8 Dead, Several Others Shot At Pittsburgh Synagogue

Show me where I erred in the facts.
The KKK didn’t murder Jews and Catholics. They murdered blacks, who were mostly Protestant.

The KKK was opposed to immigrants, who were mainly Jews and Catholics at the time, but they weren’t murdering them.
 
Show me where I erred in the facts.

You have no empirical evidence that Robert Bowers' ideology is connected to Democrats/Liberals in any way. Only your conceits. If anything, going by your logic, he reads exactly like an extreme right-wing gun nut.

https://cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/181027160506-02-bowers-gab-photo-1027-exlarge-169.jpg

Therefore, you gots no facts.

https://media.giphy.com/media/bkiBOCL34XzYA/200.gif

You have erred. Your errs have errs. Your fave character on Sesame Street is named Errnie. You should open up an amusement park and call it Errtopolis.

:D
 
Are you equipped to answer the following questions:

1) How does anarchism align with the “right” side of the political spectrum?

Government control....they sit just right of libertarians.

What makes them right is that lack of government control facilitates a natural hierarchy....the very thing leftist wish to stamp out.

2) What is the “right” side of the political spectrum? Who’s definition are you using?

Hierarchy and lack of government control.

The common one with egalitarianism on the left and hierarchy on the right.

3) If Democrats are the new Nazis, and Trump is the embodiment of anti-Nazi politics, why are people who call themselves Nazis siding with and voting for Trump?


The Nazi Party's "National Socialism" was socialism to the exact same degree East Germany's "German Democratic Republic" was a democracy.

But for shits and giggles, let’s look at the honest-to-f

That's simply not true, what definition of socialism are you using?
 
There was, once, a faction of the Nazi Party that took the "socialist" part of National Socialism seriously, and demanded class war, social revolution, and a struggle against capitalism; but they were purged in the Night of Long Knives, and never heard of again. Hitler decided the support of Germany's capitalists was more important.

What definition of socialism are you using? Because that's NOT what socialism is.

The difference -- and it does matter -- is what might be called Enlightenment/Rationality (Commies) v. Romanticism/Irrationalism (Nazis). See the Pournelle Chart.

No.....there are a lot of differences, including the socialist MUCH higher body count.

But they are united in their totalitarianism.

No -- Hitler could say that, but the capitalists couldn't; all he feared was the loss of their political backing.

Capitalist couldn't because then they wouldn't be capitalist. ;)
 
The Nazis were socialists bullshit AGAIN? Come on people.

The left really hates the definition of the word "socialism" .....they try so hard to avoid it but it's so hard when it's at the central core of all your politics. :D
 
The left really hates the definition of the word "socialism" .....they try so hard to avoid it but it's so hard when it's at the central core of all your politics. :D

The left hates lots of things, some good, some bad but you know what everyone with a brain hates? Idiots who say Nazis were socialists.
 
They are? We should all sign up to be on the winning team. Get to know your Nazi neighbors. I wonder if they’ll vote Democrat?
 
The left hates lots of things, some good, some bad but you know what everyone with a brain hates? Idiots who say Nazis were socialists.

Why? Because it goes against the leftist narrative that socialist can't be a bunch of imperial dick heads shoving their brand of equality down everyone's throat? :D

In Nazi Germany the means of production and distribution of goods and services were either owned outright or highly controlled/administered by the state (collective).

They were DEFINITIVELY socialists and being nationalistic in the process doesn't make that go away.
 
Last edited:
Show me where I erred in the facts.

Gladly. Right here: "but there is little difference between him and the militant arm of the Democrat party of old, the KKK, "

Klansmen were influential inside both major parties. At the KKK's height it was the Republican convention in Cleveland that was "the Kleveland Konvention".

Maybe if you ask that great American Historian Dinesh d'Souza you admire so much he will set you straight on the facts? :rolleyes:
 
The KKK didn’t murder Jews and Catholics. They murdered blacks, who were mostly Protestant.

The KKK was opposed to immigrants, who were mainly Jews and Catholics at the time, but they weren’t murdering them.

You're problem has always been being too stupid to post:

On August 11, 1921, Father Coyle was shot in the head on the porch of St. Paul's Rectory by E. R. Stephenson, a Southern Methodist Episcopal minister and a member of the Ku Klux Klan. There were many witnesses.[3] The murder occurred just hours after Coyle had performed a secret wedding between Stephenson's daughter, Ruth, and Pedro Gussman, a Puerto Rican she had met while he was working on Stephenson's house five years earlier. Gussman had also been a customer of Stephenson's barber shop. Several months before the wedding, Ruth had converted to Roman Catholicism.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Coyle

Former Klansman Kills Three in Kansas City Jewish Center
Witnesses say gunman singled out Jews, yelled 'Heil Hitler' upon arrest; Netanyahu sends condolences to victims' families.

https://www.haaretz.com/jewish/ex-klansman-kills-3-in-jewish-center-1.5245033

The Klan's Attacks on Jews
February 9, 1993

By Gregory M. Lamb. Gregory M. Lamb is Page 1 editor of the Monitor.

https://www.csmonitor.com/1993/0209/09131.html

Google the names Michael Schwerner and Andrew Goodman and educate yourself for a change.
 
