The new faces of the neo-fascist & racist Democratic Party!

[jp55665566]

https://www.returnofkings.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/global-warming-myth-667x441.jpg

 

[jp55665566]

Dumpinton: "Christine Blasey-Ford & Sandra Fluke are two MORE heroes of the modern Democratic Party, along with that smug David Hogg kid. These people are EXACTLY why the Democratic Party is growing weaker while Trump gets stronger!"


Ford's lawyer now admits that Ford's accusations were all about abortion rulings; and not about Judge Kavanaugh being a rapist.

 

[Dumpington]

JKendallDane writes: "I'm disappointed, Dump. You left out the Mexicans and atheists on that one."

I don't think that the modern Democratic Party cares about those Hispanic Americans here in the U.S. LEGALLY, Jay-Kendall - or about the Mexican people living south of the border. Today's Democrats are ONLY interested in those people who have entered our nation ILLEGALLY, whom they can then entice to vote for Democrats at election time. And if those people coming here illegally are atheists and/or transgendered, then they're DOUBLY-welcomed!

"Congrats, Dump. You have reached a new level of your morphing process."

Okay, I was WRONG to imply that you in any ways respect any of those weirdos currently associated with the left: Colin Kaepernick, Megan Rapinoe, Jussie Smollett, Sandra Fluke, & Christine Blasey-Ford are all embarrassing to ALL Americans, including even to Trump-haters like yourself!

"Just because I enjoy rapey web-sites doesn't make me a bad person. I'm not as weird as you all seem to believe!"

No, Dan - you're a perfectly normal liberal Trump-hating Democrat.

jp55665566 writes: "Ford's lawyer now admits that Ford's accusations were all about abortion rulings; and not about Judge Kavanaugh being a rapist."

Dr. Christine Blasey Ford committed perjury in her failed effort to de-rail last year's Kavanaugh Supreme Court confirmation. She simply wanted to do her part to help Planned Parenthood keep its taxpayer funding.

 

[dan_c00000]

Dr. Christine Blasey Ford committed perjury in her failed effort to de-rail last year's Kavanaugh Supreme Court confirmation.

More pro-sexual assault misogyny from lit's own number one rape apologist.

 

[Dumpington]

dan_c00000 writes: "I agree except that they haven't ditched it when the NRA endorsed the murder of children..."

No, Dan - you've got it wrong again - it's not the NRA that has endorsed the murder of children - it's the folks at PLANNED PARENTHOOD!

And because Planned Parenthood is currently running the Democratic Party, and San Francisco is currently run by Democrats, they have no choice but to try and pretend that it's the National Rifle Association performing ABORTIONS instead! But the NRA doesn't do that!

Abortion is a horrific thing, Dan - and it should be labelled as a terrorist action, but so long as the Democrats take their marching orders from Planned Parenthood they're going to try and blame others for their barbaric agenda!

"More pro-sexual assault misogyny from the rape apologists running Planned Parenthood."

When Planned Parenthood plays their tune, Dan, every Democrat must dance!

 

[jp55665566]

Dump: "No, Dan - you've got it wrong again - it's not the NRA that has endorsed the murder of children - it's the folks at PLANNED PARENTHOOD!"

WoW. You got that right. Planned Parenthood is WAAAY more dangerous to the lives of children than the NRA. I'm pretty sure the NRA hasn't even killed one child, while Planned Parenthood is actually in the killing business !

 

[YDB95]

A right-wing website with a long history of complete disregard for the truth says Ford's lawyer now admits that Ford's accusations were all about abortion rulings; and not about Judge Kavanaugh being a rapist.

Fixed that for you. You're welcome.

 

[Dumpington]

jp55665566 writes: "Planned Parenthood is WAAAY more dangerous to the lives of children than the NRA. I'm pretty sure the NRA hasn't even killed one child, while Planned Parenthood is actually in the killing business!"

Planned Parenthood is to America's unborn babies what the Auschwitz death-camp was to Europe's Jewish population in the early 1940's. And the folks at Planned Parenthood are every bit as clinical in killing on a massive scale as were Hitler's people at Auschwitz!

YDB95 writes: "Ford's lawyer now admits that Ford's accusations were all about abortion rulings; and not about Judge Kavanaugh being a rapist."

