███████████ Mueller Investigation Results Thread ███████████

[coati]

I don't think that most people who voted for him understood that they were turning the presidency over to an organized crime family.

Right, because one third of the nation is terminally stupid. Mouth breathers. Products of our educational system.

The rest of his base is made up of terminally greedy people who have no ethics. Organized crime is admired among this group.

And then there are the eligible voters who do not vote.

Perfect storm.

 

[Aglaopheme]

Start at 1:50

https://youtu.be/923SiDdLSic

Ha! I...we reme...recall when that happened. I was in Philly for the Convention.

 

[cowslinger64]

Any of you on the right care to try and explain this?


https://www.politico.com/story/2018/11/28/mueller-bill-senate-mcconnell-1023314


Republicans block Mueller protection bill from Senate floor vote




Anyone that doesn't think this investigation needs to be protected and carried to finish, hasn't been paying attention..

 

[Rightguide]

I quit reading at the first lie, which was item one in the list.Nothing in the order was identified as a crime, nor was "collusion" mentioned anywhere in it.

You've obviously never read the order, so here, educate yourself.
https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/967231/download

I read it long before you ever did.

"any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump;"

"Links and/or coordination" is synonymous with the word "collusion," and there is no statute defining those terms as illegal under the federal code either. It was the media who first used the word "collusion."

Here's when the word was first used:

On July 22, 2016, Wikileaks released more than 19,000 emails from top members of the Democratic National Committee. Two days after the release, Hillary Clinton’s campaign manager Robby Mook told CNN that, according to “experts,” Russian state actors had stolen the emails from the DNC and were releasing them through Wikileaks “for the purpose of actually helping Donald Trump.”

"Mook did not use the word “collusion,” but the press, in reporting his comments, did. Within the hour, in an article timestamped at 9:55 a.m., the Washington Examiner reported that Paul Manafort and Donald Trump Jr, had responded to Mook’s allegations and “vigorously denied any kind of collusion between Trump Sr. and the Russian president.” (To be clear, Manafort denied “any ties” between Putin and the Trump campaign, and Donald Trump Jr. criticized Mook for “lie after lie.” Neither one of them mentioned “collusion.”) Ninety minutes later, at 11:27 a.m., ABC News repeated what it termed Mook’s “allegation of collusion between the campaign and Russia.” And three hours later, at approximately 12:35 p.m., Bernie Sanders’s campaign manager, Jeff Weaver, told CNN’s Jake Tapper, “If there was some kind of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian intelligence or Russian hackers, that clearly has to be dealt with.”

https://www.lawfareblog.com/where-heck-did-term-collusion-come

You stopped reading because you saw the foundation of your present belief system crumbling beneath your feet.

 

[Luk]

On July 22, 2016,

In June of 2016, when 45 was the clear Republican candidate, 45 was in negotiations with Putin to build a Trump Tower in Moscow.

Spin that, Douchebag von Fuckface.

 

[cowslinger64]

I read it long before you ever did.

"any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump;"

"Links and/or coordination" is synonymous with the word "collusion," and there is no statute defining those terms as illegal under the federal code either. It was the media who first used the word "collusion."

Here's when the word was first used:

On July 22, 2016, Wikileaks released more than 19,000 emails from top members of the Democratic National Committee. Two days after the release, Hillary Clinton’s campaign manager Robby Mook told CNN that, according to “experts,” Russian state actors had stolen the emails from the DNC and were releasing them through Wikileaks “for the purpose of actually helping Donald Trump.”

"Mook did not use the word “collusion,” but the press, in reporting his comments, did. Within the hour, in an article timestamped at 9:55 a.m., the Washington Examiner reported that Paul Manafort and Donald Trump Jr, had responded to Mook’s allegations and “vigorously denied any kind of collusion between Trump Sr. and the Russian president.” (To be clear, Manafort denied “any ties” between Putin and the Trump campaign, and Donald Trump Jr. criticized Mook for “lie after lie.” Neither one of them mentioned “collusion.”) Ninety minutes later, at 11:27 a.m., ABC News repeated what it termed Mook’s “allegation of collusion between the campaign and Russia.” And three hours later, at approximately 12:35 p.m., Bernie Sanders’s campaign manager, Jeff Weaver, told CNN’s Jake Tapper, “If there was some kind of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian intelligence or Russian hackers, that clearly has to be dealt with.”

https://www.lawfareblog.com/where-heck-did-term-collusion-come

You stopped reading because you saw the foundation of your present belief system crumbling beneath your feet.

=============

More of your ridiculously narrow, ignorant view... The word collusion is NOT in the letter... so you need to find another bit to chew on.

Show me collusion specifically in this letter.


https://www.nytimes.com/interactive...nt-Robert-Mueller-Special-Counsel-Russia.html

 

[Rightguide]

In June of 2016, when 45 was the clear Republican candidate, 45 was in negotiations with Putin to build a Trump Tower in Moscow.

Spin that, Douchebag von Fuckface.

So what? He was not legally obligated as a candidate to halt his business activities or negotiations to build in any foreign country. In addition these negotiations were in no way a violation of US law. So, it's just another deep/media/democrat nothing burger. The man was a real estate mogul, building and land development is what he does.

 

[cowslinger64]

So what? He was not legally obligated as a candidate to halt his business activities or negotiations to build in any foreign country. In addition these negotiations were in no way a violation of US law. So, it's just another deep/media/democrat nothing burger. The man was a real estate mogul, building and land development is what he does.

