Kreepy Kavanaugh

[SpeareChucker]

There is NO ONE named, or who was alleged to be present, in that article that substantiate her story. NONE!!!!

Doesn't matter. If you don't believe the story, then you want women to be raped...

 

[beew]

She never stated she was black out drunk. Please, stop making crap up. There are other folks in that article that remember the incendent happening.

What about the parties where women were being drugged and gang raped? Will that change your mind? Will you defend and deflect from those crimes as well?

You're equating apples with oranges.

I, too think that Ramirez's account has holes in it. Some things just don't add up.

But I am quite concerned about Ford's allegations (which seem both genuine and serious) and the lawyer's letter about more people coming forward.

 

[Aglaopheme]

Doesn't matter. If you don't believe the story, then you want women to be raped...

Oh sweet baby Jesus.....

Let’s discount all of the folks named and unnamed that recall hearing about the inccident when it happened.

 

[Rightguide]

Of course I do not believe that two wrongs make a right.

I believe that Kavanaigh’s criminal behavior is disgusting.

I believe that actions set a precedence.

I believe that Republicans are going to be drowning in a new Year if the Women.

I believe it’ll be a very very long time before women, the majority of women, come back to the Republican Party, if ever.

I believe anyone who would convict a man on an accusation alone is an ignorant useless human being with zero redeeming social value.

 

[trysail]

Your assignment:
find the logical error.

by: "object Object"

What kind of person is most likely to apply and stay in the government bureaucracy (aka swamp)? They certainly won't be small government types who believe in minimal intrusions into the private affairs of individuals or businesses, because that would mean less power and authority for themselves. They certainly won't be people that want to quickly, efficiently, and permanently fix problems that only government can address, because that would mean lower job security - after all why should we keep agencies and people who no longer have a purpose? On the other hand, it almost certainly will be people that believe free markets and the unregulated behavior of individual citizens is likely to lead to "unfair", or "racist", or "misogynist", or "environmentally unfriendly", or other "bad" results that need to be regulated and constantly monitored in order to prevent the country from going down the "wrong" path. What this means is that the vast majority of these unelected, impossible-to-fire permanent members of the government bureaucracies are extremely likely to be very leftist leaning highly partisan Democrats, who obviously view the limited government, drain the swamp rhetoric (and occasional action) of Republicans and Libertarians with a great deal of disgust, anger, and desire to thwart at every turn. The only way to reduce the problem is to shrink the size and power of government (especially non-elected "permanent" types), but as Trump is experiencing first hand, the swamp is fighting back with everything they have with the able assist of the mainstream media...

​

​

 

[Luk]

I believe anyone who would convict a man on an accusation alone is an ignorant useless human being with zero redeeming social value.

You're a birther.

 

[Aglaopheme]

https://twitter.com/michaelavenatti/status/1044215921575772162?s=21

Should theses allegations be looked into?

Anenatti has a perfect track record on delivering.

 

[SpeareChucker]

You're equating apples with oranges.

I, too think that Ramirez's account has holes in it. Some things just don't add up.

But I am quite concerned about Ford's allegations (which seem both genuine and serious) and the lawyer's letter about more people coming forward.

Why the hell do you think Ramirez suddenly popped up after the calendar was produced if not to try and get Ford off the hook for testifying when everyone, including Feinstein, knows that she is simply lying?

 

[Rightguide]

Oh sweet baby Jesus.....

Let’s discount all of the folks named and unnamed that recall hearing about the inccident when it happened.

Let's just be thankful this woman's name is Ford because if it was Broaddrick, Jones, or Willey, none of those Democrat sons of bitches would give a damn.

 

[SpeareChucker]

*chuckle*

Everyone wants to get in on the act:

Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh faced a storm of new sexual misconduct allegations Sunday after attorney Michael Avenatti said he had knowledge that Kavanaugh and high school friend Mark Judge targeted women with drugs and alcohol in order to “allow a ‘train’ of men to subsequently gang rape them.” …

In Avenatti’s email, a screenshot of which he posted to Twitter, the lawyer told Davis that he had “significant evidence of multiple house parties in the Washington D.C. area during the early 1980s” where Kavanaugh, Judge and others “would participate in the targeting of women with alcohol/drugs.”

Avenatti included a list of questions for Senate investigators to ask Kavanaugh, including: “Did you ever attend any house party during which a woman was gang raped or used for sex by multiple men?”

Michael Avenatti

 

[trysail]

We know she requested anonymity.


Did she change her mind or was her mind changed for her?
How did the WaPo get her name?



​

 

[SpeareChucker]

Let's just be thankful this woman's name is Ford because if it was Broaddrick, Jones, or Willey, none of those Democrat sons of bitches would give a damn.

No one knows the name of the woman accusing Ellison...



I guess she'll have to wait 30 years before Democrats will believe her.

 

[SpeareChucker]

We know she requested anonymity.


Did she change her mind or was her mind changed for her?
How did the WaPo get her name?



​

*chuckle*

Magic H8Ball sez: Feinstein's staff.

 

[Rightguide]

Why the hell do you think Ramirez suddenly popped up after the calendar was produced if not to try and get Ford off the hook for testifying when everyone, including Feinstein, knows that she is simply lying?

They've probably acquired a platoon of liars willing to destroy the process in support of ideology.

 

[beew]

Why the hell do you think Ramirez suddenly popped up after the calendar was produced if not to try and get Ford off the hook for testifying when everyone, including Feinstein, knows that she is simply lying?