Even some Democratic Party legislators now admit that Bill Clinton was very likely a sex-offender, and that he probably should have been forced to resign the presidency for his behavior towards women in the 1990's. Brett Kavanaugh's primary fault in the eyes of the modern Democratic Party lies in the fact that he's pro-life, and the folks at Planned Parenthood were leaning HARD on Senate Democrats last year to BLOCK the Kavanaugh Supreme Court nomination. They FAILED miserably in their efforts, and their party paid the price at the polls in 2018, where they earned an additional net-loss of two U.S. Senate seats!

When Ruth Bader-Ginsburg finally leaves/quits the U.S. Supreme Court (it could happen at any time), President Trump will now have a MUCH easier time getting his next pick confirmed, even if Dr. Christine Blasey-Ford should come forth with a new series of accusations (which only Senate Democrats will believe!)

 

[jp55665566]

When Ruth Bader-Ginsburg finally leaves/quits the U.S. Supreme Court (it could happen at any time), President Trump will now have a MUCH easier time getting his next pick confirmed, even if Dr. Christine Blasey-Ford should come forth with a new series of accusations (which only Senate Democrats will believe!)

Democrats would sooner nuke Capitol Hill than allow RBG to "retire". I suspect they have an RBG body-double staged and ready, or possibly already in play. There is NO WAY President Trump will be allowed to select another Supreme Court justice ! These clowns are that desperate.

 

[Dumpington]

jp55665566 writes: "Democrats would sooner nuke Capitol Hill than allow RBG to "retire"."

I have thought the exact same thing! Many of them are already angry at her for not retiring back in 2009, when President Obama & his party still controlled the U.S. Senate and could have comfortably confirmed ANY loser (e.g. Merrick Garland)!

"I suspect they have an RBG body-double staged and ready, or possibly already in play."

I wouldn't be at all surprised if the Democratic Party and Planned Parenthood have already hired an expert taxidermist who is prepared to make a deceased Ruth Bader-Ginsgurg appear alive for the forseeable future, or at least until that day in the distant future when their party re-takes both the White House & the U.S. Senate (e.g. 2032 or 2034?)

"There is NO WAY President Trump will be allowed to select another Supreme Court justice ! These clowns are that desperate."

The Democrats have already brought in Dr. Christine Blasey-Ford to train a host of other women to "remember" alleged acts of sexual violence against whomever Trump might nominate. It doesn't matter WHO they are or WHAT outrageous claims these female "victims" may make - the Democrats in the U.S. Senate (and their media allies) are fully prepared to believe them!

 

[JKendallDane]

(image of faked Time cover from the rape apologist site deleted from quote because that kind of trash doesn't need any more exposure to the easily swayed "we'll believe anything if it looks like it's owning the libs" minds)

JP556-etc... A good rule of thumb when trying to rack up "cred points" is to NOT re-post something that was debunked TWICE in the half dozen comments before your failed attempt at a score. When you do that you just end up embarrassing yourself.

JKendallDane writes: "I'm disappointed, Dump. You left out the Mexicans and atheists on that one."

I don't think that the modern Democratic Party cares about those Hispanic Americans here in the U.S. LEGALLY, Jay-Kendall - or about the Mexican people living south of the border. Today's Democrats are ONLY interested in those people who have entered our nation ILLEGALLY, whom they can then entice to vote for Democrats at election time. And if those people coming here illegally are atheists and/or transgendered, then they're DOUBLY-welcomed!

Sorry, Dump, but just because that makes the ten-gazillionth time you have spit that garbage out, it still isn't true. But do keep chewing on it and maybe ten-gazzillion-and-one will be the time it magically works.

"Congrats, Dump. You have reached a new level of your morphing process."

Okay, I was WRONG to imply that you in any ways respect any of those weirdos currently associated with the left: Colin Kaepernick, Megan Rapinoe, Jussie Smollett, Sandra Fluke, & Christine Blasey-Ford...

Actually, Dump, I DO respect Kaepernick for his peaceful protest method.

Same as I respect Rapinoe for publicly flipping 45 the bird and making him eat his own words.

And Sandra Fluke for refusing to bow down and take the hysterical attacks of Rush calling her a "slut and a prostitute."

And Dr. Blasey-Ford for having the courage to come forward and testify in a calm, factual manner while maintaining total decorum, about a highly emotion day in her life as opposed to the whining, blubbering, "See my tears - Life isn't being FAIR to me!" rambling mess Kavanaugh showed the world.

