███████████ Mueller Investigation Results Thread ███████████

[KeithD]

BFD. You have assailed people for things they might have done long before they started working for Candidate or President Trump. As I have said, I like to keep things in perspective.

Christ almighty!

This was six years after he left the Obama administration. You have no perspective, Box.

 

[Boxlicker101]

Are you really too stupid to understand that this was long after he was gone from the Obama administration and it was in cahoots with Trump's campaign manager? What compels you Trumpettes to be so stupid?

Trump began his campaign for POTUS in 2015. Why would he have a campaign manager before then? (in 2012)

 

[KeithD]

Trump began his campaign for POTUS in 2015. Why would he have a campaign manager before then? (in 2012)

Yes, you are as dumb as a rock. (And you just yourself mumbled about doing wrong in the years before an association).

Just stop while you are miles behind.

 

[Boxlicker101]

Christ almighty!

This was six years after he left the Obama administration. You have no perspective, Box.

Craig started working for the Ukrainian gov. in 2012.

 

[phrodeau]

BFD. You have assailed people for things they might have done long before they started working for Candidate or President Trump. As I have said, I like to keep things in perspective.

So you don’t see the difference between a guy who worked for the White House becoming a criminal, and a criminal who goes on to work for the White House?

 

[IrezumiKiss]

https://i.ibb.co/MMbBCCJ/File-Apr-19-7-45-35-PM.png

https://media1.tenor.com/images/c7fbca99d80f522742dc114cc001db77/tenor.gif?itemid=5841776

 

[ishtat]

Craig started working for the Ukrainian gov. in 2012.

Box. Unless you know which Ukranian regime Craig was working for it might be wise to keep quiet. There is a group which are puppets of Putin's Russia and a fractured opposition which mostly are not. Most of both sides can be bought and in 2012 most of the buying was being done by Putin. It looks as though Craig was on the same payroll as Manafort and Gates - and we know whose friends they are.

It's not a question of where Craig came from but where he was going - which was on the Putin payroll with Trump's boys.

That is a simplified account - just for you and your friends Box.

 

[cartepostale]

Why are you 'censoring' your own posts? Are you looking for attention? Are you a fantasist?

 

[toeskr]

The report is out. Do you all have anything? Anyway? Anywhere?

Or are you going to follow the CNN path and grasp for straws?

Let's impeach based upon? ????

No blue dress, cigars or dead bodies.

I suggest, implore you all.... Waters - Pocahontas ticket.

Winner, winner chicken dinner.

Or you could just go with the old white guys, so progressive. LOL

 

[Que]

Box. Unless you know which Ukranian regime Craig was working for it might be wise to keep quiet. There is a group which are puppets of Putin's Russia and a fractured opposition which mostly are not. Most of both sides can be bought and in 2012 most of the buying was being done by Putin. It looks as though Craig was on the same payroll as Manafort and Gates - and we know whose friends they are.

It's not a question of where Craig came from but where he was going - which was on the Putin payroll with Trump's boys.

That is a simplified account - just for you and your friends Box.

You are 100% right about that. I have no idea who was bribing them to do exactly what but it's clear that they were all more or less serving the same faction.

Quite specifically though the manafort prosecution was pushed and Craig involvement was minimized because there was a narrative to push here.

 

[Que]

So you don’t see the difference between a guy who worked for the White House becoming a criminal, and a criminal who goes on to work for the White House?

One doesn't "become a criminal" when you get caught or when someone decides to revisit a crime that they previously passed on.

Criminals become criminals on the day they actually commit the crime. Who knows what about their criminal bent depends entirely about who knows what when.

 

[phrodeau]

One doesn't "become a criminal" when you get caught or when someone decides to revisit a crime that they previously passed on.

Criminals become criminals on the day they actually commit the crime. Who knows what about their criminal bent depends entirely about who knows what when.

Pray tell us what date Craig’s crime was committed.

 

[HisArpy]

Quote by hisderpy:


Her job is to present the facts in the best light possible while minimizing events which the public shouldn't know or which could cause panic.

In ANY reading of that, it's at best known as telling "little white lies".

Her job is to lie. She lies poorly. Which is a testament to her personal character instead of an indictment of it.



Lol.. YOU are the LAST person to call anyone stupid.


And who cares what you see or don't? Your opinion is absolutely worthless. You get your lawyer ass handed to you constantly.


Wait for the unredacted one, and Mueller to be subpoenad to testify.. then let REAL lawyers and judges look at it.

Oh look, more foam and spittle.

Congress will not get the unredacted report. The report has material in it which is ILLEGAL for Barr to give to Congress absent a court order. Congress can go pound sand. The fact that they are demanding Barr commit a crime should be telling you something about the mental state of Nadler et al. That you're good with it says something about yours.

