White Liberals Patronize People of Color

[DawnODay]

Of course, anyone who follows politics already realizes that white liberals look down on people of color, and think they need to be coddled and protected. This study from Yale and Princeton shows one way this manifests.

White liberals present themselves as less competent when addressing minorities, while conservatives use the same vocabulary no matter what the race of their audience, according to a newly released study.

Yale and Princeton researchers found that white Democratic presidential candidates and self-identified liberals played down their competence when speaking to minorities, using fewer words that conveyed accomplishment and more words that expressed warmth.

On the other hand, there were no significant differences in how white conservatives, including Republican presidential candidates, spoke to white versus minority audiences.

“White liberals self-present less competence to minorities than to other Whites — that is, they patronize minorities stereotyped as lower status and less competent,” according to the study’s abstract....

The study flies in the face of a standard talking point of the political left — that white conservatives are racist — while raising questions about whether liberals are perpetuating racial stereotypes about blacks being less competent than whites.​

V. Richardson, White liberals more likely to 'patronize' minorities than conservatives, study finds, Washington Times (Nov. 28, 2018).

 

[phrodeau]

As opposed to those who refuse to employ or house them?

 

[YDB95]

Nice framing with "coddled and protected" there, as if you can't have one without the other, too.

And I say this as someone who does think white liberals tend to go overboard when it comes to racial issues, too.

 

[NickStJohn]

[[[[[

 

[Boxlicker101]

Of course, anyone who follows politics already realizes that white liberals look down on people of color, and think they need to be coddled and protected. This study from Yale and Princeton shows one way this manifests.

White liberals present themselves as less competent when addressing minorities, while conservatives use the same vocabulary no matter what the race of their audience, according to a newly released study.

Yale and Princeton researchers found that white Democratic presidential candidates and self-identified liberals played down their competence when speaking to minorities, using fewer words that conveyed accomplishment and more words that expressed warmth.

On the other hand, there were no significant differences in how white conservatives, including Republican presidential candidates, spoke to white versus minority audiences.

“White liberals self-present less competence to minorities than to other Whites — that is, they patronize minorities stereotyped as lower status and less competent,” according to the study’s abstract....

The study flies in the face of a standard talking point of the political left — that white conservatives are racist — while raising questions about whether liberals are perpetuating racial stereotypes about blacks being less competent than whites.​

V. Richardson, White liberals more likely to 'patronize' minorities than conservatives, study finds, Washington Times (Nov. 28, 2018).

Liberals have adopted an old colonial phrase: "White man's burden."

 

[YDB95]

Liberals have adopted an old colonial phrase: "White man's burden."

Interesting twist, there, but we're the ones who are trying to atone for the damage done in that era.

 

[dan_c00000]

Racist dawn finally came back! And "her" alt box is defending "her"! Wow and "she's" still playing the real racist card. An argument I've absolutely ruined "her" on.

Poor racist dawn. When you show "her" reality "she" runs away!

NAACP SEES CONTINUED RISE IN HATE CRIMES, LEGACY OF TRUMP’S RACISM

The bad news for racist dawn keeps coming. It turns out "her" racist hero Scott Walker shoveled way too much tax payer money at Foxconn.

Wisconsin offered Foxconn more than Virginia and New York did for Amazon

Racist dawn also didn't foresee that a huge multinational company like Foxconn could give two shits about the local workforce.

Poor racist dawn. If white people are the best why is Foxconn bringing in engineers from Asia? Come on racist dawn. You're a white supremacist. Tell us.

Foxconn will need engineers from Asia at Wisconsin factory

Damn racist dawn. You ran right into a buzz saw. Poor racist dawn. I'm guessing "she'll" be going back to hiding behind "her" alts again.

 

[BotanyBoy]

As opposed to those who refuse to employ or house them?

And want them to market/employ/house themselves.....just like other successful people.

It's not anyone's obligation to employ and or house anyone else.

 

[phrodeau]

It's not anyone's obligation to employ and or house anyone else.

