Trump’s Wall

"During the peak of unauthorized migration into the US circa 2000, the overwhelming majority of migrants were single men; only 10 percent of Border Patrol apprehensions were families or unaccompanied children. In November 2018, 57 percent were families or children."


https://www.vox.com/2018/12/27/18157515/immigrant-families-detention-border-children-deaths-ice


REFUGEES

Nooooo...they are being told, that if they show up as a family, and claim refugee status, they will get in. Children are exploited, to give them a chance at making a good living, something that is rough to do in Honduras, (I've been there for business), and to start the exploitation of chain migration.
That's, generally, after they pay the coyotes. (No....coyotes are not big fuzzy dog looking animals with bushy tails that eat your chickens)
Furthermore....they are illegal immigrants, not just migrants. And, the fact that they are families, or children DOES NOT make them refugees.

Ya'll might wanna learn some Spanish, and talk to 'em.
 
Although appeal to authority tends to be a weak argument, Trumps fired Chief of the border patrol does come to the argument with both expertise experience and no apparent ax to grind.

If there really was no benefit to putting a wall anywhere I'm sure it wouldn't be too hard to find some border patrol agents to interview who would say, "No that's nonsense they'll just go around or over it; we don't want to wall, we just want better trucks.." or whatever but they're not finding any border patrol agents to say that because of course it's nonsense.

A wall will make their job easier not harder and it'll make the job of the coyotes harder not easier.

Hey... remember when you posted your picture..



congrats on being in Men In Black!!!


http://www.oschti.ch/images/Filme/Men-in-Black/Carel-Struycken-Arquillian-Men-in-Black.jpg
 
"During the peak of unauthorized migration into the US circa 2000, the overwhelming majority of migrants were single men; only 10 percent of Border Patrol apprehensions were families or unaccompanied children. In November 2018, 57 percent were families or children."


https://www.vox.com/2018/12/27/18157515/immigrant-families-detention-border-children-deaths-ice


REFUGEES
No, just natural market forces responding to the conditions offered by Obama's illegal DACA program.

He tried to streettttcchhh that to the DAPA program to make it a better inducement but the courts slapped him down.

All politicians understand the ratchet effect. Change generally goes one way. Once you allowed the dreamers to stay illegally it's become very very difficult to reverse that program even though there is no question that that action was illegal. A year or two before you actually did it Obama pointed out that such an action was not within his authority.. Just like when we had the feet dry program for Cubans it made sense for Cubans to try to get to the Florida Shore by any method possible with the understanding that if they got their feet to the shore they were in. That's the way it is with a dreamer program: you bring a kid, get the kid across the border and you now have an anchor to come yourself.

You're taking a set of facts and jumping to conclusion that is not bolstered by those facts. The facts that would bolster your conclusion would be the number of Asylum claims that are actually granted and those are miniscule. So it has nothing to do with Refugee status and everything to do with the attractant of the dreamer program which was what intended by that program.

It also led to more deaths for children and more unaccompanied minors.
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
If Republicans really cared about or wanted the wall they’d have found a way in the past two years. McConnell is currently crickets on it.

As far as Democrats offering 25B for the wall over 10 years for concessions and such awhile back, well...Trump thought he knew what he was doing being he’s the great negotiator and so here we are.
 
Nooooo...they are being told, that if they show up as a family, and claim refugee status, they will get in. Children are exploited, to give them a chance at making a good living, something that is rough to do in Honduras, (I've been there for business), and to start the exploitation of chain migration.
That's, generally, after they pay the coyotes. (No....coyotes are not big fuzzy dog looking animals with bushy tails that eat your chickens)
Furthermore....they are illegal immigrants, not just migrants. And, the fact that they are families, or children DOES NOT make them refugees.

Ya'll might wanna learn some Spanish, and talk to 'em.

Do you ever back any of your obvious bullshit up or do you just flap your lips until you tucker out?
 
:rolleyes:

so you Googled the word f refugees migrants and Caravan and came up with an article from a British newspaper to prove something. Genius!

It would help your case if

A) the British spoke actual English

And

B) if their use of the word Refugee carried any legal gravity which it doesn't.

You say potato.

I'm simply showing the absurdity of any black and white interpretation of the current situation.

However, everyone can agree what we need is a scalpel and not a sledgehammer approach.

The world is watching.

Not that you care, but we are supposed to be the good guys.
 
"During the peak of unauthorized migration into the US circa 2000, the overwhelming majority of migrants were single men; only 10 percent of Border Patrol apprehensions were families or unaccompanied children. In November 2018, 57 percent were families or children."


https://www.vox.com/2018/12/27/18157515/immigrant-families-detention-border-children-deaths-ice


REFUGEES

The 1951 Refugee Convention is a key legal document and defines a refugee as: “someone who is unable or unwilling to return to their country of origin owing to a well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group, or political opinion.”

https://www.unhcr.org/en-us/what-is-a-refugee.html

Notice it says nothing about economic betterment for either themselves or their kids, nor domestic violence, nor gang violence, both of which also exist in the US.