Which is why whenever you try to "hand me my ass" with 1 hand, while shitting in your other hand, you come up empty every time.

 

[bbx56]

I see the NIGGERS be like

https://media.tenor.com/images/7b32e1c41a8cbe973b35d12ecb800a88/tenor.gif

 

[bbx56]

https://media1.tenor.com/images/c7fbca99d80f522742dc114cc001db77/tenor.gif?itemid=5841776

thats the LAW, NIGGER

deal with it

 

[RoryN]

Democrats say Trump impeachment proceedings 'possibly coming' after Mueller report

Democrats "can foresee" the possibility of impeachment proceedings against President Donald Trump following the release of special counsel Robert Mueller's report. Speaking on the Sunday political talk shows, the chairmen of three key House investigatory committees sounded open to the possibility of bringing impeachment proceedings against the president.

"I can foresee that possibly coming," House Oversight Committee Chairman Elijah Cummings, D-Md., told CBS's "Face the Nation" on Sunday, adding that he is "not there yet" on impeachment. The report itself, Cummings said, provides Congress with an investigatory "roadmap," he said. "I think [Mueller] basically said to us as a Congress, 'It's up to you to take this further with regard to obstruction and the other matters that might come up,'" Cummings said.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/co...-possibly-coming-after-mueller-report-n996806

 

[Que]

Orlly?

What do Nancy Pelosi and Steny Hoyer, the actual Democrats in charge, have to say about that?

Hey, did you hear that disgraced Congressional hearing perjurer, James Clapper has draaagggggged the goalposts from something he calls "active colusion" to the totally real, "passive collusion?"

Also: did you notice in the Mueller report (that you have not even read any complete excerpts of much less the entire thing since no one has) that Mueller had completed all of the interviews and had all the evidence needed to reach the conclusion that NO American, much less anyone associated with the Trump campaign, and certainly not Donald John Trump had coordinated in any way with the Russians before the midterms, but chose to hold back that complete exoneration while the Dems were actively using that false narrative in fundraising and political ads in order to influence the outcome of the midterms? No, of course you did not notice that.

 

[phrodeau]

Seems to me that impeachment will happen if Trump is re-elected (possible) and Democrats take the Senate and House (very possible).

 

[Que]

Follow-up question:
When are we going to see the unredacted thread title? What are you hiding behind those unprecedented redactions? Hiw are we supposed to perform our vital oversight responsibilities to laugh at and ridicule your original post without access to the full, unredacted title?

We may have to contact Laurelle to overrule your obfuscation of the truth!

 

[Que]

Seems to me that impeachment will happen if Trump is re-elected (possible) and Democrats take the Senate and House (very possible).

Not a chance in hell.

 

[phrodeau]

Not a chance in hell.

That Trump gets re-elected? OK.

 

[Que]

Pray tell us what date Craig’s crime was committed.

"Crime" singular?

Are you under the impression that people who are willing to engage in criminality do so with sing7karity; that the first instance that their criminal activity comes to public scrutiny is the first and only time they have violated criminal statutes?

In this instance, fo you think an invitation or opportunity to be involved with a crime of this proportion would have been possible without the imprimatur of being Obama's chief counsel? That his intimate familiarity with HRC (then the assumed next POTUS) was not a factor, especially given her world-wide renown for selling favors and influence?

The larger question about Craig is why were the Ukranian investigators encouraged to disclose their findings on Manafort and not Craig.

 

[Que]

That Trump gets re-elected? OK.

You really are a stupid little snark artist aren't you?

Why don't you go back, read what you, yourself wrote, and tell the class what the actual subject of the sentence is? What is the idea you are postulating, not the ancillary events that need to happen for your fantasy of the central theme of your idea to occur?

 

[bbx56]

Democrats say Trump impeachment proceedings 'possibly coming' after Mueller report

Democrats "can foresee" the possibility of impeachment proceedings against President Donald Trump following the release of special counsel Robert Mueller's report. Speaking on the Sunday political talk shows, the chairmen of three key House investigatory committees sounded open to the possibility of bringing impeachment proceedings against the president.

"I can foresee that possibly coming," House Oversight Committee Chairman Elijah Cummings, D-Md., told CBS's "Face the Nation" on Sunday, adding that he is "not there yet" on impeachment. The report itself, Cummings said, provides Congress with an investigatory "roadmap," he said. "I think [Mueller] basically said to us as a Congress, 'It's up to you to take this further with regard to obstruction and the other matters that might come up,'" Cummings said.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/co...-possibly-coming-after-mueller-report-n996806

Good

Let them show themselves even crazier then they are

 

[Carnal_Flower]

Trump Approval drops to 37% the lowest in a year after Mueller Report.

37% approval LOLOLOLOLOLOL