Smollett....PFFFT! He sealed his own fate and I couldn't care less what, if anything, happens to him at this point.

Guess that means you were wrong about BEING wrong four out of five times there. But then again, being wrong about things is pretty much normal for you.

.

 

[Dumpington]

JKendallDane writes: "Sorry, Dump, but just because that makes the ten-gazillionth time you have spit that garbage out, it still isn't true."

If I was spitting-out liberal/progressive garbage then you'd be perfectly fine with it, Jay-Kendall. For example, if I applauded Colin Kaepernick as an American patriot for disrespecting our flag & national anthem in front of millions of people you'd say that you AGREE with my stupidity because you'd feel the exact same way.

"Actually, Dump, I DO respect Kaepernick for his peaceful protest method."

Yes, I KNOW you do - and you ALSO admire the Nike shoe company for paying Kaepernick millions of dollars to spread his hatred of the U.S. abroad, just as you ALSO admire Megan Rapinoe for letting the rest of the world know how much she disrespects our nation! And yes, I know that you're impressed with Sandra Fluke & Dr. Christine Blasey-Ford - and you'd even be admiring Jussie Smollett right now if he hadn't been publicly exposed as the perpetrator of a racist hoax!

"Guess that means you were wrong about BEING wrong four out of five times there."

I know you feel guilty about abandoning Jussie Smollett, but don't worry about that - Michelle Obama is still supporting him! YOUR loyal liberal-Democrat-inspired support of these anti-American weirdos is exactly why President Trump won in 2016, and why he'll win AGAIN in 2020!

 

[JKendallDane]

Attack-Deflect-Divert-Blah, Blah, Blah

Sentence after sentence after sentence of channeling Sean, Tucker, Rush, Coulter, and Matt all topped off with an always-dependable pure Dumpism like...

YOUR loyal liberal-Democrat-inspired support of these anti-American weirdos is exactly why President Trump won in 2016, and why he'll win AGAIN in 2020!

I finally figured out why I bother with you, Dump. It's like watching "All In the Family" reruns where you already know what Archie Bunker is gonna say to almost everything, but you just wanna see it happen because it's always so funny that anyone can actually be that detached from reality.

Please don't ever stop offering up your pearls of presumed wisdom.

.

 

[jp55665566]

What is Elizabeth Warren thinking?

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ED47EgfUYAAFnSA?format=png&name=small

Imagine... Elizabeth Warren chooses Hillary Clinton to be her Vice-President. Talk about an express one-way ticket to the graveyard! Check out Hillary's "Seig Heil" salute to her NAZI handlers. Don't do it people. Just say "No" !

 

[Dumpington]

JKendallDane writes: "I finally figured out why I bother with you, Dump. It's like watching "All In the Family" reruns where you already know what Archie Bunker is gonna say to almost everything, but you just wanna see it happen because it's always so funny that anyone can actually be that detached from reality."

The important thing, Jay-Kendall, is that you're still interested in reading what I have to say! I'm not sure what I'd do if you ever stopped caring about my opinions here on this forum!

"Please don't ever stop offering up your pearls of presumed wisdom."

Not to worry, my friend - I'm here for you!

jp55665566 writes: "Imagine... Elizabeth Warren chooses Hillary Clinton to be her Vice-President."

That is HILARIOUS - a Warren-Clinton Democratic Party ticket would be landslided even worse than Reagan's 49-state clobbering of Mondale-Ferraro in '84! Those two femi-nazis running together would set the Democratic Party back half-a-century at least!

 

[JKendallDane]

JKendallDane writes: "I finally figured out why I bother with you, Dump. It's like watching "All In the Family" reruns where you already know what Archie Bunker is gonna say to almost everything, but you just wanna see it happen because it's always so funny that anyone can actually be that detached from reality."

The important thing, Jay-Kendall, is that you're still interested in reading what I have to say! I'm not sure what I'd do if you ever stopped caring about my opinions here on this forum!

Stop masturbating yourself, Dump. It's not so much that I care about your opinions as it is that I just find them so humorous and, in a twisted way, so eerily enlightening. Call it you being an ever-present reminder of the wisdom I had when I finally started consistently flipping the national GOP the bird 35 years ago.

