Climate continues to change.

[von_Bismarck]

You see no hypocrisy in bitching about human caused global warming while promoting laboratory mystery "meat" and corking volcanoes so they don't emit too much carbon?

Are you really, really certain on that?

On that note, I'm going to take a crap and go to bed, gents. After I turn up the thermostat.

Lolwut?

 

[Que]

Did you do the math on that all by yourself? Maybe next you can figure out how many millions of years it would take for that green stuff to sequester all that CO2.

And yes I did the math myself a one-to-one correspondence is fairly easy to calculate.

And no it's not exactly a one-to-one correspondence because fossil fuels are actually more efficient in the sense that you're going to get more energy for the same amount of carbon dioxide emitted. So actually you would need less green stuff planted to absorb all of our current CO2 from fossil fuel sources if all of those fossil fuel sources were replaced with your Fantastical green stuff energy sources.

 

[phrodeau]

Other than sticking your head in the sand and assuming that all of your carbon from non-fossil fuel sources is somehow not a problem what are you doing to reduce your carbon footprint?

I posted verifiable scientific information on a porn board, and you didn’t.

 

[Badd Leroy]

Ummm Que

Hey Que.. get a clue.
You’re backing the wrong fucking fighter here man. The REAL science says that the changes in climate are so complicated, we can never pinpoint one cause or another... It’s impossible !!
Perhaps man has an impact, perhaps it’s a natural cycle, perhaps it’s something from the cosmos!!
The fact is, me little lamb, is that the science still can’t tell us everything and you are just another DUPE in the big money scheme of things... BAAAAHHH.

Sorry Que... was meant for phrodo.

 

[gunthernehmen]

Please, don’t confuse me with wanting to cork all the volcanos and cattle, and figure out flavors of nuclear winter. I was merely saying other things can cause climate change. I personally don’t buy into global earming nor do I care about it.

Now, that doesn’t mean I don’t recycle or drive a hybrid car. I’m just not going out of my way to be a tree hugging, pot smoking hippie preaching that the end of the world is coming because of a change in the weather.

Oh that wasn't directed at you.

Coat suggested we could relieve the pressure in the volcanoes to eliminate that source of carbon. I think it was Bismol that suggested we feed the masses with Soylent Green. I forget who was going on about radioactive cow farts! I'm pretty sure they were all just kidding. At least I hope they were.

 

[thør]

Regardless of the success or failure of the Paris Agreement......

This lake shown in the article is pretty much gone, now. I wish they'd use up to date photos.

 

[InsightRiot]

"At First We Didn't Believe It": Fast-Melting Greenland Glacier Starts Growing Again In Massive U-Turn

A commenter in this article wrote:

"That was kind of a surprise. We kind of got used to a runaway system"

Of course you got used to a "runaway system". Because all your models will eventually predict a runaway system, so that's what you expect to see. But the Earth is not a runaway system. It's has correction mechanisms built into it or it would have already turned into Venus or Mars millions of years ago.

 

[trysail]

Every time I hear or read some nitwit claim that "Dangerous Anthropogenic Global Warming/Climate Change" is "settled science" I roll my eyes in disgust.

As far as I'm concerned, the lowest level in hell should be reserved for the bastards who politicize scientific inquiry and method. The slimeballs who have intentionally indoctrinated, frightened and brainwashed children deserve a special place in that hell.


​

 

[Badd Leroy]

Every time I hear or read some nitwit claim that "Dangerous Anthropogenic Global Warming/Climate Change" is "settled science" I roll my eyes in disgust.

As far as I'm concerned, the lowest level in hell should be reserved for the bastards who politicize scientific inquiry and method. The slimeballs who have intentionally indoctrinated, frightened and brainwashed children deserve a special place in that hell.


​

Right on!

 

[trysail]

There has been very little warming, especially in the last twenty-odd years.


http://www.drroyspencer.com/wp-content/uploads/UAH_LT_1979_thru_March_2019_v6-550x317.jpg

​

 

[von_Bismarck]

Right on!

Take your anti-science dipshittery, shine it up real nice, turn it sideways, and stick it up your ass.

 

[gunthernehmen]

Prior to that Galileo dude dropping some rocks off the leaning tower of Pizza, it was "settled science" that two stones of different sizes, will fall at different rates.

When scientists forget that they don't "actually" know everything, they become little more than con artists playing three card monte to scam tourists out a few bucks.

 

[trysail]

Another Attenborough Tragedy Porn Exposé

by "Bishop Hill"

" "Tragedy porn” is now a standard green propaganda technique. You’ve probably been on the receiving end of it, and will recognise it once I describe it. First of all you need a victim. Animals – preferably fluffy ones, and preferably with large eyes – are ideal, but people will do at a pinch. Then you have to film them in the process of dying or otherwise suffering. A presenter or scientist needs to be on hand to describe the events, preferably choking away their tears. Then you blame global warming.

It is often an effective technique, but care is required. Last week, tragedy porn proved to be the undoing of Sir David Attenborough, when a carefully contrived story on Netflix that global warming was driving walruses over cliff tops unravelled over the course of a week, as a series of flaws were discovered in the narrative and in the tales spun by the production team as they attempted to cover up what they had done. Once it emerged that the production team may well have played a role in causing the tragedy, it all started to look a bit problematic.