Gladly. Right here: "but there is little difference between him and the militant arm of the Democrat party of old, the KKK, "

Klansmen were influential inside both major parties. At the KKK's height it was the Republican convention in Cleveland that was "the Kleveland Konvention".

Maybe if you ask that great American Historian Dinesh d'Souza you admire so much he will set you straight on the facts? :rolleyes:

When the Klan was founded there wasn't a Republican below the Mason Dixon Line who wasn't an enemy of the Klan, either a carpetbagger or a soldier.
 
Look at vettebirther deflecting and cherry picking. What a piece of shit.
 
For the record Dinesh DeSouza knows more about American history than you ever will.

Ahahaha!

I am not a historian. I don’t pretend to know a lot about history. Instead, when presented with a question of history and historicity, I ask actual historians. There’s this concept of scholarly authority you seem to have a problem with.

Actual historians make mincemeat of DeSouza’s bullshit. For the most entertaining form of DeSouza DeStruction, take a look at @KevinMKruse, who routinely and patiently takes on DeSouza and his dupes armed only with historical fact and a smidgeon of spiteful snark.


Hitler's socialism was real. He controlled the means of production through regulation and policy. Here's a little history for you:

Did you read the last sentence of your quote?

The Nazi regime did not regulate commerce to promote social welfare, but to eliminate undesirable ethic influence.

That’s. Not. Socialism. At least, not the socialism that the self-designated “democratic socialists” are pushing for. And if you idiots would look at substance instead of label, ends instead of means, you’d see that. You’d still disagree with the Democratic “democratic socialists,” but then I could respect your opinion.
 
For the record Dinesh DeSouza knows more about American history than you ever will. Hitler's socialism was real. He controlled the means of production through regulation and policy. Here's a little history for you:

"The Nazis granted millions of marks in credits to private businesses.[60] Many businessmen had friendly relations to the Nazis,[56] most notably with Heinrich Himmler and his Freundeskreis der Wirtschaft[61] Hitler’s administration decreed an October 1937 policy that “dissolved all corporations with a capital under $40,000 and forbade the establishment of new ones with a capital less than $200,000,” which swiftly effected the collapse of one fifth of all small corporations.[62] On July 15, 1933 a law was enacted that imposed compulsory membership in cartels, while by 1934 the Third Reich had mandated a reorganization of all companies and trade associations and formed an alliance with the Nazi regime.[63] Nonetheless, the Nazi regime was able to close most of Germany’s stock exchanges, reducing them “from twenty-one to nine in 1935,” and “limited the distributed of dividends to 6 percent.”[64] By 1936 Germany decreed laws to completely block foreign stock trades by citizens.[65] These moves showed signs of Antisemitism and a move towards a war economy, with the belief that the stock market was being operated by Jews."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_Nazi_Germany

The above is but a small bit of the "totalitarianism" that was the German National Socialist government's control over their economy, the main characteristic that unites Socialism, Communism, Fascism, and the policies of today's Democrat Party. The only difference being the degree of the application of force in securing their policy goals.

The Pittsburgh shooter claimed to be a Nazi, but there is little difference between him and the militant arm of the Democrat party of old, the KKK, who roamed the South murdering Jews and Catholics in years past. :rolleyes:



The key economic philosophy behind fascism was central planning but private ownership, which explains why (after a slow start) the Nazis eventually had so much support from tycoons. That's neither pure capitalism or (for fuck's sake) socialism.
 
When the Klan was founded there wasn't a Republican below the Mason Dixon Line who wasn't an enemy of the Klan, either a carpetbagger or a soldier.

Even if that were true, it’s meaningless because of what happened to the KKK afterward, you twat.
 
Former Klansman Kills Three in Kansas City Jewish Center
Witnesses say gunman singled out Jews, yelled 'Heil Hitler' upon arrest; Netanyahu sends condolences to victims' families.

https://www.haaretz.com/jewish/ex-klansman-kills-3-in-jewish-center-1.5245033

Let’s ignore the fact you’re hopping from origins of the KKK to the actions of KKK members toward the turn of the millennium for now.

Oh my God, you’re right, the Kanasas Klansman Killer wasn’t a Republican! I guess DeSouza is right after all, and the KKK is and has always been an arm of the Democratic Party.

Except Glen Miller wasn’t a Democrat either.

He was a member of the National Socialist Party of America. You know, actual neo-Nazis.

But there’s that word “Socialist” again!

But things went south of the NSPA, when they murdered a bunch of card-carrying Communists in the 1970s.

So Miller disassociated himself from the NSPA, joined the DNC, and credited Nancy Pelosi for inspiring his murder spree.

I’m kidding. He was a founding member of the White Patriot Party of NC.
 
Did Anti-Semitic BDS Rhetoric aided by ALL COLLEGE CAMPUSUS and DUMZ Trigger the Synagogue Shooter?
 
what happened?

The 1924 Republican National Convention, and what built up to it and came away from it.

Now, GOP leadership did not, and currently does not, solicit KKK support (well, apparently except for the Goldwater and Nixon campgains via their Ratfuckers). But for nearly a century the KKK has wanted to be a mainstream component of the GOP.

Edit: BB, I have you on iggy and only peek at your posts when I feel a disturbance in the Farce. Calm your tits.
 
Back
Top