Speaking of going back in time, there's something I'd really like to know, Dump. Who did you vote for in the '92 primary...GHWB or your evil twin, Pat Buchanan?

.

 

[Dumpington]

JKendallDane writes: "Stop masturbating yourself, Dump."

Do you seriously believe that responding to your political posts excites me that much, Jay-Kendall? - (It doesn't!)

"...when I finally started consistently flipping the national GOP the bird 35 years ago."

And how very exciting that must have been for you.

"Speaking of going back in time, there's something I'd really like to know, Dump. Who did you vote for in the '92 primary...GHWB or your evil twin, Pat Buchanan?"

Back in '92 I voted for President Bush. All Pat Buchanan ultimately did was help Bill Clinton. I could say the exact same thing about Ross Perot.

 

[JKendallDane]

"...when I finally started consistently flipping the national GOP the bird 35 years ago."

And how very exciting that must have been for you.

No, it actually was a difficult decision since one of my ancestors helped found the party and was their first VP candidate in 1856. Even more so because I had been a Republican candidate for office myself in three previous elections. My roots were very deep, but Reagan and his gang managed to poison them. The ever-increasing stupidity from the GOP that has followed finished those roots off.

"Speaking of going back in time, there's something I'd really like to know, Dump. Who did you vote for in the '92 primary...GHWB or your evil twin, Pat Buchanan?"

Back in '92 I voted for President Bush. All Pat Buchanan ultimately did was help Bill Clinton. I could say the exact same thing about Ross Perot.

Even GHWB himself admitted to the people in his sky box at the '92 Houston convention that allowing Buchanan to do his infamous Mein Kampf speech in prime time had just handed Clinton the keys to the White House. Ross Perot was just the icing on that already-baked cake.

.

 

[Dumpington]

JKendallDane writes: "No, it actually was a difficult decision since one of my ancestors helped found the party and was their first VP candidate in 1856. Even more so because I had been a Republican candidate for office myself in three previous elections. My roots were very deep, but Reagan and his gang managed to poison them. The ever-increasing stupidity from the GOP that has followed finished those roots off."

Okay, I think I see the problem here. You say that you LIKED the 1856 Republican presidential ticket of John Fremont & William Dayton, who ended-up winning 33.09% of the popular vote, along with eleven-states worth a total of 114 electoral votes.

But then you DISLIKED Ronald Reagan, who in 1980 won 50.75% of the popular vote, along with carrying 44-states worth 489 electoral votes - and then, in 1984, followed that up winning 58.77% of the popular vote, along with FORTY-NINE STATES worth an all-time record-high 525 electoral votes!

It sounds to me like you prefer those Republicans who LOSE presidential elections (like John McCain) over those who win - and I can now better understand why you dislike President Trump as much as you do! These Republicans and their support for traditional American values upsets & vexes you!

"Even GHWB himself admitted to the people in his sky box at the '92 Houston convention that allowing Buchanan to do his infamous Mein Kampf speech in prime time had just handed Clinton the keys to the White House. Ross Perot was just the icing on that already-baked cake."

"Mein Kampf" speech? Oh yeah, I almost forgot - anybody who doesn't celebrate/promote the gay/transgendered political agenda in the United States today is a "Nazi" to those on the progressive anti-American far-left! And if you have any reservations about Islamic Sharia Law then that makes you a white supremacist. I got it.

 

[JKendallDane]

JKendallDane writes: "No, it actually was a difficult decision since one of my ancestors helped found the party and was their first VP candidate in 1856. Even more so because I had been a Republican candidate for office myself in three previous elections. My roots were very deep, but Reagan and his gang managed to poison them. The ever-increasing stupidity from the GOP that has followed finished those roots off."

Okay, I think I see the problem here. You say that you LIKED the 1856 Republican presidential ticket of John Fremont & William Dayton... (You had to Google that one, didn't ya', Dump? See, you learned something from a lib today. Little steps are: PROGRESS! Keep taking them! )

It sounds to me like you prefer those Republicans who LOSE presidential elections (like John McCain) over those who win - and I can now better understand why you dislike President Trump as much as you do! These Republicans and their support for traditional American values upsets & vexes you!