We're free to be as patronizing as we like, too. Now let me freshen your bong water.

 

[BotanyBoy]

We're free to be as patronizing as we like, too. Now let me freshen your bong water.

Never said you weren't.

No.

And nice deflection!

 

[Boxlicker101]

Racist dawn finally came back! And "her" alt box is defending "her"! Wow and "she's" still playing the real racist card. An argument I've absolutely ruined "her" on.

Poor racist dawn. When you show "her" reality "she" runs away!

NAACP SEES CONTINUED RISE IN HATE CRIMES, LEGACY OF TRUMP’S RACISM

The bad news for racist dawn keeps coming. It turns out "her" racist hero Scott Walker shoveled way too much tax payer money at Foxconn.

Wisconsin offered Foxconn more than Virginia and New York did for Amazon

Racist dawn also didn't foresee that a huge multinational company like Foxconn could give two shits about the local workforce.

Poor racist dawn. If white people are the best why is Foxconn bringing in engineers from Asia? Come on racist dawn. You're a white supremacist. Tell us.

Foxconn will need engineers from Asia at Wisconsin factory

Damn racist dawn. You ran right into a buzz saw. Poor racist dawn. I'm guessing "she'll" be going back to hiding behind "her" alts again.

I'm not Dawn, but she and I have been on the same side here, so I will respond:

Scott Walker did lose in his bid for reelection. but it's interesting that he carried Racine County, where Foxconn is or will be located, and which paid out the most money to them.

A few engineers will be hired from Asia, at least temporarily, because the technology is from there and American engineers are not yet familiar enough with it. Once the Americans have achieved the requirement amount of expertise, they will mostly replace the Asians. The rank and file employees there will all be Americans, of various races.

Hate crimes have nothing to do with this thread, so I will ignore that part of the previous post.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

A few engineers will be hired from Asia, at least temporarily, because the technology is from there and American engineers are not yet familiar enough with it. Once the Americans have achieved the requirement amount of expertise, they will mostly replace the Asians. The rank and file employees there will all be Americans, of various races.

Is this a guarantee, or a hope?

 

[Boxlicker101]

Is this a guarantee, or a hope?

I Can't guarantee anything. However, with as many employees as will be needed, the laws of averages would require a mixture of races. The majority would be white, because that is the race of most of the people in that immediate area. However there are some Hispanics and American Indians within a few miles and many black people living in the cities of Racine and Kenosha.

 

[Sweet_Cupcake]

Of course, anyone who follows politics already realizes that white liberals look down on people of color, and think they need to be coddled and protected. This study from Yale and Princeton shows one way this manifests.

White liberals present themselves as less competent when addressing minorities, while conservatives use the same vocabulary no matter what the race of their audience, according to a newly released study.

Yale and Princeton researchers found that white Democratic presidential candidates and self-identified liberals played down their competence when speaking to minorities, using fewer words that conveyed accomplishment and more words that expressed warmth.

On the other hand, there were no significant differences in how white conservatives, including Republican presidential candidates, spoke to white versus minority audiences.

“White liberals self-present less competence to minorities than to other Whites — that is, they patronize minorities stereotyped as lower status and less competent,” according to the study’s abstract....

The study flies in the face of a standard talking point of the political left — that white conservatives are racist — while raising questions about whether liberals are perpetuating racial stereotypes about blacks being less competent than whites.​

V. Richardson, White liberals more likely to 'patronize' minorities than conservatives, study finds, Washington Times (Nov. 28, 2018).

This proves that Yale and Princeton each have their share of racist, data-manipulating researchers too.

 

[dan_c00000]

Scott Walker did lose in his bid for reelection.

I've left in the only part of your post that's true. It's funny that you keep saying you're not dawn but in every one of "her" threads you show up. I've already busted "her" as a man. I'm not shocked you two are the same considering both of your propensities for racism and hatred of the poor.

You're both also completely illiterate. Look at what one of the author's says about their findings.

