Trump Tax Figures Show Over $1 Billion in Business Losses

The fact that you aren't intelligent enough to read a relatively simple and straight forward post without garbling the meaning isn't my problem, it's yours.

And what I posted has nothing to do with who I approve of nor does it any way say "democrats are good" (how you came up with that bit of nonsense is completely beyond me).

It is about A_J trying to create a false equivalency, as you morons do with Trump by saying all politicians lie so it doesn't matter if it's one or 10,000 it's still a lie which is complete bullshit.


If A_J thinks that the Clintons are as bad he should post proof. That shouldn't be such a foreign concept to someone claiming to be a lawyer.

The reality of the Clinton's misdeeds are known enough to the point that no one need garner "proof" of the sort you're claiming to need for a MB discussion.

You claim "orange man bad" because Trump's company filed for bankruptcy. Yet you offer no proof that such a thing is "bad". Shouldn't YOU have to provide the proof you demand of others?

Meanwhile, you also claim (without actually saying so because that puts you on the record) that the Clinton's are good because, why again?

Or maybe you are trying to say that Bernie is a good guy because it was "Mirs Sanders" who ran the college financial scam.

Or Biden is better than Trump because the fact that he interfered in an investigation into his son in the Ukraine isn't "as bad" as Trump's bankruptcy filing or tax data information. Meanwhile back in China...

Or that Warren is better because she didn't lie because she really is 1/1024 Native American.

When the narrative is "my guy is better than your guy" then you should at least have a guy who actually IS better. Because otherwise, what you're really arguing is "my guy is better than your guy because he's not as much of a crook as your guy is".

Which isn't high praise in anyone's book let alone a rational argument.
 
Trump's apparent explanation — I didn't really lose all that money; I only pretended to so I could cheat on my taxes — isn't really persuasive to me, since obviously he could be both a horrible businessman AND a crook.

The theory that he saw the presidency as the ultimate grift is looking more plausible all the time.
 
The same can be said about the Clintons...

Even Bernie...



Who's you "scammer?"

Who, in your mind, has no clue as to how to work the system and would be,
as such, a perfect leader?

Trumps history for everyone to see is leaving a trail of tears and broken promises. The con artist is in a whole different league than those you mention.
 
12 posts and still deflecting.

It's okay, we know that there's no way to DEFEND the Fraud in Chief.

So keep DEFLECTING, no matter how obvious it is to the rest of us. ;)

It’s okay harpy is here to take over for him. The baton has been passed. Harpy is always the top defender/deflector in any of the unindicted co-conspirator threads.
 
It’s okay harpy is here to take over for him. The baton has been passed. Harpy is always the top defender/deflector in any of the unindicted co-conspirator threads.

The degree to which you go to vilify Trump is amazing.
 
Trump's apparent explanation — I didn't really lose all that money; I only pretended to so I could cheat on my taxes — isn't really persuasive to me, since obviously he could be both a horrible businessman AND a crook.

The theory that he saw the presidency as the ultimate grift is looking more plausible all the time.

You have actually examined the tax returns being discussed, AND are enough of a "tax expert" in corporate finance and business, that you can say this with what level of certainty?
 
That's the point.


The Democrats had become so blemished that
people voted for him, warts and all.

He had to live in the world as it is,
not as in the world we wish to be.


And now those awash in the riches of political power
want to continue to scream
NOT HIM! but me...

I think Trumps presidential win is a matter of the times choosing the man. Beltway insider establishment politics had become so blemished that people voted to throw a monkey wrench into DC to see what would happen.

Again, if you guys actually read books on his background you'd be worried he'd siphon off a shitload of money and leave the country bankrupt. The tax cut might just be the start.
 
The unindicted co-conspirator does a fine job of it all by himself. It very well May be the one thing he is good at.

Ah, but you see, you don't limit your indictments to just Trump. You spread it around so that ALL are equally tarred by that brush.

Perhaps it isn't Trump, or his supporters, which colors your view of the world.
 
Again, if you guys actually read books on his background you'd be worried he'd siphon off a shitload of money and leave the country bankrupt. The tax cut might just be the start.

