Cock size

My personal opinion is its not the length or the girth of it that matters, it's the guy who is using it. Sex isnt just about penetration, it's about everything he does to me with what he has and the knowledge of how to do it. That said, if he knows what he's doing and has a big one then big win for me! I am lucky my Hubs has the goods in all departments! :) Happy Flower!
 
From a personal perspective I am quite happy with the length and girth of my cock, it's length fully erect is just under 7". I've never had any complaints from any ladies that it's served and I know from a 20 year career as a bisexual player/swinger who has seen plenty of erect cocks that I am larger than average,
If I had one wish it would be for thicker and longer cock (when not erect) solely for locker room and nudist clubs and free beaches. And this is only to impress other guys while I displayed it flaccid. I'm not bothered about impressing women. Just other guys.

Guys much more than girls judge you by your flaccid size because that is what guys usually see Gay or Straight. As for women if they see your flaccid penis there is a fairly good chance they will see it erect.
 
My flaccid size varies so much that I’m not sure when I would measure even if I cared. Obviously temperature plays a roll. Looking in the mirror before a shower is different than after. Sometimes I really have to dig it out of my pubes just to pee. I’m not in a locker room setting anywhere and haven’t been since the 60s. We don’t have nude beaches in central Ohio and I don’t have a wife that would ever consider the swap/swinging lifestyle, so it’s only porn for my “exposure” to the sight of other cocks and as we all know, those are usually larger.
 
I used to think that size didn't matter . That was until I tried BIG . It was quite painful to start with , I thought that he was going to split me in 2 but that was part of the pleasure , painful pleasure . He pounded me doggy until I came and came again . He wasn't wearing a condom , I couldn't resist and he came inside me before he withdrew and finished off over my boobs . SOOO wet and sticky ,totally satisfied Now I absolutely LUV BIG :)
 
Oh dear. Guys always make complete idiots of themselves when advertising the size of their penises. It seems to me that pretty much every bloke posting here thinks they have a 7 or 8 inch penis and they're almost certainly all talking out of their asses.

I'd like to introduce a little context here. Measured correctly, 8 inches puts you almost off the chart whereas a 7 inch penis makes you roughly in the top 0.01% of men. The average length of an erect penis is actually a little over 5 inches as demonstrated by this excellent review of the literature in the British Journal of Urology: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/bju.13010

But of course it doesn't really matter all that much. It's what you do with it that counts!

Yeah, I was thinking that same thing, but I wasn't going to be the one to say it. They kill me with that shit.
 
Some research into females which show better response during PIV sex showed:

1. The closer the clit is to the urethra, the more perceived stimulation.

This distance is fixed by a girl's genes; you get what you got.

And no, I don't have any ideas why. One might argue that a clit higher up is a better target for the guy's pubic bone. Or maybe all the guys were so long they had to keep themselves from bottoming out, so no bumping the clit.

2. A penis large enough to engage the inner lips and pull them in and out as the penis strokes provides more perceived stimulation. This is because the lips tug on the clitoral hood, which slides over the clit.

Now that's something a girl can do something about, to the extent her particular configuration allows her lips to be tugged, and a finds guys wide enough to do it.

(Supposedly the research discounted the additional stimulation a penis can give inside the vagina when making the correlations between relative clitoris location and labia minor engagement. Still, reporting was inherently subjective.)


Interesting, especially #2. :)
 
Some research into females which show better response during PIV sex showed:

The closer the clit is to the urethra, the more perceived stimulation.

This is more than just "perception." I can attest to it from my experience with different women.
I think — it's not like my 'research' has involves a vast sampling of women— that this also has a considerable effect on a woman's preference for positions. A woman who has some distance between vaginal opening and clitoris is apt to get more clitoral stimulation in a missionary position. If a woman's clit is very close to her opening, this may be less of a factor, and she may like a rear-entry position just as much.

... the research discounted the additional stimulation a penis can give inside the vagina when making the correlations between relative clitoris location and labia minor engagement.

This is because there are vastly more nerve endings around the vaginal opening than inside the vagina. Which is why (short-dicked researchers will tell you) length is unimportant.

That said: all this reliance on physiology to 'scientifically prove' that penis size is or isn't important is typically male research. True science relies on empirical evidence— and empirical evidence in this case is obtained by asking actual women what actually gives them the most pleasure— not by getting out a pair of calipers and measuring their various parts
 
I'm from the states and people are really out here getting adult circumcisions because people dislike uncut dicks THAT MUCH.

We have one of the highest circumcision rates in the world. Americans hate foreskins. I don't know what the fuck you're talking about.

I'm not a fan, myself.
The paper is Circumcision Rates in the United States: Rising or Falling? What Effect Might the New Affirmative Pediatric Policy Statement Have?

I read the abstract. The conclusion is that circumcision should be mandatory after birth.

Shitty paper. Very shitty statistical science. Author bias. Database does not cover the statistical universe. Opposing arguments dismissed as "unscientific" or irrelevant.

It's work like this, plus knee-jerk reactions, that cause great shifts in policy which after further considerations turn out to not be near as justified as original thought.

Hormone replacement therapy is one such. I've heard several experienced physicians say "we rushed too fast to move all our patients off of HRT".

EDITED to add:

An alternative unscientific view is SEX AS NATURE INTENDED IT. (PDF version) The writer seems very bias against circumcision, and argues why circumcision evolved.
 
Last edited:
The paper is Circumcision Rates in the United States: Rising or Falling? What Effect Might the New Affirmative Pediatric Policy Statement Have?

I read the abstract. The conclusion is that circumcision should be mandatory after birth.

Shitty paper. Very shitty statistical science. Author bias. Database does not cover the statistical universe. Opposing arguments dismissed as "unscientific" or irrelevant.