Your emotion or UN law?
 
If Republicans really cared about or wanted the wall they’d have found a way in the past two years. McConnell is currently crickets on it.

As far as Democrats offering 25B for the wall over 10 years for concessions and such awhile back, well...Trump thought he knew what he was doing being he’s the great negotiator and so here we are.

Apparently you've never heard of the filibuster rule in the Senate.

As it is I somewhat agree with you the Republicans gave away the store they continued all of Obama's spending and added some of their own on top of that coupled with tax breaks. It was grossly irresponsible.

What's another 5 billion among friends? If they cared at all they should have included it and shut down the government if they didn't get it. Which is what Trump is finally doing and he should basically leave it shut down forever until he gets it, just on general principles. The Democrats have been promising border security since Reagan and foiling any efforts to get it.
 
Do you ever back any of your obvious bullshit up or do you just flap your lips until you tucker out?

It’s not bullshit. That is your area of expertise. Your’s is quite obvious, and comes with nothing to back it up.
I have backed my satements. I have given you links and places to look.
And you ignore it, since it conflicts with your ideology, and does not fit your leftist narrative.
 
Notice it says nothing about economic betterment for either themselves or their kids, nor domestic violence, nor gang violence, both of which also exists in and is imported with them to the US.

Your emotion or UN law?

FYP. It's not for nothing that Phoenix has as much kidnapping as Mexico City..
 
Notice it says nothing about economic betterment for either themselves or their kids, nor domestic violence, nor gang violence, both of which also exist in the US.

Your emotion or UN law?

War. You can call it "gang violence" if you want.

It's simply a matter of semantics.

With peoples' lives at stake.
 
It’s not bullshit. That is your area of expertise. Your’s is quite obvious, and comes with nothing to back it up.
I have backed my satements. I have given you links and places to look.
And you ignore it, since it conflicts with your ideology, and does not fit your leftist narrative.

No, you've just repeated the same nonsensical bullshit. Bring some real facts to back your shit up. Something besides, "They're shooting at me on my property!" You realize that no one, not even your fellow morons, believes that, right?
 
If Republicans really cared about or wanted the wall they’d have found a way in the past two years. McConnell is currently crickets on it.

As far as Democrats offering 25B for the wall over 10 years for concessions and such awhile back, well...Trump thought he knew what he was doing being he’s the great negotiator and so here we are.


The irony seems lost on the Trumpturds that the current government shut-down is for money to build a wall that Trump promised to deliver during the election, that the USA would not be paying for.

Mexico was to pay for it...MAGA baby!



But, but Obama!

But, but Democrats!
 
The irony seems lost on the Trumpturds that the current government shut-down is for money to build a wall that Trump promised to deliver during the election, that the USA would not be paying for.

Mexico was to pay for it...MAGA baby!



But, but Obama!

But, but Democrats!

Why not just post the original Facebook memes instead of writing these things out as if they're your original thoughts?
 
No, you've just repeated the same nonsensical bullshit. Bring some real facts to back your shit up. Something besides, "They're shooting at me on my property!" You realize that no one, not even your fellow morons, believes that, right?

I gave plenty. This thread and another.
I don’t give a flying fuck what you think. You are a hateful spiteful insulting idiot.
Turn around, is fair play.
You ain’t me.
You don’t live where I do.
You haven’t seen what I have seen.
You don’t know who I know, and who I have known.
You haven’t been here, but you are a self proclaimed expert.

To that....I say bite me.
 
Why not just post the original Facebook memes instead of writing these things out as if they're your original thoughts?

You're really too dumb to know that Facebook has real news items. It's not like it's just some place where Liberals lie about 45 and all of his dumbfuckery. Real facts. Maybe you should take a look there so that when getting schooled, your only defense isn't, "Facebook meme! I win!".
 
I gave plenty. This thread and another.
I don’t give a flying fuck what you think. You are a hateful spiteful insulting idiot.
Turn around, is fair play.
You ain’t me.
You don’t live where I do.
You haven’t seen what I have seen.
You don’t know who I know, and who I have known.
You haven’t been here, but you are a self proclaimed expert.

To that....I say bite me.
We need to walk a mile in your moccasins, but they're full of stinkfoot and sand.
 
The irony seems lost on the Trumpturds that the current government shut-down is for money to build a wall that Trump promised to deliver during the election, that the USA would not be paying for.

Mexico was to pay for it...MAGA baby!



But, but Obama!

But, but Democrats!

There’s a lot of folks who don’t care who pays for it.....we just want it.
Looked at the gofundme page for the wall lately? 19 and a half million today....still going. But we are just Trumpturds.

Maybe you can come up with a better reason we shouldn’t have a wall.
 
Back
Top