Dems on collusion: No, not Trump. We meant McConnell

[Counselor706]

The more they open their mouths, the greater the probability Trump is re-elected.

Dem accuses McConnell of 'collusion' for blocking Mueller report release

 

[BotanyBoy]

It's like NOBODY in the DNC knows the law or how the US government works.

 

[HisArpy]

Or Mad Maxies "well I didn't really mean impeachment when I said impeachment" back pedaling.

 

[Rightguide]

Or Mad Maxies "well I didn't really mean impeachment when I said impeachment" back pedaling.

She said yesterday the Democrats never seriously considered impeaching the President. She's quite fluent in "Monster Dinosaur Turd."

 

[TontoedRanger]

This is coming out on a radio station I listen to. Talking points are from the Dem POV of Russian Collusion as in Hillary in concert w/DNC and a suspected British agent acting as liasion for DNC and vying for the Dems and Putin to rig last election in their favor.

 

[Colonel Hogan]

It was thoroughly predictable how this narrative was going to go.

Absent any criminal indictments or even the remotest presentation of evidence sufficient to support the recommendation of later indictments against the President, the focus now turns to a LACK of specific language in the report characterizing his EXONERATION. And the hardly subtle implication of that omission is that the absence of such language somehow leaves the issue of the President's "guilt" in limbo.

Horseshit.

There are only two possible verdicts in a criminal trial -- guilty or not guilty. And "not guilty" as a matter of unarguable fact is a legal description that encompasses a range of material facts from "totally innocent" to "yeah, the bastard probably did it but there simply isn't enough evidence to convict him OF it."

There simply is NO legal distinction between those two extremes of the range. One is every bit as much of an "exoneration" as the other.

Thus, a prosecutor looking at a potential criminal defendant who is likely to be found "not guilty" of a criminal charge has absolutely no ethical reason to "grace" a highly suspicious suspect with a "factual exoneration" that individual may not deserve and the prosecutor cannot prove AND the prosecutor simultaneously HAS EVERY ETHICAL REASON not to prejudge the guilt of someone by voicing speculative disparaging opinions as to that guilt which he ALSO CANNOT PROVE.

He simply either prosecutes, doesn't prosecute or recommends prosecution by other authorities.

Whining about the absence of a specific literal exoneration in the Mueller report is pissing in the wind over absolutely nothing, and it is absolutely nothing that Robert Mueller had a moral or legal responsibility to do.

 

[TontoedRanger]

Well said Colonel. So many variables when trying to read into it.

 

[Kantarii]

It's like NOBODY in the DNC knows the law or how the US government works.

There are a lot of Freshmen up there, mostly women this year.

 

[Rightguide]

And now Democrats and Media dummies who never had to write a book report are saying you can't summarize a 300 page report in 4 pages.

 

[HisArpy]

And now Democrats and Media dummies who never had to write a book report are saying you can't summarize a 300 page report in 4 pages.

Or read it in 48 hours and then have enough time to write a 4-page letter.

 

[bellisarius]

And it apparently has escaped their notice that the report itself will contain a summary. Straw grasping ad infinitum.

 

[Luk]

WATCH: ADAM SCHIFF LISTS ALL THE WAYS HE SAYS TRUMP CAMPAIGN COLLUDED WITH RUSSIA, SHUTS OFF REPUBLICAN'S MIC

 

[BotanyBoy]

WATCH: ADAM SCHIFF LISTS ALL THE WAYS HE SAYS TRUMP CAMPAIGN COLLUDED WITH RUSSIA, SHUTS OFF REPUBLICAN'S MIC

Luk doesn't understand that (D)'s stamping their feet with nothing to back it up doesn't work in the real world LOL

 

[Luk]

Less than 3 minutes. SpazBot2K is obviously not asexual by choice. Dumbfuck didn't even get past the headline. Just saw "Luk" and lost his shit again.

 

[bellisarius]

Luk doesn't understand that (D)'s stamping their feet with nothing to back it up doesn't work in the real world LOL

Nobody, but nobody, gives a shit about what Schiff says anymore. Well, maybe Rachel but her ratings are tanking too.

 

[Adre]

Nobody, but nobody, gives a shit about what Schiff says anymore. Well, maybe Rachel but her ratings are tanking too.

