███████████ Mueller Investigation Results Thread ███████████

[Rightguide]

Let's review.

• Yesterday, Barrister TimmehThreeTries claimed the report cannot be given access without a court order.
• Today, Barrister TimmehThreeTries claims that the AG decides who, if any, get to see the report.

Question: Was TimmehThreeTries lying to us yesterday? Or is he lying to us today?

There's a difference between the redacted report and the unredacted report. Pay attention.

 

[LincolnDuncan]

Upon consideration of alternate facts it has been determined that truth isn't truth

 

[Rightguide]

Upon consideration of alternate facts it has been determined that truth isn't truth

You've been a championship level purveyor of untruth and alternative facts for two years.

 

[heathergives]

https://thefederalistpapers.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/mueller-investigation.jpg

 

[LincolnDuncan]

You've been a championship level purveyor of untruth and alternative facts for two years.

I'm certain that you can document that assertion, please do

 

[Rightguide]

I'm certain that you can document that assertion, please do

All I'd have to do is point to the entirety of your anti-Trump posts which are full of steaming bullshit.

 

[heathergives]

All I'di have to do is point to the entirety of your anti-Trump posts which are full of steaming bullshit.

http://www.webdesignfromscratch.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Steaming-Pile.jpg

 

[IrezumiKiss]

I'm certain that you can document that assertion, please do

All I'd have to do is point to the entirety of your anti-Trump posts which are full of steaming bullshit.

so do it.

or keep talking about doing.

https://media.giphy.com/media/ToMjGpz81S7usvTIM8w/giphy.gif

 

[LincolnDuncan]

All I'd have to do is point to the entirety of your anti-Trump posts which are full of steaming bullshit.

Another alternate fact. You can't document your allegation.

 

[Rightguide]

Another alternate fact. You can't document your allegation.

Shut up. You spent two years lying about the President and his campaign.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

Another alternate fact. You can't document your allegation.

Shut up. You spent two years lying about the President and his campaign.

https://media1.tenor.com/images/be086d21f9b53f52ec780eb725b9f234/tenor.gif?itemid=5904978

Can't do it, eh?

Guess Vette's all hat, no cattle.

http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lxpj6grFIe1qcaomb.gif

 

[bbx56]

https://media1.tenor.com/images/be086d21f9b53f52ec780eb725b9f234/tenor.gif?itemid=5904978

Can't do it, eh?

Guess Vette's all hat, no cattle.

http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lxpj6grFIe1qcaomb.gif

https://i.4pcdn.org/pol/1488005686199.gif

 

[Que]

The (non) "results" of the Mueller Report have been known for weeks now. Do they think continuing to yammer about what the wish the results would be is going to alter the actual results?

 

[RobDownSouth]

https://media1.tenor.com/images/be086d21f9b53f52ec780eb725b9f234/tenor.gif?itemid=5904978

Can't do it, eh?

Guess Vette's all hat, no cattle.

http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lxpj6grFIe1qcaomb.gif

Vetty failed in 'Nam as US Marine
Now he fails on Lit as a human bein'!

 

[HisArpy]

Let's review.

• Yesterday, Barrister TimmehThreeTries claimed the report cannot be given access without a court order.
• Today, Barrister TimmehThreeTries claims that the AG decides who, if any, get to see the report.

Question: Was TimmehThreeTries lying to us yesterday? Or is he lying to us today?

Ain't you the darling of the fuckup dept. But, keep trying. I'm sure that one of these days you'll say something that's accurate. It isn't going to be today, but someday. Maybe.

 

[silver gurl]

The (non) "results" of the Mueller Report have been known for weeks now. Do they think continuing to yammer about what the wish the results would be is going to alter the actual results?

It is not known.

Then why don't they show the entire report and why did Barr sum it up in 100 words. Shut the people up and show the report.

Otherwise, it looks like they are hiding something.

 

[HisArpy]

It is not known.

Then why don't they show the entire report and why did Barr sum it up in 100 words. Shut the people up and show the report.

Otherwise, it looks like they are hiding something.

1. Some parts of the report are classified and cannot be released. However, there is a 98% unredacted copy that select members of Congress can go view in a secure room at the DOJ. TO DATE, no D members of Congress have done so. One should be asking themselves (as well as asking the D congressmen who are on the list to do so) why they haven't.