The team found that Democratic candidates used fewer competence-related words in speeches delivered to mostly minority audiences than they did in speeches delivered to mostly white audiences. The difference wasn’t statistically significant in speeches by Republican candidates, though “it was harder to find speeches from Republicans delivered to minority audiences,” Dupree notes.

See how it says Republicans are not statistically different from Democrats? And notice how that's when they can even find a racist Republican talking to a minority group?

You're such a racist fuck you can't even bring yourself to read the study. Go on claiming whites are superior racist box/dawn and you'll keep getting your ass handed to you. Enjoy your Klan rally.

 

[YDB95]

This proves that Yale and Princeton each have their share of racist, data-manipulating researchers too.

Could very well be that, or it could be that this is nothing more than a reflection that conservatives don't give a damn about the very real results of slavery and Jim Crow that we're still living with today.

And want them to market/employ/house themselves.....just like other successful people.

It's not anyone's obligation to employ and or house anyone else.

Not the point, and you know it. The point is it's immoral and wrong to deny jobs or housing to anyone on the basis of hir race, and the cold hard truth is that would still happen a LOT if it were legal. Heck, there's evidence that it happens plenty even though it hasn't been legal in decades. Which just goes to show we haven't put that ugly chapter of the past to bed yet, and it's naive to pretend we have.

 

[Boxlicker101]

I've left in the only part of your post that's true. It's funny that you keep saying you're not dawn but in every one of "her" threads you show up. I've already busted "her" as a man. I'm not shocked you two are the same considering both of your propensities for racism and hatred of the poor.

You're both also completely illiterate. Look at what one of the author's says about their findings.

The team found that Democratic candidates used fewer competence-related words in speeches delivered to mostly minority audiences than they did in speeches delivered to mostly white audiences. The difference wasn’t statistically significant in speeches by Republican candidates, though “it was harder to find speeches from Republicans delivered to minority audiences,” Dupree notes.

See how it says Republicans are not statistically different from Democrats? And notice how that's when they can even find a racist Republican talking to a minority group?

You're such a racist fuck you can't even bring yourself to read the study. Go on claiming whites are superior racist box/dawn and you'll keep getting your ass handed to you. Enjoy your Klan rally.

First, are you saying that Scott Walker did NOT carry Racine County?https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wisconsin_gubernatorial_election,_2018

Second, look at this phrase and tell me which of us is illiterate: You're both also completely illiterate. Look at what one of the author's /I]

As for the rest of your post, you apparently don't understand what is being said.

Since I'm not a Democrat, I have never attended a Klan rally.

 

[RustyRedheadSpitfire]

So no one is bothered that the research paper hasn’t even been published yet, and the reference is to an opinion piece in a newspaper biased in favor of the GOP? If you are going to cite research, cite the actual fucking published paper, not somebody’s opinion reporting on what they think it says.

 

[dan_c00000]

I'm a racist.

I had to fix your post. It was really full of bullshit. Anyway, I'm saying you're a racist and a piece of shit. I'm also saying you're illiterate because you didn't read the study. When your alt dawn posted this "she" saw liberal, white, and racism and post it without reading it. "She" then blamed the Democracts by playing the real racist card. You tried to do that just now and got your ass handed to you.

You ought to read the study but you wont' because you're an illiterate racist.

If you are going to cite research, cite the actual fucking published paper, not somebody’s opinion reporting on what they think it says.

As I did. You can read the study here if you'd like.

I've already quoted from the author (box and his alt dawn didn't read the article). But I'll make some additional points here and really destroy box/dawn's bullshit.

- On page 14 you'll notice that racist Republicans only gave 14 speeches to minority groups over the past two decades. That's less than one a year.

- On page 20 Democrats used more warmth words than Republicans did. In other words Democrats care racist Republicans like box/dawn do not. That's why box/dawn often go to Klan rallies.

- On page 69 blind judges found that liberals were the ones determined to be the egalitarians. Meaning people felt that the liberals most wanted to "affiliate equality with a Black or White partner -- and conservatives to be the discriminatory ones".

