███████████ Mueller Investigation Results Thread ███████████

Oooh. Shit jussie got real.

Everyone knows that ShitSlinger is a cowardly blowhard, but I think this is the first time we see Zumi breaking out his internet tough guy. . .

In his rabid fervor it appears he forgot his weave.:rolleyes:
 
Yeah, they totally exude a feeling of defending the security of our fair nation.

You mean the nation the intersectional/identitarian socialist (most of the Democrats) that want effectively destroyed at it’s political foundation?

Wouldn’t expect any of them to feel anything but their obvious and open hate for the USA.
 
There's at least three kinds of Trump supporters.

1. The purely braindead like Rightguide and BB.

2. The purely racist and xenophobic, i.e. Que and Bellisarious

3. The pseudo-intellectuals like Harpy who know what Trump is "on some level" but cannot admit they support a dictator, so spend their every waking moment trying to argue against the obvious, in a desperate attempt to keep the truth at bay. = desperate attempt to keep ladling water out of the boat

Oh yeah, one more

4. The Rabid "Left" Haters and White Supremicists, i.e. Psycho Boy

They're all Deplorables

Except we have been right for two years and you in your "vast wisdom" have been "fucked up beyond all recognition" on the subject of Trump/Russian collusion, Mueller, Kavanaugh, the law, and Obama's Deep State coup.
 
Except we have been right for two years and you in your "vast wisdom" have been "fucked up beyond all recognition" on the subject of Trump/Russian collusion, Mueller, Kavanaugh, the law, and Obama's Deep State coup.

I can hear it now, the insane howls of;


"But, but, if it hadn't been for TRUMP! none of that would have happened..."
 
I can hear it now, the insane howls of;


"But, but, if it hadn't been for TRUMP! none of that would have happened..."

So typical of Democrat thought, "the robbery wouldn't have happened if the bank hadn't been built." Trump ran on draining the swamp so it was only natural the Swamp would attack him, the people of the United States, the Constitution, with a massively illegal Coup d'état. :D
 
There's at least three kinds of Trump supporters.

1. The purely braindead like Rightguide and BB.

2. The purely racist and xenophobic, i.e. Que and Bellisarious

3. The pseudo-intellectuals like Harpy who know what Trump is "on some level" but cannot admit they support a dictator, so spend their every waking moment trying to argue against the obvious, in a desperate attempt to keep the truth at bay. = desperate attempt to keep ladling water out of the boat

Oh yeah, one more

4. The Rabid "Left" Haters and White Supremicists, i.e. Psycho Boy

They're all Deplorables


https://www.bing.com/th?id=OIP.dbfba1N5Ifypxzmx7EzZdQHaHK&w=217&h=208&c=7&o=5&pid=1.7
 
The walls are coming in on Comey and many others:


The FBI’s Trump-Russia Investigation Was Formally Opened on False Pretenses
By ANDREW C. MCCARTHY
May 6, 2019 6:30 AM

From the article:

As I have previously detailed, after the hacked DNC emails were published, Steele (whose sources had not foretold the hacking by Russia or publication by WikiLeaks) simply folded this event into his preexisting narrative of a Trump–Russia conspiracy.

Prior to early July, when the FBI began receiving Steele-dossier reports (which the State Department would also soon receive), the intelligence community — particularly the CIA, under the direction of its hyperpolitical director, John Brennan — had been theorizing that the Trump campaign was in a corrupt relationship with Russia. Thanks to the Steele dossier, even before Downer reported his conversation with Papadopoulos to the State Department, the Obama administration had already been operating on the theory that Russia was planning to assist the Trump campaign through the anonymous release of information that would be damaging to Clinton. They had already conveniently fit the hacked DNC emails into this theory.

Downer’s report enabled the Obama administration to cover an investigative theory it was already pursuing with a report from a friendly foreign government, as if that report had triggered the Trump-Russia investigation. In order to pull that off, however, it was necessary to distort what Papadopoulos had told Downer.

To repeat, Papadopoulos never told Downer anything about emails. Moreover, the Mueller report provides no basis for Papadopoulos to have known that Russia was planning the anonymous release of information damaging to Clinton in order to help Trump; nor does the Mueller report allege that Papadopoulos actually told Downer such a thing.