2. Barr's letter quoted the summary of the report. IF the actual summary of the report isn't a sufficient summary of the report, then what is?

 

[RobDownSouth]

1. Some parts of the report are classified and cannot be released. However, there is a 98% unredacted copy that select members of Congress can go view in a secure room at the DOJ. TO DATE, no D members of Congress have done so. One should be asking themselves (as well as asking the D congressmen who are on the list to do so) why they haven't.

or one could read the news and find out that the Democrats objected en masse (note to Que: that means as a group) to the onerous conditions arbitrarily placed upon the six Democrats permitted to read the report: they could take no notes or photos of testimony, essentially giving cover to the Trump administration because they could find out there really WAS a Pee Tape existing and partisan shitbags such as yourself would gin up your usual selective outrage and say "Oh? Prove It!", knowing it would be a "he said/she said" stalemate.

 

[Rightguide]

or one could read the news and find out that the Democrats objected en masse (note to Que: that means as a group) to the onerous conditions arbitrarily placed upon the six Democrats permitted to read the report: they could take no notes or photos of testimony, essentially giving cover to the Trump administration because they could find out there really WAS a Pee Tape existing and partisan shitbags such as yourself would gin up your usual selective outrage and say "Oh? Prove It!", knowing it would be a "he said/she said" stalemate.

Last I heard only three Republican Congressmen have read the unredacted classified version.

 

[Que]

It is not known.

Then why don't they show the entire report and why did Barr sum it up in 100 words. Shut the people up and show the report.

Otherwise, it looks like they are hiding something.

No one is "hiding anything." If there was anything TO hide, the Dems would go look at the parts Robs fantasy pee tape is in and "leak it" (heh!) like they leaked everything else. Hell they leaked things that were not even true. It was designed to get them even more traction than the out of power party gets in off year elections.

To quote famous liar Harry Reid, "Well it worked, didn't it?"

Andrew Weisman got slapped down by the Supreme Court for his completely despicable prosecutorial misconduct in the Enron case. He is more than willing to make up any and everything he can in order to create process crimes in order to force people to accept prison rather than be ruined for life.

He ran the Mueller probe. He had millions of dollars and squeezed everybody he possibly could in every way he could for as long as he could possibly milk oit.

He, not Barr, summed up the findings in not 100 words but NINETEEN PAGES which Dems are whining they should have had two weeks ago, but can find nothing in now that they have it.

There was never any there, there. There won't ever be any there, there. Ever.

This was a massive smear campaign that predictably caused over-reaction in our thin-skinned President that the Dems then exploited and milked far past the expiration date.

 

[Luk]

Just 2 lawmakers have seen less-redacted Mueller report

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/04/30/mueller-report-redacted-1295105

Dafuq does less-redacted mean?

 

[HisArpy]

or one could read the news and find out that the Democrats objected en masse (note to Que: that means as a group) to the onerous conditions arbitrarily placed upon the six Democrats permitted to read the report: they could take no notes or photos of testimony, essentially giving cover to the Trump administration because they could find out there really WAS a Pee Tape existing and partisan shitbags such as yourself would gin up your usual selective outrage and say "Oh? Prove It!", knowing it would be a "he said/she said" stalemate.

The things they're are whining about are SOP for classified materials being viewed inside a classified SCIF room.

Or don't you know that?

 

[Que]

Just 2 lawmakers have seen less-redacted Mueller report

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/04/30/mueller-report-redacted-1295105

Dafuq does less-redacted mean?

It means the removed the redactions where Trump exercised his right to claim executive privilege to shield his private conversations with his advisors that might prove embarrassing in or out of context or that might provide his political enemies political fodder they are not in any way entitled to.

Oh, wait.

Nevermind.

None of the redactions were done because of him exercising that privilege.

 

[Que]

The real question is:

When will 24 GBers (6 posters from each faction plus their top advisors) be permitted to see the less redacted version of the thread title??

 

[Luk]

Here's another one...

The report says that Russia hacked at least 2 voting systems in Florida. Florida officials want a briefing on exactly what happened, as they should. If part of that info implicates 45, do they still have a right to protect their state's voting system against the Putins?