Kreepy Kavanaugh

None of that changes her testimony.
She wanted to info out there.
She wants to speak with the FBI.
!!!!!!!!!!!!!

My lord! Large font AND brilliant yellow at the same time. :eek:


But, it wasn't quite stupendous enough. So I gussied it up some for you. :D
 
Women reporters and women journalists attempted to get answers from Orange tRump, and he used his usual tactics, to slap down on them.


Cecilia Vega caught the worst of it.


Cecilia Vega
@CeciliaVega

RT @GMA: Yesterday: Pres. Trump at first declines to answer @CeciliaVega's question on Kavanaugh inquiry, preferring to talk...

(link to ABC tweet)

7:10 AM · Oct 2, 2018


ABC News Politics
@ABCPolitics

In pair of testy exchanges, Pres. Trump at first declines to answer @CeciliaVega's question on Kavanaugh inquiry, preferring to talk trade

Tara Palmeri
@tarapalmeri
@ABC

White House Correspondent. Recovering ink-stained wretch. DC NYC BXL DC DM me for signal, telegram etc
Washington, D.C.


7:10 AM · Oct 2, 2018

Tara Palmeri Retweeted

Maggie Haberman
Maggie Haberman
@maggieNYT
·
Oct 1
He’s talking about Kavanaugh the way he used to publicly defend staff members he had begun to spur on

12:31 PM · Oct 1, 2018


Tara Palmeri Retweeted

Karen Travers
@karentravers
·
Oct 1
Wow.
@CeciliaVega
asks Trump about limiting FBI investigation into Kavanaugh allegations.

He doesnt want to talk that, says he wants to talk trade. She follows w/Q about if it will pass Congress. Pushes again on Kavanaugh, still doesnt want to answer.
WH aide GRABS mic from her

11:58 AM · Oct 1, 2018

Justice Is A Rare Equation
@JKayeoss
·
Oct 1
Replying to
@GSarafan
and
@MinicDavid


Next time tRump insults a female reporter. The reporters should all go silent and take a knee!


#VoteBlueToSaveAmerica #StopKavanaugh
#ImpeachTrumpNow
#CorruptGOP

1:42 PM · Oct 1, 2018
 
Which you didn't find necessary to assign a gender-biased intended-to-demean characterization.

At least we're all in agreement.

Is that a jersey-number in your screen name?

Or she just could have spoken normally. I didn't mean to offend.
 
Busybody and Que-Beew just went over the 700 post mark!

They obviously have a LOT to say about this issue.

#ItsNotRapeIfSheDontFightBack
#WharAreTehBruises
#HowWasSheDressed
#WhereWereHerParents
#BoysWillBeBoys
 
Busybody and Que-Beew just went over the 700 post mark!

They obviously have a LOT to say about this issue.

#ItsNotRapeIfSheDontFightBack
#WharAreTehBruises
#HowWasSheDressed
#WhereWereHerParents
#BoysWillBeBoys

that's a surprisingly low number :D
 
From the article you linked:

This isn’t a theory, by the way. It’s what the polls show.

So here you have a conservative outlet claiming "polls" are not mere theory, but "hard data."

If you want to go that route, fine, but anytime polls come out showing Trump approval the lowest in history or a big blue wave coming, the first outcry from Deplorables is THE POLLS ARE CRAP WHAT ABOUT 2016

My thoughts:

Polls are crap when they look good for Dems, hard scientific fact when they look bad

Polls are crap when they look bad for Trump, "hard data" when they look good.

Nowhere did I say I agreed or disagreed with the poll OR the article. I only posted the link because it was related to something Comshaw and I had discussed slightly in this thread.

Then I backed it up with another source which seems to corroborate the poll/article based on more data and in-depth analysis.

There are other articles out there which come to different conclusions. BUT, they don't have any data to support those opinions. You can choose to believe them and dismiss the hard data if you wish.
 
Or she just could have spoken normally. I didn't mean to offend.

You may not have, and I appreciate your response. I was responding to it, because I do think that terms like using "little girl" in this setting is loaded, and we can all work on being more mindful with our language.

I have certainly done it plenty in my life, growing up in the 70s-90s, and still catch myself when I hear it. I try to hold myself accountable to which slang is worthy of keeping and which is evidence of unnecessary bias and could be inappropriately hurtful or blind.

I especially hawk my own language and conversation for any use of a term that uses gender or persuasion as a negative, ie "sissy," "pussy," etc. The hardest one to lose is "cocksucker" as it's such an otherwise beautiful curse word. It has deeper implications however, that are important enough to ditch the word over. Not to mention, I have nothing but gratitude for those that have practiced the art with me, how did it become an insult/curse word? I LOVE cocksuckers.