What I would prefer is a GOP that embodies the ideals and methods of governing that made it the party of Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt, and Eisenhower. Instead, it's become the party of "Voodoo Trickle-Down Economics" and been hijacked by a constantly whining, egomaniacal narcissist who has no clue what he is doing 95% of the time.

Get back to offering candidates like Jerry Ford, Bob Dole, Jack Kemp, and even John McCain and you might get my attention again. Things like 45 and Mikey "Evangel-iban" Pence ain't gonna cut it.

"Even GHWB himself admitted to the people in his sky box at the '92 Houston convention that allowing Buchanan to do his infamous Mein Kampf speech in prime time had just handed Clinton the keys to the White House. Ross Perot was just the icing on that already-baked cake."

"Mein Kampf" speech? Oh yeah, I almost forgot - anybody who doesn't celebrate/promote the gay/transgendered political agenda in the United States today is a "Nazi" to those on the progressive anti-American far-left! And if you have any reservations about Islamic Sharia Law then that makes you a white supremacist. I got it.

Get real, Dump. Buchanan's speech was being compared to Mein Kampf within minutes of him finally slithering off the stage...by both Dems AND Repubs alike.

Your deflections into how YOU want to paint everyone to the left of you are duly noted...and rejected.

.

 

[Dumpington]

JKendallDane writes: "You had to Google that one, didn't ya', Dump?"

No, Jay-Kendall - I NEVER use Google - I went right to the source: http://www.uselectionatlas.org - it's got all the information that I needed to know!

"What I would prefer is a GOP that embodies the ideals and methods of governing that made it the party of Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt, and Eisenhower."

WHO in their right mind would embrace the party of George McGovern (who won only one-state), Walter Mondale (who won only one-state), Bill Clinton (who lied under oath about sexually harrassing women), or Barack "Rainbow Lights" Obama? - I mean, seriously?

"Get real, Dump. Buchanan's speech was being compared to Mein Kampf within minutes of him finally slithering off the stage...by both Dems AND Repubs alike."

If you truly believe that Pat Buchanan is anything like Hitler then you know absolutely NOTHING about the real Adolf Hitler!

"Your deflections into how YOU want to paint everyone to the left of you are duly noted...and rejected."

I'm serious, Jay-Kendall - you display a clear IGNORANCE of Adolf Hitler and his Nazi Party when you compare him with Republican presidential candidates! A much more REALISTIC comparison you could make would be to compare a Planned Parenthood clinic with Auschwitz.

 

[YDB95]

Back in '92 I voted for President Bush. All Pat Buchanan ultimately did was help Bill Clinton. I could say the exact same thing about Ross Perot.

And you would be wrong as usual (about Perot, that is). Study after study has shown in a two-way race, Clinton still would have won.

JKendallDane writes: "No, it actually was a difficult decision since one of my ancestors helped found the party and was their first VP candidate in 1856. Even more so because I had been a Republican candidate for office myself in three previous elections. My roots were very deep, but Reagan and his gang managed to poison them. The ever-increasing stupidity from the GOP that has followed finished those roots off."

Okay, I think I see the problem here. You say that you LIKED the 1856 Republican presidential ticket of John Fremont & William Dayton, who ended-up winning 33.09% of the popular vote, along with eleven-states worth a total of 114 electoral votes.

But then you DISLIKED Ronald Reagan, who in 1980 won 50.75% of the popular vote, along with carrying 44-states worth 489 electoral votes - and then, in 1984, followed that up winning 58.77% of the popular vote, along with FORTY-NINE STATES worth an all-time record-high 525 electoral votes!

It sounds to me like you prefer those Republicans who LOSE presidential elections (like John McCain) over those who win - and I can now better understand why you dislike President Trump as much as you do!

Okay, this is genuinely enlightening. It's all about winning for you, isn't it, Dump? Don't know why I didn't see it before.

"Mein Kampf" speech? Oh yeah, I almost forgot - anybody who doesn't celebrate/promote the gay/transgendered political agenda in the United States today is a "Nazi" to those on the progressive anti-American far-left! And if you have any reservations about Islamic Sharia Law then that makes you a white supremacist. I got it.

Do you remember Buchanan's speech at all? Did you even watch it?

 

[Dumpington]

YDB95 writes: "Study after study has shown in a two-way race, Clinton still would have won."

