Anti trump protests in the uk

That's pretty funny.

Honestly, he really is that hated here. And, in all honesty, I don't think it's all about politics. The despots and dictators get protests, but few of them attract as much mockery and loathing as trump. I think it's a cultural thing, like how evangelical preachers are popular there. You like loud people who big things up. In our culture, that's vulgar and distasteful. That's why we want our vicars drive rusty Micra's and speak quietly and drink tea. So, yeah, it's probably only 90% about politics.

It's the reactionary left.....they behave the same way here, like 5 year olds.

Dear UK,

We are sorry.

Love,
America

^^ doesn't speak for the USA.

Here's the amusing thing...



They (dolf's people) celebrated a deal with Hitler.

They are big fans of authority there....just look at how they are prosecuting their comedians, artist and scientist for being offensive even when it's 100% true.

Before judging us, keep in mind fewer than 1 in 5 Americans actually cast a vote for him, and he received the help of a country other than ours to obtain the office.

And the (D)'s couldn't manage to put anything better up.

Still can't either. :D
 
It's the reactionary left.....they behave the same way here, like 5 year olds.

The right here don't see him as on their team, which the right over there probably would, and his slogan wasn't to make Britain great again. Nobody here has a good enough reason to overlook the unpleasant. There you might say he's a serial groper but he's fixing your immigration problem. Here we just say he's a serial groper. Who puts ketchup on steak *shudder*
 
DeepState U.S. = DeepState U.K. same/same working against President Trump and for the entrenched corrupt bureaucracy.
 
The US is not a democracy idiot.

It is no surprise that a bigoted racist like you feels this way. However, most people qualified to make such a judgement consider the US to be a liberal democracy, along with most of Western Europe. Schmucks like you really don’t matter.
 
The US and the UK are sovereign nations and allies. Unilaterally rejecting treaties made in conjunction with your allies without consultation or warning is a way to piss off your friends.

Iran is dangerous. The nuclear agreement was a multi-national attempt to mitigate the danger. The treaty wasn't ideal but was better than nothing.

As for the Paris accord on climate change? President Trump's rejection pissed off almost every other country in the world.

Ogg, that's what I'm trying to tell you. There is no treaty between the US and Iran. There never was. We don't even have diplomatic relations with them.

What you are talking about was an agreement made between the Obama administration and Iran. The fact that some other folks joined in doesn't change the fact that that agreement is NOT backed up by US law, legislative or constitutional.
 
It is no surprise that a bigoted racist like you feels this way. However, most people qualified to make such a judgement consider the US to be a liberal democracy, along with most of Western Europe. Schmucks like you really don’t matter.

STFU with your wild ass accusations of racism aimed at people who's only crime is to be smarter than you are.:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
 
Most Brits see these protesters as just as much a product of American vulgarity as the president. Sure we hate him, but grumbling ineffectually behind closed doors is much more our style.

Also London is more of a globalist city than an English one at this point so don't assume that's how we all behave.

These protesters are a national embarrassment, they didn't seem to mind every tin-pot dictator in the world having tea with the queen but show up to insult the leader of our closest ally on the anniversary of D-day.
you clearly move in different circles to the ones i did
the ONLY people i knew who liked trump/his policies were the few very prejudiced, ignorant & crass that opened their mouths to me about voting for brexit

I wonder how many of them can actually articulate what in the hell it is they're protesting?
oh, they know exactly why the cannot stand having the orange man on british soil and there were doctors, teachers, lawyers, professors, politicians & journalists as well as plenty who can articulate in the queen's english who don't have degrees. your condescending post is a joke given you don't realise the us is a representative democracy
By Eugene Volokh https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...public-or-a-democracy/?utm_term=.355050102848

I often hear people argue that the United States is a republic, not a democracy. But that’s a false dichotomy. A common definition of “republic” is, to quote the American Heritage Dictionary, “A political order in which the supreme power lies in a body of citizens who are entitled to vote for officers and representatives responsible to them” — we are that. A common definition of “democracy” is, “Government by the people, exercised either directly or through elected representatives” — we are that, too.

The United States is not a direct democracy, in the sense of a country in which laws (and other government decisions) are made predominantly by majority vote. Some lawmaking is done this way, on the state and local levels, but it’s only a tiny fraction of all lawmaking. But we are a representative democracy, which is a form of democracy.

And indeed the American form of government has been called a “democracy” by leading American statesmen and legal commentators from the Framing on
. It’s true that some Framing-era commentators made arguments that distinguished “democracy” and “republic”; see, for instance, The Federalist (No. 10), though even that first draws the distinction between “pure democracy” and a “republic,” only later just saying “democracy.” But even in that era, “representative democracy” was understood as a form of democracy, alongside “pure democracy”: John Adams used the term “representative democracy” in 1794; so did Noah Webster in 1785; so did St. George Tucker in his 1803 edition of Blackstone; so did Thomas Jefferson in 1815. Tucker’s Blackstone likewise uses “democracy” to describe a representative democracy, even when the qualifier “representative” is omitted.



Sure they were. That's the standard accusation for any protest against Trump.

What kind of moron would even believe it?

Oh, nevermind.
:D
they were 10,000 strong just in trafalgar square yesterday... and that square really isn't that big!

Maybe they have a problem with Trump cozying up to dictators and praising them while belittling our traditional allies and interfering with their internal politics as he is currently doing with his Brexit comments?