Thank you for listening.
 



by Francis Menton, Esq.
("Manhattan Contrarian")



"...It’s not my purpose to weigh in on the credibility contest between Judge Kavanaugh and his main accuser, Christine Blasey Ford. What’s more notable to me is that the Democrats, to a person, have shown that they care so desperately about stopping this guy. It’s not just that the principal accusation in question is so old, and so completely uncorroborated, and involving people of such a young age, that I would never have thought that Senators of either party would have brought a witness like this forward in such a context. But then there are all the surrounding indicia of no-holds-barred fight to the death: holding the accusation secret for six weeks and then springing it on the eve of a vote in a Hail Mary play for delay; dishonoring the accuser’s request for anonymity and turning her into roadkill of proceedings where all that counts is momentary political advantage; the sudden last-minute emergence of multiple additional accusers, each more preposterous than the next, including one alleging that the nominee organized a dozen or so gang rape parties..."





A graduate of Yale College, Menton is a retired partner of Wilkie, Farr & Gallagher LLP



 
ALL CUSTOMERS: Brett!!!

I chuckled.


Heh. Ironically, Garland will be far kinder to Kavanaugh than if the situation were reversed. Given Kavanaugh's partisan nature.

Odd the right wing baton handoff happening. :D

Oddly enough there is also another poster that keeps bringing up that Biden rule bullshit.

Interesting.
 
That's absurd.

It’s a legit risk. The GOP was looking at a pretty low turn-out across the board because all they had were turds to polish.

They are now spending time and money like water to whip up pro-Kavanaugh outrage and/or “Oh fuck, if the Democrats take the senate, then we might be stuck with a 6-3 SCOTUS majority when we need a 7-2 because...uh...[Koch brother hands speaker a wad of cash] TO STICK IT TO THE LIBS!” panic.
 
I found her little girl voice to be disingenuous.

Sweet Jesus fuck, man.

Well. At least you own it, I guess.

attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • FEF5ADA7-5A87-4E62-9AAA-6AE2279FA493.jpeg
    FEF5ADA7-5A87-4E62-9AAA-6AE2279FA493.jpeg
    95.4 KB · Views: 0
I don't know how to describe it. A 51(?) year old woman speaking in the style and tone of an adolescent? Is that better? I've never really seen that before, even from a Californian. It appeared disingenuous to me.
 
I don't know how to describe it. A 51(?) year old woman speaking in the style and tone of an adolescent? Is that better? I've never really seen that before, even from a Californian. It appeared disingenuous to me.

“Style?” Did she says “totes rapey!” or something?

Abraham Lincoln had a high squeaky voice too, dont’chya know.
 
https://www.currentaffairs.org/2018/09/how-we-know-kavanaugh-is-lying

How We Know Kavanaugh Is Lying

This man should not serve another day as any kind of judge…
He went before the United States Senate and showed total contempt for his vow to tell the truth. He attempted to portray a highly esteemed doctor as a crazy person, by consistently misrepresenting the evidence. He treated the public like we were idiots, like we wouldn’t notice as he pretended he was ralphing during Beach Week from too many jalapeños,
as he feigned ignorance about sex slang,
as he misread his own meticulously-kept 1982 summer calendar,
as he replied to questions about his drinking habits by talking about church,
as he suggested there are no alcoholics at Yale,
as he denied knowing who “Bart O’Kavanaugh” could possibly be based on,
as he declared things refuted that weren’t actually refuted,
as he claimed witnesses said things they didn’t say,
as he failed to explain why nearly a dozen Yale classmates said he drank heavily,
as he invented an imaginary drinking game to avoid admitting he had the mind of a sports jock in high school,
as he said Ford had only accused him last week,
as he responded to his roommate’s eyewitness statement with an incoherent story about furniture,
as he pretended Bethesda wasn’t five miles wide,
as he insisted Renate should be flattered by the ditty about how easy she was,
as he declared that distinguished federal judges don’t commit sexual misconduct even though he had clerked for exactly such a judge.
 

How did the WaPo get her name?

http://www.reactiongifs.com/r/dtdk.gif

https://media.giphy.com/media/DCEMdPGLStf4Q/source.gif

https://media.giphy.com/media/Ll2fajzk9DgaY/giphy.gif

https://alfahir.hu/sites/default/files/indexfoto/who_cares_03_1.gif

https://image.ibb.co/kWRpte/can_we_panic_now.gif

:D

I don't know how to describe it. A 51(?) year old woman speaking in the style and tone of an adolescent? Is that better? I've never really seen that before, even from a Californian. It appeared disingenuous to me.

You should hear Jennifer Tilly speak sometime.

I know you and every other supposed expert on women think y'all have some sort of "gotcha" here with the voice gambit, but not every woman over fifty sounds like Selma from Night Court, guy. :D
 
I don't know how to describe it. A 51(?) year old woman speaking in the style and tone of an adolescent? Is that better? I've never really seen that before, even from a Californian. It appeared disingenuous to me.
Between the two, I'd be more inclined to suggest that Brett should lower his voice.
 
Back
Top