Maybe you don’t, but he’s a very competent prosecutor who will be a major thorn in President GoodBrain’s side for two more years.

 

[TontoedRanger]

Maybe you don’t, but he’s a very competent prosecutor who will be a major thorn in President GoodBrain’s side for two more years.

There's something to be said for a healthy President with good brains.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Nobody, but nobody, gives a shit about what Schiff says anymore. Well, maybe Rachel but her ratings are tanking too.

It's hard being in the fake news bidniz long term.

Maybe you don’t, but he’s a very competent prosecutor who will be a major thorn in President GoodBrain’s side for two more years.

LOL.....The "noose has been tightening" around Trumps neck for over two years now.

Best of luck.

 

[Adre]

It's hard being in the fake news bidniz long term.



LOL.....The "noose has been tightening" around Trumps neck for over two years now.

Best of luck.

The only noose I’m looking for is the 11/20 vote, and now that Trump is making it about healthcare, I’m feeling pretty good. We saw how well that worked in the midterms.

 

[Que]

Maybe you don’t, but he’s a very competent prosecutor who will be a major thorn in President GoodBrain’s side for two more years.

Maybe you should start a goodthread about the goodprosecutor.

 

[BotanyBoy]

The only noose I’m looking for is the 11/20 vote,

Well then you better hope to GAWD the (D)'s find a viable candidate sometime between now and then

Because eco-communism and "fuck whitey!!" aren't going to get the "dumbfuckistan" votes from flyover hell that ya'll openly loath and regularly deride as idiots too stupid to know whats in their best interest that you need to take the WH back.

and now that Trump is making it about healthcare, I’m feeling pretty good. We saw how well that worked in the midterms.

Trump is easily defeated, what he does is really irrelevant to his staying in 2020 or not.

If the (D)'s run a moderate liberal on a sane and plausible (aka alt-right to some in the DNC) platform? They cruise to an easy victory.

They run an anti-white socialist like Harris, Booker or Warren? Ya'll gonna be crying about that popular vote in LA and NYC again. You can't win with 8 states.

 

[bellisarius]

Well then you better hope to GAWD the (D)'s find a viable candidate sometime between now and then

Because eco-communism and "fuck whitey!!" aren't going to get the "dumbfuckistan" votes from flyover hell that ya'll openly loath and regularly deride as idiots too stupid to know whats in their best interest that you need to take the WH back.



Trump is easily defeated, what he does is really irrelevant to his staying in 2020 or not.

If the (D)'s run a moderate liberal on a sane and plausible (aka alt-right to some in the DNC) platform? They cruise to an easy victory.

They run an anti-white socialist like Harris, Booker or Warren? Ya'll gonna be crying about that popular vote in LA and NYC again. You can't win with 8 states.

The dems better be careful there. If the repubs come up with a reasonable replacement and Nancy and Chuckie decide to block it they're going to get the blame for it no matter how much they spin. The folks that will be effected by the collapse of SchuckNJiveCare would prefer something rather than nothing.

It's all gong to hinge on that "IF."

 

[BotanyBoy]

The dems better be careful there. If the repubs come up with a reasonable replacement and Nancy and Chuckie decide to block it they're going to get the blame for it no matter how much they spin. The folks that will be effected by the collapse of SchuckNJiveCare would prefer something rather than nothing.

It's all gong to hinge on that "IF."

Especially if they did it super clean, totally righteous, and in accordance with American political tradition/values....it will be voluntary, folks can opt out at some level, an honest tax to provide for a public service.....everything done right.

Force them to back Trump or look like TOTAL fuckers.

If someone in the (R) leadership is able to convince the rest of the (R)'s of the beauty in doing that and pulls off something that savage? I'll have to register as a Republican

I think Cocaine Mitch will be pushing it...that guy is a fuckin' American beast.

 

[Rightguide]

Luk doesn't understand that (D)'s stamping their feet with nothing to back it up doesn't work in the real world LOL

Luk and Adam don't understand that all of Adam's bullshit has been disproved.

 

[bellisarius]

The sticking point is going to be pre-existing conditions. I can see an 'assigned risk' pool but that's gong to be expensive and some folks are going to need help of some sort.

What does seem to be taking off and working are the 'collective' groups and the cross state purchasing.