But no, it must be personal because you agree with his idiotic policies.
the majority of brits just cannot abide him: he's crass, loud-mouthed, a chronic liar, a con-man, gauche, and embodies the kind of dictatorial meme that brits loathe - don't forget that charles the first got the chop for claiming he was made king by god and everyone else had to obey him. parliament stripped away the powers of regent and they are now the face of britain but not the power behind it.

The US is not a democracy idiot.
really? you don't vote for a government to make decisions and laws that rule your society?
democracy: noun
a system of government by the whole population or all the eligible members of a state, typically through elected representatives.
"capitalism and democracy are ascendant in the third world"
synonyms: representative government, elective government, constitutional government, popular government;

The US and the UK are sovereign nations and allies. Unilaterally rejecting treaties made in conjunction with your allies without consultation or warning is a way to piss off your friends.

Iran is dangerous. The nuclear agreement was a multi-national attempt to mitigate the danger. The treaty wasn't ideal but was better than nothing.

As for the Paris accord on climate change? President Trump's rejection pissed off almost every other country in the world.
yup
 
You guys are incorrigible..:D
when those same people told me why they wanted out of the e.u, it was ALL about 'fucking foreigners' and 'straight bananas'

dark-skinned foreigners were their problem: "taking all the jobs and houses" while, at the same time "not working, thieving from us, living off our taxes and getting free health care and bringing in all their billions of kids and extended families", and if they were muslim+darker skinned even worse, though they had no problem with white/pale-skinned immigrants (of which there are plenty) even if they happened to be muslim.
 
when those same people told me why they wanted out of the e.u, it was ALL about 'fucking foreigners' and 'straight bananas'

dark-skinned foreigners were their problem: "taking all the jobs and houses" while, at the same time "not working, thieving from us, living off our taxes and getting free health care and bringing in all their billions of kids and extended families", and if they were muslim+darker skinned even worse, though they had no problem with white/pale-skinned immigrants (of which there are plenty) even if they happened to be muslim.
Fata -who was anything But xenophobic- said that she voted pro- Brexit.

I don't know what idiots you've been socializing with.
but people from my circle -the few who were pro-Trump- had economic or safety considerations in mind.

Not all Trump supporters are driven by racism.
I prefer to call them misguided or wishful thinkers, at most.
 
People have been getting pretty creative with our traditional sport of taking the piss out of politicians.



That's the thing: you'd be seeing a lot of this no matter who the president was, because protesting an American president traveling abroad is the world's most popular sport. But the fact that Trump absolutely cannot abide criticism makes baiting his whiny ass irresistible.
 
That's the thing: you'd be seeing a lot of this no matter who the president was, because protesting an American president traveling abroad is the world's most popular sport. But the fact that Trump absolutely cannot abide criticism makes baiting his whiny ass irresistible.
Now he's saying the protests are fake news but that there were tons of people showing him love.
 
The right here don't see him as on their team, which the right over there probably would, and his slogan wasn't to make Britain great again. Nobody here has a good enough reason to overlook the unpleasant. There you might say he's a serial groper but he's fixing your immigration problem. Here we just say he's a serial groper. Who puts ketchup on steak *shudder*

Of course not, why would they? He's a nationalist....he's on team USA.

He's on team USA unapologetically, which is what sends the left to the fuckin' moon and makes them behave even crazier and why he'll likely get re-elected.

He's working on the immigration issue, all the open borders/immigration folks are making that difficult though. The harder the left pushes for erasing the USA and it's culture? The harder they push for a totalitarian god state to make equal outcomes for all??? The more likely Trump will win.


We will...but it's not looking very good for the (D)'s so far.

As long as the "woke" identetarian socialist left continue to be the alienating voice of the DNC? Trump just has to keep trollin' the twitter/FB mob and he wins.
 
Last edited:
Now he's saying the protests are fake news but that there were tons of people showing him love.

Showing him love? Yes, there are, and not just because he is President of the USA on the eve of the 75th anniversary of D-Day.

Some of us think that President Trump is addressing the world's problems in a different but effective way.
 
That's the thing: you'd be seeing a lot of this no matter who the president was, because protesting an American president traveling abroad is the world's most popular sport. But the fact that Trump absolutely cannot abide criticism makes baiting his whiny ass irresistible.

Truth. Also, people are enjoying making our own government blush. It's possible to hide it from him, but our own government knows they're being ripped on.
 
A person that has made it their life's profession to observe and report, said this-

"Watch what he (Donald J. Trump) does."

I have been watching.

What Donald J. Trump does, is troll.
 
Showing him love? Yes, there are, and not just because he is President of the USA on the eve of the 75th anniversary of D-Day.

Some of us think that President Trump is addressing the world's problems in a different but effective way.

just come out of the closet already, oswald.
 
Showing him love? Yes, there are, and not just because he is President of the USA on the eve of the 75th anniversary of D-Day.

Some of us think that President Trump is addressing the world's problems in a different but effective way.

I was commenting on the fact that the size of the crowds of the protesters were 3-4 times as large as the ones supporting him (despite it being e eve of the 75th anniversary of D-Day) and yet he called the reports of protesters fake news.

But I'm curious, what problems do you think he is addressing in a "different but effective way?"
 
Back
Top