The Inept Bomber was a Trump Fan

[SpeareChucker]

At this point this is a given; finally we have a few (I hope) real facts.
He also has a history of this type of behavior and was known to law enforcement, which is why he was tracked down so quickly.

But from the first hour on, we have been regaled, long before we had any factual information, that this was the result of Trump's angry rhetoric.

Maybe it was.

Or maybe, his targets were selected not on the basis of Trump marching orders, but the angry, sometimes violent, rhetoric from the people who were shocked and dismayed over the Trump election despite all of the nasty things they said about him. Those seemed to be the people targeted.

I really don't know, I'm waiting for motivation, which probably won't come out until after the election, but I am amazed by the number of people who already know the truth sans any factual evidence and the storyline that Trump is the sole strange attractor to the chaos of political violence.

 

[doowdniw]

I really don't know

You could have stopped right there.

 

[BBX50]

At this point this is a given; finally we have a few (I hope) real facts.
He also has a history of this type of behavior and was known to law enforcement, which is why he was tracked down so quickly.

But from the first hour on, we have been regaled, long before we had any factual information, that this was the result of Trump's angry rhetoric.

Maybe it was.

Or maybe, his targets were selected not on the basis of Trump marching orders, but the angry, sometimes violent, rhetoric from the people who were shocked and dismayed over the Trump election despite all of the nasty things they said about him. Those seemed to be the people targeted.

I really don't know, I'm waiting for motivation, which probably won't come out until after the election, but I am amazed by the number of people who already know the truth sans any factual evidence and the storyline that Trump is the sole strange attractor to the chaos of political violence.

You are?

ARE YOU BLIND?

 

[Adre]

Who thinks Spearsucker would be this calm and cool if the bomber was a radical lefty? Now all of a sudden he’s wanting to look into motivation.

 

[SpeareChucker]

You are?

ARE YOU BLIND?

Well, I'm not reading this by Braille...

 

[SpeareChucker]

You could have stopped right there.

So everything else before that was good to go?

 

[RobDownSouth]

At this point this is a given; finally we have a few (I hope) real facts.
He also has a history of this type of behavior and was known to law enforcement, which is why he was tracked down so quickly.

But from the first hour on, we have been regaled, long before we had any factual information, that this was the result of Trump's angry rhetoric.

Maybe it was.

Or maybe, his targets were selected not on the basis of Trump marching orders, but the angry, sometimes violent, rhetoric from the people who were shocked and dismayed over the Trump election despite all of the nasty things they said about him. Those seemed to be the people targeted.

I really don't know, I'm waiting for motivation, which probably won't come out until after the election, but I am amazed by the number of people who already know the truth sans any factual evidence and the storyline that Trump is the sole strange attractor to the chaos of political violence.

Now that the evildoer has been caught, and his party affiliation clearly identified, Triple H (Half-breed Half-wit Housesquaw) insists that we must discern the MAGAbomber's "motivation" (why?) and that of course won't be until..wait for it....after the election.

Had this bozo been a registered Democrat, do you think Triple H would have afforded him the same standard?

Me neither.

 

[RobDownSouth]

Who thinks Spearsucker would be this calm and cool if the bomber was a radical lefty? Now all of a sudden he’s wanting to look into motivation.

After all, the poor guy hasn't been actually convicted of anything yet, right? RIGHT? And then there's the appeals courts too! And then when all is said and done, NotAJ and NotIshmael will exclaim "This is OLD NEWS".

 

[zipman]

Funny that A_J calls him an "inept bomber" instead of a "domestic terrorist."

We wouldn't want the mental image of a terrorist to be anything other than a muslim, right A_J?

 

[SpeareChucker]

Call me A_J one more time and you go on actual ignore instead of virtual ignore.

Would you be happier if I had labeled him an inept domestic terrorist?

I would think that bomber covers all that unless your forte is

~~ political parsing ~~​

 

[adrina]

"Look at what you made me do."

