Alternate Blurting II: Bandito

internecine

not sure if they posted a personal pic... i missed why

Well, there's an army of alts hiding in the wings ready to step in. Again, not a good system. Guess I should make one in case my potty mouth gets me in trouble. 🙊 (Sorry Aglo, seemed most relevant emoji.)

You are a very powerful defender of your wife.

ahahahaha!

As he should be. Perhaps one day you'll find a love like that. :)
 
Well, there's an army of alts hiding in the wings ready to step in. Again, not a good system. Guess I should make one in case my potty mouth gets me in trouble. 🙊 (Sorry Aglo, seemed most relevant emoji.)



As he should be. Perhaps one day you'll find a love like that. :)
yeah, they have 'em prepped and ready for when laurel repeatedly boots them for breaking her site's rules

oh, we decided long ago we didn't feel we wanted 'defending' by the other on here... :D we've both been members here as individuals and, now, as partners, and we're both perfectly capable of dealing with scum... mostly having them on ignore. doesn't stop lace attempting to bait H (lace pissing into the wind because that's how dumb he is) as he has from the minute H and i got together on here as a couple. he hates the fact i called him out publicly on his bullying of other members and hates anyone with a happy relationship... guess it reinforces his sense of inadequacy when it comes to that. :cattail:
 
internecine

not sure if they posted a personal pic... i missed why

There was no offense, you cow cunt! That poster made commentary on threads using thread titles from the available archives and attributed to the original poster by their current avatars. There was not even a divisive link posted.

The content that triggered you snowflakes so was your own fucking words.


Let's just say someone on high wanted to remove any possible internecine conflicts.

Was it the poster's very choice of name that threatened you? Your someone on high won't, but really should, get their triggered ass out in the open
to explain for one and all what the New Rules actually are.

Free Speech - No Offense?
 
. Perhaps one day you'll find a love like that. :)

In context, you are wishing he find flatulent love in his future? Is that some sort of Canadian blessing? :confused:

That seems less then well-wishing.
 
Last edited:
There was no offense, you cow cunt! That poster made commentary on threads using thread titles from the available archives and attributed to the original poster by their current avatars. There was not even a divisive link posted.

The content that triggered you snowflakes so was your own fucking words.




Was it the poster's very choice of name that threatened you? Your someone on high won't, but really should, get their triggered ass out in the open
to explain for one and all what the New Rules actually are.

Free Speech - No Offense?
:rolleyes:

kybele hasn't been here for years

now do fuck off, silly person. join your buds shouting into the dark, hoping someone might hear you. annnnnnnd *iggyclick* :rose:
 
yeah, they have 'em prepped and ready for when laurel repeatedly boots them for breaking her site's rules

oh, we decided long ago we didn't feel we wanted 'defending' by the other on here... :D we've both been members here as individuals and, now, as partners, and we're both perfectly capable of dealing with scum... mostly having them on ignore. doesn't stop lace attempting to bait H (lace pissing into the wind because that's how dumb he is) as he has from the minute H and i got together on here as a couple. he hates the fact i called him out publicly on his bullying of other members and hates anyone with a happy relationship... guess it reinforces his sense of inadequacy when it comes to that. :cattail:

Lol, still, H is adorable when he bitch slaps for you. And vice versa.

http://1zl13gzmcsu3l9yq032yyf51-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Albert-Einstein-quote-on-not-caring-about-what-others-think-Great-spirits-have-always-encountered-violent-opposition-from-mediocre-minds-696x365.jpg
 
:rolleyes:

kybele hasn't been here for years

now do fuck off, silly person. join your buds shouting into the dark, hoping someone might hear you. annnnnnnd *iggyclick* :rose:

Kybele
Guest

Nevermind Alien Vs Predator...

This quotation? Used as commentary in a thread comparing the offenses of Trump and Clinton through the Epstein lens? Mentioning a former poster and his/her words is offensive?

The Lit Archives themselves are offensive?

Perhaps we talk of recipes only then here. If that's okay with you?
 
This quotation? Used as commentary in a thread comparing the offenses of Trump and Clinton through the Epstein lens? Mentioning a former poster and his/her words is offensive?

The Lit Archives themselves are offensive?

Perhaps we talk of recipes only then here. If that's okay with you?

problems reading? i specifically pointed out i didn't know the reason why you got ban hammered.

but there ya go again... my ignore list is filled with the likes of you, frikkin spammy alts :rolleyes:

'nother one bites the dust
 
How is it that butters is right there to reply to posts from people she says she has on ignore?

She's either:

a) psychic

or

b) a big fat lying cunt


I vote liar.
 
Silver has been posting that same ass pic for.... how long?

1985?

“You cant hide your lyin’ ass”
 
[Material prohibited per our forum guidelines.] - Last Warning Already Given

Where was a prior warning given? Where anywhere but this one post? This warning, it seems was levied just as the ban was hammered. For what exact cause?

The very post deleted seems to have been quoted below in the thread. It quotes a thread title and the avatar that created the post? In literature, this is known as a citation. Has the thread quoted been deleted? No. Is the implied criticism of this thread the offense? Was it the usage of the currently active avatar in use on these boards the offense? Is the active avatar pic offensive?

The two faced cow is no longer part of this discussion. The Rules are. From a free range food fight that managed to messily regulate itself, this General Board has become the very lounge that was created as tender subbie to it. Is the General Board now to be what mommy and the sycophants deign as proper and nice? Is stifling parody, criticism, outlier and your very archival record really in your best intellectual interest? Are you all now too tender either to ignore any particular post or, heavens, reply intellectually to it?

Those who choose now to gloat over the most recent, heavy handed moderation of the one forum on this site that came closest to a free speech corner should take a moment to think over the current autocratic politics you seem to hate. Want to discuss backbone while you are at it?

Just show yourselves you Rule Makers. Give this one incident some definition for all to see. No rule was breached by internecine. Not a single demonstrable one. But, some one must have rung the bell? Some tender someone. Some favored one. Is this the New Rule?

Or, is it the Archive itself? That seems to be the pattern. What is contained within; that which was freely published by people here; that which is THE ENTIRETY OF YOUR CASH COW is not to be subject to debate, criticism, parody or scrutiny by membership? Certainly no one line of discourse on this little General Board is that threatening, especially if they conform to the already proscribed rules. So, proscribe the New Rules.

You own the place. Wave the wand and make all the bad people go away. Let the nice people swap naughty quips and recipes. Or, if you still believe in the lofty banner Free Speech - No Spam, you could remind them once again how not to respond to "triggering" words or direct them once again to their snowflake subbie lounge where this kind of arbitrary favoritism was ordained.

There is nothing literate or erotic about corrupted censorship.
 
Back
Top