The Honduran invasion.

Yep, pure and simple. I like the idea of a couple of squadrons of B-52s spaced in tandem delivering a fifty mile long string of CBU-24 cluster bombs along that highway.;)

Meh....little live fire training for our grunts would be more useful.

It isn't bullshit, and you know it. Here is what a law dictionary associates with the word "invasion:"

Uh oh.....dictionaries and encyclopedias, the left wings mortal fucking enemies.


They REALLY hate those things :D

Yes! Use air strikes to take out unarmed civilians!

How do you know they are unarmed there Cpt. unenforced open borders?

They aren't civilians, they are hostile foreign nationals, and if they try to breech that wire it's gonna be a hostile invasion force.

You know what that means? Free-fire engagement.

45 might have to break out some more MOAB's.

https://media.breitbart.com/media/2016/06/Trump-shrug-John-Minchillo-AP-640x480.jpg
 
I'm not saying that it's necessarily true. As I keep saying, I suck in these areas to be able to give an informed opinion.

But that was one of the arguments that some of the Democrat press mentioned, besides the argument that one needs to help people in need.

I would simply find such a debate to be far more logical and informative, rather than the "Our hearts bleed for the kids who are now dying from hunger or war. So let any strong and burly man who hops in a boat or boards a train in!
Otherwise you're a racist!"

The democrats blame everything, everywhere, on the US. If Omar the Bedouin camel breeder gets a hang nail, it the fault of the US. I would suggest you research some actual history and forget anything you ever heard from a democrat or the press.

The key to the puzzle is those that have managed to be successful. How did they do it? What mistake have they not made that virtually all of their neighbors keep making over and over and over again?
 
And exactly why would you even begin to jump to that conclusion? Hmmmm?

I think a more productive focus of research would be to answer the question, "Why are so many Central and South American nations governmental and fiscal basket cases?" Or turn the question around and ask, "Why are so few Central and South American nations able to keep their governmental and fiscal shit together?"

You won't find the answer in the United States or Europe.



How convenient to have a selective memory.

It is the US of A’s continued presence and policies in the region that has helped directly create the instability, poverty, and migration problems in the region.

Why not shine a light on the corporate greed, when US corporations bought up hundreds of thousands of acres of land and soil for their fruit plantations and created banana republics. Cheap labour, cheap fruit for US consumers, and little good soil for farmers and peasants to use. The destabilization of the coffee industry. These alone resulted in serious social economic inequalities and instability, and a huge financial dependence on the US throughout Honduras.

Or would you like to look at the decades of US military involvement and presence, whether Ol’ Uncle Sam did not like the way a particular government and needed to do their part in a coup or two, or someone in Central America was going against US interests in the region (like those leftist Sandinistas), and the US thought it a fine place for a military installation, some arms, and presence, predominantly during the Reagan years.

The US bears a direct responsibility for the mess down there, and should make some room. The results of your meddling and greed are on their way, en masse. They’re coming home.
 
How convenient to have a selective memory.

It is the US of A’s continued presence and policies in the region that has helped directly create the instability, poverty, and migration problems in the region.

Why not shine a light on the corporate greed, when US corporations bought up hundreds of thousands of acres of land and soil for their fruit plantations and created banana republics. Cheap labour, cheap fruit for US consumers, and little good soil for farmers and peasants to use. The destabilization of the coffee industry. These alone resulted in serious social economic inequalities and instability, and a huge financial dependence on the US throughout Honduras.

Or would you like to look at the decades of US military involvement and presence, whether Ol’ Uncle Sam did not like the way a particular government and needed to do their part in a coup or two, or someone in Central America was going against US interests in the region (like those leftist Sandinistas), and the US thought it a fine place for a military installation, some arms, and presence, predominantly during the Reagan years.

The US bears a direct responsibility for the mess down there, and should make some room. The results of your meddling and greed are on their way, en masse. They’re coming home.

Nicely done. You buried that axe deep in his skull.
 
How convenient to have a selective memory.

It is the US of A’s continued presence and policies in the region that has helped directly create the instability, poverty, and migration problems in the region.

Why not shine a light on the corporate greed, when US corporations bought up hundreds of thousands of acres of land and soil for their fruit plantations and created banana republics. Cheap labour, cheap fruit for US consumers, and little good soil for farmers and peasants to use. The destabilization of the coffee industry. These alone resulted in serious social economic inequalities and instability, and a huge financial dependence on the US throughout Honduras.

Or would you like to look at the decades of US military involvement and presence, whether Ol’ Uncle Sam did not like the way a particular government and needed to do their part in a coup or two, or someone in Central America was going against US interests in the region (like those leftist Sandinistas), and the US thought it a fine place for a military installation, some arms, and presence, predominantly during the Reagan years.

The US bears a direct responsibility for the mess down there, and should make some room. The results of your meddling and greed are on their way, en masse. They’re coming home.

Nicely done. You buried that axe deep in his skull.

Yup. Republicans just cannot bring themselves to admit that Ronnie was a piece of shit who did a few good things - not the other way around.
 
