Ban all of the previously and repeatedly banned posters. Especially the perma-banned

[SgtSpiderMan]

Have you ever considered putting a corncob up your ass?

You've got a lot of butt hurt about this topic for someone who has never been banned.

 

[beew]

You've got a lot of butt hurt about this topic for someone who has never been banned.

Have you ever considered putting a corncob up your ass?

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

Have you ever considered putting a corncob up your ass?

You've got a lot of butt hurt and a weird obsession with me.

 

[SpeareChucker]

Have you ever considered putting a corncob up your ass?

It was too gentile...

 

[beew]

You've got a lot of butt hurt and a weird obsession with me.

Have you ever considered putting a corncob up your ass?

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

It was too gentile...

I don't see what religion has to do with that guy's obsession with me.

Looks like you couldn't back up your claim.

 

[beew]

Looks like you couldn't back up your claim.

Have you ever considered putting a corncob up your ass?

 

[SpeareChucker]

Is your corncob pipe clutched firmly in your teeth?



Can you even name one banned left-winger?


Back, or not?

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

Is your corncob pipe clutched firmly in your teeth?



Can you even name one banned left-winger?


Back, or not?

Never made any claims about that. Looks like you were wrong. Strange that you made such a claim for someone who hasn't been here that long.

 

[beew]

Jesus Spidey
You're so boring with your OCD

You're taking any fun out of this thread for me.

 

[SpeareChucker]

*chuckle*


Sets the rules, claims a win, and then takes his ball home...

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

*chuckle*


Sets the rules, claims a win, and then takes his ball home...

When you get asked to back up what you said and refuse and instead make personal attacks.......

 

[dolf]

In all honesty, you don't do that with zumi. Other Blurt posters do.
And I don't usually find you mean spiritted.

But the way you immediately pile up on such occasions pissed me off and confused me: Is it just about an understandable reaction to being picked on, or whatever history you have with Ish? Or is it the real you?
Like -what's her name? it slips me at the moment-: she was Mother Theresa incarnated to certain posters, but when they were banned and lost their power/ gave her by default: she pounced.

Lots of cunts post here. A few are placed in the cunt pile based on my interaction with them. More often than not, their placement is the result of what I witnessed in their interactions with others. If they come up in conversation, damn straight will I say why they're a cunt.

Frankly, I have no idea why you always assume that two posters agreeing must be conspiring. Or that they belong to some group. I haven't sent or received a pm in over two weeks, and that was only somebody clarifying an aspect of the legal system, which was far more interesting than sucking up and kissing arse.

Sometimes "mob opinion" just means that everyone has independently come to the same conclusion.

 

[dolf]

Also, I've never claimed to be nice.

 

[SpeareChucker]

When you get asked to back up what you said and refuse and instead make personal attacks.......

How obtuse are you?


I mean, seriously...

 

[Wrong Element]

Can you even name one banned left-winger?


Back, or not?

Sure, KO got banned. Came back, got banned again.


Can you name even one conservative who got banned for their politics rather than for repeatedly breaking rules?

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

How obtuse are you?


I mean, seriously...

I'm not the one who made a claim they couldn't give one example for and resorted to personal attacks.

 

[oralaccents]

Cunt stomach.

 

[dolf]

Sure, KO got banned. Came back, got banned again.


Can you name even one conservative who got banned for their politics rather than for repeatedly breaking rules?

Fata was a lefty, and so is Lt.

Why is this a left/right issue?

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

Fata was a lefty, and so is Lt.

Why is this a left/right issue?

Because there is a particular poster who can't accept responsibility for their choices, so they're claiming they were banned because of their politics.

 

[dolf]

Because there is a particular poster who can't accept responsibility for their choices, so they're claiming they were banned because of their politics.

Then why be site traffic to profit commie scum?

 

[oralaccents]

Because there is a particular poster who can't accept responsibility for their choices, so they're claiming they were banned because of their politics.

So what?

 

[von_Bismarck]

Not a valid metric since many people do, but only conservatives get banned.


This is an issue that even Congress is looking in to...


Have I reminded you lately that


you are a moron?

This is a lie, and you know it.

 

[duranman]

Fata may well be a lefty, but give her a huge London cock down her throat and she'd be obsequious to a fascist. She's an amazing arse licker too aren't you darling? Don't answer with your mouth full babe, there's a good girl

 

[Shelly2inme]

Weak minded

The concept of wanting anyone band seems strange to me. I think a lot of things posted here and a lot of things in all aspects of life are crazy. But I don't want to live in a world where a person or group of people decides who can and can not speak. That can sound great until the pendulum swings back and shuts your mouth. We all have the power to read or not read anything we want. The power to ban and to block is already in our own minds. So, why want a third party to your banning and blocking for you?