Damn poor racist box/dawn. Looks like your real racist card blew up in your face again.

Still waiting on box/dawn's answer about their racist hero Scott Walker.

Scott Walker has jailed African Americans at nation’s highest rate, spent more on prisons than university system

Box/dawn are going to have a shitty week. I bet he's really looking forward to that Klan rally with his fellow Republicans.

 

[YDB95]

First, are you saying that Scott Walker did NOT carry Racine County?https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wisconsin_gubernatorial_election,_2018

Since that's a heavily Republican part of Wisconsin (although the city of Racine leans blue), so what?

 

[Boxlicker101]

Since that's a heavily Republican part of Wisconsin (although the city of Racine leans blue), so what?

Actually, that part is not heavily GOP. Milwaukee Co. to the north and Kenosha Co. to the south both voted Dem, as they usually do. Almost half the pop. lives in the city of Racine. The voters in the county went for Walker because of the great thing he did for them, even though it is costing a lot of money up front.

 

[DawnODay]

...

...

Foxconn will need engineers from Asia at Wisconsin factory....

...

A few engineers will be hired from Asia, at least temporarily, because the technology is from there and American engineers are not yet familiar enough with it. Once the Americans have achieved the requirement amount of expertise, they will mostly replace the Asians. The rank and file employees there will all be Americans, of various races.

Hate crimes have nothing to do with this thread, so I will ignore that part of the previous post.

As I've written elsewhere, Box, I don't bother reading dan_c00000's posts anymore. They are almost always off-topic (as here), poorly cited and out of date (I don't know about these usual deficiencies this time, I didn't look). I have noted, however, dan_c00000's blatant anti-immigrant bigotry, especially when it comes to people from Asia. I do admit that I have given some thought to what spawned dan_c00000's anti-Asian racism, along with his frequently demonstrated misogamy. Perhaps some woman from Asia was promoted over him to senior book re-shelver at the library, leaving him in the junior position.

 

[phrodeau]

As I've written elsewhere, Box, I don't bother reading dan_c00000's posts anymore. They are almost always off-topic (as here), poorly cited and out of date (I don't know about these usual deficiencies this time, I didn't look). I have noted, however, dan_c00000's blatant anti-immigrant bigotry, especially when it comes to people from Asia. I do admit that I have given some thought to what spawned dan_c00000's anti-Asian racism, along with his frequently demonstrated misogamy. Perhaps some woman from Asia was promoted over him to senior book re-shelver at the library, leaving him in the junior position.

Box quoted Dan's entire post but you did not. Specifically, you removed a part that was actually on-topic, just so you can claim that the quoted post is off-topic.

How would you know to do that if you don't bother reading his posts, hmmmm?

You sound like someone who says, "I never watch CNN, and that report they just had on is totally false.

 

[YDB95]

Actually, that part is not heavily GOP. Milwaukee Co. to the north and Kenosha Co. to the south both voted Dem, as they usually do. Almost half the pop. lives in the city of Racine. The voters in the county went for Walker because of the great thing he did for them, even though it is costing a lot of money up front.

Even if I agreed that Walker had ever done anything good for the bottom 99% of Wisconsin, how do you figure that's why Racine County voted for him when the state as a whole did not?

And more to the point, Racine is in Paul Ryan's district, which has been represented by Republicans only since 1995. I think that speaks to which way it leans in general. It supported Drumpf in 2016, for example.

 

[PrincepsCyberius]

Box quoted Dan's entire post but you did not. Specifically, you removed a part that was actually on-topic, just so you can claim that the quoted post is off-topic.

How would you know to do that if you don't bother reading his posts, hmmmm?

You sound like someone who says, "I never watch CNN, and that report they just had on is totally false.

Well, I've looked at dan's whole post, and I don't see anything on topic.

As opposed to those who refuse to employ or house them?

Dawn cites a study from two prestigious universities. What evidence supports your assertion of anyone refusing "to employ or house" anyone?