Kreepy Kavanaugh

That's absurd.

There IS a Democratic Base, you know, and it's overwhelmingly anti-Kavanaugh.

This is not going to hurt them in relation to the 60% who think Kavanaugh should not be on the Court. Will it hurt them with Deplorables? Who cares? They're all Kool Aid drinkers anyway.


I thought this was revealing. It goes along with what we were talking about earlier...

Why the Kavanaugh debacle may be hurting Democrat chances in the Senate

It seems to me that politicians, being politicians, would be better skilled at recognizing a sinking ship than what we are seeing displayed in this particular confirmation.
 
I know of no evidence that he assaulted Dr. Ford 36 years ago. Her testimony was not enough to change my mind. I found her little girl voice to be disingenuous.

Do you have a description for Kavanaugh’s voice, condescending, misgonyst or otherwise?
 
That's absurd.

There IS a Democratic Base, you know, and it's overwhelmingly anti-Kavanaugh.

This is not going to hurt them in relation to the 60% who think Kavanaugh should not be on the Court. Will it hurt them with Deplorables? Who cares? They're all Kool Aid drinkers anyway.

You may think it's absurd, but the data is the data. If you disagree with it, go conduct your own poll in Red States with Democrat incumbents running for re-election and publish the results.


BTW, the poll results and the article seems to be tracking the analysis of other political opinions on the issue.

Real Clear Politics article
 
Dr. Ford's testimony is already on record. There is no need for her to continually be asked to repeat it. Nor is there any reason to justify increasing her anxiety and stress levels over what she feels was a traumatic event in her life.

This torturing of Dr. Ford for political purposes should stop. We've heard her story. It's time to let her heal as best she can.

There absolutely no reason for Dr. Ford to testify at all. She requested anonymity. Senator Feinstein could have absolutely handled this confidentially. That wouldn't have served her political purpose then.
 
Wait--I thought polls were crap.

Blue Wave Polls = Crap

Trump Approval Polls = Crap

Dems in trouble with the Senate Polls = ABSOLUTELY ACCURATE AND TRUE


You may think it's absurd, but the data is the data. If you disagree with it, go conduct your own poll in Red States with Democrat incumbents running for re-election and publish the results.


BTW, the poll results and the article seems to be tracking the analysis of other political opinions on the issue.

Real Clear Politics article
 
Why do the Rethugs only ever offer crap?

--Donald Trump as POTUS lol

--A Lame-Ass "Healthcare" Plan that was laughed off the map

--A Lame-Ass Tax Plan that EVERYONE hates and is a total failure in the Mid-terms

--An Unhinged Frat Boy Sexual Assaulting SCOTUS nominee

If it's Low Quality, it's Republican
If it's corrupt and shitty, it's Republican
If it lies, it's Republican
(How We Know Kavanaugh Is Lying--32 pages explaining his lies one by one)

If it's shoddy and last minute, it's Republican

Answer: Because they hate this country and they hate democracy.
 
Last edited:
Why do the Rethugs only ever offer crap?

--Donald Trump as POTUS lol

--A Lame-Ass "Healthcare" Plan that was laughed off the map

--A Lame-Ass Tax Plan that EVERYONE hates and is a total failure in the Mid-terms

--An Unhinged Frat Boy Sexual Assaulting SCOTUS nominee

If it's Low Quality, it's Republican
If it's corrupt and shitty, it's Republican
If it lies, it's Republican
If it's shoddy and last minute, it's Republican

Answer: Because they hate this country and they hate democracy.

Wait, they did have Roy Moore!
 


We know she requested anonymity.


Did she change her mind or was her mind changed for her?
How did the WaPo get her name?



 
Wait--I thought polls were crap.

Blue Wave Polls = Crap

Trump Approval Polls = Crap

Dems in trouble with the Senate Polls = ABSOLUTELY ACCURATE AND TRUE

Nowhere did I say I agreed or disagreed with the poll OR the article. I only posted the link because it was related to something Comshaw and I had discussed slightly in this thread.

Then I backed it up with another source which seems to corroborate the poll/article based on more data and in-depth analysis.

There are other articles out there which come to different conclusions. BUT, they don't have any data to support those opinions. You can choose to believe them and dismiss the hard data if you wish.
 
None of that changes her testimony. She wanted to info out there. She wants to speak with the FBI.
 
At least it was his real voice.

Which you didn't find necessary to assign a gender-biased intended-to-demean characterization.

At least we're all in agreement.

Is that a jersey-number in your screen name?
 
Kavanaugh Accuser Co-Authored Study Citing Use Of Hypnosis To Retrieve Memories:cool:

in other words

made up BS
 
Back
Top