How is it that in this view you forget that the $20 Trillion in US debt doesn't exist? Or that it came about before Trump became President? Or that the money was "siphoned off" by others? Or that being $20T in debt which cannot be repaid means that the country actually IS "bankrupt"?
 
It takes quite a lack of talent to lose one billion-with-a-B dollars.

Yet to the white trash demographic, Trump is the epitome of a "success".
 
You've got him now Betty!




Everything that didn't stick in his election is going to schtick now!


Maybe you should step back and reexamine your premises....

That's not the point of the thread, AJ, you no comprehending dumbfuck.
 
Trump looks like 'em and speaks their preferred narrative. That's all that matters.
 
It takes quite a lack of talent to lose one billion-with-a-B dollars.

Yet to the white trash demographic, Trump is the epitome of a "success".

Oh come now....that is only a hundred million a year

Just under 274 thousand a day. Takes a real genius to do that. Hell...he could have given 1000 deplorables 274 dollars each and every day for ten years..and they would be saying God bless you
 
Last edited:
How is it that in this view you forget that the $20 Trillion in US debt doesn't exist? Or that it came about before Trump became President? Or that the money was "siphoned off" by others? Or that being $20T in debt which cannot be repaid means that the country actually IS "bankrupt"?

I get that Trump can do no wrong in your eyes.
 
The reality of the Clinton's misdeeds are known enough to the point that no one need garner "proof" of the sort you're claiming to need for a MB discussion.

You claim "orange man bad" because Trump's company filed for bankruptcy. Yet you offer no proof that such a thing is "bad". Shouldn't YOU have to provide the proof you demand of others?

Meanwhile, you also claim (without actually saying so because that puts you on the record) that the Clinton's are good because, why again?

Or maybe you are trying to say that Bernie is a good guy because it was "Mirs Sanders" who ran the college financial scam.

Or Biden is better than Trump because the fact that he interfered in an investigation into his son in the Ukraine isn't "as bad" as Trump's bankruptcy filing or tax data information. Meanwhile back in China...

Or that Warren is better because she didn't lie because she really is 1/1024 Native American.

When the narrative is "my guy is better than your guy" then you should at least have a guy who actually IS better. Because otherwise, what you're really arguing is "my guy is better than your guy because he's not as much of a crook as your guy is".

Which isn't high praise in anyone's book let alone a rational argument.

Again, I didn't say anyone was good (nor did I imply it).

And the discussion that you initiated by jumping in wasn't about "Trump's bankruptcy filing or tax data information." It's not my fault if you're too stupid to understand what is being discussed. Go back and read the entire exchange again.

And for the record, I think Trump lying about things like Russian contacts with his campaign staff, obstruction and illegal immigrants voting in elections (to name just a few of his lies) are indeed far worse than Elizabeth Warren misrepresenting the percentage of her indian heritage.
 
Only in Deplorable Bizarro World would losing $100,000,000/yr be looked upon with admiration and acceptance. The rest of the world is not so easily deceived.
 
Harpy seems to be missing the point.

Who else passed themselves off as self-made billionaire real estate geniuses and brilliant at "business?"

A lot of people voted for him because they believed this and believed he would do the same for the USA.

The issue is Conman Myth vs Conman Reality. Anything else is Yabba Dabba Whattaboutism and Deflection.
 
What the right wingers here dont understand...it is either tax fraud...or campaign finance fraud. We put Al Capone away for less. This man's days are numbered
 
Amazing! Hillary asks the Chinese for Trump's taxes and they magically appear. Is that collusion? just askin'
 
Amazing! Hillary asks the Chinese for Trump's taxes and they magically appear. Is that collusion? just askin'

45 asked Russia to hack Hillary and now 45 is president. Is that collusion? Just askin'!
 
Hate, hate, hate.

8 Years of half the country hating the mulatto president, now the other half of the country hates the old white new york huckster.

Good times.
 
It’s okay harpy is here to take over for him. The baton has been passed. Harpy is always the top defender/deflector in any of the unindicted co-conspirator threads.

It's funny how they all need to deflect any criticism so badly.

Nothing must tarnish the image of Dear Leader!!!
 
Back
Top