Why did he lie about it then?

 

[Luk]

So what? He was not legally obligated as a candidate to halt his business activities or negotiations to build in any foreign country. In addition these negotiations were in no way a violation of US law. So, it's just another deep/media/democrat nothing burger. The man was a real estate mogul, building and land development is what he does.

So why is everyone lying about it?

Nothing burger. Yeah, bwahahaha!

 

[Aglaopheme]

And links is synonymous with golf!

https://media.giphy.com/media/zerHFGOr2RTmU/giphy.gif

 

[Rightguide]

So why is everyone lying about it?

Nothing burger. Yeah, bwahahaha!

The media and the Democrats know you're dumb enough to think it means something bad for TRUMP.

 

[Busybody18]

Why did he lie about it then?

who lied?

 

[Rightguide]

who lied?

He doesn't know.

 

[Luk]

Dafuq do you think 45's lawyer just admitted to?

 

[Busybody18]

who lied?

if Cohen did, so what....zero to do with Trump

and Trump didnt cause his answers to Muslim MuleLiar were in synch with new Cohen proffer

 

[cowslinger64]

He doesn't know.

You're punking me, right?

 

[Busybody18]

You're punking me, right?

who LIED, NiggerSlinger?


hey! you NIGGER BOI, Hussein OBAMA claimed credit for the US OIL BOOM!

 

[cowslinger64]

Rather than having to wade through a pile of your idiotic threads, you're on ignore bizzydummy.


Trump lied.


That point is impossible to argue.


So feel free to go fuck yourself.

 

[Kirkrapine]

"Links and/or coordination" is synonymous with the word "collusion," and there is no statute defining those terms as illegal under the federal code either. It was the media who first used the word "collusion."

The legal term is "conspiracy."

 

[cowslinger64]

=============

More of your ridiculously narrow, ignorant view... The word collusion is NOT in the letter... so you need to find another bit to chew on.

Show me collusion specifically in this letter.


https://www.nytimes.com/interactive...nt-Robert-Mueller-Special-Counsel-Russia.html

He doesn't know.

I'm sure it's totally just an oversight on your part... but you forgot to show me the word collusion in the letter.

Ya got a chance to prove a point here..

 

[phrodeau]

Dafuq do you think 45's lawyer just admitted to?

Attempted collusion?

 

[cowslinger64]

He doesn't know.

https://www.yahoo.com/gma/trump-cal...ing-wrong-155703435--abc-news-topstories.html


Trump calls potential 2016 Moscow deal 'very legal,' 'very cool' in renewed defense


President Donald Trump defended his actions pursuing a business deal in Russia, calling it "very legal & very cool" as he woke up in Argentina on Friday morning to start his day at the G-20 summit.

In a pair of tweets, Trump reiterated his defense from Thursday saying he was doing nothing wrong in running his business during the 2016 presidential campaign. The controversy over Trump pursuing construction of a Trump Tower in Russia bubbled to the surface after his former personal attorney Michael Cohen pleaded guilty to making false statements about his involvement in pursuing the deal.

Trump tweeted: "I am a very good developer, happily living my life, when I see our Country going in the wrong direction (to put it mildly). Against all odds, I decide to run for President & continue to run my business-very legal & very cool, talked about it on the campaign trail. Lightly looked at doing a building somewhere in Russia. Put up zero money, zero guarantees and didn’t do the project. Witch Hunt!"


Also trump:

Trump, as he did Thursday, has previously denied that he has any business deals with Russia, tweeting shortly before he was inaugurated, "I HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH RUSSIA -- NO DEALS, NO LOANS, NO NOTHING!"

 

[RoryN]

So what?

So, if a liberal / female / dark-skinned President had done the same, you and the rest of your deplorable friends would have been tying nooses to trees months ago.

And that - plus so many other factors - make you worthless human beings.

 

[Kirkrapine]

The media and the Democrats know you're dumb enough to think it means something bad for TRUMP.

It means something bad for Trump.

 

[Busybody18]

https://www.yahoo.com/gma/trump-cal...ing-wrong-155703435--abc-news-topstories.html


Trump calls potential 2016 Moscow deal 'very legal,' 'very cool' in renewed defense


President Donald Trump defended his actions pursuing a business deal in Russia, calling it "very legal & very cool" as he woke up in Argentina on Friday morning to start his day at the G-20 summit.

In a pair of tweets, Trump reiterated his defense from Thursday saying he was doing nothing wrong in running his business during the 2016 presidential campaign. The controversy over Trump pursuing construction of a Trump Tower in Russia bubbled to the surface after his former personal attorney Michael Cohen pleaded guilty to making false statements about his involvement in pursuing the deal.

Trump tweeted: "I am a very good developer, happily living my life, when I see our Country going in the wrong direction (to put it mildly). Against all odds, I decide to run for President & continue to run my business-very legal & very cool, talked about it on the campaign trail. Lightly looked at doing a building somewhere in Russia. Put up zero money, zero guarantees and didn’t do the project. Witch Hunt!"


Also trump:

Trump, as he did Thursday, has previously denied that he has any business deals with Russia, tweeting shortly before he was inaugurated, "I HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH RUSSIA -- NO DEALS, NO LOANS, NO NOTHING!"

MOFO Nigger cant discern between a DEAL and POTENTIAL!