That's how it works. Immigrants often send money to the families they left behind. Have done for centuries.

How do you know that? Do all the military-aged men who get in do that?
Weak sauce for promoting this:


https://cdn.images.dailystar.co.uk/dynamic/1/photos/934000/620x/56c873a1d625f_4940431921.jpg

or a forced take over of any country's borders.

Many of the young male refugees have been on a social benefit for years.
Money that could have been better spent on Charitable NGO's for the children or trully vulnerable people left behind.
 
Just so we're all clear on this, that photo is from 2016, and is probably about the Syrian crisis.

How do you know that? Do all the military-aged men who get in do that?
Weak sauce for promoting this:


https://cdn.images.dailystar.co.uk/dynamic/1/photos/934000/620x/56c873a1d625f_4940431921.jpg

or a forced take over of any country's borders.

Many of the young male refugees have been on a social benefit for years.
Money that could have been better spent on Charitable NGO's for the children or trully vulnerable people left behind.

Q-####, you fucking dumb-dumb.
 
#256 and #257

Dudes. :D

If you want to replace online emoting with logical arguments, you'd better look for a different spokesperson than 84.
 
s.

The US bears a direct responsibility for the mess down there, and should make some room. The results of your meddling and greed are on their way, en masse. They’re coming home.

No it doesn't you brainwashed tool, but keep on spouting your anti-American bullshit, it marginalizes you more effectively than any time wasting point by point rebuttal.:rolleyes:
 
How can you not?

According to (D)'s we're the worst ever...super racist, sexist and for that owe the world and need to punish white guys for the sins of their race.

please name a single democrat who has said those things.
 
I heard the Middle East terrorits imbedded in the caravan brought AIDS bazookas that lock on to fat white males in pickup trucks.

I’m really freaked because when they do it all the smartest people on these threads are going to have their dicks fall off and then they will have two hands to type with.
 
How do you know that? Do all the military-aged men who get in do that?
Weak sauce for promoting this:
https://cdn.images.dailystar.co.uk/dynamic/1/photos/934000/620x/56c873a1d625f_4940431921.jpg

or a forced take over of any country's borders.

Many of the young male refugees have been on a social benefit for years.
Money that could have been better spent on Charitable NGO's for the children or trully vulnerable people left behind.



Quote:Originally Posted by von_Bismarck View Post
Just so we're all clear on this, that photo is from 2016, and is probably about the Syrian crisis.
Q-####, you fucking dumb-dumb.


Better?

https://www.libertynation.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Honduran-Migrant-Caravan-feature.jpg
https://i.imgur.coam/t8IAOrV.jpg
 

Perfect, in fact. Taking a pic from a fellow 45-alt-right dude is about what I'd expect.

Now, let's take a harder look. That's the front of the caravan. The younger, stronger males are in the front of the pack while the women and children are understandable towards the back of the pack.

See? This is when you are unable to form your own thought and have to swipe ignorant dumbfuck's thoughts.
 
attachment.php
 
Perfect, in fact. Taking a pic from a fellow 45-alt-right dude is about what I'd expect.

Now, let's take a harder look. That's the front of the caravan. The younger, stronger males are in the front of the pack while the women and children are understandable towards the back of the pack.

See? This is when you are unable to form your own thought and have to swipe ignorant dumbfuck's thoughts.

How do you know?
Any larger scale pictures showing that's the case?
And I'm not referring to those close-ups that have been selectively zooming in.
 
How can you not?

According to (D)'s we're the worst ever...super racist, sexist and for that owe the world and need to punish white guys for the sins of their race.

I've never met a Democrat who thinks that way, and I've known a lot of Democrats.
 
No it doesn't you brainwashed tool, but keep on spouting your anti-American bullshit, it marginalizes you more effectively than any time wasting point by point rebuttal.:rolleyes:


Brainwashed? I’m sorry facts and history befuddle you.

Perhaps you could better prepare yourself for these revelations if you broadened your information sources beyond INFOWARS, Trump tweets, and the drunken, partisan ramblings of your RWCJ counterparts.

As far as rebuttals, all you could muster would be opinion. I can’t speak for others, but my sides are already sore from laughing at your dedicated stupidity.
 
Perfect, in fact. Taking a pic from a fellow 45-alt-right dude is about what I'd expect.

Now, let's take a harder look. That's the front of the caravan. The younger, stronger males are in the front of the pack while the women and children are understandable towards the back of the pack.

See? This is when you are unable to form your own thought and have to swipe ignorant dumbfuck's thoughts.

Here you go.
https://theconservativetreehouse.files.wordpress.com/2018/10/caravan-5.jpg

And it stands to common sense logic that, when faced with such a challenging cross country or journey by sea, you'd find a lot more strong, fully abled young men who would be willing to take the risk.

It would also makes more sense that those who really want to help starving children should advocate for directing the resources towards those in greatest need.
 
Your pist has nothing to do with what we were just talking about, Q-####.
 
Back
Top