"He's not hurting the people he needs to be hurting"

Par for the course:

bellisarius said:
The more I think about it the more I like the idea of summary executions. You'd only have to whack a few thousand to get the millions running to the borders like a herd of cockroaches in an infested house (and our house IS infested) run for the baseboards when you turn on the light. We could call it "Operation House Tent." Has a ring to it, doesn't it? And there is a side benefit, we'd get to see exactly how tolerant our northern cousins are, you know, the ones with the loud fucking mouths telling us what we should do, when several million of the cockroaches head north.

http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=90245716&postcount=388
 
Oh fuck off. If Obama had said, "And some [group you like] I assume are good people", you'd be saying the same thing, and everyone knows it. :cool:

I had no major problem with Obama. Agreed with some of what he did, disagreed with others. I have a problem with hyperbole for the sake of trying to make a point..


You know what though? The shoe fits. Do I need to point out the few percentage points just to appease you?

Go back to infowars.

You've got no credibility.

:rolleyes:

I have no credibility with you because I pointed out the flaws in your statement. ;)

Lol, I guess you didn't understand why I used Alex Jones to argue your BS? Sad. If we interact again, I'll respond to you as I would a child. :D
 
Last edited:
I had no major problem with Obama. Agreed with some of what he did, disagreed with others. I have a problem with hyperbole for the sake of trying to make a point..




I have credibility with you because I pointed out the flaws in your statement. ;)

Lol, I guess you didn't understand why I used Alex Jones to argue your BS? Sad.

No you are full of it because you're trying to parse the obvious.

Great so you can't differentiate between news and Alex Jones and think they are interchangeable.

Yeah sure thing bub. Apparently you have a really hard time understanding reality.

Perhaps you think like she does though? Perhaps you voted for Trump to stick it to the liberal elites and aren't happy that he isn't doing what these people want. You don't seem to have any problem with the "both sides" narrative. Maybe those folks in Charlottesville were "really fine people".

I don't give a shit at this point. You're picking nits and you obviously have a sore spot with a spade being called a spade.

See RWCJ et al.

Yes, lack credibility.

And of course are a paragon of maturity. :rolleyes: Expect the same in kind. Instead of arguing the topic, you make personal attacks. Good job.
 
Of course you don't. Our conversation points our your erroneous assertions.




By the timestamp on my edit, you'll see that I added the no before you posted you response. I have no problem admitting to and fixing my mistakes

So now you want to elevate yourself?

Yeah, full of it. And you still lack credibility.

Perhaps you'd like to compare Alex Jones made up stories again to this woman's very real words. :rolleyes:
 
So now you want to elevate yourself?

Yeah, full of it. And you still lack credibility.

Perhaps you'd like to compare Alex Jones made up stories again to this woman's very real words. :rolleyes:

Alex Jones to your grouping of every supporter of Trump to this woman's words. BS to fight BS, it's to bad it went over your head.
 
Alex Jones to your grouping of every supporter of Trump to this woman's words. BS to fight BS, it's to bad it went over your head.

Oh jesus christ you're an idiot.

Seriously do I need to do a #notallmen moment with you to describe the small percentage that may not be about hurting those liberal elites? It's not like it's any secret. It's been going on for ages. Policy drawn up for maximum librul tears.

Do fuck off. And have a lovely time. You haven't proven anything or elevated yourself. You've just proven yourself to be a pompous jerk who can't understand reality.

Hang out with Botany some more.
 
Oh jesus christ you're an idiot.

Seriously do I need to do a #notallmen moment with you to describe the small percentage that may not be about hurting those liberal elites? It's not like it's any secret. It's been going on for ages. Policy drawn up for maximum librul tears.

Do fuck off. And have a lovely time. You haven't proven anything or elevated yourself. You've just proven yourself to be a pompous jerk who can't understand reality.

Hang out with Botany some more.

Do you feel picked on for making an asinine comparison? :eek:

You have a good day.
 
Thanks Botany, you too. :rose:

:rolleyes: I've been and and belonged to a number of forums and each one has people who suspects every new person of being someone they hate.

I'm not Botany. I'm Bill_Cosplay :D who used to read loving wives stories, tried out the non-interactive chatroom and found my way to the forum, where I enjoyed some Playground games and found myself responding to over-the-top opinions in the political forum.

I'm nobody's alias but my own.
 
Last edited:
This is really what we should be discussing.


OK.

I am not sure that was her point. Was it the "elite" or just the people who were not her that should be hurt?

The CNN article that was linked was not all that interesting but the NYT article by Mazzei was.

Ms. Minton who said “I voted for him, and he’s the one who’s doing this. I thought he was going to do good things. He’s not hurting the people he needs to be hurting.” just seems to be another Trumpster who bought into the lie.

