherever you're getting the invective you regularly post about Christine Blakey-Ford and Sandra Fluke, those are probably rape-apologist sites. I don't know where they are and I don't really want to know, but the language you use is exactly the way those neanderthals talk about any woman who says anything to suggest it's not 1952 anymore.

 

[Dumpington]

JKendallDane writes: "Many, many Democrats have said the very same things I did about border security."

The Democratic Party DOESN'T CARE about border security, Jay-Kendall! Long ago, that party lost blue collar America, and they're currently in the process of losing BLACK America, too - and so they're trying to make up for it by bringing in as many illegals as they possibly can to register to vote for Democrats in states like California. It's also why that party so vehemently opposes voter photo-ID laws and instead supports things like Sanctuary Cities that IGNORE U.S. immigration laws!

"Thank YOU, Dump, for yet once again proving you don't have the first clue about what the whole Kaepernick and Rapinoe thing was about."

Modern liberal-progressives view self-described-America-haters like Colin Kaepernick & Megan Rapinoe as HEROES - and the same is true of Jussie Smollett! The modern Democratic Party views the U.S. flag as a symbol of racism & white supremacy, and instead prefers to honor the gay/rainbow flag in pride parades, avoiding Fourth of July parades honoring America!

YDB95 writes: "Naturally he didn't acknowledge it in any way."

Yeah - you & JkendallDane post a LOT of silliness that I don't acknowledge - like when you repeatedly try and pretend that being an obscure Illinois state legislator is a more prestigious job than being the governor of the second largest state in America (in both size & population!) Or when you seriously argue that getting a law degree exhibits more business acumen than a Harvard MBA!

"The only one who endorsed that site was you, by posting that link (which, as JKD and I have both pointed out to you now, is a fake)"

You and JKendallDane need to face the FACTS: first, Al Gore called it global warming - but then when the earth began cooling instead he changed his alarmist rhetoric to "CLIMATE CHANGE" so that the environmental crazies could blame EVERYTHING on the U.S. no matter what was happening!

"Wherever you're getting the invective you regularly post about Christine Blakey-Ford and Sandra Fluke..."

Christine Blasey-Ford & Sandra Fluke are two MORE heroes of the modern Democratic Party, along with that smug David Hogg kid. These people are EXACTLY why the Democratic Party is growing weaker while Trump gets stronger!

 

[JKendallDane]

Not to steal your thunder or anything, but I posted a link that said the same in response to Dump several posts ago. Naturally he didn't acknowledge it in any way.

Yeah, I missed that earlier one of yours, YDB. My bad. I didn't realize his doubling-down of that today was actually a tripling-down repeat from yesterday.

I am getting a kick out of the Gordian Knot machinations he is going through now by proclaiming he IS acknowledging it by NOT acknowledging it and then immediately going into full-blown deflect and divert mode. He's become more predictable than the answer to the question of who's going to come out on top in a Roadrunner ~ Wile E. Coyote cartoon.

Almost every one of his posts are turning into some really weird endless-loop morph that starts with Tucker Carlson conspiracies, then jumps into Sean Hannity style twisted attempts at rationalization, and ends by jumping into Ann Coulter's body and brain for the dismount stick of "All liberals and Dem's are evil and out to turn the whole country into transgendered gay Mexican atheists that refuse to dry hump the flag until they are given everything for free!"

<shrug> I guess we should just be thankful for the laughs he provides and consider it cheap entertainment.

JKendallDane writes: "Many, many Democrats have said the very same things I did about border security."

The Democratic Party DOESN'T CARE about border security, Jay-Kendall! Long ago, that party lost blue collar America, and they're currently in the process of losing BLACK America, too - and so they're trying to make up for it by bringing in as many illegals as they possibly can to register to vote for Democrats in states like California.

^^Tucker Carlson mode^^

Oh yeah, Dump. If there is ONE place we Dems really need to add even more Democratic voters it's that fire-engine-red state of California.

"Thank YOU, Dump, for yet once again proving you don't have the first clue about what the whole Kaepernick and Rapinoe thing was about."

Modern liberal-progressives view self-described-America-haters like Colin Kaepernick & Megan Rapinoe as HEROES - and the same is true of Jussie Smollett! The modern Democratic Party views the U.S. flag as a symbol of racism & white supremacy, and instead prefers to honor the gay/rainbow flag in pride parades, avoiding Fourth of July parades honoring America!

^^Ann Coulter mode^^

I'm disappointed, Dump. You left out the Mexicans and atheists on that one.

YDB95 writes: "Naturally he didn't acknowledge it in any way."

Yeah - you & JkendallDane post a LOT of silliness that I don't acknowledge - like when you repeatedly try and pretend that being an obscure Illinois state legislator is a more prestigious job than being the governor of the second largest state in America (in both size & population!) Or when you seriously argue that getting a law degree exhibits more business acumen than a Harvard MBA!

^^Deflect & Divert mode^^

That-a-boy, Dump! When all else fails, go with your favorite standard debate technique.

"The only one who endorsed that site was you, by posting that link (which, as JKD and I have both pointed out to you now, is a fake)"

You and JKendallDane need to face the FACTS: first, Al Gore called it global warming - but then when the earth began cooling instead he changed his alarmist rhetoric to "CLIMATE CHANGE" so that the environmental crazies could blame EVERYTHING on the U.S. no matter what was happening!

^^Hannity mode^^

That one should earn you a ten minute beddy-bye phone call with 45. Don't let Sean have all the fun.

"Wherever you're getting the invective you regularly post about Christine Blakey-Ford and Sandra Fluke..."

Christine Blasey-Ford & Sandra Fluke are two MORE heroes of the modern Democratic Party, along with that smug David Hogg kid. These people are EXACTLY why the Democratic Party is growing weaker while Trump gets stronger!

^^Matt Gaetz mode^^

Congrats, Dump. You have reached a new level of your morphing process. Got to warn you though...he is my CongressTwit and he is real touchy about sharing those public butt kisses of 45 with anyone besides Lindsey Graham. Only use that style in very special circumstances.

.

 

[69johnmichaels]

Don't Cheeto's base

= educationally challenged Caucasians.

 

[dan_c00000]

"Return of the Kings" web-site RAPE-APOLOGISTS

Desperately trying to dig yourself out of the same rapey hole, eh? Going to be a shitty weekend for your buddy.

 

[jp55665566]

From the Dump: The Democratic Party DOESN'T CARE about border security, Jay-Kendall! Long ago, that party lost blue collar America, and they're currently in the process of losing BLACK America, too - and so they're trying to make up for it by bringing in as many illegals as they possibly can to register to vote for Democrats in states like California. It's also why that party so vehemently opposes voter photo-ID laws and instead supports things like Sanctuary Cities that IGNORE U.S. immigration laws!


So true.