███████████ Mueller Investigation Results Thread ███████████

NIGGERS on the DUMZ side getting ass handed to em by Barr

They AXE him if its a problem if Trump did XYZ and he keeps saying

NO!

Tee

HEE!
 
Barr lied about the thrust of the Mueller Report to curry favor with Trump and the Trumpettes here are peddling like crazy to back up Barr's lies. What a surprise. :rolleyes:
 
Lying about what is in Mueller's letter has replaced lying about what is in Mueller's report as America's favorite sport.

I guess according to Barr, the fact that Trump didn't simply shut down the investigation means he "cooperated" with Mueller? Mueller wanted to speak to Trump; Trump refused. That's hardly cooperation.
 
NIGGERS AGHAST!




Whitehouse: “If you are the president of the United States, you can either waive or readily override the OLC opinion and say I’m ready … I want to exonerate myself. Let’s go. Could you not?”

Barr: “How is this relevant to my decisions?


“I don’t think spying has any kind of pejorative connotation at all,” Barr said. “I think spying is a good English word…It’s commonly used in the press…”


Whitehouse again feeling he was losing the argument said under his breath before ending his session: “spying” isn’t commonly used by the Department of Justice. Barr laughed and said: “It’s commonly used by me.”
 
He is going after NIGGERCO

AG Barr: “I Can’t Fathom” Why Obama Admin Did Not Tell Trump Campaign About FBI Investigation
 
NIGGERS AGHAST!




Whitehouse: “If you are the president of the United States, you can either waive or readily override the OLC opinion and say I’m ready … I want to exonerate myself. Let’s go. Could you not?”

Barr: “How is this relevant to my decisions?


“I don’t think spying has any kind of pejorative connotation at all,” Barr said. “I think spying is a good English word…It’s commonly used in the press…”


Whitehouse again feeling he was losing the argument said under his breath before ending his session: “spying” isn’t commonly used by the Department of Justice. Barr laughed and said: “It’s commonly used by me.”

White "Out" House, is a dumb son of a bitch.
 
There's nothing wrong with the Mueller Report that Trump and his chumps stopping obstructing justice and American principles (enabled by the Republicans in Congress) wouldn't solve.
 
Resign, for what?

Especially with Mueller stating that, "...nothing in the Attorney General’s March 24 letter was inaccurate or misleading"

Because rabies in the media is contagious to the unsophisticated. :D
 
There's nothing wrong with the Mueller Report that Trump and his chumps stopping obstructing justice and American principles (enabled by the Republicans in Congress) wouldn't solve.

^^^

Ignorant and obtuse.
 
I watched a little of the hearings. Boy, Harris and Booker are truly despicable. Harris tells Barr not to interrupt her/immediately interrupts Barr. If either one of those clowns becomes President, I'm moving to Canada. Bwaaahahahaha!
 
Because rabies in the media is contagious to the unsophisticated. :D

They claim to have read the letter and don't seem to understand the contents or have the ability to put it in the proper timeline.

What Mueller was expressing concern about was the relatively terse prose in Barr's release of the principle findings. Mueller felt that should have been more fleshed out to prevent the very sort of idiotic, idle speculation you see in this failed thread and in the complaint media.

Barr felt the less said, by way of "summary" the better. He opted to not release out of context the Weissmann and company out-of-context soft landing of the probe's failure to indict and release all of what can be released including those summary parts at once.

They HAVE now, every hot and tittle that Mueller felt should be released (earlier to avoid the media speculation) along with everything that can be released to the publuc.

The clear evidence that the Dems actually want less transparency not more so that they can pretend the boogeyman is in the redacted portions is the fact that they refused to even go look at the redacted portions. They don't give a shit about anything but trying to keep this dead horse in play, Weekend at Bernie's style
 
MSNBC introduced a new feature today at the Barr hearing: Whenever someone told an especially egregious falsehood, they'd break away from live coverage to do an immediate fact check.

They did it twice in the first hour, the first time was when Sen. Lindsey Graham channeled his inner-Ishmael to announce there was "no collusion", they immediately cut to Brian Williams in their studio who informed viewers "The chairman of the Judiciary Committee just said that Mueller found there is no collusion. That is not correct"
 
MSNBC introduced a new feature today at the Barr hearing: Whenever someone told an especially egregious falsehood, they'd break away from live coverage to do an immediate fact check.

They did it twice in the first hour, the first time was when Sen. Lindsey Graham channeled his inner-Ishmael to announce there was "no collusion", they immediately cut to Brian Williams in their studio who informed viewers "The chairman of the Judiciary Committee just said that Mueller found there is no collusion. That is not correct"

Awesome.
 
Great "fact" check except for the actual fact that no collusion (coordination) was found.
 
Great "fact" check except for the actual fact that no collusion (coordination) was found.

Wrong. The Trump team actively worked with Russian nationals to win the presidential election. It didn't rise to the level of "criminal conspiracy", but was instead the usual "Trump sleaziness".

As the report takes pains to point out, “collusion” has no legal definition and is not a federal crime. So while the report did not establish conspiracy or coordination, it does not make a determination on “collusion” — and in fact, it strongly suggests that there was at least an attempt to collude by Trump’s campaign and agents of the Russian government.

The fact that it did not rise to the level of criminal activity does not mean it was not a serious breach of trust and a damning indictment of the president’s commitment to the health of the American legal and political system. The section of the report focusing on Russian interference in the election is not an exoneration of Trump’s innocence. It’s a devastating portrayal of his approach to politics.

Although Attorney General William Barr said that there was “no collusion” in his press conference before the report’s release, Mueller is actually quite explicit that he did not address the question of “collusion.” This is because, to his mind, the term is not precise enough, nor does it fall within the ambit of what was essentially a criminal investigation.

“Collusion is not a specific offense or theory of liability found in the United States Code, nor is it a term of art in federal criminal law,” Mueller writes. “For those reasons, the Office’s focus in analyzing questions of joint criminal liability was on conspiracy as defined in federal law.” So when Mueller concludes that he “did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities,” he is not saying that there is no evidence of “collusion” at all, in any sense. What he is saying is that there is insufficient evidence to prove that the Trump administration was directly involved in Russian crimes like stealing Clinton’s emails.

But did the Trump campaign actively work with the Russian government to improve its electoral chances? If that’s the standard, then the report provides plenty of evidence to suggest the answer is yes.
 
Back
Top