Says the abuser.

Or every Trump apologist.

 

[Adre]

Call me A_J one more time and you go on actual ignore instead of virtual ignore.

Would you be happier if I had labeled him an inept domestic terrorist?

I would think that bomber covers all that unless your forte is

~~ political parsing ~~​

Careful, Zip. My life has not been the same since notAJ put me on real ignore.

 

[Kirkrapine]

Or maybe, his targets were selected not on the basis of Trump marching orders, but the angry, sometimes violent, rhetoric from the people who were shocked and dismayed over the Trump election despite all of the nasty things they said about him.

What difference does it make? You know the voters are going to hold this against the GOP either way -- as they should, either way.

 

[Kirkrapine]

"Look at what you made me do."

Says the abuser.

Or every Trump apologist.

This.

 

[von_Bismarck]

Call me A_J one more time and you go on actual ignore instead of virtual ignore.

Lol. What a whiny snowflake.

 

[AngusBridie]

One of our machines was walking the wheel in the wrong direction. a bad machine doesn't know its a bad machine,, but the factory knows.

 

[SpeareChucker]

"Look at what you made me do."

Says the abuser.

Or every Trump apologist.

I don't get it.

Look at what Trump made me do??? Is that your basic position?
Are you even able to elaborate on complex motivations, or is your explanation as Wile E. Coyote as were the ACME bombs this mental case mailed?

 

[SpeareChucker]

What difference does it make? You know the voters are going to hold this against the GOP either way -- as they should, either way.

Oh, the big blue tsunami again?

It makes a difference, it makes a big difference.

 

[Kirkrapine]

Oh, the big blue tsunami again?

It makes a difference, it makes a big difference.

How, if the man's motives won't even be publicly known until well after e-day?

 

[Luk]

Inept Trump fan is redundant.

 

[SpeareChucker]

How, if the man's motives won't even be publicly known until well after e-day?

There's a point there, but this is a 24/7 news cycle and for the last 72 hours it has been about "the bombs." Now that there is an arrest and resolution, the news cycle will drift back to things that will draw viewers and advertisers, things like the illegal caravan. No one died here, no one ended up on life support in critical condition and as far as the electorate is concerned, I don't think that this is going to change many votes because of the ineptitude of this idiot and the the immediate bias of the press. It will harden then two sides, but I doubt if any outcomes actually change.

No one cares about the motivations at this point and that was the point of my OP; the only thing that mattered was how Trump was inciting violence to most of the Democrat-supporting press. It perfectly fit a narrative and not one o the outlets even waited for a single fact before embellishing "the narrative."

HANDS UP DON'T SHOOT!

 

[Kirkrapine]

Now that there is an arrest and resolution, the news cycle will drift back to things that will draw viewers and advertisers, things like the illegal caravan.

The caravan is not illegal; and if anyone in it succeeds in crossing the border, they will not be illegal either. People are never illegal.

 

[Adre]

The caravan is not illegal.

True, Mexico allowed them in. And it’s not illegal to come to our border and ask to get in, although Lit’s rightwing whackos would like it to be.

Btw, see how notAJ was able to swing the thread away from the bomber, whose narrative he now does not like, back to the caravan, which still fits into his narrow worldview.

 

[pointless]

True, Mexico allowed them in. And it’s not illegal to come to our border and ask to get in, although Lit’s rightwing whackos would like it to be.

Btw, see how notAJ was able to swing the thread away from the bomber, whose narrative he now does not like, back to the caravan, which still fits into his narrow worldview.

well, yeah. low hanging fruit, dude.

 

[cowslinger64]

Call me A_J one more time and you go on actual ignore instead of virtual ignore.

Would you be happier if I had labeled him an inept domestic terrorist?

I would think that bomber covers all that unless your forte is

~~ political parsing ~~​

*points and laughs at Not Republican - Not AJ.*