In 1988, the Democratic Party's presidential candidate (Michael Dukakis) won 45.65% of the popular vote against George H.W. Bush and lost badly. Four years later, in 1992, the Democrat candidate (Bill Clinton) won only 43.01% of the popular vote, but he STILL won the presidency. HOW is this possible? Because in '92, 3rd-party candidate Ross Perot won 18.91% of the vote, most of it from Bush!

"Okay, this is genuinely enlightening. It's all about winning for you, isn't it, Dump? Don't know why I didn't see it before."

This isn't about me, YDB95 - it's about JKendallDane - he dislikes those Republicans won WIN presidential elections.

"Do you remember Buchanan's speech at all? Did you even watch it?"

Yes, I did - which is why I say that anybody comparing it to "Mein Kampf" is IGNORANT of Adolf Hitler & Nazi Germany! It's not unlike those idiots in the Democratic Party who have actually compared our immigrant detention centers with Nazi concentration camps! You can't defend that kind of stupidity!

 

[YDB95]

In 1988, the Democratic Party's presidential candidate (Michael Dukakis) won 45.65% of the popular vote against George H.W. Bush and lost badly. Four years later, in 1992, the Democrat candidate (Bill Clinton) won only 43.01% of the popular vote, but he STILL won the presidency. HOW is this possible? Because in '92, 3rd-party candidate Ross Perot won 18.91% of the vote, most of it from Bush!

No, "most of it" was not from Bush. Perot voters were about evenly split between Clinton, Bush and neither for their second choice. And what happened in the previous election had nothing to do with what happened next time.

"Okay, this is genuinely enlightening. It's all about winning for you, isn't it, Dump? Don't know why I didn't see it before."

This isn't about me, YDB95 - it's about JKendallDane - he dislikes those Republicans won WIN presidential elections.

The scary thing is, I believe you really believe it's that simple. I must have been reading your nonsense for too long.

"Do you remember Buchanan's speech at all? Did you even watch it?"

Yes, I did - which is why I say that anybody comparing it to "Mein Kampf" is IGNORANT of Adolf Hitler & Nazi Germany! It's not unlike those idiots in the Democratic Party who have actually compared our immigrant detention centers with Nazi concentration camps! You can't defend that kind of stupidity!

I'm still waiting for you to provide cites on anyone comparing them with Nazi concentration camps (not just concentration camps, but specifically Nazi ones). And Pat Buchanan has been making anti-Semitic comments for decades (and already had been in 1992), so any comparison to Hitler (for whom he expressed admiration in a 1977 column, by the way) isn't as far off as you no doubt wish it was.

 

[BotanyBoy]

I'm still waiting for you to provide cites on anyone comparing them with Nazi concentration camps (not just concentration camps, but specifically Nazi ones). .

Direct comparisons .....direct invocation of Nazi imagery.

But Representative Jerrold Nadler, Democrat of New York and the chairman of the Judiciary Committee, chimed in to support Ms. Ocasio-Cortez. Mr. Nadler, who is Jewish, tweeted: “One of the lessons from the Holocaust is ‘Never Again’ - not only to mass murder, but also to the dehumanization of people, violations of basic rights, and assaults on our common morality. We fail to learn that lesson when we don’t callout such inhumanity right in front of us.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/18/us/politics/ocasio-cortez-cheney-detention-centers.html

But Ms. Ocasio-Cortez, 29, is typically intentional about her word choice, as she herself made clear when she addressed her Instagram followers on Monday evening in one of her regular unscripted videos.

“I want to talk to the people that are concerned enough with humanity to say that ‘Never Again’ means something,” she said, invoking a phrase Jews use when discussing the importance of remembering the Holocaust. “The fact that concentration camps are now an institutionalized practice in the home of the free is extraordinarily disturbing and we need to do something about it.”

She called Mr. Trump’s administration “an authoritarian and fascist presidency,” adding: “I don’t use those words lightly. I don’t use those words to just throw bombs. I use that word because that is what an administration that creates concentration camps is. A presidency that creates concentration camps is fascist.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/18/us/politics/ocasio-cortez-cheney-detention-centers.html


There are more.....easy to find left leaning MSM/indi sources to verify all sorts of Nazi/Hitler comparisons and inaccurate accusations of fascism pouring out of the left....from Capital Hill to the street of Seattle.

If you're not trying to keep your head in the sand about the US left and their recent behavior that is.