The State Department’s report to the FBI claiming that Papadopoulos had “suggested” these things to Downer was manufactured to portray a false connection between (a) what Papadopoulos told Downer and (b) the hacking and publication of the DNC emails. That false connection then became the rationale for formally opening the FBI’s Trump-Russia investigation — paper cover for an investigation of the Trump campaign that was already under way.

https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/05/fbi-trump-russia-investigation-george-papadopoulos/
 
Papadopoulos is a known liar. He has had his day in court and written a book. Now he changes his story yet again. Who believes that shit?
 
Papadopoulos is a known liar. He has had his day in court and written a book. Now he changes his story yet again. Who believes that shit?

A seasoned highly qualified former federal prosecutor way above your diminished comprehension in matters of law and justice.
 
This should worry everyone, even Democrats. Absent a direct order from the President the CIA is forbidden from conducting its operations inside the United States against American citizens. Did Obama authorize this?

PETER STRZOK SUSPECTED CIA WAS BEHIND INACCURATE MEDIA LEAKS


Chuck Ross | Reporter

Peter Strzok suspected CIA employees were behind inaccurate leaks to the press regarding possible Trump campaign contacts with Russia, according to an email the former FBI counterintelligence official sent to colleagues in April 2017.

“I’m beginning to think the agency got info a lot earlier than we thought and hasn’t shared it completely with us. Might explain all these weird/seemingly incorrect leads all these media folks have. Would also highlight agency as source of some of the leaks,” Strzok wrote in an email to FBI colleagues on April 13, 2017.

In the letter, Sens. Chuck Grassley of Iowa and Ron Johnson of Wisconsin asked Atkinson if he has investigated whether the CIA or other intelligence community agencies leaked information to the press.

They pointed to a Dec. 15, 2016 text message that Strzok, the lead investigator on the Trump-Russia probe, sent to then-FBI attorney Lisa Page.

“Think our sisters have begun leaking like mad. Scorned and worried and political, they’re kicking in to overdrive,” Strzok wrote Page.

https://dailycaller.com/2019/05/06/peter-strzok-cia-leaks-email/
 
George Papadopoulos @GeorgePapa19
3h3 hours ago

Andrew Mcarthy means well in his op-Ed today. However, he has absolutely no idea that the FBI came to interview me about why I set up the meeting between Trump-Egyptian President while on the campaign; connections to Israel; and with the intent to catch me in a perjury trap.​

Still going to buy whatever he says?
 
This is why you're an idjit in public.

Fact: Trump divested himself of all involvement with his company when he became President. How/what/why/specific details are irrelevant because the purpose and intent is for Trump to not be involved in the day-to-day operations and decisions and thus not "profit" from those operations officially.

What makes you think he did? What makes you think he’s not?
 
Do we need to subpoena Rory to reveal the ----'REDACTED---- portions of the thread title?

He seems to be resisting our oversight . . .even starting a tangential thread pretending that the meaningless opinion of hundreds (maybe thousands!) of prosecutors means more than the actual results of the report or the guy that supervised it.M

Mueller is even more over this than Rory is:

https://www-m.cnn.com/2019/05/21/politics/robert-mueller-testify-congress-negotiations/index.html

Do you blame him?

Btw... lame attempt at spinning it your way, egghead.:rolleyes:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/mueller-shuns-public-hearing-talks-182238858.html

Robert Mueller is balking at testifying publicly before Congress, pushing for a closed-door appearance in negotiations with House Democrats, according to three people familiar with the special counsel’s position.

Mueller has told the Democratic-controlled House Judiciary Committee that he doesn’t want to be dragged into a political fight and that he’s hesitant to publicly discuss his final report, according to the people, who asked not to be identified discussing the continuing negotiations.
 
Today, 05:42 PM. Remove user from ignore list. cowslinger64
This message is hidden because cowslinger64 is on your fake ignore list.

"You are one dumbshit motherfucker. What part of you're on ignore don't you understand? Do you enjoy replying to me, taking all that time, and for months and months and months have it completely disregarded?

How fuckin pathetic can you possibly be?

btw.. consider your next reply completely disregarded as well. Holy fuck. :rolleyes::rolleyes:"
 
Since this thread has resurrected...

Originally Posted by HisArpy View Post
This is why you're an idjit in public.

Fact: Trump divested himself of all involvement with his company when he became President. How/what/why/specific details are irrelevant because the purpose and intent is for Trump to not be involved in the day-to-day operations and decisions and thus not "profit" from those operations officially.

Fact: Not true. He is the only president to date to not do so. He is hands on and calls to see how business is going (Rick Reilly books and articles). His business profits at your expense every time he deliberately chooses to golf at a Trump course. https://trumpgolfcount.com
 
Back
Top