I would argue that in her world view, from Florida, Trump should be hurting brown people that want to immigrate. Trump should be hurting brown people on welfare. Trump should be hurting white people that want to help brown people. Trump should be hurting people that are not citizens that live here work here and pay taxes and are all but citizens because amnesty is bad. Trump should be hurting anyone who is not her.
 
:rolleyes: I've been and and belonged to a number of forums and each one has people who suspects every new person of being someone they hate.

I'm not Botany. I'm Bill_Cosplay :D who used to read loving wives stories, tried out the non-interactive chatroom and found my way to the forum, where I enjoyed some Playground games and found myself responding to over-the-top opinions in the political forum.

I'm no body's alias but my own.

Same difference - parsing the obvious and engaging in ascription. So really, six of one, half dozen of the other. We can go with Botany2 if it makes you feel unique. :)

Good night Botany2. Thank you for your very informative display.
 
:rolleyes: I've been and and belonged to a number of forums and each one has people who suspects every new person of being someone they hate.

I'm not Botany. I'm Bill_Cosplay :D who used to read loving wives stories, tried out the non-interactive chatroom and found my way to the forum, where I enjoyed some Playground games and found myself responding to over-the-top opinions in the political forum.

I'm nobody's alias but my own.

Coach? Is that you?
 
Same difference - parsing the obvious and engaging in ascription. So really, six of one, half dozen of the other. We can go with Botany2 if it makes you feel unique. :)

Good night Botany2. Thank you for your very informative display.

If you're going to address me, call me by me handle, otherwise we're done.
 
Alex Jones to your grouping of every supporter of Trump to this woman's words. BS to fight BS, it's to bad it went over your head.

Exactly.

But it's worse than that.

It's the categorization of every Trump VOTER as a Trump SUPPORTER and, as you observe, the further alchemic transformation of every supporter as one motivated by JUST ONE THING, AND ONE THING ONLY -- a lust for blood.

Just as the cited individual lost perspective on the possibility of multiple impacts deriving from a single act, Adrina and crew apparently deny the possibility of a single act -- a vote -- being driven by multiple motivations, even held by as forlorn an example as that brought forth.

It simply isn't possible that this women had other considerations affecting her vote. It is only the one she spoke of in the article, soooo, she is ONLY about hurting other people.

The real enemy of painting starkly in black and white are any shades of grey.
 
Exactly.

But it's worse than that.

It's the categorization of every Trump VOTER as a Trump SUPPORTER and, as you observe, the further alchemic transformation of every supporter as one motivated by JUST ONE THING, AND ONE THING ONLY -- a lust for blood.

Just as the cited individual lost perspective on the possibility of multiple impacts deriving from a single act, Adrina and crew apparently deny the possibility of a single act -- a vote -- being driven by multiple motivations, even held by as forlorn an example as that brought forth.

It simply isn't possible that this women had other considerations affecting her vote. It is only the one she spoke of in the article, soooo, she is ONLY about hurting other people.

The real enemy of painting starkly in black and white are any shades of grey.

Sophistry ^^^^^^^^
 
Thing is, oh esteemed minds, anyone that supports Trump after all his lies and outrageous behavior can claim no special exclusions in regards to moral high ground as separated from this woman just because they can be the maybe 1 in 10 that don't fit the mold of wanting Trump to exact some kind of revenge on liberals.

Hogan, you've turned into a pedant while fully missing the forest through the trees.

Here's your #notallmen cookie too. :rolleyes:

Sophistry ^^^^^^^^

Yup.
 
Oh jesus christ you're an idiot.

Seriously do I need to do a #notallmen moment with you to describe the small percentage that may not be about hurting those liberal elites? It's not like it's any secret. It's been going on for ages. Policy drawn up for maximum librul tears.

Do fuck off. And have a lovely time. You haven't proven anything or elevated yourself. You've just proven yourself to be a pompous jerk who can't understand reality.

Hang out with Botany some more.

Small percentage? Yeah. I guess I need a #notallmen moment to remind you that the vast majority of the nearly 63 million votes cast for Donald Trump do not make up the voting block known as archconservative any more than the vast majority of the almost 66 million votes cast for Clinton constitute the extreme liberal left.

That is the ironic thing you and the people you abhor share. You need the buy-in or at least tacit support of a large number of more moderate voters than you because you do not have the political power to affect change on your own.

And then curiously when you lose, you ascribe the worst motivations to a LARGER segment of opposition voters than is accurate. Exactly what do you gain by describing the power of the opposition in greater focused energy and effect than is actually the case?

**********
Edited to add:

And, yeah, it's on a par of stupidity as that of conservatives who take a pronounced liberal bias of the media and then whitewash everything they write or broadcast as 'fake news.' It seems both extremes can't give up the frenzied race to jump the shark.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top