Yes, I read your post about the calendar. I was taken aback.
Can you give me some detailed links?

It might well be that it doesn't apply to the date that Ford had in mind.
Everything about her allegations seemed so credible to me. And it was the Democrats, not her, who decided to reveal them only 6 weeks later, at such a crucial time.

 

[Rightguide]

No one knows the name of the woman accusing Ellison...



I guess she'll have to wait 30 years before Democrats will believe her.

Damn true, and many have forgotten the names I mentioned.

 

[schism666]

even in a rape thread, the right wing circle jerk manages to get each other off. actually, more than likely, it's because it's a rape thread is the reason they are getting off.

 

[Rightguide]

It might well be that it doesn't apply to the date that Ford had in mind.
Everything about her allegations seemed so credible to me. And it was the Democrats, not her, who decided to reveal them only 6 weeks later, at such a crucial time.

Have you seen the letter? Have you heard her testimony? Have you analyzed her demeanor as she testified? have you seen her placed under oath?

How can you assess these claims as credible without any of the above? How can you make a judgement without even knowing if she did in fact write the letter or having actually seen it's contents? The Democrats have created a Soviet style Star Chamber proceeding. Kavanaugh is the real victim here.

 

[Rightguide]

even in a rape thread, the right wing circle jerk manages to get each other off. actually, more than likely, it's because it's a rape thread is the reason they are getting off.

When did you see evidence that a rape occurred?

 

[SpeareChucker]

Yes, I read your post about the calendar. I was taken aback.
Can you give me some detailed links?

It might well be that it doesn't apply to the date that Ford had in mind.
Everything about her allegations seemed so credible to me. And it was the Democrats, not her, who decided to reveal them only 6 weeks later, at such a crucial time.

Ford won't have a firm idea of what date she wishes to designate until she sees the notebook. She's lying for the cause. Show her the calendar and she'll remember the date, you betcha!

Here's one: https://nypost.com/2018/09/23/kavanaugh-will-use-1982-calendar-to-deny-sex-assault-claims/

Just search on "kavanaugh calendar."

 

[ChinoMoreno]

When did you see evidence that a rape occurred?

man cant you comprendo? he said rape thread nothing about a rape being proven, lol

 

[trysail]

From NPR:

...Feinstein tweeted this week that Ford had sought confidentiality and "I honored that. It wasn't until the media outed her that she decided to come forward. "
​

ROTFLMFAO

Yowsah, the media "outed her" all by themselves. It was fucking magic. The immaculate leak.


​

 

[SpeareChucker]

Yes, I read your post about the calendar. I was taken aback.
Can you give me some detailed links?

It might well be that it doesn't apply to the date that Ford had in mind.
Everything about her allegations seemed so credible to me. And it was the Democrats, not her, who decided to reveal them only 6 weeks later, at such a crucial time.

If Feinstein thought this letter was credible, and she had it in July, when she met with Judge Kavanaugh in private, before the hearings even began, why did she not ask him about the incident? She would not have had to mention a name...

Why didn't she ask about it during the hearings?

Why was it only leaked when the Democrats knew that they had failed to land a glove of the Judge during the hearings?

 

[Aglaopheme]

After a parade of witnesses alleging the same in other cases.

That letter signed by 65 women backing Kavanaugh has now grown to over 200 who have known him, all expressing doubt in the accusations, and attesting to his character. The exact opposite of what happened in Cosby's case. Kavanaugh, the accused, is entitled to the presumption of innocence, which you fucks never heard of until it happens to you.

I'm sure it's another uncorroborated smear. The NYTs, after interviewing several of her contemporaries, couldn't find anyone who remembered the event. Now she's saying she thinks it was Kavanaugh.

This is just the latest left wing attack in an ongoing 30 year conspiracy to destroy the Senate confirmation process, nominees who will swear to uphold the Constitution, and turn the SCOTUS into a progressive Politburo.

I means the minority doesn't get to pick the judges unless they can lie about the nominees or subvert the process.

I believe anyone who would convict a man on an accusation alone is an ignorant useless human being with zero redeeming social value.

They've probably acquired a platoon of liars willing to destroy the process in support of ideology.

Have you seen the letter? Have you heard her testimony? Have you analyzed her demeanor as she testified? have you seen her placed under oath?

How can you assess these claims as credible without any of the above? How can you make a judgement without even knowing if she did in fact write the letter or having actually seen it's contents? The Democrats have created a Soviet style Star Chamber proceeding. Kavanaugh is the real victim here.

Have you heard his or thier testimonies? Have you analyzed his or thier demeanors as he/they testified? have you seen him or them placed under oath?

How can you assess these claims as credible without any of the above? How can you make a judgement without even knowing if he did in fact commit these crimes or having actually him or the women testify? The Republicans have created a Soviet style Star Chamber proceeding with the bots to back up thief lunacy. The women are the real victims here.

 

[Wrong Element]

Why the hell do you think Ramirez suddenly popped up after the calendar was produced if not to try and get Ford off the hook for testifying when everyone, including Feinstein, knows that she is simply lying?

She didn't "pop up," the New Yorker found out that Yalies who knew Kavanaugh back in the day were emailing each other, "Hey, remember that time when he shoved his penis in that girl's face?" The reporters found Ramirez while working that lead.


Of course, if he didn't have "Will expose cock to women who didn't ask to see it" written on his calendar, you'll probably find that exculpatory.