It's work like this, plus knee-jerk reactions, that cause great shifts in policy which after further considerations turn out to not be near as justified as original thought.

Hormone replacement therapy is one such. I've heard several experienced physicians say "we rushed too fast to move all our patients off of HRT".

EDITED to add:

An alternative unscientific view is SEX AS NATURE INTENDED IT. (PDF version) The writer seems very bias against circumcision, and argues why circumcision evolved.

Should be a separate thread. This is a major derail, and obviously an emotionally charged topic.
 
https://media.giphy.com/media/vfnl0WsAUY4bC/giphy.gif

I'm from the states and people are really out here getting adult circumcisions because people dislike uncut dicks THAT MUCH.

We have one of the highest circumcision rates in the world. Americans hate foreskins. I don't know what the fuck you're talking about.

I'm not a fan, myself.





I'm honestly not sure wtf this has to do with what I said.


I said I was uncut/uncircumcised and its not very common where I live, someone asked where I lived and I said America.
 
I'm honestly not sure wtf this has to do with what I said.


I said I was uncut/uncircumcised and its not very common where I live, someone asked where I lived and I said America.

Oh, that's my bad then. I thought you were saying people preferred uncut.

Seriously, my bad. Sorry if I got out of line! The other posts in the thread make me feel like I did. So just- formal apology.

I'm sure you've got a great dick. I feel bad I came so hard with sources and shit for nothing. My bad!
 
As far as length 5" to 8" is my comfort zone. Much over that that is actually painful and not enjoyable, at least for me. I also love a man who is thick and can fill be side to side so to speak. Different women are constructed differently vaginally and likes can vary. But honestly, men put too much emphasis on size. I have known men who were well hung but didn't have a damn clue how to use what they have.
 
Will the real slim penis please stand up

Hahahaha I’m loving how every guy on this post say they are 7 inches or bigger but the average size in reality is 6 inches.

This site must just attract better than average guys huh 🤔
 
I know that this topic has been covered before but I'm just curious and I can't help it. Women what are your favorite sizes ? And does size count? I'm about 8 inches sometimes I even get a little bigger if in very horny. Is it a good size? I'm very confused about what size is considered small/average and big.


It’s not what you got it’s how you use it! 8 inches is very nice to satisfy at least me. I think most men are like 6ish on average so you are gifted. I’m not a size queen or anything however 8 inches and thick sounds like a good time and maybe even a little bit of a challenge. Any object over 10 at least for me is just starting to be painful and hard to enjoy even with plenty of lube. Not that I haven’t it’s just hard to concentrate lol
 
a lenghty thread for sure

what amazes me most about this thread: it grew to almost a hundred posts, and very few of them were anything other than anecdotes. Rare were posts of general value, #72 is an exception, and #75 perhaps. Pardon me, if I overlooked a good one of yours.

Funny how Litsters often tend to beat a subject to death. By adding more and more useless posts, which say no more than a previous one did already. With very little listening to outlier or even non-mainstream opinions. And hardly any interest in the efforts of the very few posters, who aimed to progress beyond anecdotes here.

Nothing unusual for a discussion on Lit, I find.

One subject I found that was definitely missing: the effects of peer pressure and conditioning. Smallchange was bemoaning his tiny size, even though he is doing fine with several women, I understand. So why bemoan rather than celebrate, I ask him?

Fact is, and nobody can rationally object to the following: when a man and a woman have their orgasms in countless ways other than by penetration, whether the man even HAS a penis or not makes no difference, orgasm-wise. Only factors I am aware of that might contribute to a difference: #1: common sense dictates that a big penis SHOULD BE better, humans have been conditioned on this ever since Mother Nature = i.e. evolution started working on human sexuality. Bigger penis = better genes = higher willingness of a woman to let the owner fuck her.

In the 21st century AD one would think such conditioning to have worked off, but this thread says otherwise. Mind you, I am talking about couples who have graduated from fucking to other forms of love-making.

Factor #2 makes more sense to me: when a big cock stands at attention, it impresses a woman more than a small one. Now very few women, usually from the smarter half of the population, are capable of extrapolating possible pain factors related to a large cock size. The vast majority I suppose are so taken in by having captured for her very own (even if only temporarily) a man with an outstanding cock size that the idea "I have drawn a winning lottery ticket" overwhelms her. An offer she simply cannot refuse, so to speak.

One more thought worth stating: all my words above DO NOT APPLY to women, who feel they need to be penetrated, in order to achieve an orgasm. Where that "penetration fetish" comes from is subject to another debate, I am sure.
 
Hahahaha I’m loving how every guy on this post say they are 7 inches or bigger but the average size in reality is 6 inches.

This site must just attract better than average guys huh 🤔


I, along with a few other women on here, have commented on that amongst ourselves too. lol

It's all good though. We expect you guys to lie to us. That's why sometimes we bring a tape measurer to bed with us ;) :)
 
I, along with a few other women on here, have commented on that amongst ourselves too. lol

It's all good though. We expect you guys to lie to us. That's why sometimes we bring a tape measurer to bed with us ;) :)

Hahahahaha good on you!!
 
"But you promised me it was going to be nine inches!"

(words I've actually said on more than one occasion :( )

I think I would die if I disappointed someone that way, I know I'm always sad when I have to read the terms and conditions to get something I want.

Ahem, I am 9"*


*Applies to a the KKS measuring system and not metric or standard measurements. Conversion rates vary and will be discussed only after coitus.
 
[QUOTE
*Applies to a the KKS measuring system and not metric or standard measurements. Conversion rates vary and will be discussed only after coitus. [/QUOTE]


I laughed at that. The fine print gets you every time.
 
Back
Top