It’s therefore unfortunate that in Climate Change: the Facts, his latest magnum opus – which aired last week on BBC1 – producers deployed a bit of tragedy porn, and once again it appears that viewers were misled..."



(much) more...

​

​

 

[Que]

Instead of nattering on with endless meaningless, anecdotal weather reports why not do something about the monumental problem of carbon dioxide? According to you, any carbon that is released from the burning of recently as opposed to ancient grown plants does not cause global warming. I have found the perfect investment girl you:

Mantria. In addition to many other green energy investments they produce biochar from green waste as a charcoal substitute that is totes carbon neutral. Early investors made huge profits. Although past performance is no guarantee of future performance it still has the support of The Clinton Foundation according to the latest information on their website, so you know this is legit.

 

[gunthernehmen]

Instead of nattering on with endless meaningless, anecdotal weather reports why not do something about the monumental problem of carbon dioxide? According to you, any carbon that is released from the burning of recently as opposed to ancient grown plants does not cause global warming. I have found the perfect investment girl you:

Mantria. In addition to many other green energy investments they produce biochar from green waste as a charcoal substitute that is totes carbon neutral. Early investors made huge profits. Although past performance is no guarantee of future performance it still has the support of The Clinton Foundation according to the latest information on their website, so you know this is legit.

So far, nobody has presented any actual proof that global warming is caused by mankind. If we aren't causing it, then how can our actions STOP it?

Even so, using eco friendly energy is just as valid as packing out trash rather than littering trails, or limiting how many fish we take from the Grand Banks so we don't destroy the population we're depending on. Just don't expect any of that to alter the climate in any direction.

Is Mantria based in Haiti, by any chance?

 

[phrodeau]

The observed increase in atmospheric CO2 is known to be caused by the combustion of fossil fuels because of the isotope signature. Who’s been burning the fossil fuels? Well, that’s a total mystery.

 

[Klinkster]

No....it's not.

The observed increase in atmospheric CO2 is known to be caused by the combustion of fossil fuels because of the isotope signature. Who’s been burning the fossil fuels? Well, that’s a total mystery.

 

[heathergives]

The observed increase in atmospheric CO2 is known to be caused by the combustion of fossil fuels because of the isotope signature. Who’s been burning the fossil fuels? Well, that’s a total mystery.

Natural CO2 sources account for the majority of CO2 released into the atmosphere. Oceans provide the greatest annual amount of CO2 of any natural or anthropogenic source. Other sources of natural CO2 include animal and plant respiration, decomposition of organic matter, forest fires, and emissions from volcanic eruptions. There are also naturally occurring CO2 deposits found in formation layers within the Earth’s crust that could serve as CO2 sources.

 

[phrodeau]

No....it's not.

Here’s a link for you: dummies.com

 

[Klinkster]

Your link..... is called BULLSHIT.

Sorry....you have a theory. That's all.

Here’s a link for you: dummies.com

 

[RobDownSouth]

So far, nobody has presented any actual proof that global warming is caused by mankind. If we aren't causing it, then how can our actions STOP it?
<deflection snip>

Hello shitbag, my name is RobDownSouth and I get perverse enjoyment at making climate change shitbags (including, but not limited to, Trysail, Que, AJ and now yourself) look foolish.

Now, let's go to school.

NOBODY has EVER claimed that mankind is the SOLE cause of global warming, and I defy you to prove otherwise.

What shitbags typically try to man-splain is that humans overall are a tiny fraction of the natural cycle of CO2 levels rising in the global carbon cycle.
Scientists have refuted this claim quite thoroughly: Climate Change Denialist Myth 34: When Climate Change Denialist Claim That Human C02 Emissions Are a Small Part of Climate Change

If the big words confuse you (ala Trysail), here is a nifty little summary for you

Have a nice day and keep those PRATTs coming!

 

[heathergives]

Here’s a link for you: dummies.com

I'm getting tired of my relationship with carbon isoDOPES -.- it's too complicated.
Time for you to give up carbon dating.

 

[Klinkster]

So Big-Chief-Situm-On-The-Cactus, says “Hello Shitbag”......

And that is supposed to strengthen his argument....or what?

 

[RobDownSouth]

So Big-Chief-Situm-On-The-Cactus, says “Hello Shitbag”......

And that is supposed to strengthen his argument....or what?

"Shitbag" is a term of affection I reserve for climate change denialists.
Deal with it.
Or don't.
I don't care....shitbag.

 

[nowisthetime]

Hello shitbag, my name is RobDownSouth and I get perverse enjoyment at making climate change shitbags (including, but not limited to, Trysail, Que, AJ and now yourself) look foolish.

Now, let's go to school.

NOBODY has EVER claimed that mankind is the SOLE cause of global warming, and I defy you to prove otherwise.

What shitbags typically try to man-splain is that humans overall are a tiny fraction of the natural cycle of CO2 levels rising in the global carbon cycle.
Scientists have refuted this claim quite thoroughly: Climate Change Denialist Myth 34: When Climate Change Denialist Claim That Human C02 Emissions Are a Small Part of Climate Change

If the big words confuse you (ala Trysail), here is a nifty little summary for you

Have a nice day and keep those PRATTs coming!

Oh they are so feeble-minded and evil, simply parroting their Fox news talking heads and their gasbag leader.

Of course KlinQue has something to say.