Kreepy Kavanaugh

[SpeareChucker]

...

Since 2011, more than 300 students have gone to court, claiming they were wrongfully disciplined by campus administrators. The colleges were implementing Obama administration guidelines regarding sexual misconduct. These guidelines discouraged colleges from subjecting the accuser to questioning by the other side. The guidelines also set the standard of proof at the lowest possible level, a mere preponderance of evidence. In short, 50% plus a feather. On that meager basis, a student could face expulsion and be tarred for life as a sexual predator.

Last year, DeVos rescinded the Obama-era guidelines and promised reforms. But so far the real action is in the courts.

On September 7 Judge Thapar of the Sixth Circuit issued a blockbuster ruling for fairness. The case involved two students at the University of Michigan who had sex in their dorm after a party. The male said it was consensual. The female claimed she was too drunk to consent, and accused him of sexual assault. The university sided with her and forced him to leave the school. But the court ruled the university erred by refusing to allow the female student to be cross-examined. Coddling the accuser by shielding her from questioning violated the accused’s due process rights. The University of Michigan is appealing, teeing the case up for a Supreme Court battle.

...

Betsy McCaughey


And this is the #MeToo fight that we are all embroiled in.
If she says it, he is guilty. Is she supposed to be questioned? NO!

This is why Ford won't show up. She demanded to be questioned by only male Senators so that she could play victim. Now she's going to be subjected to questioning by a FEMALE professional in the area. This is why I don't think she will show up to "his" trial in a court where half of the jurors have already pronounced him guilty.


https://spectator.org/democrats-may-thank-hillary-for-this-november/

 

[Carnal_Flower]

But his calendar!!!

 

[Pookie]

I saw that take.

Going on Fox was not good plan.

I think these “other witnesses” mentioned in Swetnick‘s declaration will soon come out on the record.

Speaking of that interview ... https://youtu.be/wZgtEIp-mTU

 

[BBX50]

So to summarize claims:

Swetnick graduated High School in 1980.
In 1982, as a college student, she was attending high-school parties where druggings & gang rapes occurred with regularity.

She went back to those parties 10 times.

She is just now reporting this, 37 years later.

Ok


There will be more

"Memories" are being recollected as we speak

 

[BBX50]

you comment on the calendar?

which shows he was around for BEACH WEEK

but you cant believe ONE and believe the OTHER

 

[SpeareChucker]

So to summarize claims:

Swetnick graduated High School in 1980.
In 1982, as a college student, she was attending high-school parties where druggings & gang rapes occurred with regularity.

She went back to those parties 10 times.

She is just now reporting this, 37 years later.

Ok


There will be more

"Memories" are being recollected as we speak

This premise is so ludicrously funny that I had to quote it...

 

[BBX50]

But his calendar!!!

idiot!

 

[BBX50]

So...Swetnick repeatedly witnessed Judge and Kavanaugh sexually abuse women at parties, but she kept going to the parties until she herself was raped?

Good luck under questioning with that story, then.

oh

and NOT one of the RAPED CUNTS reported it..........REALLY

 

[BBX50]

This premise is so ludicrously funny that I had to quote it...

So...Swetnick repeatedly witnessed Judge and Kavanaugh sexually abuse women at parties, but she kept going to the parties until she herself was raped?

Good luck under questioning with that story, then

oh

and NOT one of the RAPED CUNTS reported it..........REALLY

 

[BBX50]

Shorter: "Kavanaugh didn't gang rape anyone and Avenatti's client isn't even claiming he did."

In other words, there is no claim that Kavanaugh was witnessed raping anyone. Avenatti is trying to use guilt by association. It’s dangerous slander.

 

[Adre]

So to summarize claims:

Swetnick graduated High School in 1980.
In 1982, as a college student, she was attending high-school parties where druggings & gang rapes occurred with regularity.

She went back to those parties 10 times.

She is just now reporting this, 37 years later.

Ok


There will be more

"Memories" are being recollected as we speak

And just how does this exonerate the judge? How does this prove he is not lying?

 

[BBX50]

So Julie Swetnick says she was raped in "approximately" 1982-after seeing this in 81-83, BUT KEPT GOING to these parties?

She SAW girls being raped and didn't stop it?

Who are HER witnesses that she claims to have?


So lets get this straight....she saw GIRLS being RAPED and not only didnt report THE CRIME TO POLICE.....Is that a crime?......BUT SHE WENT BACK?????????

really

 

[SpeareChucker]

So...Swetnick repeatedly witnessed Judge and Kavanaugh sexually abuse women at parties, but she kept going to the parties until she herself was raped?

Good luck under questioning with that story, then.

oh

and NOT one of the RAPED CUNTS reported it..........REALLY

Okay, I quoted you again.

 

[BBX50]

And just how does this exonerate the judge? How does this prove he is not lying?

exonerate?

HELL, YOU DONT NEED THAT

HE IS GUILTY!

I know, DUMZ SAY SO!

 

[SpeareChucker]

So Julie Swetnick says she was raped in "approximately" 1982-after seeing this in 81-83, BUT KEPT GOING to these parties?

She SAW girls being raped and didn't stop it?

Who are HER witnesses that she claims to have?


So lets get this straight....she saw GIRLS being RAPED and not only didnt report THE CRIME TO POLICE.....Is that a crime?......BUT SHE WENT BACK?????????

really

Ask BoyNextDoor why she didn't go to the police...


Accomplice???
They say the getaway driver is as guilty as the bank robber.

 

[Adre]

Shorter: "Kavanaugh didn't gang rape anyone and Avenatti's client isn't even claiming he did."

In other words, there is no claim that Kavanaugh was witnessed raping anyone. Avenatti is trying to use guilt by association. It’s dangerous slander.

His problem now is perjury, not gang rape.

 

[Aglaopheme]

Speaking of that interview ... https://youtu.be/wZgtEIp-mTU

Like RBG!

Is Kavanaugh getting oranger by the day? I think he is.

 

[SpeareChucker]

exonerate?

HELL, YOU DONT NEED THAT

HE IS GUILTY!

I know, DUMZ SAY SO!

Why bother with a trial?
Let's just get to the sentencing.

Get a rope!

 

[Aglaopheme]

His problem now is perjury, and gang rape.

That’s better.

*nods*

 

[BBX50]

if you SEE RAPE

1-You report it

2-You dont go back.....

 

[BBX50]

That’s better.

*nods*

what about the calendar?

 

[RoryN]

Holy shit.

Who posted?
Name Posts
BBX50 239
Rightguide 179
SpeareChucker 93
Que 79
beew 46

You women-hating deplorables have taken your meltdown to the next level, haven't ya?

What happened to "we don't care about what happens to Trump - we'll get the Supreme Court"? Poor babies.

 

[Aglaopheme]

if you SEE RAPE

1-You report it

2-You dont go back.....

You should confess that to a priest.

 

[Pookie]

Like RBG!

I totally snorted at that.

 

[BBX50]

WELL, SURE: The View’s Joy Behar: I’d vote for a rapist as long as they’re pro-abortion.