RobDownSouth
BoycotDivestSanctio
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2002
- Posts
- 78,020
Bob is still on lunch break using his employer's computers?
Weaksauce deflection attempt, chief.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Bob is still on lunch break using his employer's computers?
BoyNextDoor wonders why none of these women have ever gone to the police:
http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?p=89790739&posted=1#post89790739
As Angie points out, there's no statute of limitations...
Can it be that they don't really want an investigation?
And none of it was ever taken to the police or the parents.
Not one single example...
First rumblings that Trump's support for Rapey McRaperson may be eroding coming from the White House this morning.
Donald, using his masterful second guessing, thinks Rapey screwed up going on Fox to declare his virginity.
How does a letter from Ford get her in to testify but a sworn affidavit from Swetnik get ignored by the committee?
![]()
yes, ONE not doing so....maybe
two, not doing so....Hmmm
THREE? BEE ESS
note my point re parents NOT signing letter
As I predicted, the calendar no matter longer matters.
Ford will never show up.
She doesn't have to now.
The second one will never have to show up, because there will be a fourth one.
This is an orchestrated event.
yes, ONE not doing so....maybe
two, not doing so....Hmmm
THREE? BEE ESS
note my point re parents NOT signing letter
Nobody is jumping ship.
The sides are fully locked down.
One side does not want Trump to appoint any Justice to the SCOTUS and the other side is used to being called deplorable and being smeared and tarnished without any justification. If anything, the lines are being hardened. When it gets down to the level of the National Enquirer, then you start losing the middle running right into the election.
You are a liar.These women do not want to go under oath...
No SpearChucker I did not. I do wonder why Karen Monahan specifically has not gone to the police.
I fully understand Dr Ford and Julie Swetnik not coming forward then, and why they are now.
...
Like a lot of sexual fantasies, the ones partisans peddle seem unmoored from reality. In your dreams, the Bella Twins may wrestle over the right for the next dance with you. In Democrat dreams, they fantasize about a teenage Brett Kavanaugh presiding over the Supreme Court of Gang Rape. And if you have not noticed, they generally air these fantasies on nighttime cable television in a fevered, breathy manner. It all seems better suited for Cinemax than CNN.
One’s dreams tell us little about the people in them and much about the person fantasizing about them. Imagining one’s political enemies as guilty of the vilest offenses seems a roundabout way of imagining oneself as immersed in a virtuous struggle against evil. If only our enemies so cooperated with this script in real life, then the public would truly see our goodness. Alas, the people we disagree with profoundly on politics do not always diverge profoundly from us in ethics. In other words, a judge’s position, and a perceived one at that in this case, on Roe v. Wade does not indicate a proclivity for gang rape. But for some it does. This makes them, and not the person they inveigh against, guilty of a great evil.
Tellingly, those issuing charges against Brett Kavanaugh all harbor profound political disagreements with him. Michael Avenatti, who talks of running for president against Trump, remains the sole person putting his name to charges that a teenage Brett Kavanaugh gaveled harsh sentences of gang rape against various female folk inside the Beltway. Christine Blasey Ford donated to progressive pressure group ActBlue and Senator Bernie Sanders, marched against Donald Trump, and signed a letter by health professionals protesting the administration’s border policies. Deborah Ramirez, who accuses Kavanaugh of exposing himself to her at Yale, told the New Yorker that she “works toward human rights, social justice, and social change.”
Does Brett Kavanaugh so politicize his predatory behavior that he only targets left-wing activists or do left-wing activists make up tales of predatory behavior to target the judge?
...
As I predicted, the calendar no matter longer matters.
Ford will never show up.
She doesn't have to now.
The second one will never have to show up, because there will be a fourth one.
This is an orchestrated event.
NEW: 501(c)(4) "dark money" nonprofit Judicial Crisis Network—which stopped running SCOTUS ads on Facebook yesterday—will not say if Brett Kavanaugh should still be confirmed to the Supreme Court, saying allegations of misconduct should be further examined
It's an AJ twofer!
"Ideology makes smart people fall for stupid ideas. It also makes otherwise good people embrace evil behavior."
Daniel J. Flynn
Rut Roh.